中国农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 602-615.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.04.003
赵勇,赵培方,胡鑫,赵俊,昝逢刚,姚丽,赵丽萍,杨昆,覃伟,夏红明,刘家勇()
收稿日期:
2018-09-04
接受日期:
2018-12-15
出版日期:
2019-02-16
发布日期:
2019-02-27
通讯作者:
刘家勇
作者简介:
赵勇,E-mail: 基金资助:
ZHAO Yong,ZHAO PeiFang,HU Xin,ZHAO Jun,ZAN FengGang,YAO Li,ZHAO LiPing,YANG Kun,QIN Wei,XIA HongMing,LIU JiaYong()
Received:
2018-09-04
Accepted:
2018-12-15
Online:
2019-02-16
Published:
2019-02-27
Contact:
JiaYong LIU
摘要:
【目的】采用重要农艺性状快速分级的方法对甘蔗种质资源进行评价,为种质资源的进一步精准评价和杂交利用提供参考。【方法】基于大田试验,在成熟期选择株高、茎径、有效茎、叶部病害程度(花叶病、锈病、褐条病等叶部病害田间自然发病的综合反映)和总体生势等5个重要农艺性状,对317份国内外甘蔗种质资源(2重复)进行分级评价。每个性状分为5级,其中株高以1级为最高,依次递减,5级最矮;同理,茎径以1级最粗,5级最细;有效茎以1级最多,5级最少;总体生势以1级最好,5级最差;叶部病害以1级为无或轻,5级最严重。各性状分级由分级小组成员共同完成。基于农艺性状分级数据,采用方差、广义遗传力、主成分、聚类和判别分析等统计方法,对317份种质资源进行综合评价分析,筛选农艺性状表现优良的种质资源。并在此基础上,采用一次旋光法,对筛选出的优良种质资源甘蔗糖分进行评价。【结果】方差和广义遗传力分析结果表明,317份甘蔗种质各个农艺性状指标分级数据间均存在极显著差异(P<0.01),广义遗传力在0.61—0.72,其中广义遗传力最高为茎径(0.72),最低为株高(0.61)。主成分分析结果表明,5个农艺性状可简化为1个主成分因子,即5个农艺性状的综合叠加,且此主成分所提供的信息占全部信息量的63.57%,特征根显著高于其他主成分的特征根之和。基于主成分结果,对317份种质进行聚类分析,将其划分为5类,第Ⅰ类包含20份种质,第Ⅱ类包含97份,第Ⅲ类包含82份,第Ⅳ类包含80份,第Ⅴ类包含38份;农艺性状表现以第Ⅰ类和第Ⅱ类的117份种质资源最优(占全部种质数的36.91%)。聚类结果的逐步判别分析显示,平均判对概率为95.85%。聚类结果充分体现了种质资源在田间试验中的实际表现。基于农艺性状聚类分析结果,对第Ⅰ类和第Ⅱ类共计117份种质的甘蔗糖分进行评价。结果显示,117份种质11月至翌年3月平均蔗糖分在5.0%—17.10%,最高为云蔗09-1601(17.1%),最低为CP79-318(5.0%)。平均蔗糖分15.0%以上的种质有43份,其中有11份超过16.0%。【结论】株高、茎径、有效茎、叶部病害程度和总体生势等是反映甘蔗种质资源田间表现的重要农艺性状指标。基于重要农艺性状快速分级的方法可以作为大量甘蔗种质资源评价的另一途径。
赵勇,赵培方,胡鑫,赵俊,昝逢刚,姚丽,赵丽萍,杨昆,覃伟,夏红明,刘家勇. 基于农艺性状分级对317份甘蔗种质资源的评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(4): 602-615.
ZHAO Yong,ZHAO PeiFang,HU Xin,ZHAO Jun,ZAN FengGang,YAO Li,ZHAO LiPing,YANG Kun,QIN Wei,XIA HongMing,LIU JiaYong. Evaluation of 317 Sugarcane Germplasm Based on Agronomic Traits Rating Data[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(4): 602-615.
