中国农业科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (15): 2965-2976.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.15.011

所属专题: 蔬菜病虫害生物防治

• 植物保护 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同防治措施对花椰菜地节肢动物群落结构的影响

曾粮斌1,程 毅1,严准1,马 骏2,任顺祥3,魏 林4,薛召东1

 
  

  1. 1中国农业科学院麻类研究所,长沙 410205
    2广东出入境检验检疫局检验检疫技术中心,广州 510623
    3华南农业大学昆虫学系/生物防治教育部工程研究中心,广州 510640
    4湖南省农业科学院植物保护研究所,长沙410125
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-24 出版日期:2016-08-01 发布日期:2016-08-01
  • 通讯作者: 马骏,E-mail:majmail@163.com。薛召东,E-mail:841117557@qq.com
  • 作者简介:曾粮斌,E-mail:zengliangbin@caas.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(31501653)、国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-19-E09)、中国农业科学院科技创新工程(ASTIP-IBFC09)、湖南省现代农业蔬菜产业技术体系

Effects of Different Control Strategies on the Structure of the Arthropod Community in the Cauliflower Field

ZENG Liang-bin1, CHENG Yi1, YAN Zhun1, MA Jun2, REN Shun-xiang3, WEI Lin4, XUE Zhao-dong1   

  1. 1Institute of Bast Fiber Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410205
    2Guangdong Inspection and Quarantine Technology Center, Guangdong Enter-exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Guangzhou 510623
    3Department of Entomology, South China Agricultural University/ Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou 510640
    4Institute of Plant protection, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125
  • Received:2016-02-24 Online:2016-08-01 Published:2016-08-01

摘要: 【目的】明确不同防治措施对花椰菜地节肢动物群落特征的影响,为花椰菜地害虫防治和天敌保护利用提供理论依据。【方法】设置不施药对照区、生物农药防治区和化学农药防治区,按5点随机取样,记录植株和地面所有节肢动物的数量。在田间定点埋放盛有洗衣粉水溶液的玻璃瓶调查在地表活动的节肢动物种类及数量,根据调查结果分析不同防治措施下花椰菜地节肢动物群落特征的差异。【结果】在广州花椰菜地共调查到节肢动物87种,其中植食性害虫29种,捕食性天敌54种,中性昆虫4种。防治措施明显影响节肢动物群落的物种数及其数量。不施药对照区的捕食性天敌、植食性害虫和中性昆虫的数量均高于其他两种施药防治处理区,不同处理区节肢动物群落物种数及其个体数为不施药对照区>生物农药防治区>化学农药防治区。花椰菜地植食性昆虫功能类群的优势集中性以花椰菜苗期为最小,成熟期最大;捕食性天敌的优势集中性在不同防治区同样以苗期相对较小,而在不施药防治对照区花椰菜各生育期,其大小接近一致;在施药防治区,捕食性天敌的优势集中性表现出波动现象。在花椰菜不同生育期以及不同防治措施区节肢动物群落的优势种不同。整个生育期优势度指数>0.1的有烟粉虱、桃蚜、小菜蛾、菜青虫、前凹狼蛛、拟环纹豹蛛和八斑鞘腹蛛。花椰菜地节肢动物群落多样性指数(H ′)在不同防治区和花椰菜各生育期之间均呈现不同程度的差异,各指数之间的变化趋势相似。群落整体多样性指数随花椰菜生长而增大,至中后期达到最大,此结果与田间群落的发展动态相吻合,在不同防治区之间的多样性指数为不施药对照区>生物农药防治区>化学农药防治区。均匀度指数在不同生育期和防治处理区的变化程度相似。害虫亚群落多样性与群落整体多样性变化趋势相似,其多样性指数在花椰菜生长中后期达到最大。不同防治措施区之间的多样性指数为不施药对照区>生物农药防治区>化学农药防治区,其中以化学农药防治区花椰菜苗期为最小。均匀度在花椰菜苗期为最大,而后随花椰菜生长而减小。捕食性天敌亚群落多样性在花椰菜各个生育期和防治处理之间变化相对平稳。地表节肢动物的调查表明,两种药剂处理区所施药剂对地表节肢动物的杀伤较大。同时,从地表节肢动物数量和捕食性天敌的数量动态来看,地表中性昆虫对捕食性天敌前期的定殖有一定的作用。蜘蛛与植食性昆虫、中性昆虫以及捕食性昆虫具有极显著的相关性,捕食性昆虫与中性昆虫之间也具极显著的相关性,表明这些功能团之间在数量上具有较好的跟随效应。捕食性昆虫与植食性昆虫之间相关未能达到显著水平。【结论】药剂防治措施虽然能有效降低害虫的种群数量,但也使天敌数量相应减少。地表中性昆虫对捕食性天敌前期的定殖有一定的作用,药剂防治能影响花椰菜地节肢动物群落特征,生物农药对花椰菜地节肢动物群落影响小于化学农药。

