Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2013, Vol. 12 Issue (8): 1363-1370    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60544-4
Special Focus: Water Versus Energy Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Technologies for Efficient Use of Irrigation Water and Energy in China
 ZHANG  Qing-tao, XIA  Qing, Clark  C K Liu , Shu  Geng
1.Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, School of Environment and Energy, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, P.R.China
2.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu 96822, USA
3.Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  While the shortage of water and energy is a well-recognized worldwide natural resources issue, little attention has been given to irrigation energy efficiency. In this paper, we examine the potential energy savings that can be achieved by implementing improved irrigation technologies in China. The use of improved irrigation management measures such as a flow meter, irrigation scheduling, and/or regular maintenance and upgrades, typically reduces the amount of water pumped over the course of a growing season. The total energy saved by applying these improved measures could reach 20%, as compared with traditional irrigation methods. Two methods of irrigation water conveyance by traditional earth canal and low pressure pipeline irrigation (LPPI) were also evaluated. Our study indicated that LPPI could save 6.48×109 kWh yr-1 when applied to 11 Chinese provinces. Also, the CO2 emission was reduced by 6.72 metric tons per year. Among these 11 surveyed provinces, the energy saving potential for two provinces, Hebei and Shandong, could reach 1.45×109 kWh yr-1. Using LPPI, potential energy saved and CO2 emissions reduced in the other 20 Chinese provinces were estimated at about 2.97×109 kWh yr-1 and 2.69 metric tons per year, respectively. The energy saving potential for Heilongjiang, a major agriculture province, could reach 1.77×109 kWh yr-1, which is the largest in all provinces. If LPPI is applied to the entire country, average annual energy saving of more than 9 billion kWh and average annual CO2 emission reduction of more than 9.0 metric tons could be realized. Rice is one of the largest users of the world’s fresh water resources. Compared with continuous flooding irrigation, intermittent irrigation (ITI) can improve yield and water-use efficiency in paddy fields. The total increments of net output energy and yield by ITI in paddy fields across China could reach 2.5×1016 calories and 107 tons, respectively. So far only a small part of agricultural land in China has adopted water and energy saving technologies. Therefore, potential water and energy savings in China by adapting improved irrigation technology could be significant and should be carefully studied and applied.

Abstract  While the shortage of water and energy is a well-recognized worldwide natural resources issue, little attention has been given to irrigation energy efficiency. In this paper, we examine the potential energy savings that can be achieved by implementing improved irrigation technologies in China. The use of improved irrigation management measures such as a flow meter, irrigation scheduling, and/or regular maintenance and upgrades, typically reduces the amount of water pumped over the course of a growing season. The total energy saved by applying these improved measures could reach 20%, as compared with traditional irrigation methods. Two methods of irrigation water conveyance by traditional earth canal and low pressure pipeline irrigation (LPPI) were also evaluated. Our study indicated that LPPI could save 6.48×109 kWh yr-1 when applied to 11 Chinese provinces. Also, the CO2 emission was reduced by 6.72 metric tons per year. Among these 11 surveyed provinces, the energy saving potential for two provinces, Hebei and Shandong, could reach 1.45×109 kWh yr-1. Using LPPI, potential energy saved and CO2 emissions reduced in the other 20 Chinese provinces were estimated at about 2.97×109 kWh yr-1 and 2.69 metric tons per year, respectively. The energy saving potential for Heilongjiang, a major agriculture province, could reach 1.77×109 kWh yr-1, which is the largest in all provinces. If LPPI is applied to the entire country, average annual energy saving of more than 9 billion kWh and average annual CO2 emission reduction of more than 9.0 metric tons could be realized. Rice is one of the largest users of the world’s fresh water resources. Compared with continuous flooding irrigation, intermittent irrigation (ITI) can improve yield and water-use efficiency in paddy fields. The total increments of net output energy and yield by ITI in paddy fields across China could reach 2.5×1016 calories and 107 tons, respectively. So far only a small part of agricultural land in China has adopted water and energy saving technologies. Therefore, potential water and energy savings in China by adapting improved irrigation technology could be significant and should be carefully studied and applied.
Keywords:  water and energy efficiency       irrigation management       low pressure pipeline irrigation       energy saving potential       intermittent irrigation  
Received: 17 October 2012   Accepted:
Fund: 

The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31270748 and 91025008), the Shenzhen Science and Technologies Development Plan Program of China (JC201005280681A).

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence Shu Geng, Tel: +86-755-26032802, Fax: +86-755-26032078, E-mail: gengxu@pkusz.edu.cn     E-mail:  gengxu@pkusz.edu.cn

Cite this article: 

ZHANG Qing-tao, XIA Qing, Clark C K Liu , Shu Geng. 2013. Technologies for Efficient Use of Irrigation Water and Energy in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(8): 1363-1370.

[1]Bhuyan S I. 2004. Modernization of rice irrigation systems:implications for diversified cropping. In: PaperPresented at the FAO Expert Consultation onModernization of Irrigation Schemes. Food andAgriculture Organization, Bangkok.Bouman

[2]B A M, Lampayan R M, Tuong T P. 2007. WaterManagement in Irrigated Rice: Coping with WaterScarcity. International Rice Research Institute, LosBanos, Philippines. p. 54.