表1
重要农艺性状分级参考"
性状Traits | 范围Range | 分级Rank |
---|---|---|
株高 Plant height (cm) | ≥280 | 1 |
220—280 | 2 | |
160—220 | 3 | |
100—160 | 4 | |
≤100 | 5 | |
茎径 Stalk diameter (cm) | ≥3.0 | 1 |
2.5—3.0 | 2 | |
2.0—2.5 | 3 | |
1.5—2.0 | 4 | |
≤1.5 | 5 | |
有效茎 Millable stalks (条/m) | ≥10 | 1 |
8—9 | 2 | |
6—7 | 3 | |
4—5 | 4 | |
≤3 | 5 | |
叶部病害程度 Leaf disease (%) | ≤5 | 1 |
5—10 | 2 | |
10—20 | 3 | |
20—30 | 4 | |
≥30 | 5 | |
总体生势 General vigor | 基于对性状的观察,对种质材料进行综合评价并分级 The comprehensive evaluation of the germplasms based on the observation of four traits | 1 |
2 | ||
3 | ||
4 | ||
5 |
表2
农艺性状方差和遗传变异分析"
农艺性状 Agronomic traits | 平均值 Averages | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation (%) | 遗传方差 Genetic variance | 广义遗传力 Broad-sense heritability |
---|---|---|---|---|
株高Plant height | 2.39** | 31.01 | 0.34 | 0.61 |
叶部病害程度Leaf disease | 2.95** | 29.70 | 0.53 | 0.69 |
有效茎Millable stalks | 3.02** | 23.23 | 0.31 | 0.64 |
茎径Stalk diameter | 2.79** | 28.01 | 0.44 | 0.72 |
总体生势General vigor | 2.91** | 27.70 | 0.45 | 0.69 |
表4
主成分分析各性状的特征向量与特征根"
农艺指标 Agronomic traits | 第一主成分 First component | 第二主成分 Second component | 第三主成分 Third component | 第四主成分 Fourth component | 第五主成分 Fifth component |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
总体生势(X1)General vigor | 0.52 | -0.26 | 0.02 | -0.19 | -0.79 |
茎径(X2)Stalk diameter | 0.41 | -0.43 | 0.68 | 0.11 | 0.41 |
有效茎(X3)Millable stalks | 0.47 | -0.06 | -0.50 | -0.57 | 0.45 |
叶部病害(X4)Leaf disease | 0.36 | 0.86 | 0.35 | -0.11 | -0.01 |
株高(X5)Plant height | 0.46 | 0.07 | -0.40 | 0.79 | 0.08 |
百分率Percentage (%) | 63.57 | 13.56 | 12.12 | 7.41 | 2.34 |
累计百分率Cumulative percentage (%) | 63.57 | 77.13 | 90.25 | 97.66 | 100 |
特征根Eigenvectors | 3.18 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.37 | 0.12 |
P值P value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
表5
种质各类群的主成分平均综合得分及各性状原始分级数据平均值"
类群 Groups | 主成分综合得分(均值) Principal component comprehensive scores (average) | 原始分级数据(均值)Primary grade data(average) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总体生势 General vigor | 茎径 Stalk diameter | 有效茎 Millable stalks | 叶部病害程度 Leaf disease | 株高 Plant height | ||
第Ⅰ类群Ⅰ group | -3.10 | 1.68 | 1.88 | 1.93 | 1.93 | 1.30 |
第Ⅱ类群Ⅱ group | -1.45 | 2.25 | 2.33 | 2.53 | 2.52 | 1.95 |
第Ⅲ类群Ⅲ group | -0.14 | 2.87 | 2.70 | 3.04 | 2.89 | 2.31 |
第Ⅳ类群Ⅳ group | 1.10 | 3.43 | 3.16 | 3.38 | 3.28 | 2.71 |
第Ⅴ类群Ⅴ group | 3.31 | 4.26 | 3.86 | 4.04 | 4.03 | 3.63 |
表6
类群判别分析矩阵表"
来自\判为 Come\Go | 第Ⅰ类群 Ⅰ group | 第Ⅱ类群 Ⅱ group | 第Ⅲ类群 Ⅲ group | 第Ⅳ类群 Ⅳ group | 第Ⅴ类群 Ⅴ group | 小计(份) Total (piece) | 正确率 Accuracy (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第Ⅰ类群Ⅰ group | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 90.00 |
第Ⅱ类群Ⅱ group | 0 | 92 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 97 | 94.85 |
第Ⅲ类群Ⅲ group | 0 | 0 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 82 | 100.00 |
第Ⅳ类群Ⅳ group | 0 | 0 | 5 | 75 | 0 | 80 | 93.73 |
第Ⅴ类群Ⅴ group | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 36 | 38 | 94.76 |
平均判对概率 Average accuracy | 95.85 |
表7
优良种质名称及其原始性状级别和蔗糖分表现(平均值)"
种质资源 Germplasm | 级别 Grade | 总体生势 General vigor | 茎径 Stalk diameter | 有效茎 Millable stalks | 叶部病害 Leaf disease | 株高 Plant height | 甘蔗糖分 Sugar content (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CP73-2109* | 1 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 12.2 |
F170* | 1 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 13.3 |
FR93-761* | 1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 14.0 |
PHil60-19* | 1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 12.2 |
Q124* | 1 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 15.1 |
Q172* | 1 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 14.3 |
Q179* | 1 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 15.1 |
Q189* | 1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 14.6 |
Q197* | 1 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 13.9 |
ROC4* | 1 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 13.8 |
SP80-3280* | 1 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 14.6 |
HN 54-11* | 1 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 13.9 |
YT00-318* | 1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 14.9 |
YT 89-240* | 1 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 15.3 |
YT 93-159* | 1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 16.2 |
YZ01-1413* | 1 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 14.2 |
YZ 06-160* | 1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 14.0 |
YZ 08-1095* | 1 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 13.4 |
YZ 08-1609* | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 15.4 |
YZ 09-1028* | 1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 14.8 |
CO1001 | 2 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 10.2 |
CO281 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 13.7 |
CO419 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 13.3 |
