Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2026, Vol. 25 Issue (6): 2255-2267    DOI: 10.1016/j.jia.2026.04.019
Section 3: Impacts and Effects Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Does the usage of online agricultural information reduce agrochemical expenses in China?

Junzhe Hu, Lena Kuhn, Ihtiyor Bobojonov#, Mashkhura Babadjanova, Zhanli Sun

Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), Halle (Saale) 06120, Germany


 Highlights 

Online agricultural information increases agrochemical spending among Chinese family farms, particularly among smallholders.

Poor information quality limits the potential sustainability gains of online agricultural information.  

Education and digital literacy are key to increasing the positive potential of digital information.


Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Motivated by growing concerns about excessive agrochemical use and the resulting environmental pollution in China, this study explores the importance of online agricultural information for chemical fertilizer and pesticide use decisions among grain farmers.  In particular, we focus on the functional agricultural information used for productive purposes for smallholders.  Based on a survey dataset of 1,833 family farms across five Chinese provinces, we employ a propensity score matching (PSM) approach to estimate treatment effects of online agricultural information.  The results reveal that online acquisition of agricultural information does not reduce the expenses of chemical fertilizers and pesticides in our sample; rather, the opposite is true.  The use of online agricultural information significantly increased agrochemical expenses, particularly among smallholders.  Within our sample region, the limited evolution of online information content and the inherent challenges faced by smallholder farmers are the major barriers to the beneficial effects of online agricultural information in reducing agrochemical use.  Our findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions and educational efforts to bridge the knowledge gaps of smallholders.  Furthermore, there is a need to raise awareness among information providers to ensure that their recommendations avoid encouraging overdoses of agrochemicals.  In addition, enhancing farmers’ digital literacy will be a future task of development policy.

 

Keywords:  digitalization       propensity score matching        sustainability        chemical fertilizer        pesticides  
Received: 10 December 2024   Accepted: 01 March 2026 Online: 15 April 2026  
Fund: 

We acknowledge financial support from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01DO21009).

About author:  #Correspondence Ihtiyor Bobojonov, E-mail: Bobojonov@iamo.de

Cite this article: 

Junzhe Hu, Lena Kuhn, Ihtiyor Bobojonov, Mashkhura Babadjanova, Zhanli Sun. 2026. Does the usage of online agricultural information reduce agrochemical expenses in China?. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 25(6): 2255-2267.

Aker J C. 2011. Dial “A” for agriculture: A review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries. Agricultural Economics42, 631–647.

Al-Hassan M. 2013. Farm household level impacts of information communication technology (ICT)-based agricultural market information in Ghana. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics5, 161–167.

Asongu S, le Roux S, Nwachukwu J C, Pyke C. 2019. The mobile phone as an argument for good governance in sub-Saharan Africa. Information Technology and People32, 897–920.

Bai X, Wang Y, Huo X, Salim R, Bloch H, Zhang H. 2019. Assessing fertilizer use efficiency and its determinants for apple production in China. Ecological Indicators104, 268–278.

Baourakis G, Kourgiantakis M, Migdalas A. 2002. The impact of e-commerce on agro-food marketing: The case of agricultural cooperatives, firms and consumers in Crete. British Food Journal104, 580–590.

Becerril J, Abdulai A. 2010. The impact of improved maize varieties on poverty in Mexico: A propensity score-matching approach. World Development38, 1024–1035.

El Bilali H, Allahyari M S. 2018. Transition towards sustainability in agriculture and food systems: Role of information and communication technologies. Information Processing in Agriculture5, 456–464.

Binswanger H P, Sillers D A. 1983. Risk aversion and credit constraints in farmers’ decision-making: A reinterpretation. The Journal of Development Studies20, 5–21.

Caliendo M, Kopeinig S. 2008. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys22, 31–72.

