中国农业科学

• • 上一篇    

最新录用:典型区域秸秆和有机肥混土填埋后的腐解特征

李德近1,马想1,2,孙悦1,徐明岗1,3,段英华1
  

  1. 1中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所/农业农村部耕地质量监测与评价重点实验室,北 100081;2上海市园林科学规划研究院,上海 200232;3 山西农业大学生态环境产业技术研究院,太原 030031
  • 发布日期:2022-06-22

Decomposition Characteristics of Straw and Organic Fertilizer Mixed Soil after Landfill in Typical Area

LI DeJin1, MA Xiang1, 2, SU Yue1, XU MingGang1, 3, DUAN YingHua1 #br#   

  1. 1Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Arable Land Quality Monitoring and Evaluation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081; 2 Shanghai Academy of Landscape Planning, Shanghai 201499; 3Engineer and Technology Academy of Ecology and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031 
  • Online:2022-06-22

摘要: 【目的】秸秆和有机肥是我国农田主要有机物料来源,翻压旋耕是其主要的还田方式,明确其在我国典型农田土壤中的腐解过程特征和驱动因素,可为更好利用秸秆资源与合理施用有机肥提供科学依据。【方法】在我国典型黑土、潮土和红壤上开展大田有机物料混土填埋试验。设置4种处理:小麦秸秆混土(WS+soil)、玉米秸秆混土(MS+soil)、猪粪混土(PM+soil)和牛粪混土(CM+soil),按土壤∶物料碳=100∶4.5,称取物料土壤混合物200 g装于尼龙袋填埋于土壤中,填埋后1年内采样6次,之后2—2.5年采样一次,满4年采样一次,共8次采样。分析各混土有机物料的腐解差异,采用双指数方程明确易分解碳库和难分解有机碳库的比例和腐解速率,阐明各土壤中有机物料的快速腐解速率、慢速腐解速率及积温转折点,并用随机森林模型来量化物料组成和环境因素分别对腐解速率的相对贡献。【结果】秸秆混土的腐殖化系数为22%—43%,有机肥混土的为45%—58%。有机肥混土腐解较秸秆慢,区域间差异不大,有机物料从北往南腐解加快,且秸秆腐解较有机肥快。秸秆的易分解有机碳比例(70%—87%)高于有机肥的易分解有机碳库比例(57%—79%),且秸秆易分解碳库的腐解速率K1为(1.0—4.9)%·a-1,高于有机肥的K1((0.7—1.1)%·a-1。秸秆在3种土壤上的积温转折点差别不大,积温转折点约在3.7×103℃之前为快速腐解,之后为慢速腐解阶段。而有机肥的快速腐解和慢速腐解积温转折点差异从北往南逐渐增大,且有机肥的积温转折点为秸秆的2—5倍。土壤积温和土壤有机碳含量均是混土秸秆和有机肥的主要驱动因素,对其腐解率贡献了约17%和13%,另外对混土秸秆的最主要驱动因素为土壤碳氮比,对于混土有机肥来说是时间因素。【结论】秸秆还田较有机肥腐解快,秸秆的易分解有机碳库比例高和分解速率快是造成其差异的主要原因之一对于秸秆来说碳氮比是其腐解主要影响因素,对于有机肥来说则是时间,因此秸秆还田应多考虑土壤和物料自身碳氮比来调节秸秆的腐解,对于有机肥则应充分考虑其长期效应。


关键词: 秸秆, 有机肥, 腐解残留率, 有机碳库比例, 土壤积温

Abstract: 【Objective】Straw and manure are the main sources of organic materials in China, and Rotary tillage is the main way of returning farmland. The characteristics and driving factors of their decomposition process in typical farmland soils in China are studied to provide a scientific basis for better utilization of straw resources and rational application of manure.MethodsThe landfill experiment of field organic material mixed with soil was carried out on a typical black soil, fluvo-aquic soil and red soil in China. Four treatments were set up: wheat straw plus soil (WS+Soil), Maize straw plus soil (MS+Soil), Pig manure plus soil (PM+Soil) and Cow manure plus soil (CM+Soil). All the organic materials (8 g carbon) were mixed with 200 g of soil in a nylon mesh bag buried in soil, Six samples are taken within one year after landfilling, once from 2 to 2.5 years after landfilling, and once in 4 years. A total of eight samples are taken. The decomposition differences of organic materials in different mixtures were analyzed. The double exponential equation was used to clarify the proportion and decomposition rate of easy-to-decompose carbon pool and refractory organic carbon pool, and to clarify the fast decomposition rate, slow decomposition rate and accumulated temperature turning point of organic materials in each soil. The Random forest model was used to quantify the relative contribution of material composition and environmental factors to the decomposition rate. ResultsThe humification coefficient of straw pluil was ranged from 22% to 43%, and that of manure plus soil was ranged from 45% to 58%. The decomposition rate of manure plus soil was slower than straw plus soil, and there was little difference between regions. Besides, the decomposition of organic materials was accelerated from north to south, and the decomposition of straw was faster than that of organic fertilizers. The proportion of decomposable organic carbon of straw (70%-87%) was higher than that of organic fertilizer (57%-79%), and the decomposition rate of straw decomposable carbon pool K1 ((1.0-4.9)%·a-1) was higher than that of organic fertilizer K1( (0.7-1.1)%·a-1). There was little difference in the turning point of accumulated temperature of straw in the three types of soil. Before 3.7 × 103 ℃, it is the stage of rapid decompositionand then it is the stage of slow decomposition. On the other hand, the difference in accumulated temperature at the turning point of rapid decomposition and slow decomposition of organic fertilizer gradually increased from north to south, and the accumulated temperature at the turning point of organic fertilizer was 2-5 times higher that of straw. Soil accumulated temperature and soil organic carbon content were the main driving factors of mixed soil straw and organic fertilizer, contributing about 17% and 13% of the decomposition rate, respectively. In addition, the main driving factor for mixed soil straw is the ratio of soil carbon to nitrogen, but the main driving factor for mixed soil organic fertilizer is the time.ConclusionStraw returning to the field decomposes faster than organic fertilizer, and the high proportion of easily decomposable organic carbon pool and fast decomposition rate of straw is one of the main reasons for the difference. For straw, the ratio of carbon to nitrogen is the main factor affecting its decomposition, and for organic fertilizer, it is time. Therefore, the ratio of carbon to nitrogen of soil and material should be considered to regulate the decomposition of straw, the long-term effect of organic fertilizer should be fully considered.


Key words: straw, organic fertilizer, raction of carbon remaining,  , Proportion of organic carbon pool, soil accumulated temperature