CP00-1301 | 2 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 14.8 |
CP00-2459 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 13.2 |
CP29-116 | 2 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 11.6 |
CP33-310* | 2 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 12.4 |
CP34-120* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 14.3 |
CP40-10 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 12.1 |
CP44-154 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 13.1 |
CP51-22 | 2 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 8.0 |
CP73-351* | 2 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 13.9 |
种质资源 Germplasm | 级别 Grade | 总体生势 General vigor | 茎径 Stalk diameter | 有效茎 Millable stalks | 叶部病害 Leaf disease | 株高 Plant height | 甘蔗糖分 Sugar content (%) |
CP77-1776 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 14.4 |
CP79-318 | 2 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 |
CP88-1834* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 15.4 |
CP88-1834* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 15.4 |
CP88-1884 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 15.2 |
CP89-1509 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 11.0 |
CP89-2143* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 16.3 |
CP92-1167* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 14.0 |
CP94-1100* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 15.5 |
F134* | 2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 12.9 |
F146 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 14.6 |
F172* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 13.6 |
FR97-41* | 2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 12.5 |
FR97-53 | 2 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 15.4 |
FR99-116* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 12.8 |
KQ01-1261 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 15.8 |
KQ01-1390* | 2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 15.3 |
KQ99-1474 | 2 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 14.2 |
PHil63-17* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 12.8 |
PHil72-446* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 11.1 |
PHil72-78 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 14.6 |
Poj2725* | 2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 13.6 |
Poj2836* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 12.2 |
Q121* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 16.0 |
Q127* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 15.8 |
Q152* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 14.8 |
Q183* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 16.0 |
Q188* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 15.8 |
Q196 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 14.7 |
Q199 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 13.3 |
Q202* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 13.9 |
Q206 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 15.5 |
RB72-454* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 13.6 |
RB73-5275* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 11.3 |
RB75-15 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 14.4 |
RB76-5418 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 12.1 |
RB83-5089 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 13.3 |
种质资源 Germplasm | 级别 Grade | 总体生势 General vigor | 茎径 Stalk diameter | 有效茎 Millable stalks | 叶部病害 Leaf disease | 株高 Plant height | 甘蔗糖分 Sugar content (%) |
RB84-5257 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 12.2 |
RB85-5156* | 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 14.8 |
ROC16 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 15.7 |
ROC23* | 2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 15.2 |
ROC3* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 14.3 |
ROC9* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 13.7 |
SP70-1143 | 2 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 13.1 |
VMC74-527 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 14.1 |
VMC 88-354 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 13.5 |
VMC 95-105 | 2 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 14.8 |
VMC 95-36* | 2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 14.0 |
VMC 95-88* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 14.2 |
VMC 96-60 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 9.9 |
CT57-416 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 14.6 |
DZ03-83* | 2 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 14.8 |
DZ93-88* | 2 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 16.6 |
FN38 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 15.1 |
FN39 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 15.4 |
GZ81-871* | 2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 15.1 |
GZ91-2* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 11.9 |