CAGDRS (China Agricultural Green Development Research Society), IARRP (Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning). 2022. China Agricultural Green Development Report. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)

CINIC (China Internet Network Information Center). 2022. The 50th Statistical Report on China’s Internet Development. (in Chinese)

Cole S A, Fernando A N. 2012. The value of advice: Evidence from mobile phone-based agricultural extension. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 13-047, November 2012.

Cooper J, Dobson H. 2007. The benefits of pesticides to mankind and the environment. Crop Protection26, 1337–1348.

Cruz J L, Albisu L M, Zamorano J P, Sayadi S. 2022. Agricultural interactive knowledge models: Researchers’ perceptions about farmers’ knowledges and information sources in Spain. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension28, 325–340.

Dehejia R H, Wahba S. 2002. Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics84, 151–161.

Deichmann U, Goyal A, Mishra D. 2016. Will digital technologies transform agriculture in developing countries? Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 47, 21–33.

Emileva B, Kuhn L, Bobojonov I, Glauben T. 2023. The role of smartphone-based weather information acquisition on climate change perception accuracy: Cross-country evidence from Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia and Uzbekistan. Climate Risk Management41, 100537.

Freeman K, Qin H. 2020. The role of information and interaction processes in the adoption of agriculture inputs in Uganda. Agronomy10, 202.

Fu X, Akter S. 2016. The Impact of mobile phone technology on agricultural extension services delivery: Evidence from India. The Journal of Development Studies52, 1561–1576.

Gao Y, Zhao D, Yu L, Yang H. 2020. Influence of a new agricultural technology extension mode on farmers’ technology adoption behavior in China. Journal of Rural Studies76, 173–183.

Gonel F, Akinci A. 2018. How does ICT-use improve the environment? The case of Turkey. World Journal of ScienceTechnology and Sustainable Development15, 2–12.

Gong Y, Baylis K, Kozak R, Bull G. 2016. Farmers’ risk preferences and pesticide use decisions: Evidence from field experiments in China. Agricultural Economics47, 411–421.

Ha L T, Huong T T L, Thanh T T. 2022. Is digitalization a driver to enhance environmental performance? An empirical investigation of European countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption32, 230–247.

Heckman J J, Ichimura H, Todd P. 1998. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. The Review of Economic Studies65, 261–294.

ITU (International Telecommunication Union). 2021. ITU Data Hub. https://datahub.itu.int/

Issahaku H, Abu B M, Nkegbe P K. 2018. Does the use of mobile phones by smallholder maize farmers affect productivity in Ghana? Journal of African Business19, 302–322.

Jin S, Bluemling B, Mol A P J. 2015. Information, trust and pesticide overuse: Interactions between retailers and cotton farmers in China. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences72–73, 23–32.

Ju X T, Xing G X, Chen X P, Zhang S. L, Zhang L J, Liu X J, Cui Z L, Yin B, Christie P, Zhu Z L, Zhang F S. 2009. Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America106, 3041–3046.

Kaila H, Tarp F. 2019. Can the Internet improve agricultural production? Evidence from Viet Nam. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 50, 675–691.

Kang H, Baek J, Chu S H, Choi J Y. 2023. Digital literacy among Korean older adults: A scoping review of quantitative studies. Digital Health,9, 20552076231197334.

Kang S, Ait Sidhoum A, Frick F, Sauer J, Zheng S. 2023. The impact of information and communication technology on the technical efficiency of smallholder vegetable farms in Shandong of China. Q Open3, 1–21.

Li X, Wu L, Gao H, Hu N. 2024. Can digital literacy improve organic fertilizer utilization rates?: Empirical evidence from China. EnvironmentDevelopment and Sustainability26, 1–26.

Li X, Yu G, Wen L, Liu G. 2023. Research on the effect of agricultural science and technology service supply from the perspective of farmers’ differentiation. Innovation and Green Development2, 100055.

Li Z, Hu R, Zhang C, Xiong Y, Chen K. 2022. Governmental regulation induced pesticide retailers to provide more accurate advice on pesticide use to farmers in China. Pest Management Science78, 184–192.

