基于越橘南高丛与北高丛正反交群体的果实贮藏相关性状筛选及其遗传倾向

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.19.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】筛选与越橘果实贮藏性相关的性状并揭示其遗传规律,为越橘果实贮藏性改良育种提供依据。【方法】调查越橘果实的果蒂痕大小、果实硬度、可溶性固形物含量、酸含量、果实重量、果型指数、贮藏性等7个性状,通过相关性分析和主成分分析筛选与贮藏性相关的主要性状,利用正反交群体分析其遗传倾向。【结果】相关性分析和主成分分析结果表明,越橘果实贮藏性与果蒂痕性状呈极显著负相关（P<0.001）,与果实硬度性状呈极显著正相关（P<0.01）,二者是与蓝莓贮藏性相关的主要性状。越橘果实带柄和脱柄贮藏试验表明果蒂痕大小对越橘果实贮藏有重要影响。果蒂痕大小和果实硬度性状在正、反交群体中呈正态分布,表现为多基因控制的数量性状,变异系数均大于15%。正、反交群体果蒂痕大小趋近于亲本平均值,无父母本倾向,其广义遗传力（H²）在正、反交群体中分别为0.887和0.867,其遗传变异主要来自遗传效应,遗传潜能较大。正、反交群体果实硬度平均值均趋于低值亲本,即存在倾向于果实硬度变小的劣质遗传,H²在正、反交组合中分别为0.535和0.514,表明越橘果实硬度遗传效应较小,遗传不稳定,易受环境影响。【结论】越橘果实果蒂痕大小和果实硬度性状与贮藏性密切相关,其中果蒂痕性状呈趋中遗传,其遗传变异主要来自遗传效应,遗传潜能大,超高亲遗传不明显;果实硬度性状遗传受低值亲本影响较大,存在明显的劣质遗传倾向,遗传效应小,受环境影响大。

关键词: 越橘, 贮藏性, 果蒂痕, 果实硬度, 正反交, 广义遗传力

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study was aimed to screen the diagnostic phenotypic traits for the storability of blueberry fruit and analyze their inheritance to assist the storage improvement breeding. 【Method】 Seven phenotypic traits were investigated, including stem scar, berry firmness, soluble solids content, acid content, fruit weight, fruit index and storability, among which the storability related traits was screened through correlation analysis and principal component analysis (PCA), and the inheritance was analyzed with reciprocal cross progenies.【Result】 The correlation analysis and PCA showed that stem scar was negatively correlated with fruit storability (P<0.001), but berry firmness was positively correlated with fruit storability (P<0.01). Both stem scar and berry firmness played major roles in the development of the storability of blueberry fruit. The storage test of fruit with and without stalk revealed that stem scar had a great influence on the storability of blueberry. The size of stem scar and berry firmness presented normal distributions in reciprocal populations with the coefficient of variation of more than 15%, suggesting that stem scar and berry firmness were quantitatively controlled by polygenes. The mean of stem scar in the reciprocal populations was similar to the mid-parental values, and its broad sense heritability (H²) in reciprocal populations were 0.887 and 0.867, respectively, indicating that the variations of stem scar mainly resulted from inheritance, and were mainly affected by additive effects. The mean of berry firmness in both reciprocal populations was prone to low value parent, and its broad sense heritability was 0.585 and 0.514, respectively in reciprocal populations, indicating that berry firmness was affected to a great extent by environmental effects. 【Conclusion】 The stem scar and berry firmness were the major traits for blueberry fruit storability. The inheritance of stem scar inclined to the mid-parental value, and its variation was mainly controlled with genetic effects, while berry firmness value tended to the low-value parent with large environmental effects.

Key words: blueberry, storability, stem scar, berry firmness, reciprocal population, genetic heritability

刘有春,刘威生,王兴东,杨艳敏,魏鑫,孙斌,张舵,杨玉春,刘成,李天忠. 基于越橘南高丛与北高丛正反交群体的果实贮藏相关性状筛选及其遗传倾向[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(19): 4045-4056.