GZ02-70* | 2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 16.3 |
GZ65-542 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 15.6 |
GZ75-65 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 15.9 |
GZ95-108* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 15.0 |
GT02-351* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 15.2 |
GT 02-467* | 2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 15.2 |
GT 11 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 15.3 |
GT 69-360* | 2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 12.1 |
GT 84-332* | 2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 16.0 |
GT 89-5* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 15.3 |
GT94-119 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 14.5 |
GT96-211* | 2 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 14.7 |
GT97-69 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 14.4 |
LC03-1137* | 2 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 14.9 |
种质资源 Germplasm | 级别 Grade | 总体生势 General vigor | 茎径 Stalk diameter | 有效茎 Millable stalks | 叶部病害 Leaf disease | 株高 Plant height | 甘蔗糖分 Sugar content (%) |
LC05-136 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 15.4 |
MT69-421* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 16.1 |
MT70-611* | 2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 15.4 |
MT00-236 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 15.3 |
MT96-86 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 13.1 |
YZ06-80* | 2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 15.6 |
YZ08-2060 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 14.8 |
YZ09-1601* | 2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 17.1 |
YZ11-1779 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 16.4 |
YZ64-24* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 15.3 |
YZ65-225* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 14.3 |
YZ71-998* | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 16.7 |
YZ89-351 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 14.5 |
YZ89-7 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 15.3 |
YZ94-375 | 2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 14.2 |
[1] | 彭绍光 . 甘蔗育种学. 北京: 农业出版社, 1984: 174-184. |
PENG S G. Sugarcane Breeding Science. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1984: 174-184. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 蔡青 . 甘蔗种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 1-3. |
CAI Q. Sugarcane Germplasm Resources Description Norms and Data Standards. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2006: 1-3. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 刘新龙, 蔡青, 吴才文, 马丽, 应雄美, 陆鑫, 范源洪 . 甘蔗品种资源的表型遗传多样性. 生物多样性, 2010,18(1):37-43. |
LIU X L, CAI Q, WU C W, MA L, YING X M, LU X, FAN Y H . Phenotypic diversity of sugarcane variety germplasm. Biodiversity, 2010,18(1):37-43. (in Chinese) | |
[4] |
刘新龙, 马丽, 蔡青, 应雄美, 陆鑫, 苏火生, 毛钧, 范源洪 . 云南甘蔗种质表型性状的遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2010,11(6):703-708.
doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.37-38.1549 |
LIU X L, MA L, CAI Q, YING X M, LU X, SU H S, MAO J, FAN Y H . Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits in Yunnan sugarcane germplasm. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2010,11(6):703-708. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.37-38.1549 |
|
[5] | 吴建涛, 许环映, 谢静, 邱永生, 张垂明, 周峰, 刘壮, 王勤南 . 粤糖系列甘蔗亲本表型性状遗传多样性分析 . 植物遗传资源学报, 2018(4):1-17. |
WU J T, XU H Y, XIE J, QIU Y S, ZHANG C M, ZHOU F, LIU Z, WANG Q N . Genetic Diversity analysis of phenotypic characters of sugarcane parents in YT series sugarcane varieties. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2018(4):1-17. (in Chinese) | |
[6] |
赵俊, 吴才文, 赵培方, 夏红明, 暂逢刚, 杨昆, 李复琴, 刘家勇 . 引进甘蔗种质工艺与农艺性状的相关性及聚类分析. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,38(5):476-481.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1238.2012.00476 |
ZHAO J, WU C W, ZHAO P F, XIA H M, ZAN F G, YANG K, LI F Q, LIU J Y . Principal component analysis and cluster analysis of agronomic and quality traits of exotic sugarcane germplasm. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2012,38(5):476-481. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1238.2012.00476 |
|
[7] |
昝逢刚, 吴才文, 赵培方, 赵俊, 夏红明, 杨昆, 姚丽, 覃伟, 刘家勇 . 国外引进甘蔗种质表型性状的遗传多样性分析. 西南农业学报, 2014,27(4):1369-1373.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2014.04.005 |
ZAN F G, WU C W, ZHAO P F, ZHAO J, XIA H M, YANG K, YAO L, QIN W, LIU J Y . Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic characters of sugarcane germplasms Introduced from Foreign Countries. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014,27(4):1369-1373. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2014.04.005 |
|
[8] |
徐超华, 陆鑫, 马丽, 刘新龙, 刘洪博, 苏火生, 林秀琴, 蔡青 . 斑茅种质资源的表型性状及遗传多样性. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014,40(2):117-121.
