酿酒酵母菌对绵羊瘤胃上皮细胞β-防御素-1（SBD-1）基因表达的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.19.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】探索益生性酿酒酵母菌对绵羊瘤胃上皮细胞β-防御素-1（sheep beta-defensin-1, SBD-1）表达的调节作用，为在分子水平上揭示益生菌对防御素的调控机理提供一定的理论基础及依据。【方法】首先将新鲜的绵羊瘤胃组织用PBS和抗生素处理后进行瘤胃上皮细胞原代培养，当原代细胞数量长到细胞培养瓶的85%以上时，将细胞传于12孔板用于细胞刺激试验。同时将活化并纯化后的酿酒酵母菌25℃、180 r/min有氧培养48 h后，进行5次平行平板计数试验，根据平板计数的数据处理方法，得到浓度为5.2×10⁸ CFU·mL^-1的酿酒酵母菌液，再通过倍比稀释把所得菌液依次稀释成浓度为5.2×10⁷、5.2×10⁶、5.2×10⁵、5.2×10⁴ CFU·mL^-1的菌液，用以上不同浓度（5.2×10⁴ —5.2×10⁸ CFU·mL^-1）的酿酒酵母菌对体外培养的绵羊瘤胃上皮细胞分别进行不同时间（2、4、8、12、24 h）的刺激，并设置对照组用DMEM/F12培养基代替酿酒酵母菌。然后提取总RNA，逆转录为cDNA后，利用实时荧光定量PCR技术和酶联免疫吸附测定（ELISA）法检测瘤胃上皮细胞中SBD-1表达差异。最后用SAS 9.2软件对数据进行相关差异性分析。【结果】荧光定量PCR结果表明，在各时间组内SBD-1 mRNA的表达量随着菌液浓度的增加均呈先升高后降低的趋势，当菌液浓度为5.2×10⁷ CFU·mL^-1时表达量达到最大，并与对照组和其他浓度组相比差异极显著（P＜0.01）。当菌液浓度一定时，SBD-1 mRNA的表达量先是随着刺激时间的延长而呈上升趋势，刺激时间为12 h时SBD-1 mRNA表达量达到峰值，之后呈下降趋势。因此，当浓度为5.2×10⁷ CFU·mL^-1的菌液刺激瘤胃上皮细胞12 h后，SBD-1基因的表达量达到最高，且与此浓度下其他时间组的表达量相比差异极显著（P＜0.01）。ELISA检测结果显示，SBD-1蛋白表达趋势与SBD-1 mRNA检测结果基本一致。不同浓度的菌液分别刺激绵羊瘤胃上皮细胞2、4、8、12、24 h后均能提高共培养上清中SBD-1蛋白的表达，且与对照组相比存在极显著差异（P＜0.01）。在菌液浓度为5.2×10⁷ CFU·mL^-1刺激瘤胃上皮细胞12 h后SBD-1蛋白分泌水平达到最高，与此浓度下各时间组相比差异极显著（P＜0.01）。【结论】酿酒酵母菌能够提高绵羊瘤胃上皮细胞SBD-1的表达，且菌液浓度为5.2×10⁷ CFU·mL^-1刺激瘤胃上皮细胞12 h后，SBD-1的表达量达到最高。

关键词: &beta, -防御素-1；瘤胃上皮细胞；酿酒酵母菌；实时荧光定量PCR；酶联免疫吸附测定；绵羊

Abstract: 【Objective】The regulatory effect of probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the β-defensin-1 (Sheep Beta-Defensin-1, SBD-1) expression was explored in cultured ruminal epithelial cells of sheep, which would provide a theoretical foundation and basis for the regulation mechanism of probiotics to defensins at the molecular level. 【Method】 Firstly, the primary culture of the sheep ruminal epithelial cells were carried out after treating the sheep ruminal tissue with PBS and antibiotic. When the number of cells in primary cell culture bottles grew to more than 85%, the cells were passaged to 12-well plates for cell stimulation test, meanwhile, a parallel plate count test was conducted for five times after the activated and purified S. cerevisiae were cultured at 25℃, 180 r/min aerobically for 48 h. A concentration of 5.2 × 10⁸ CFU·mL^-1 S. cerevisiae was obtained according to processing method of plate count, then the concentration was further diluted to the concentrations of 5.2×10⁷, 5.2×10⁶, 5.2×10⁵ and 5.2×10⁴ CFU·mL^-1 by a serial dilution. The cultured sheep ruminal epithelial cells were stimulated for different times (2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h) by different concentrations of S. cerevisiae (5.2×10⁴ - 5.2×10⁸ CFU·mL^-1), and a control group was set up with DMEM/F12 medium instead of S. cerevisiae. Secondly, the total RNA was extracted from the tested cells and reversely transcripted into cDNA, then different expressions of SBD-1 were examined by real time fluorescence quantitative PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests. Finally, the related differences analysis of data was done by SAS 9.2 software. 【Result】The realtime fluorescence quantitative PCR results showed that the expression of SBD-1 mRNA in each time group increased and then decreased following the increase of concentrations, the expression of SBD-1 mRNA was the highest when the cells were stimulated with the concentration of 5.2 × 10⁷ CFU·mL^-1, and significantly higher than the control group and the other concentration groups (P＜0.01). When the concentration was constant, the expression of SBD-1 mRNA increased with the extension of stimulating time, which the expression of SBD-1 mRNA was the highest at 12 h, then downward. Therefore, the expression of SBD-1 was the highest at the concentration of 5.2 × 10⁷ CFU·mL^-1 and 12 h stimulating, compared with the other time groups at this concentration was significantly different (P＜0.01 ). The results of ELISA test showed that the expression trend of SBD-1 protein was consistent with the SBD-1 mRNA. After the sheep ruminal epithelial cells were stimulated with different concentrations of S. cerevisiae for 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h, the expression of SBD-1 protein in the co-culture supernatants increased, and there was a significant difference compared with the control group (P＜0.01 ). The expression of SBD-1 protein reached the highest level at concentration of 5.2 × 10⁷ CFU·mL^-1 and 12 h stimulating, the difference was significant compared with the each time group under this concentration (P＜0.01).【Conclusion】The results of this study indicated that S. cerevisiae could improve the expression of SBD-1 in ruminal epithelial cells of sheep. And the level of SBD-1 expression was the highest when the ruminal epithelial cells were stimulated for 12 h with the concentration of 5.2 × 10⁷ CFU·mL^-1.