LIU YouChun,LIU WeiSheng,WANG XingDong,YANG YanMin,WEI Xin,SUN Bin,ZHANG Duo,YANG YuChun,LIU Cheng,LI TianZhong. Screening and Inheritance of Fruit Storage-Related Traits Based on Reciprocal Cross of Southern×Northern High Bush Blueberry (Vaccinium Linn)[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(19): 4045-4056.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.19.017

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2020/V53/I19/4045

图/表 9

表1

图1

表2

图2

表3

表4

图3

表5

图4

参考文献 43

[1]	MANNOZZI C, TYLEWICZ U, CHINNICI F, SIROLI L, ROCCULI P, ROSA M D, ROMANI S. Effects of chitosan based coatings enriched with procyanidin by-product on quality of fresh blueberries during storage. Food Chemistry, 2018, 251: 18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.015 pmid: 29426419
[2]	王琛, 李雪涛, 陶烨, 孟宪军. ⁶⁰Coγ辐照对低温贮藏蓝莓品质和膜脂过氧化作用的影响. 食品科学 2016, 37(22): 318-323. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201622049
	WANG C, LI X T, TAO Y, MENG X J. Effect of ⁶⁰Co γ-irradiation on storage quality and membrane lipid peroxidation of blueberry fruits during cold storage. Food Science, 2016, 37(22): 318-323. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201622049
[3]	于继男, 薛璐, 鲁晓翔, 陈绍慧. 温度驯化对蓝莓冰温贮藏期间生理品质变化的影响. 食品科学, 2014, 35(22): 265-269. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201422052
	YU J N, XUE L, LU X X, CHEN S H. Effect of cold acclimation on quality of blueberry fruits during Ice-temperature storage. Food Science, 2014, 35(22): 265-269. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201422052
[4]	左建冬. 预冷、冰温技术在蓝莓保鲜中的应用. 制冷与空调, 2017, 17(9): 80-82.
	ZUO J D. Application of precooling, ice-temperature technology in the preservation on blueberry. Refrigeration and Air-conditioning, 2017, 17(9): 80-82. (in Chinese)
[5]	魏文平, 华璐云, 万金庆, 庞文燕, 宋立尧, 雷桥. 蓝莓冰温贮藏的实验研究. 食品工业科技, 2012, 33(13): 346-348.
	WEI W P, HUA L Y, WAN J Q, PANG W Y, SONG X Y, LEI Q. Experimental study on ice temperature storage of blueberry. Food industry technology, 2012, 33(13): 346-348. (in Chinese)
[6]	刘铮, 黄含达, 杨静慧, 黄俊轩, 梁发辉, 张景新. -1℃贮藏下不同品种设施蓝莓果实耐储特性的比较. 北方园艺, 2019(14): 117-123.
	LIU Z, HUANG H D, YANG J H, HUANG J X, LIANG F H, ZHANG J X. Storage characteristics of different varieties of blueberry fruits stored at -1℃. Northern of Horticulture, 2019(14): 117-123. (in Chinese)
[7]	吉宁, 龙晓波, 李江阔, 曹森, 张鹏, 马超, 马立志, 王瑞. 1-MCP 结合臭氧处理对蓝莓低温保鲜效果的影响. 食品工业科技, 2019(11): 302-307.
	JI N, LONG X B, LI J K, CAO S, ZHANG P, MA C, MA L Z, WANG R. Effect of 1-MCP coupling with ozone treatment on storage of blueberry at low temperature. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019(11): 302-307. (in Chinese)
[8]	巴良杰, 罗冬兰, 曹森, 尤勇刚, 余碧青, 王瑞. 1-MP结合⁶⁰Co γ辐照对蓝莓贮藏品质的影响. 北方园艺, 2019(8): 118-124.
	BA L J, LUO D L, CAO S, YOU Y G, YU B Q, WANG R. Effects of 1-MCP combined with ⁶⁰Co γ irradiation on the quality of blueberry during storage. Northern Horticulture, 2019(8): 118-124. (in Chinese)
[9]	纪淑娟, 周倩, 马超, 程顺昌. 1-MCP处理对蓝莓常温货架品质变化的影响. 食品科学, 2013, 35(2): 322-327.
	JI S J, ZHOU Q, MA C, CHENG S C. Effect of 1-MCP treatment on quality changes of blueberry at room temperature. Food Science, 2013, 35(2): 322-327. (in Chinese)
[10]	CHIABRANDO V, GIACALONE G. Shelf life extension of highbush blueberry using 1-methylcyclopropene stored under air and controlled atmosphere. Food Chemistry, 2011, 126(4): 1812-1816. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.12.032
[11]	郭丹, 韩英群, 郝义. 箱式气调保鲜对蓝莓果实贮藏期及货架期品质生理影响. 西北农业学报, 2016, 25(12): 1829-1836.
	GUO D, HAN Y Q, HAO Y. Effect of box modified atmosphere storage on quality and physiology of blueberry during storage and shelf-life. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2016, 25(12): 1829-1836. (in Chinese)
[12]	刘萌, 范新光, 王美兰, 周志才, 张长峰, 张玉华. 不同包装方法对蓝莓采后生理及贮藏效果的影响. 食品科学, 2013, 34(14): 346-350. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201314072
	LIU M, FAN X G, WANG M L, ZHOU Z C, ZHANG C F, ZHANG Y H. Influence of different packaging methods on physiological properties of blueberry during postharvest storage. Food Science, 2013, 34(14): 345-350. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201314072
[13]	孟宪军, 姜爱丽, 胡文忠, 田密霞, 刘程惠. 箱式气调贮藏对采后蓝莓生理生化变化的影响. 食品工业科技, 2011, 32(9): 379-383.
