|
|
|
|
|
| Does poverty-alleviation-based industry development improve farmers’ livelihood capital? |
| LIU Ming-yue1, FENG Xiao-long2, WANG San-gui3, ZHONG Yu1 |
1 Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
2 College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, P.R.China
3 School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, P.R.China |
|
|
|
|
摘要
精准扶贫是中国全面建设小康社会、实现中华民族伟大“中国梦”的重要保障。产业扶贫是精准扶贫“五个一批”工程的重头戏，也是其他扶贫措施取得实效的重要基础。本文基于可持续生计框架，采用综合评价方法测度农户的生计资本，进而利用PSM-DID方法估计产业扶贫对农户生计资本的影响效应。结果显示，产业扶贫对农户生计资本有显著的正向影响，能显著提升农户的人力资本、社会资本和金融资本，但对自然资本和物质资本的影响不显著。产业扶贫对农户生计资本的影响具有异质性，对非贫困户的影响显著于贫困户。另外，产业扶贫对农户生计资本的影响也存在地区差异，对贵州农户的影响大于四川，但对甘肃农户的影响不显著。针对以上结论，未来需要通过加大人力资本培育力度、增强金融资本创新手段、发挥社会资本引导作用等提高农户的可持续生计，同时更要加大对贫困户的产业扶持力度。
Abstract Targeted poverty alleviation is a unique approach adopted in China to help achieve the vision of a moderately prosperous society in all aspects and the “Chinese Dream”. Industrial development as a means of poverty alleviation is an integral part of the “Five-pronged Poverty Alleviation Measures” Project of targeted poverty alleviation, and a critical foundation for other poverty alleviation measures. In this study, a comprehensive evaluation method was used to measure farmers’ livelihood based on the framework of sustainable livelihood. Specifically, the effects of industrial development on farmers’ livelihood capital were estimated by employing the propensity score matching combined with the difference-in-differences (PSM-DID) approach. Findings suggest that industrial development had a significantly positive effect on the livelihood capital of farmers. Industrial development can significantly enhance farmers’ human, social and financial capital, while it cannot significantly affect the natural and physical capital. Industrial development had heterogeneous effects on farmers’ livelihood capital, more efficiently impacting on the non-poor than the poor. The effects on farmers’ livelihood capital varied across regions, with Guizhou experiencing a larger effect than Sichuan. However, the effect was insignificant for farmers in Gansu. To improve farmers’ livelihood capital, it is necessary to take measures to strengthen their human capital, promote the innovation of financial products, and make good use of their social capital; it is also essential to strengthen the support of industrial development to the poor.
|
|
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72003185 and 71661147001). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence WANG San-gui, Tel: +86-10-82509150, E-mail: wangsg@ruc.edu.cn; ZHONG Yu, Tel: +86-10-82109807, E-mail: zhongyu@caas.cn
|
| About author: LIU Ming-yue, E-mail: liumingyue@caas.cn; |
Cite this article:
LIU Ming-yue, FENG Xiao-long, WANG San-gui, ZHONG Yu.
2021.
Does poverty-alleviation-based industry development improve farmers’ livelihood capital?. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(4): 915-926.
|
Ahsan M N, Warner J. 2014. The socioeconomic vulnerability index: A pragmatic approach for assessing climate change led risks - A case study in the south-western coastal Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10, 32–49.
Ali A, Abdulai A. 2010. The adoption of genetically modified cotton and poverty education in Pakistan. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 175–192.
Azam M. 2018. Does social health insurance reduce financial burden? Panel data evidence from India. World Development, 102, 1–17.
Chen C W, Chen J P, Tao J K. 2018. Industry poverty alleviation: Foreign experience and its policy implications. Economic Geography, 38, 127–134. (in Chinese)
Duong P B, Thanh P T. 2019. Adoption and effects of modern rice varieties in Vietnam: Micro-econometric analysis of household surveys. Economic Analysis and Policy, 64, 282–292.
Ellis F. 2000. Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 10–11.
Hu H, Si Y F, Wang L J. 2018. The impact of industrial poverty alleviation strategies on the livelihoods and household incomes of the rural poor: An empirical analysis from Shaanxi Province. Chinese Rural Economy, (1), 78–89. (in Chinese)
I??k A T, Adal? E A. 2017. The decision-making approach based on the combination of entropy and ROV methods for the apple selection problem. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3, 80–86.
Krantz L. 2001. The Sustainable Livelihood Approach to Poverty Reduction. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Sweden. pp. 1–2.
Lee W S. 2013. Propensity score matching and variations on the balancing test. Empirical Economics, 44, 47–80.
Lei X, Lin W. 2010. The new cooperative medical scheme in rural China: Does more coverage mean more service and better health? Health Economics, 18, S25–S46.
Li B, Zuo T. 2016. Discussion about the implementation logic in poverty alleviation through rural industrialization from the perspective of precise poverty alleviation - A case study of greenhouse vegetable industry in Y village. Journal of Southwest University (Social Science edition), 42, 66–73. (in Chinese)
Li M, Gan C, Ma W L, Jiang W. 2020. Impact of cash crop cultivation on household income and migration decisions: Evidence from low-income regions in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19, 2571–2581.
Li Y, Li Y, Su B. 2016. Realizing targeted poverty alleviation in China: People’s voices, implementation challenges and policy implications. China Agricultural Economic Review, 8, 443–454.
Liang Y, Zhou K, Lin X, Zhou Z, Sun W, Zeng J. 2020. Effectiveness of high-speed railway on regional economic growth for less developed areas. Journal of Transport Geography, 82, 1–10.