doi: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2014.02.002 |
XU C H, LU X, MA L, LIU X L, LIU H B, SU H S, LIN X Q, CAI Q . Phenotypic traits and genetic diversity of Erianthus arundinaceum germplasm. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences), 2014,40(2):117-121. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2014.02.002 |
|
[9] |
杨翠凤, 张春雅, 杨丽涛, 李杨瑞 . 不同基因型甘蔗种质资源的表型遗传多样性. 广西植物, 2015(4):556-563.
doi: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201403017 |
YANG C F, ZHANG C Y, YANG L T, LI Y R . Phenotypic genetic diversity of sugarcane germplasm resources with different genotypes. Guangxi Plants, 2015(4):556-563. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201403017 |
|
[10] | 肖祎, 刘军, 周英明, 张翠苹, 陈道德, 钟萍, 吕达 . 果蔗种质资源新植表现及遗传多样性聚类分析. 甘蔗糖业, 2018(2):6-11. |
XIAO Y, LIU J, ZHOU Y M, ZHANG C P, CHEN D D, ZHONG P, LÜ D . New planting performance and genetic diversity cluster analysis in chewing cane germplasm resources. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 2018(2):6-11. (in Chinese) | |
[11] |
SINGH P, SINGH S P, TIWARI A K, SHARMA B L . Genetic diversity of sugarcane hybrid cultivars by RAPD markers. Biotech, 2017,7(3):222.
doi: 10.1007/s13205-017-0855-x |
[12] | 吴海兰, 王先宏, 何丽莲, 李富生 . 基于SSR标记的云南甘蔗栽培种质遗传多样性分析. 分子植物育种, 2014,12(1):144-151. |
WU H L, WANG X H, HE L L, LI F S . Genetic diversity analysis of Yunnan sugarcane cultivars on SSR marker. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2014,12(1):144-151. (in Chinese) | |
[13] |
ALI A, WANG J D, PAN Y B, DENG Z H, CHEN Z W, CHEN R K, GAO S J . Molecular identification and genetic diversity analysis of Chinese sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Hybrids) varieties using SSR markers. Tropical Plant Biology, 2017: 1-10.
doi: 10.1007/s12042-017-9195-6 |
[14] |
YOU Q, XU L P, ZHENG Y F, QUE Y X . Genetic diversity analysis of sugarcane parents in Chinese breeding program using gSSR markers. The Scientific World Journal, 2013(7):613062.
doi: 10.1155/2013/613062 pmid: 23990759 |
[15] |
劳方业, 刘睿, 何慧怡, 邓海华, 陈仲华, 陈健文, 符成, 张垂明, 杨业后 . 崖城系列甘蔗亲本遗传多样性的AFLP标记分析. 分子植物育种, 2008,6(3):517-522.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-416X.2008.03.017 |
LAO F Y, LIU R, HE H Y, DENG H H, CHEN J W, FU C, ZHANG C M, YANG Y H . AFLP analysis of genetic diversity in Yacheng series sugarcane parents. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2008,6(3):517-522. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-416X.2008.03.017 |
|
[16] |
昝逢刚, 应雄美, 吴才文, 赵培方, 陈学宽, 马丽, 苏火生, 刘家勇 . 98份甘蔗种质资源遗传多样性的AFLP分析. 中国农业科学, 2015,48(5):1002-1010.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.05.18 |
ZAN F G, YING X M, WU C W, ZHAO P F, CHEN X K, MA L, SU H S, LIU J Y . Genetic diversity analysis of 98 collections of sugarcane germplasm with AFLP markers. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015,48(5):1002-1010. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.05.18 |
|
[17] |
SINGH R B, SINGH B, SINGH R K . Study of genetic diversity of sugarcane (Saccharum) species and commercial varieties through TRAP molecular markers. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2017,22(7):1-7.
doi: 10.1007/s40502-016-0249-9 |
[18] | 宋弦弦 . 甘蔗及其近缘植物遗传多样性的SRAP和TRAP标记分析[D]. 福建: 福建农林大学, 2009. |
SONG X X , Analysis of genetic diversity on sugarcane and its relatives by SRAP and TRAP markers[D]. Fujian: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2009. ( in Chinese) | |
[19] |
CHANG D, YANG F Y, YAN J J, YAN Q W, BAI S Q, LIANG X Z, ZHANG Y W, GAN Y M . SRAP analysis of genetic diversity of nine native populations of wild sugarcane, Saccharum spontaneum, from Sichuan, China. Genetics & Molecular Research, 2012,11(2):1245-1253.