	MENG X J, JIANG A L, HU W Z, TIAN M X, LIU C H. Effects of plastic box modified atmosphere storage on the physiological and biochemical changes of postharvest blueberry fruits. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2010, 32(9): 379-383. (in Chinese)
[14]	邹小波, 杨志坤, 石吉勇, 黄晓玮, 张文, Haroon Elrasheid TAHIR. 阿拉伯胶/白色玫瑰茄提取物复合涂膜对低温贮藏蓝莓保鲜效果的影响. 食品科学, 2019, 40(7): 204-211.
	ZOU X B, YANG Z K, SHI J Y, HUANG X W, ZHANG W, HAROON E T. Preservation effect of gum arabic edible coating incorporated with white roselle extract ( Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) on cold-stored blueberries. Food Science, 2019, 40(7): 204-211. (in Chinese)
[15]	李翠萍, 袁磊, 杨延存, 王茜, 周凯乐, 刘双, 李鹏程. 山梨醇提高壳聚糖季铵盐涂膜对蓝莓的保鲜效果. 现代食品科技, 2018, 34(12): 117-121.
	LI C P, YUAN L, YANG Y C, WANG Q, ZHOU K L, LIU S, LI P C. Effect of plasticizers on the preservation of blueberries by quaternary ammonium salt of chitosan coating. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2018, 34(12): 117-121. (in Chinese)
[16]	张群利, 崔琳琳, 郑权, 邬泽凯, 丁云闪, 覃懿琴, 张佳俐, 何美杉, 陈钧浦. 纤维素复合抗菌保鲜膜包覆对采后蓝莓的保鲜效果. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(19): 261-265.
	ZHANG Q L, CUI L L, ZHENG Q, WU Z K, DING Y S, TAN Y Q, ZHANG J L, HE M S, CHEN J P. Fresh-keeping effect of cellulose composite antibacterial preservative film on postharvest blueberry. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(19): 261-265. (in Chinese)
[17]	孙莎, 郜海燕, 熊涛, 陈杭君, 刘瑞玲, 吴伟杰. 五倍子提取液对蓝莓采后病害和品质的影响. 林业科学, 2018, 54(6): 53-62.
	SUN S, GAO H Y, XIONG T, CHEN H J, LIU R L, WU W J. The effect of galla chinensis extract on postharvest disease and storage quality of blueberry. Scientia Sivae Sinicae, 2018, 54(6): 53-62. (in Chinese)
[18]	LIN S H, WANG W, ZHANG J H, YANG X L. Initial screening of 10 plant essential oils in vitro antibacterial activity against blueberry pathogens. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2019, 20(3): 17-21.
[19]	王和涛. 丁香精油与壳聚糖涂膜对蓝莓的保鲜效果. 食品工业, 2019, 40(1): 203-206.
	WANG H T. Effect of clove essential oil and chitosan compound film coating on blueberry preservation. Food Industry, 2019, 40(1): 203-206. (in Chinese)
[20]	王磊明, 李洋, 张茜, 冯刚. 壳聚糖-肉桂精油复合膜对蓝莓保鲜效果的影响. 食品科技, 2017, 42(9): 14-20.
	WANG L M, LI Y, ZHANG Q, FENG G. Effects of composite membrane of chitosan and cinnamon essential oil on preservation of blueberries. Food Science and Technology, 2017, 42(9): 14-20. (in Chinese)
[21]	陶烨, 王琛, 高雅, 李晓平, 崔智博, 孟宪军. 不同剂量⁶⁰Co-γ辐照对蓝莓果实贮藏品质的影响. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2017, 8(7): 2779-2785.
	TAO Y, WANG C, GAO Y, LI X P, CUI Z B, MENG X J. Effects of different doses of ⁶⁰Co-γirradiation on storage quality of blueberry fruits. Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2017, 8(7): 2779-2785. (in Chinese)
[22]	龙明秀, 吴凤玉, 田竹希, 刘敏, 何扬波, 李咏富, 石彬, 梁倩. ⁶⁰Co-γ辐照处理对蓝莓保鲜效果的影响. 核农学报, 2019, 33(11): 2165-2176.
	LONG M X, WU F Y, TIAN Z X, LIU M, HE Y B, LI Y F, SHI B, LIANG Q. Effect of ⁶⁰Coγirradiation treatment on preservation effects of blueberry. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(11): 2165-2176. (in Chinese)
[23]	姬亚茹, 周福慧, 姜爱丽, 顾思彤, 胡文忠. 乙醇熏蒸处理对采后蓝莓果实品质的影响. 包装工程, 2018, 13: 85-92.
	JI Y R, ZHOU F H, JIANG A L, GU S T, HU W Z. Effects of ethanol fumigation treatments on the quality of postharvest blueberry fruits. Packaging Engineering, 2018, 13: 86-92. (in Chinese)
[24]	廖嘉, 胡文忠, 权春善, 姬亚茹, 杨香艳, 龙娅, 李元政. 采后浆果熏蒸保鲜技术的研究进展. 食品与发酵工程, 2019, 45(14): 277-284.
	LIAO J, HU W Z, QUAN C S, JI Y R, YANG X Y, LONG Y, LI Y Z. Fumigation preservation technology for postharvest berries: A review. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2019, 45(14): 277-284. (in Chinese)
[25]	刘有春, 陶承光, 魏永祥, 刘成, 王兴东, 刘威生, 杨艳敏. 越橘果实糖酸含量和不同发育阶段的变化及其与叶片中可溶性糖含量的相关关系. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(19): 4110-4118. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.19.017
	LIU Y C, TAO C G, WEI Y X, LIU C, WANG X D, LIU W S, YANG Y M. Fruit sugar and acid content, variation at different fruit development stages and their relationship with leaf soluble sugar content of blueberry. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(19): 4110-4118. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.19.017
[26]	刘有春, 魏永祥, 王兴东, 刘成, 蒋明三, 张舵, 袁兴福, 陶承光. 南高丛越橘品种‘Sapphire’和北高丛品种‘Berkeley’正反交后代果实糖酸组分含量的遗传倾向. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(24): 4878-4885. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.24.011