Key words: β-defensin-1, ruminal epithelial cells, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, realtime fluorescence quantitative PCR, ELISA, sheep

金鑫，张曼，范燕茹，王佩，杨银凤. 酿酒酵母菌对绵羊瘤胃上皮细胞β-防御素-1（SBD-1）基因表达的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(19): 3910-3918.

JIN Xin, ZHANG Man, FAN Yan-ru, WANG Pei, YANG Yin-feng. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the Expression of SBD-1 in Cultured Ruminal Epithelial Cells of Sheep[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(19): 3910-3918.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.19.013

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2015/V48/I19/3910

参考文献

[1] Valdovska A, Jemeljanovs A, Pilmane M, Zitare I, Konosonoka I H, Lazdins M. Alternative for improving gut microbiota: use of Jerusalem artichoke and probiotics in diet of weaned piglets. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2014, 17(1): 61-69.

[2] Semple F, Dorin J R. β-Defensins: Multifunctional modulators of infection, inflammation and more? . Journal of Innate Immunity, 2012, 4: 337-348.

[3] Yang Y F, Wang C Y, Zhao Y F, Yu X B. Reindeer β-defensin-1: Full-length cDNA cloning and tissue expression. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 2009, 131(1/2): 137-139.

[4] Nguyen T X, Cole A M, Lehrer R I. Evolution of primate theta-defensins: a serpentine path to a sweet tooth. Peptides, 2003, 24(11): 1647-1654.

[5] Lynn D J, Bradley D G. Discovery of alpha-defensins in basal mammals. Developmental and Comparative Immunology, 2007, 31(10): 963-967.

[6] Mizukawa N, Sugiyama K, Kamio M, Yamachika E, Ueno T,Fukunaga J, Takagi S, Sugahara T. Immunohistochemical staining of human alpha- defensin-1(HNP-1), in the submandibular glands of patients with oral carcinomas. Anticancer Research, 2000, 20(2B): 1125-1127.

[7] Lehrer R I,Lichtenstein A K,Ganz T. Defensins: antimicrobial and cytotoxic peptides of mammalian cells. Annual Review of Immunology,1993, 11: 105-128.

[8] Tanabe H,Yuan J, Zaragoza M M,Dandekar S, Henschen-Edman A,Selsted M E, Ouellette A J. Paneth cell alpha-defensins from rhesus macaque small intestine. Infection and Immunity, 2004, 72(3): 1470-1478.

[9] Meade K G, Cormican P, Narciandi F, Lloyd A, O'Farrelly C. Bovine β-defensin gene family: opportunities to improve animal health? Physiological Genomics, 2014, 46(1): 17-28.

[10] Xiao Y,Hughes A L,Ando J, Matsuda Y, Cheng J F, Skinner-Noble D, Zhang G. A genome-wide screen identifies a single beta-defensin gene cluster in the chicken: implications for the origin and evolution of mammalian defensins. BMC Genomics,2004, 5(1): 56.

[11] Zhao P W, Cao G F. Production of bioactive sheep β-defensin-1 in Pichia pastoris. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2012, 39(1): 11-17.

[12] Monteleone G, Calascibetta D,Scaturro M, Galluzzo P, Palmeri M, Riggio V,Portolano B. Polymorphisms of β-defensin genes in Valle del Belice dairy sheep. Molecular Biology Reports, 2011, 38(8): 5405-5412.