doi: 10.4238/2012.May.9.3 pmid: 22614352 |
[20] |
PADMANABHAN T S S, HEMAPRABHA G . Genetic diversity and population structure among 133 elite genotypes of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) for use as parents in sugarcane varietal improvement. Biotech, 2018,8(8):339.
doi: 10.1007/s13205-018-1364-2 |
[21] |
HEMAPRABHA G, GOVINDARAJ P, BALASUNDARAM N, SINGH N K . Genetic diversity analysis of Indian sugarcane breeding pool based on sugarcane specific STMS markers. Sugar Tech, 2005,7(2/3):9-14.
doi: 10.1007/BF02942521 |
[22] |
蒲光兰, 肖千文, 蔡利娟, 罗永飞, 邹雪梅 . 四川核桃种质资源坚果的数量性状变异及概率分级. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,41(6):647-650.
doi: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2015.06.013 |
PU G L, XIAO Q W, CAI L J, LUO Y F, ZOU X M . Quantitative trait variation and probability classification of nuts in Sichuan walnut germplasm resources. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2015,41(6):647-650. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2015.06.013 |
|
[23] |
蔡志翔, 严娟, 沈志军, 马瑞娟, 俞明亮 . 核桃种质资源托叶长度评价与分级体系的建立. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016,17(3):461-465.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2016.03.009 |
CAI Z X, YAN J, SHEN Z J, MA R J, YU M L . Establishment of stipular length evaluation and classification system for walnut germplasm resources. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016,17(3):461-465. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2016.03.009 |
|
[24] | 范净, 陈启亮, 杨晓平, 张靖国, 田瑞, 胡红菊 . 砂梨种质资源果实发育期遗传多样性分析及分级探讨. 湖北农业科学, 2017(24):4811-4812. |
FAN J, CHEN Q L, YANG X P, ZHANG J G, TIAN R, HU H J . Genetic diversity analysis and classification of sand pear germplasm resources in fruit development period. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2017(24):4811-4812. (in Chinese) | |
[25] |
ZHAO D L, COMSTOCK J C, GLAZ B, EDME S J, GLYNN N C, DELBLANCO I A, GILBERT R A, WAYNE R, DAVIDSON D, CHEN C Y . Vigor rating and brix for first clonal selection stage of the canal point sugarcane cultivar development program. Journal of Crop Improvement, 2012,26:60-75.
doi: 10.1080/15427528.2011.611926 |
[26] |
LIU J Y, BASNAYAKE J, JACKSON P A, CHEN X K, ZHAO J, ZHAO P F, YANG L H, BAI Y D, XIA H M, ZAN F G, QIN W, YANG K, YAO L, ZHAO L P, ZHU J R, LAKSHMANAN P, ZHAO X D, FAN Y H . Growth and yield of sugarcane genotypes are strongly correlated across irrigated and rainfed environments. Field Crops Research, 2016,196:418-425.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.022 |
[27] | 李杨瑞 . 现代甘蔗学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2010: 103-109. |
LI Y R . Modern Sugarcane Science. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2010: 103-109. (in Chinese) | |
[28] |
唐仕云, 王伦旺, 杨荣仲, 李翔, 黄海荣, 经艳, 邓宇驰, 谭芳, 黄家雍, 杨丽涛 . 糖能兼用甘蔗新品系的性状遗传分析及综合选择. 中国农业大学学报, 2016,21(2):9-19.
doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2016.02.02 |
TANG S Y, WANG L W, YANG R Z, LI X, HUANG H R, JING Y, DENG Y C, TAN F, HUANG J Y, YANG L T . Character genetic analysis and comprehensive selection of new sugarcane strains for both sugar and energy. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2016,21(2):9-19. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2016.02.02 |
|
[29] | 何启钧, 林彦铨, 张加明, 林德波 . 甘蔗产量性状与品质性状的相关与通径分析. 甘蔗, 1995(3):6-12. |
HE Q J, LIN Y Q, ZHANG J M, LIN D B . Correlation and path analysis between yield traits and quality traits of sugarcane. Sugarcane, 1995(3):6-12. (in Chinese) | |
[30] |
罗赣丰, 梁小敏, 刘小全 . 江西甘蔗种质资源主要性状的变异与相关研究. 江西农业大学学报, 2007,29(6):910-916.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2286.2007.06.014 |
LUO G F, LIANG X M, LIU X Q . Variation and correlation of main characters of sugarcane germplasm resources in Jiangxi.[J] ournal of Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2007,29(6):910-916. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2286.2007.06.014 |
|
[31] |
杨荣仲, 周会, 王伦旺, 梁强, 唐仕云, 贤武, 桂意云, 经艳, 雷敬超, 邓宇驰, 段维兴 . 甘蔗家系农艺性状遗传力分析. 南方农业学报, 2016,47(3):337-342.