	LIU Y C, WEI Y X, WANG X D, LIU C, JIANG M S, ZHANG D, YUAN X F, TAO C G. Inheritance tendency of sugar and acid contents in the reciprocal cross progenies’ fruits of Southern× Northern high Bush blueberry (Vaccinium). Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(24): 4878-4885. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.24.011
[27]	CHEN X S, WU Y, CHEN M X, HE T M, FENG J R, LIANG Q, LIU W, YANG H H, ZHANG L J. Inheritance and correlation of self-compatibility and other yield components in the apricot hybrid F1 populations. Euphytica, 2006, 150(12): 69-74. doi: 10.1007/s10681-006-9094-7
[28]	崔艳波, 陈慧, 乐文全, 张树军, 伍涛, 陶书田, 张绍玲. ‘京白梨’与‘鸭梨’正反交后代果实性状遗传倾向研究. 园艺学报, 2011, 38(2): 215-224.
	CUI Y B, CHEN H, LE W Q, ZHANG S J, WU T, TAO S T, ZHANG S L. Studies on genetic tendency of fruit characters in reciprocal crosses generation between ‘Jingbaili’ and ‘Yali’ pear cultivars. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2011, 38(2): 215-224. (in Chinese)
[29]	刘有春, 鄂辉邦, 刘成, 王兴东, 杨艳敏, 孙斌, 张舵, 袁兴福, 魏永祥. 越橘半同胞系杂交后代果实糖酸性状的变异和遗传倾向. 果树学报, 2016, 33(6): 664-675.
	LIU Y C, E H B, LIU C, WANG X D, YANG Y M, SUN B, ZHANG D, YUAN X F, WEI Y X. Variability and inheritance of sugar and acid content in blueberry (Vaccinium) fruit of half-sib crosses. Journal of Fruit Science, 2016, 33(6): 664-675. (in Chinese)
[30]	WICKHAM H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer. 2016
[31]	周会玲, 李嘉瑞. 葡萄果实结构与耐贮性关系的研究. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(7): 239-241.
	ZHOU H L, LI J R. The relationship between fruit structure and storability in table grapes. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005, 21(7): 239-241. (in Chinese)
[32]	JEWEL B. Maintaining fruit firmness[D]. Arizona: University of Arizona, 2004.
[33]	王金英, 马中国, 宗灿华. 果胶的提取与应用. 中国林副特产, 2000, 5(2): 17-l8.
	WANG J Y, MA Z G, ZONG C H. Extraction and application of pectin. Quarterly of Forest By-Product and Speciallty in China, 2000, 5(2): 17-18. (in Chinese)
[34]	魏宝东, 姜炳义, 冯辉. 番茄果实货架期硬度变化及其影响因素的研究. 食品科学, 2005, 26(3): 249-252.
	WEI B D, JIANG B Y, FENG H. Studies on changes of hardness degree of tomato fruit and factors affected shelf-Life. Food Science, 2005, 26(3): 249-252. (in Chinese)
[35]	张会芳, 刘桂珍, 张超. 草莓果实硬度影响因素及其调控措施研究进展. 长江蔬菜, 2009(12): 4-7.
	ZHANG H F, LIU G Z, ZHANG C. Research progress on influencing factors and control measures of strawberry fruit firmness. Changjiang Vegetable, 2009(12): 4-7. (in Chinese)
[36]	彭永彬, 李玉, 徐鹏程, 王晨, 上官凌飞. 葡萄果实硬度及影响硬度的主要因素. 浙江农业学报, 2014, 26(5): 1227-1234.
	PENG Y B, LI Y, XU P C, WANG C, SHANGGUAN L F. Grape fruit firmness and the main influencing factors. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2014, 26(5): 1227-1234. (in Chinese)
[37]	王力荣, 朱更瑞, 方伟超. 桃(Prunus persica L.)种质资源果实数量性状评价指标探讨. 园艺学报, 2005, 32(1): 1-5.
	WANG L R, ZHU G R, FANG W C. The evaluating criteria of some fruit quantitative characters of peach (Prunus persica L.) genetic resource. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2005, 32(1): 1-5. (in Chinese)
[38]	SPANGLO L P S, HSU C S, FEJER S O. Heritability and genetic variance components for 20 fruit and plant characters in the cultivated strawberry. Genome, 1971, 13: 443-456.
[39]	BARRITT B H. Breeding strawberry for fruit firmness. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1979, 104(5): 663-665.
[40]	李英慧, 王火旭, 任秀云. 草莓果实硬度遗传和选择研究. 辽宁师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2000, 20(3): 316-318.
	LI Y H, WANG H X, REN X Y. Study on heredity and selection of fruit firmness of strawberry. Journal of Liaoning Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2000, 20(3): 316-318. (in Chinese)
[41]	祝朋芳, 陈长青. 草莓两个经济性状遗传特性的研究. 北方果树, 2004(3): 8-9.
	ZHU P F, CHEN C Q. A study on genetic traits of two economic characters in strawberry. Northern Fruits, 2004(3): 8-9. (in Chinese)
[42]	何艳龙. 番茄果实硬度遗传规律研究. 北方园艺, 2016(14): 17-22.
	HE Y L. Study on genetic low of fruit firmness of tomato. Northern Horticulture, 2016(14): 17-22. (in Chinese)
[43]	赵亚楠, 欧春青, 王斐, 张艳杰, 马力, 姜淑苓. 梨F₁代群体果实性状的遗传分析及相关性研究. 西北农业学报, 2018, 27(12): 1811-1818.
	ZHAO Y N, OU Q C, WANG F, ZHANG Y J, MA L, JIANG S L. Genetic analysis and correlation study on pear fruit characteristics in F₁ generation. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2018, 27(12): 1811-1818. (in Chinese)