[3]Dawe D. 2005. Water productivity in rice-based systems inAsia - variability in space and time. Plant ProductionScience, 8, 221-230

[4]Deike S, Pallutt B, Christen O. 2008. Investigations on theenergy efficiency of organic and integrated farming withspecific emphasis on pesticide use intensity. EuropeanJournal of Agronomy, 28, 461-470

[5]Fredrich K, David R H. 2008. China’s water-energy nexus.Water Policy, 10(Suppl.), 51-65

[6]Hulsbergen K J, Feil B, Biermann S, Rathke G W, Kalk W D,Diepenbrock W. 2001. A method of energy balancing incrop production and its application in a long-termfertilizer trial. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,86, 303-321

[7]Liu X C. 2011. The irrigation system of low pressure pipeand surge flow irrigation with perforated flexible pipe.MSc thesis, Southwest University. (in Chinese)Ministry of Water Resources. 2009. Water ResourcesBulletin. Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing, China.(in Chinese)

[8]Mittal V K, Dhawan K C. 1989. Energy parameters forraising crops under various irrigation treatments inIndian agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems andEnvironment, 25, 11-25

[9]Mrini M, Senhaji F, Pimentel D. 2001. Energy analysis ofsugarcane production in Morocco. Environment,Development and Sustainability, 3, 109-126

[10]Mushtaq S, Maraseni T N, Maroulis J, Hafeez M. 2009.Energy and water tradeoffs in enhancing food security:A selective international assessment. Energy Policy,37, 3635-3644

[11]Naylor L R. 1996. Energy and resource constraints onintensive agricultural production. Annual Review ofEnergy and the Environment, 21, 99-123

[12]NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China). 2011. ChinaStatistics Yearbook 2010. China Statistics Press,Beijing, China. (in Chinese)Ni H, Dai G J, Ye J G, Chen Y H, Chen Z F. 1997. Influence ofdifferent irrigation methods on energy consumptionand yield of rice. Shanghai Agriculture Technology, 2,24-25

[13](in Chinese)Nie X, Wang Y Y, Liu X T, Zhao Z C. 2011. Influence ofintermittent irrigation on water consumption and yieldof cold rice in Northeast China. Journal of Food,Agriculture and Environment, 9, 3-4

[14]Peart R M, Curry R B, Rosenzweig C, Jones J W, Boote K J,Allen Jr L H. 1995. Energy and irrigation in south easternU.S. agriculture under climate change. Journal ofBiogeography, 22, 635-642

[15]Pimentel D, Hurd L E, Bellotti A C, Forester M J, Oka I N.1973. Food production and energy crisis. Science, 182,443-449

[16]Pimentel D, Pimentel M. 2003. World population, food,natural resources, and survival. World Futures, 59, 145-167

[17]Pimentel D, Herz M, Whitecraft M, Zimmerman M, Allen R,Becker K, Evans J, Hussan B, Sarsfield R, Grosfeld A,et al. 2002a. Renewable energy: current and potentialissues. Bioscience, 52, 1111-1120

[18]Pimentel D, Doughty R, Carothers C, Lamberson S, Bora N,Lee K. 2002b. Energy inputs in crop production:comparison of developed and developing countries.In: Lal L, Hansen D, Uphoff N, Slack S, eds., FoodSecurity & Environmental Quality in the DevelopingWorld. Chemical Rubber Company Press, Boca Raton,FL. pp. 129-151

[19]Qiu G Y, Yin J, Geng S. 2012. Impact of climate and land-usechanges on water security for agriculture in NorthernChina. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 11, 144-150

[20]Rijsberman F R. 2006. Water scarcity: fact or fiction?Agricultural Water Management, 80, 5-22

[21]Schnoor J L. 2011. Water-energy nexus. EnvironmentalScience and Technology, 45, 5065-5065

[22]Siddiqi A, Anadon L D. 2011. The water-energy nexus inMiddle East and North Africa. Energy Policy, 39, 4529-4540

[23]Singh H, Mishra D, Nahar N M. 2002. Energy use pattern inproduction agriculture of a typical village in arid zone,India - part I. Energy Conversion and Management,43, 2275-2286

[24]Topak R, Süheri S, Kara M, Çalisir S C. 2005. Investigationof the energy efficiency for raising crops under sprinklerirrigation in semi-arid area. Applied Engineering inAgriculture, 21, 761-768

[25]Tuong T P, Bouman B A M. 2003. Rice production in waterscarce environments. In: Kijne J W, Barker R, MoldenD, eds., Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits andOpportunities for Improvement. CABI Publishing,Wallingford, UK. pp. 53-67

[26]Tuong T P, Bouman B A M, Mortimer M. 2005. More rice,less water: integrated approaches for increasing waterproductivity in irrigated rice-based systems in Asia.Plant Production Science, 8, 231-241

[27]Wang J X, Rothausen S G S A, Conway D, Zhang L J,Xiong W, Holman I P, Li Y M. 2012. China’s waterenergynexus: greenhouse-gas emissions fromgroundwater use for agriculture. EnvironmentalResearch Letters, 7, 1-10

[28]Yan Z Y, Bai Y H. 1988. The effective measure of savingwater and energy for agriculture - low pressure pipelineirrigation. Journal of Economics of Water Resources,2, 57-59.
[1] Clinton C Shock, Candace B Shock. Research, Extension, and Good Farming Practices Improve Water Quality and Productivity[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2012, 12(1): 14-30.
No Suggested Reading articles found!