[13] 盛金良, 陈创夫, 杨霞. 绵羊防御素(sBD1)mRNA在不同发育阶段的组织分布和定量分析. 畜牧兽医学报, 2009, 40(1): 20-25.

Sheng J L, Chen C F, Yang X. Distribution and quantitative assay of sheep β-defensin-1 mRNA in differently developmental stages. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2009, 40(1): 20-25.(in Chinese)

[14] 李砚, 杨银凤. 家畜体内防御素的多态性和表达. 中国畜牧兽医, 2013, 40(3): 160-168.

Li Y, Yang Y F. Research progress of polymorphism and expression of defensins in vivo of livestock. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2013, 40(3): 160-168.(in Chinese)

[15] Galdeano C M, de Moreno de LeBlanc A, Vinderola G,Bonet M E, Perdigón G. Proposed model:mechanisms of immunomodulation induced by probiotic bacteria. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 2007, 14(5): 485-492.

[16] Schlee M, Wehkamp J, Altenhoefer A, Oelschlaeger T A,Stange E F, Fellermann K. Induction of human beta-defensin 2 by the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 is mediated through flagellin. Infection and Immunity, 2007, 75(5): 2399-2407.

[17] Schlee M,Harder J, Köten B,Stange E F,Wehkamp J,Fellermann K. Probiotic lactobacilli and VSL#3 induce enterocyte beta-defensin 2. Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 2008, 151(3): 528-535.

[18] 黎观红, 洪智敏, 贾永杰, 易中华, 瞿明仁, 刘思国. 鼠李糖乳酸杆菌LG_A对鸡小肠上皮细胞β-防御素-9基因表达的影响. 畜牧兽医学报, 2012, 43(4): 634-641.

Li G H, Hong Z M, Jia Y J, Yi Z H, Qu M R, Liu S G. Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus LG_A on β-defensin-9 expression in cultured chicken small intestine epithelial cells. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2012, 43(4): 634-641.(in Chinese)

[19] 洪智敏, 张和平, 贾永杰, 刘思国, 黎观红. 发酵乳酸杆菌F6对鸡小肠上皮细胞β-防御素-9基因表达的影响. 中国兽医学报, 2012, 32(8): 1142-1147.

Hong Z M, Zhang H P, Jia Y J, Liu S G, Li G H. Effect of probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum F6 on β-defensin-9 expression in epithelial cells of chicken small intestine. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science, 2012, 32(8): 1142-1147. (in Chinese)

[20] 刘佳明, 丁卉, 楼永良. 乳杆菌细胞壁成分对小鼠阴道组织β-防御素-2诱导表达的影响. 中国微生态学杂志, 2011, 23(4): 306-309.

Liu J M, Ding H, Lou Y L. Effects of Lactobacillus cell wall extract on the expression of β-defensin-2 in mice vaginal tissues. Chinese Journal of Microecology, 2011, 23(4): 306-309.(in Chinese)

[21] 中华人民共和国农业部公告第2045号. 中国饲料, 2014(2): 1-4.

Ministry of Agriculture of PRC. Public notice No. 2045. China’s Feed, 2014(2): 1-4.(in Chinese)

[22] Klotz J L, Baldwin R L, Gillis R C, Heitmann R N. Refinements in primary rumen epithelial cell incubation techniques. Journal of Dairy Science, 2001, 84(1): 183-193.

[23] 孙志洪, 张庆丽, 贺志雄, 韩雪峰, 谭支良, 张恩平, 汤少勋, 周传社, 王敏. 山羊瘤胃上皮细胞和空肠黏膜上皮细胞原代培养技术研究. 动物营养学报, 2010, 22(3): 602-610.

Sun Z H, Zhang Q L, He Z X, Han X F, Tan Z L, Zhang H P, Tang S X, Zhou C S, Wang M. Research on primary culture method for ruminal epithelial and jejunum epithelial cells of goats. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2010, 22(3): 602-610.(in Chinese)

[24] Schmittgen T D, Zakrajsek B A. Effect of experimental treatment on housekeeping gene expression:validation by real-time,quantitative RT-PCR. Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods, 2000, 46 (1/2): 69-81.

[25] Wehkamp J, Harder J, Wehkamp K, Wehkamp-von Meissner B,Schlee M, Enders C,Sonnenborn U,Nuding S,Bengmark S,Fellermann K, Schröder J M, Stange E F. NF-kappaB-and AP-1- mediated induction of human beta defensin-2 in intestinal epithelial cells by Escherichia coli Nissle 1917: a novel effect of a probiotic bacterium. Infection and Immunity., 2004, 72(10): 5750-5758

[26] Cunliffe R N, Mahida Y R. Expression and regulation of antimicrobial peptides in the gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Leukocyte Biology, 2004, 75(1): 49-58.

[27] Gácser A, Tiszlavicz Z,Németh T, Seprényi G, Mándi Y. Induction of humandefensins by intestinal Caco-2 cells after interactions with opportunistic Candida species. Microbes and Infection, 2014, 16(1): 80-85.