栽培/杂交组合类型组合 Cultivation/Hybrid cross type	品种份数 Accessions of variety	品种名称 Name of variety
北高丛越橘 V. corymbosum northern highbush (NHB)	12	斯巴坦 Spartan,蓝丰 Bluecrop,伯克利 Berkeley,泽西Jersey,布里吉塔 Brigitta,杜克 Duke,埃利奥特 Elliott,晚蓝 Lateblue,达柔 Darrow,喜来 Sierra,日出 Sunrise,早蓝 Earliblue
南高丛越橘 V. corymbosum southern highbush (SHB)	7	奥尼尔 O'Neal,密斯梯 Misty,佐治亚宝石 Georgiagem,莱格西 Legacy,比洛克西Biloxi,N6,N5
半高丛越橘 V. corymbosum half-highbush	4	北陆 Northland,北村 Northcountry,齐佩瓦 Chippewa,北蓝 Northblue
矮丛越橘 V. augustifolium	1	美登Blomidon
兔眼越橘 V.virgatum	2	园蓝 Gardenblue,梯扶蓝 Tifblue
北高丛×北高丛 NHB×NHB	33	斯巴坦 Spartan×蓝丰 Bluecrop,泽西Jersey×斯巴坦 Spartan,康维尔Coville×斯巴坦 Spartan
北高丛×南高丛 NHB×SHB	29	斯巴坦 Spartan×N6,斯巴坦 Spartan×奥尼尔 O'Neal,伯克利 Berkeley×N6
南高丛×北高丛 SHB×NHB	17	N5×伯克利 Berkeley,N6×斯巴坦 Spartan
南高丛×南高丛 SHB×SHB	19	奥尼尔 O'Neal×密斯梯 Misty