关键词: 花椰菜地, 节肢动物, 植食性害虫, 捕食性天敌, 群落结构

Abstract: 【Objective】The objective of this study is to reveal the effects of different control measures on characteristics of the arthropod animal community in the cauliflower field and provide a theoretical basis for pest control as well as protection and utilization of natural enemies. 【Method】The test ground of this work was divided into biological pesticide control area, chemical pesticide control area and non-pesticide control area. Five random sampling points were picked out and the numbers of all plants and arthropods on the test ground were recorded. Glass bottles with washing powders and water were placed on the set point of the field. The number of arthropod species in the ground was investigated. Cauliflower arthropod community in plots with different control measures were analyzed according to results. 【Result】There were 87 arthropod species in Guangzhou’s cauliflower field, including 29 insect pest species, 54 predator species and 4 neutral insect species. The control measures could obviously affect the diversity of species and the amount of each species of the arthropod communities. In non pesticide control area, the numbers of predators, insect pests and neutral insects were higher than those of the two pesticide control areas. The relationship of arthropod specie numbers and individual numbers among different areas was: non pesticide control area>the biological pesticide control area>the chemical pesticide control area. The dominant concentration of plant herbivore functional groups in cauliflower was at the minimum level at seeding stage and reached the maximum level at maturity stage. The dominant concentration of predatory natural enemies in different pesticide control areas was also relatively low at seedling stage. The concentration of the natural enemies remained at a similar level through different growth stages of the cauliflower in the non pesticide control area. On the other hand, the dominant concentration of predatory natural enemies fluctuated through different growth stages in pesticide control area. Cauliflower arthropod animal community varied at different growth stages and areas with different control measures. During the whole growth period, the species with the dominance index larger than 0.1 were Bemisia tabaci, Myzus persicae, Plutella xylostella, Pieris rapae, Pirata procurvus, Pardosa pseudoannulata and Coleosoma octomaculatum. The indices of cauliflower arthropod community diversity varied in different control areas and at different growth stages. Community overall diversity index (H′) increased following the cauliflower growth and reached maximum at late stage. These results coincided with the development of the field community. The trend of diversity index with different control measures was: non pesticide control area>biological pesticide control area>chemical pesticide control area. The variation of evenness index among different growth stages and different control measures was small. The variation trend in diversity of pest sub-communities and overall community was the same. The diversity index reached the maximum level in the late-mid period of cauliflower growth stage. The relationship among diversity indices with different control measures were: non pesticide control area>biological pesticide control area>chemical pesticide control area, which reached the minimum level at seedling stage of cauliflower in chemical pesticide control area. The evenness at cauliflower seedling stage was the maximum, and then decreased with the growth of cauliflower. In each growth period, the diversity of predator sub-community with different treatments remained relatively stable. The investigation results of the arthropod in the testing ground showed that the killing of the ground arthropod was larger in the two treatment areas. At the same time, it was possible to have a certain effect on the colonization of natural enemies at the early stage of the predatory natural enemies, according to the number of ground surface arthropod and the number of predatory natural enemies. Correlation of spiders with plant herbivore,neutral insects and predatory insects was significant. Correlation between predatory insects and neutral insects was also significant. These results indicated that between these functional groups in the number of compatibility or follow the effect. The correlation between predatory insects and insect herbivores was non-significant. 【Conclusion】The control measures could effectively reduce the population of pests, but also reduced the number of natural enemies. Neutral insects on ground surface would be helpful to early colonized predators. Chemical control could severely affect arthropod community of the cauliflower field, while the biological pesticide control has less influence on arthropod communities compared with the chemical pesticides.

Key words: cauliflower field, arthropod, insect pest, predator, community structure