Liu E M, Huang J K. 2013. Risk preferences and pesticide use by cotton farmers in China. Journal of Development Economics103, 202–215.

Ma W, Zheng H. 2022. Heterogeneous impacts of information technology adoption on pesticide and fertiliser expenditures: Evidence from wheat farmers in China. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics66, 72–92.

MOA (Ministry of Agriculture of China). 2014. From small farmers to family farms: China’s agriculture is on the way out of the “small farmers’ dilemma.” [2026-3-26]. https://www.moa.gov.cn/hd/zbft_news/jtncqk/xgxw_25828/201410/t20141010_4100530.htm (in Chinese)

MOA (Ministry of Agriculture of China). 2015. Notice of the Ministry of Agriculture on issuing the “Action plan for zero growth in fertilizer use by 2020” and the “Action plan for zero growth in pesticide use by 2020.” [2026-3-26]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/govpublic/ZZYGLS/201503/t20150318_4444765.htm (in Chinese)

MARA (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China). 2021. The fertilizer and pesticide utilization rates of China’s three major food crops both exceeded 40%. [2026-3-26]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/xw/bmdt/202101/t20210119_6360102.htm (in Chinese)

MARA (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China) 2022b. Notice of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs on the issuance of the “Action plan for the reduction of chemical fertilizers by 2025” and the “Action plan for the reduction of chemical pesticides by 2025.” [2026-3-26]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/govpublic/ZZYGLS/202212/t20221201_6416398.htm (in Chinese)

Menapace L, Colson G, Raffaelli R. 2013. Risk Aversion, Subjective beliefs, and farmer risk management strategies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics95, 384–389.

Mwalupaso G E, Korotoumou M, Eshetie A M, Essiagnon Alavo J P, Tian X. 2019. Recuperating dynamism in agriculture through adoption of sustainable agricultural technology - Implications for cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production232, 639–647.

Na H Kang J. 2023. Research on the impact of Internet use on fertilizer and pesticide inputs: Empirical evidence from China. Heliyon9, e20816.

NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China). 2022. China Rural Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, China. (in Chinese)

Nikam V, Ashok A Pal S. 2022. Farmers’ information needs, access and its impact: Evidence from different cotton producing regions in the Maharashtra State of India. Agricultural Systems196, 103317.

Ogutu S O, Okello J J, Otieno D J. 2014. Impact of information and communication technology-based market information services on smallholder farm input use and productivity: The case of Kenya. World Development64, 311–321.

Peng D, Li Y, Li C. 2019. The influence of Internet use on environmental attitude and literacy. Finance and Economics8, 97–109.

Pesci S, Galt R E, Durant J L, Manser G M, Asprooth L, Pinzón N. 2023. A digital divide in direct market farmers’ online sales and marketing: Early pandemic evidence from California. Journal of Rural Studies101, 103038.

Pimentel D, Acquay H, Biltonen M, Rice P, Silva M, Nelson J, Lipner V, Giordano S, Horowitz A, D’Amore M. 1992. Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use. Bioscience42, 750–760.

Priya E, Sarkar S, Maji P K. 2024. A review on slow-release fertilizer: Nutrient release mechanism and agricultural sustainability. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering12, 113211.

Rajkhowa P, Qaim M. 2021. Personalized digital extension services and agricultural performance: Evidence from smallholder farmers in India. PLoS ONE16, e0259319.

Ren C, Jin S, Wu Y, Zhang B, Kanter D, Wu B, Xi X, Zhang X, Chen D, Xu J, Gu B. 2021. Fertilizer overuse in Chinese smallholders due to lack of fixed inputs. Journal of Environmental Management293, 112913.

Rosenbaum P R. 2002. Overt Bias in Observational Studies. Springer, New York, NY.

Rosenbaum P R, Rubin D B. 1985. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician39, 33–38.

Rust N A, Stankovics P, Jarvis R M, Morris-Trainor Z, de Vries J R, Ingram J, Mills J, Glikman J A, Parkinson J, Toth Z, Hansda R, McMorran R, Glass J, Reed M S. 2022. Have farmers had enough of experts? Environmental Management69, 31–44.