指标 Index	单果重 Fruit weight	果蒂痕 Stem scar	果型指数 Index	果实硬度 Berry firmness	可溶性固形物含量 Soluble solids content	酸含量 Acid content	贮藏性 Storability
单果重 Fruit weight	1
果蒂痕 Stem scar	0.1	1
果型指数 Index	-0.724***	-0.136	1
果实硬度 Berry firmness	0.147	-0.146	-0.105	1
可溶性固形物含量 Soluble solids content	-0.227*	0.113	0.142	-0.034	1
酸含量 Acid content	-0.201	-0.167	0.245*	0.077	0.105	1
贮藏性 Storability	-0.053	-0.527***	-0.03	0.315**	0.145	0.118	1

处理 Treatment	贮藏前果实硬度 Berry firmness before storage (kg?cm^-2)	带柄贮藏 Storage with fruit stalks			脱柄贮藏 Storage without fruit stalks
处理 Treatment	贮藏前果实硬度 Berry firmness before storage (kg?cm^-2)	20 d后果实硬度 Berry firmness of after 20 days (kg?cm^-2)	降低幅度 Reduced extent of berry firmness (%)	新鲜/皱缩/发霉 Fresh/shrunk/ moldy	20 d后果实硬度 Berry firmness of after 20 days (kg?cm^-2)	降低幅度 Reduced extent of berry firmness (%)	新鲜/皱缩/发霉 Fresh/shrunk/ moldy
A	0.227	0.206	9.25	新鲜 Fresh	0.097	57.27	皱缩 Shrunk
B	0.256	0.222	13.28	新鲜 Fresh	0.103	59.77	皱缩 Shrunk
C	0.232	0.200	13.79	新鲜 Fresh	0.079	65.95	皱缩 Shrunk
D	0.206	0.184	14.81	新鲜 Fresh	0.061	71.76	皱缩+发霉 Shrunk+Moldy

主成分 Principal component	特征值 Eigenvalue	方差贡献率 Variance contribution rate (%)	累计方差贡献率 Cumulative variance contribution rate (%)
1	2.001	28.583	28.583
2	1.691	24.159	52.742
3	1.023	14.610	67.352
4	0.873	12.476	79.828

性状 Trait	亲本 Parent			正交群体 N6×Berkeley							反交群体 Berkeley×N6
性状 Trait	N6	Berkeley	?P	?x±S	范围Range	CV (%)	H²	HM (%)	HH (%)	LL (%)	?x±S	范围 Range	CV (%)	H²	HM (%)	HH (%)	LL (%)
果蒂痕大小 Stem scar size (mm)	1.964	3.501	2.732	2.847±0.534	1.412– 4.29	18.750	0.887	48.538	5.848	9.357	2.683±0.579	0.750–4.018	21.590	0.867	61.667	10.000	6.667
果实硬度 Berry firmness (kg?cm^-2)	0.189	0.278	0.234	0.185±0.035	0.080– 0.27	18.900	0.535	10.526	1.754	53.801	0.186±0.038	0.086– 0.282	20.240	0.514	9.167	0.000	56.667