|
|
摘要 Shepherd’s purse seeds were collected from winter wheat fields and road sides in Hebei Province, China. Their sensitivitiesto tribenuron-methyl were evaluated in a whole plant dose response assay in the greenhouse. Results revealed that HB-1, HB-2, HB-3, HB-4, HB-6, HB-7, HB-17, HB-18, HB-19, HB-20, HB-21, and HB-22 populations were susceptible to tribenuronmethylcharacterised by very low GR50 values of about 0.10 g a.i. ha-1. On the other hand, populations HB-15 and HB-16had moderate resistance to tribenuron-methyl with resistance indices (RI) ranging from 10-100 folds, whilst populationsHB-5, HB-8, HB-9, HB-10, HB-11, HB-12, HB-13, and HB-14 expressed high level of resistance to tribenuron-methyl withresistance indices over 100. The proportion of moderate resistance level was about 9.09%, and that of high resistance wasabout 36.36%.
Abstract Shepherd’s purse seeds were collected from winter wheat fields and road sides in Hebei Province, China. Their sensitivitiesto tribenuron-methyl were evaluated in a whole plant dose response assay in the greenhouse. Results revealed that HB-1, HB-2, HB-3, HB-4, HB-6, HB-7, HB-17, HB-18, HB-19, HB-20, HB-21, and HB-22 populations were susceptible to tribenuronmethylcharacterised by very low GR50 values of about 0.10 g a.i. ha-1. On the other hand, populations HB-15 and HB-16had moderate resistance to tribenuron-methyl with resistance indices (RI) ranging from 10-100 folds, whilst populationsHB-5, HB-8, HB-9, HB-10, HB-11, HB-12, HB-13, and HB-14 expressed high level of resistance to tribenuron-methyl withresistance indices over 100. The proportion of moderate resistance level was about 9.09%, and that of high resistance wasabout 36.36%.
|
|
Received: 06 September 2010
Accepted:
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence ZHANG Hong-jun, Senior Agronomist, Tel: +86-10-59194094, Email:
zhanghongjun@agri.gov.cn
E-mail: wt3326@sohu.com
|
| About author: WANG Gui-qi, Professor, Tel: +86-311-87670632, E-mail: wt3326@sohu.com |
Cite this article:
WANG Gui-qi, CUI Hai-lan, ZHANG Hong-jun, ZHANG Yan-qiu, LIU Xue, LI Xiang-ju, FAN Cuiqin.
2011.
Tribenuron-Methyl Resistant Shepherd’s Purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.) in Hebei Province of China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 10(8): 1241-1245.
|
| [1] Beckie H J, Hall L M, Tardif F J, Seguin-Swartz G. 2007.Acetolactate synthase inhibitor-resistant stinkweed (Thlaspiarvense L.) in Alberta. Canadian Journal Plant Science, 87,965-972.[2] Bernasconi P, Woodworth A R, Rosen B A, Subramanian M V,Siehl D L. 1995. A naturally occurring point mutation confersbroad range tolerance to herbicides that target acetolactatesynthase. Journal Biology and Cheimistry, 270, 17381-17385.[3] Cai H Q, Bao Z J, Cheng Y Z. 2010. The advantages anddisadvantages of shepherd’s purse. Shanghai AgriculturalScience and Technology, 1, 145. (in Chinese)[4] Chaleff R S, Mauvais C J. 1984. Acetolactate synthase is the siteof action of two sulfonylurea herbicides in higher plants.Science, 224, 1443-1445.[5] Corbett C A, Tardif F J. 2006. Detection of resistance toacetolactate synthase inhibitors in weeds with emphasis onDNA-based techniques: a review. Pest Management Science,62, 584-597.[6] Cui H L, Zhang C X, Zhang H J, Liu X, Liu Y, Wang G Q, HuangH J, Wei S H. 2008. Confirmation of flixweed (Descurainiasophia) resistance to tribenuron in China. Weed Science, 56,775-779.[7] Duggleby R G, McCourt J A, Guddat L W. 2008. Structure andmechanism of inhibition of plant acetohydroxyacid synthase.Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 46, 309-324.[8] Durner J, Gailus V, Boger P. 1990. New aspects on inhibition ofplant acetolactate synthase by chlorsulfuron and imazaquin.Plant Physiology, 95, 1144-1149.[9] Gerwick B C, Subramanian M V, Loney-Gallant V I. 1990.Mechanism of action of the 1,2,4-triazolo [1,5-a] pyrimidines. Pesticide Science, 29, 357-364.[10] [GRIN] USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National GeneticResources Program. Germplasm Resources InformationNetwork - (GRIN) (Online Database). 