Lin W L, Hua Z Y, Xu N. 2018. Main modes, practice dilemmas and solutions of industrial poverty alleviation - Based on the findings from field survey in several poverty counties of Henan, Hunan, Hubei and Guangxi. Economic Review Journal, (7), 102–108. (in Chinese)
Liu J, Yang Z S, Xiong Y, He Y B, Lu C H, He Y M, Yang R Y. 2019. The mode of promoting industrial targeted poverty alleviation through land circulation in western mountainous region of China - A case study of Luquan Yi and Miao Autonomous County in Yunnan Province. Asian Agricultural Research, 11, 68–79.
Liu J S, Chen X, Cao J H. 2017. The mechanism of the industrialization of precise poverty alleviation. China Population, Resources and Environment, 27, 127–135. (in Chinese)
Liu M Y, Chen F F, Wang S G, Qiu H G. 2019. Mechanism and effect of industry investment fund. China Soft Science, (7), 25–34. (in Chinese)
Liu M Y, Feng X L, Wang S G, Qiu H G. 2020. China poverty alleviation over the last 40 years: Successes and challenges. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 64, 209–228.
Liu W B, Yu X Y, Yuan P J. 2019. The impact of industrial poverty alleviation on livelihood strategies and income levels of poor farmers in ethnic areas. Economic Geography, 39, 175–182. (in Chinese)
Liu Y, Liu J, Zhou Y. 2017. Spatio-temporal patterns of rural poverty in China and targeted poverty alleviation strategies. Journal of Rural Studies, 52, 66–75.
Ma W, Renwick A, Yuan P, Ratna N. 2018. Agricultural cooperative membership and technical efficiency of apple farmers in China: An analysis accounting for selectivity bias. Food Policy, 81, 122–132.
Manyara G, Jones E. 2007. Community-based tourism enterprises development in Kenya: An exploration of their potential as avenues of poverty reduction. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15, 628–644.
NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China). 2020. Fang Xiaodan: China’s rural poor population has reduced by 11.09 million in 2019. [2020-01-23]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/sjjd/202001/t20200123_1724700.html (in Chinese)
Nelson R, Kokic P, Crimp S, Martin P, Meinke H. 2010. The vulnerability of Australian rural communities to climate variability and change: Part II - Integrating impacts with adaptive capacity. Environmental Science & Policy, 13, 18–27.
Ning Z K. 2017. Information impact on rural households’ livelihoods and policy in contiguous destitute areas of China. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science edition), 17, 123–133. (in Chinese)
Powell-Jackson T, Hanson K. 2012. Financial incentives for maternal health: Impact of a national programme in Nepal. Journal of Health Economic, 31, 271–284.
Ravallion M. 2005. Evaluating anti-poverty programs. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 3625. pp. 1–74.
Sen A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 87–110.
Shannon C E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.
Smith J A, Todd P E. 2005. Does matching overcome LaLonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics, 125, 305–353.
Spenceley A, Meyer D. 2012. Tourism and poverty reduction: Theory and practice in less economically developed countries. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20, 297–317.
Su D, Chen Y, Gao H, Li H, Chang J, Jiang D, Hu X, Lei S, Tan M, Chen Z. 2019. Effect of integrated urban and rural residents medical insurance on the utilisation of medical services by residents in China: A propensity score matching with difference-in-differences regression approach. BMJ Open, 9, e026408.
Tollefson J. 2015. Can randomized trials eliminate global poverty?. Nature, 524, 150–153.
Villa J M. 2016. Diff: Simplifying the estimation of difference-in-differences treatment effects. Stata Journal, 16, 52–71.
Wang C P, Zheng Y. 2017. The research context and theme content of Chinese industrial poverty alleviation since 21st century. China Population, Resources and Environment, 27, 145–154. (in Chinese)
Wu L J, Liu B, Tang Y P. 2019. The effect of industrial poverty alleviation on the income of poor households - Based on 1047 household data in Jiangxi Province. The World of Survey and Research, (10), 16–20.
Xiong F P, Qing L, Xiao X P. 2015. Evaluation and analysis of regional innovation ability in China based on overall entropy method. Operations Research and Management Science, 24, 155–162.
Xu H S, Yue Z. 2012. Livelihood capital, livelihood risk, and risk management strategy of the peasant household. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 33, 100–105. (in Chinese)
Xu H Z, Li X Y. 2017. Operating difficulties and explanations of industry poverty alleviation projects under the accurate poverty alleviation perspective-with greenhouse vegetable project in Licun Village in North China as an example. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 17, 9–16. (in Chinese)
Xu X, Liu E S. 2011. Innovative research on financing mode of industrial poverty alleviation. Economic Review Journal, (7), 85–88. (in Chinese)
Xu X G, Shen P. 2018. Research on sustainable livelihoods of relocate migrants based on poverty alleviation investigation and analysis on the migrants of Guizhou Province. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, (1), 103–110. (in Chinese)
You L, Wei R S. 2020. Industrial poverty alleviation model of “village party branch+cooperative”: Operational effectiveness, practical difficulties and policy suggestions. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology (Social Sciences), 22, 1–10. (in Chinese)
Zhang X, Wang C, Li E, Li E K, Xu C D. 2014. Assessment model of eco-environmental vulnerability based on improved entropy weight method. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 1–7.
Zhu J J, Hu J L, An K, Huo M. 2016. Analysis on the choice of livelihood strategies of peasant households who rent out the farmland and the influencing factors: Based on CFPS data. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 37, 49–58. (in Chinese)
Zou Z H, Yi Y, Sun J N. 2006. Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 18, 1020–1023. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