Sharma D R, Thapa R B, Manandhar H K, Shrestha S M, Pradhan S B. 2012. Use of pesticides in Nepal and impacts on human health and environment. Journal of Agriculture and Environment13, 67–74.

Sheng Y, Ding J, Huang J. 2019. The relationship between farm size and productivity in agriculture: Evidence from maize production in Northern China. American Journal of Agricultural Economics101, 790–806.

Smith H L. 1997. Matching with multiple controls to estimate treatment effects in observational studies. Sociological Methodology27, 325–353.

Smith J A, Todd P E. 2005. Does matching overcome LaLonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics125, 305–353.

Su L, Kong R. 2020. Does Internet use improve rural households’ entrepreneurial performance? An empirical analysis based on endogenous switching regression model. Chinese Rural Economy19, 62–80. (in Chinese)

Sun S, Hu R, Zhang C. 2021. Pest control practices, information sources, and correct pesticide use: Evidence from rice production in China. Ecological Indicators129, 107895.

Ullah A, Arshad M, Kächele H, Khan A, Mahmood N, Müller K. 2020. Information asymmetry, input markets, adoption of innovations and agricultural land use in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Land Use Policy90, 104261.

Wang Y, Hao F. 2018. Does Internet penetration encourage sustainable consumption? A cross-national analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption16, 237–248.

Wilson C, Tisdell C. 2001. Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs. Ecological Economics39, 449–462.

Wood C W, Torbert H A, Weaver D B. 1993. Nitrogen fertilizer effects on soybean growth, yield, and seed composition. Journal of Production Agriculture6, 354–360.

Wu Y, Xi X, Tang X, Luo D, Gu B, Lam S K, Vitousek P M, Chen D. 2018. Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America115, 7010–7015.

Yan D, Zheng S. 2021. Impact of the use of modern communication technology on farmers’ factor input: Based on evidence from vegetable growers in Shouguang of Shandong Province. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 21, 137–148. (in Chinese)

Ye Q, Rozelle S. 1994. Fertilizer demand in China’s reforming economy. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Agroeconomie42, 191–207.

Yin X, Yu X, Su Q, Li D. 2023. The impact of internet embedding on farmers’ use of chemical pesticides - Metrological analysis based on PSM model. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning44, 68–76. (in Chinese)

Yuan F, Tang K, Shi Q. 2021. Does Internet use reduce chemical fertilizer use? Evidence from rural households in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research28, 6005–6017.

Zeng J. 2023. The impact of different uses of the internet on professional farmers’ adoption of green technology for preventing and controlling diseases and pests: Based on 2544 farmers nationwide. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Social Sciences), 24, 35–44. (in Chinese)

Zhang J, Cheng M, Wei X, Gong X, Zhang S. 2019. Internet use and the satisfaction with governmental environmental protection: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production212, 1025–1035.

Zhang Q F, Wu M. 2024. The decline and transformation of smallholders in Chinese agriculture: National trends. Journal of Peasant Studies52, 485–512.

Zhang W F, Dou Z X, He P, Ju X T, Powlson D, Chadwick D, Norse D, Lu Y L, Zhang Y, Wu L, Chen X P, Cassman K G, Zhang F S. 2013. New technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogenous fertilizer in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America110, 8375–8380.

Zhao Q, Pan Y, Xia X. 2021. Internet can do help in the reduction of pesticide use by farmers: Evidence from rural China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research28, 2063–2073.

Zhu H, Song C. 2020. The impact of Internet use on labor resource allocation in family farms. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics304, 40–53. (in Chinese)

Zhu Q, van der Voort M, Ren G, Bai J. 2023. Impact of information and communication technologies on fertilizer and pesticide use efficiency of China’s grain production. Review of Development Economics27, 2331–2356.


No related articles found!
No Suggested Reading articles found!