doi: 10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2016.03.337 |
YANG R Z, ZHOU H, WANG L W, LIANG Q, TANG S Y, XIAN W, GUI Y Y, JING Y, LEI J C, DENG Y C, DUAN W X . Heritability analysis of agronomic traits in sugarcane families. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2016, 47(3):337-342. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2016.03.337 |
|
[32] |
张琼, 齐永文, 张垂明, 陈勇生, 邓海华 . 我国大陆甘蔗骨干亲本亲缘关系分析. 广东农业科学, 2009(10):44-48.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2009.10.011 |
ZHANG Q, QI Y W, ZHANG C M, CHEN Y S, DENG H H . Pedigree analysis of genetic relationship among core parents of sugarcane in Mainland China. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2009(10):44-48. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2009.10.011 |
|
[33] |
刘家勇, 赵培方, 杨昆, 夏红明, 吴才文, 陈学宽, 赵俊, 杨洪昌, 昝逢刚, 姚丽, 吴转娣, 赵丽萍, 覃伟 . 甘蔗新品种云蔗05-51的选育. 中国糖料, 2016,38(1):8-10.
doi: 10.13570/j.cnki.scc.2016.01.003 |
LIU J Y, ZHAO P F, YANG K, XIA H M, WU C W, CHEN X K, ZHAO JUN, YANG H C, ZAN F G, YAO L, WU Z D, ZHAO L P, QIN W . Breeding of new sugarcane variety, Yunzhe05-51. Sugar Crops of China, 2016,38(1):8-10. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13570/j.cnki.scc.2016.01.003 |
|
[34] |
李奇伟, 刘福业, 陈月桂, 杨俊贤, 邓海华, 吴文龙, 潘方胤, 吴建涛, 陈勇生 . 甘蔗新品种粤糖03-393(粤糖60号)的选育与种性分析. 西南农业学报, 2012,25(2):401-407.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2012.02.010 |
LI Q W, LIU F Y, CHEN Y G, YANG J X, DENG H H, WU W L, PAN F Y, WU J T, CHEN Y S . Study on breeding and characteristics analysis of new sugarcane variety Yuetang03-393(Yuetang No.60), Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012,25(2):401-407. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2012.02.010 |
|
[35] |
夏红明, 赵培方, 刘家勇, 赵俊, 昝逢刚, 陈学宽, 杨昆, 杨洪昌, 姚丽, 赵丽萍, 吴转娣, 覃伟, 吴才文 . 早熟高糖甘蔗新品种云蔗08-1609的选育. 中国糖料, 2018,40(5):6-9.
doi: 10.13570/j.cnki.scc.2018.05.002 |
XIA H M, ZHAO P F, LIU J Y, ZHAO J, ZAN F G, CHEN X K, YANG K, YANG H C, YAO L, ZHAO L P, WU Z D, QIN W, WU C W . Breeding of new sugarcane variety Yunzhe081609 with early maturing and high sucrose content. Sugar Crops of China, 2018,40(5):6-9. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13570/j.cnki.scc.2018.05.002 |
|
[36] | 文明富, 潘方胤, 吴文龙, 李奇伟, 齐永文, 彭立冲, 彭冬永, 杨俊贤 . 甘蔗新品种粤糖07-516选育及特性特征. 甘蔗糖业, 2017(3):1-5. |
WEN M F, PAN F Y, WU W L, LI Q W, QI Y W, PENG L C, PENG D Y, YANG J X . Breeding and characteristics of sugarcane cultivar Yuetang07-516. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 2017(3):1-5. (in Chinese) | |
[37] | 马文清, 郭强, 秦昌鲜, 黄珍玲, 闭德金, 彭崇, 施泽升, 莫周美, 唐利球 . 甘蔗主要农艺性状的遗传力和育种值估计. 研究报告, 2018, 1-16. |
MA W Q, GUO Q, QIN C X, HUANG Z L, BI D J, PENG C, SHI Z S, MO Z M, TANG L Q . Estimations of heritability and breeding values for the main agronomic traits in sugarcane. Research Report, 2018, 1-16. (in Chinese) | |
[38] |
姚丽, 覃伟, 赵培方, 刘家勇, 赵俊, 武晋语, 吴才文 . CP系列甘蔗亲本及杂交组合育种潜力分析. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017(6):590-596.