2010. Capsella Bursa-Pastoris Information From NPGS/GRIN. NationalGermplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland.[2010-07-05].[11] http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/tax_searchHeap I. 2010. The International Survey of Herbicide ResistantWeeds. [2010-03-18].[12] http://www.weedscience.comICAMA (Institute for Control of Agrichemicals, Ministry ofAgriculture). 1988. The Bulletins of the Pesticide Registrationin China. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, China. p. 166. (inChinese).Kudsk P, Mathiassen S K, Cotterman J C. 1995. Sulfonylurearesistance in Stellaria media (L.) Vill. Weed Research, 35, 19-24.[13] McNaughton E J Letarte, Lee E A, Tardif F J. 2005. Mutationsin ALS confer herbicide resistance in redroot pigweed(Amaranthus retroflexus) and Powell amaranth (Amaranthuspowellii). Weed Science, 53, 17-22.[14] Moodie M, Finch R P, Marshall G. 1997. Analysis of geneticvariation in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) using molecularmarkers. Weed Science, 45, 102-107.[15] Patzoldt W L, Tranel P J. 2002. Molecular analysis of cloransulamresistance in a population of giant ragweed. Weed Science,50, 299-305.[16] Rajguru S N, Burgos N R, Shivrain V K, Stewart J M. 2005.Mutations in the red rice ALS gene associated with resistanceto imazethapyr. Weed Science, 53, 567-577.[17] Saari L L, Cotterman J C, Smith W F, Primiani M M. 1992.Sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in common chickweed,perennial ryegrass, and Russian thistle. PesticideBiochemistry and Physiology, 42, 110-118.[18] Shaner D L. 1999. Resistance to acetolactate synthase (ALS)inhibitors in the United States: history, occurrence, detectionand management. Weed Science, 44, 405-411.[19] Shaner D L, Anderson P C, Stidham M A. 1984. Imidazolinones:potential inhibitors of acetohydroxyacid synthase. PlantPhysiology, 76, 545-546.[20] Smit J J, Cairns A L P. 2001. Resistance of Raphanusraphanistrum to chlorsulfuron in the Republic of South Africa.Weed Research, 41, 41-47.[21] Stidham M A. 1991. Herbicides that inhibit acetohydroxyacidsynthase. Weed Science, 39, 428-434.[22] Stromme K M, Horsman G P, Devine M D. 1998. Resistance toacetolactate synthase inhibitors and quinclorac in a populationof false cleavers (Galium spurium). Weed Science, 46, 390-396.[23] Sun J, Wang J X, Zhang H J, Liu J L, Bian S N. 2010. Study onmutations in ALS of resistance to tribenuron-methyl inGalium aparine L. Scientia Agricltura Sinica, 43, 972-977.(in Chinese)[24] Tranel P J, Wright T R. 2002. Resistance of weeds to ALSinhibitingherbicides: what have we learned? Weed Science,50, 700-712.[25] Tranel P J, Wright T R, Heap I M. 2010. ALS mutations fromherbicide-resistant weeds. [2010-02-10].[26] http://www.weedscience.org[USDA] USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2010.Plants Profile for Capsella Bursa-Pastoris. [2010-07-05].[27] http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=CABU2Warwick S I, Xu R, Sauder C, Beckie H J. 2008. Acetolactatesynthase targetsite mutations and single nucleotidepolymorphism genotyping in ALS-resistant kochia (Kochiascoparia). Weed Science, 56, 797-806.[28] Whaley C M, Wilson H P, Westwood J H. 2007. A new mutationin plant ALS confers resistance to five classes of ALSinhibitingherbicides. Weed Science, 55, 83-90.[29] Woodworth A, Bernasconi P, Subramanian M, Rosen B. 1996. Asecond naturally occurring point mutation confers broadbasedtolerance to acetolactate synthase inhibitors. PlantPhysiology, 111, S105.Yu Q, Zhang X Q, Hashem A, Walsh M J, Powles S B. 2003. ALSgene proline (197) mutations confer ALS herbicide resistancein eight separated wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum)populations. Weed Science, 51, 831-838.[30] Zhang F H. 1987. The damage and control of shepherd’s purse.Weed Science, 2, 15-17. (in Chinese)[31] Zhang Z P. 2003. Development of chemical weed control andintegrated weed management in China. Weed Biology andMangement, 3, 197-203. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