doi: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2017.06.003 |
YAO L, QIN W, ZHAO P F, LIU J Y, ZHAO J, WU J Y, WU C W . Analysis on breeding potential of series of CP parents and their cross combinations in sugarcane. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2017(6):590-596. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2017.06.003 |
|
[39] |
徐良年, 邓祖湖, 林彦铨, 陈如凯, 傅华英 . 经济遗传值在甘蔗选育种应用研究系列(三)甘蔗亲本经济育种值和家系经济遗传值分析. 中国糖料, 2013(1):5-8.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2624.2013.01.002 |
XU L N, DENG Z H, LIN Y Q, CHEN R K, FU H Y . Series studies on economic genetic value in sugarcane(Ⅲ)parent economic breeding value and family economic genetic value analysis of sugarcane. Sugar Crops of China, 2013(1):5-8. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2624.2013.01.002 |
[1] | 宋松泉,刘军,唐翠芳,程红焱,王伟青,张琪,张文虎,高家东. 种子耐脱水性的生理及分子机制研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1047-1063. |
[2] | 王秀秀,邢爱双,杨茹,何守朴,贾银华,潘兆娥,王立如,杜雄明,宋宪亮. 陆地棉种质资源表型性状综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094. |
[3] | 杜金霞,李奕莎,李美霖,陈文浛,张木清. 甘蔗不同基因型对白条病抗性的评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(21): 4118-4130. |
[4] | 万映伶,朱梦婷,刘爱青,金亦佳,刘燕. 中国观赏芍药表型多样性解析与资源评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(18): 3629-3639. |
[5] | 陈学森,王楠,张宗营,毛志泉,尹成苗. 关于果树种质资源与遗传育种若干问题的理解与思考[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(17): 3395-3410. |
[6] | 杨程,龚桂芝,彭祝春,常珍珍,易璇,洪棋斌. 基于cpInDel标记和cpSSR标记的柑橘属及近缘属植物亲缘关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(16): 3210-3223. |
[7] | 沈志军, 田雨, 蔡志翔, 徐子媛, 严娟, 孙朦, 马瑞娟, 俞明亮. 基于国家果树种质南京桃资源圃的桃褐腐病抗性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(15): 3018-3028. |
[8] | 徐晓,任根增,赵欣蕊,常金华,崔江慧. 中国高粱地方品种和育成品种穗部表型性状精准鉴定及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(11): 2092-2108. |
[9] | 聂兴华, 郑瑞杰, 赵永廉, 曹庆芹, 秦岭, 邢宇. 利用荧光SSR分子标记评估中国栗属植物遗传多样性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(8): 1739-1750. |
[10] | 李凯峰,尹玉和,王琼,林团荣,郭华春. 不同马铃薯品种挥发性风味成分及代谢产物相关性分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(4): 792-803. |
[11] | 李浩,韦本辉,黄金玲,李志刚,王令强,梁晓莹,李素丽. 粉垄对甘蔗根系结构发育及呼吸代谢相关酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(3): 522-532. |
[12] | 李敏, 苏慧, 李阳阳, 李金鹏, 李金才, 朱玉磊, 宋有洪. 黄淮海麦区小麦耐热性分析及其鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(16): 3381-3392. |
[13] | 庄昕波,陈银基,周光宏. 改性甘蔗膳食纤维对猪肉肌原纤维蛋白凝胶特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(15): 3320-3330. |
[14] | 区惠平,周柳强,黄金生,朱晓晖,曾艳,彭嘉宇,谢如林,谭宏伟,李忠宁,沈小微,刘昔辉. 基于甘蔗产量与土壤磷素平衡的磷肥施用量研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(13): 2818-2829. |
[15] | 杨涛,黄雅婕,李生梅,任丹,崔进鑫,庞博,于爽,高文伟. 海岛棉种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(12): 2499-2509. |
|