|
|
|
Evaluation of Lethal Effects of Chlorantraniliprole on Chilo suppressalis and Its Larval Parasitoid, Cotesia chilonis |
HUANG Jia; WU Shun-fan and YE Gong-yin |
State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Ministry of Agriculture/Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects,Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University |
|
|
摘要 Chlorantraniliprole was introduced into China from 2008 as a novel insecticide to control the rice stem borer, Chilosuppressalis (Walker). Cotesia chilonis (Matsumura) is the major parasitoid of C. suppressalis. We collected sevenpopulations of C. suppressalis and two populations of C. chilonis in different locations in China in 2009 to investigate thelethal effects of chlorantraniliprole on them. The populations of C. suppressalis from different regions showed variousLD50 values ranging from 2.00 to 18.70 ng per larva. Chlorantraniliprole has negligible acute contact toxicity (LC50>500 mgL-1) to C. chilonis and its oral toxicity is also much lower than that of fipronil (>2 800-fold difference in LC50). The resultsindicated that chlorantraniliprole is a good alterative in rice integrated pest management (IPM) programs. The susceptibilitydata of C. suppressalis will be useful for monitoring resistance levels in future.
Abstract Chlorantraniliprole was introduced into China from 2008 as a novel insecticide to control the rice stem borer, Chilosuppressalis (Walker). Cotesia chilonis (Matsumura) is the major parasitoid of C. suppressalis. We collected sevenpopulations of C. suppressalis and two populations of C. chilonis in different locations in China in 2009 to investigate thelethal effects of chlorantraniliprole on them. The populations of C. suppressalis from different regions showed variousLD50 values ranging from 2.00 to 18.70 ng per larva. Chlorantraniliprole has negligible acute contact toxicity (LC50>500 mgL-1) to C. chilonis and its oral toxicity is also much lower than that of fipronil (>2 800-fold difference in LC50). The resultsindicated that chlorantraniliprole is a good alterative in rice integrated pest management (IPM) programs. The susceptibilitydata of C. suppressalis will be useful for monitoring resistance levels in future.
|
Received: 25 January 2011
Accepted: 14 August 2011
|
Corresponding Authors:
YE Gong-yin, Professor, Ph D, Tel: +86-571-86971696, Fax: +86-571-86049815, E-mail: chu@zju.edu.cn
E-mail: huangj@zju.edu.cn
|
About author: HUANG Jia, Ph D |
Cite this article:
HUANG Jia; WU Shun-fan and YE Gong-yin.
2011.
Evaluation of Lethal Effects of Chlorantraniliprole on Chilo suppressalis and Its Larval Parasitoid, Cotesia chilonis. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 10(7): 1134-1138.
|
[1] Brown J J. 1996. The compatibility of tebufenozide with alaboratory lepidopteran host hymenopteran parasitoidpopulation. Biological Control, 6, 96-104[2] Chen H C, Lou Y G, Cheng J A. 2002. Research and applicationof Apanteles chilonis, a parasitoid of rice striped stemborer Chilo suppressalis. Chinese Journal of Biological Control,18, 90-93[3] Chi S Y, Peng Y, Wang Y C, Han Z J, Chen C K. 2005. Advances in the research of insecticide resistance of Chilo suppressalis.Plant Protetion, 31, 3-6[4] Cloyd R A, Bethke J A. 2011. Impact of neonicotinoid insecticides on natural enemies in greenhouse and interiorscape environments. Pest Management Science, 67, 3-9[5] Cordova D, Benner E A, Sacher M D, Rauh J J, Sopa J S, LahmG P, Selby T P, Stevenson T M, Flexner L, Gutteridge S, et al 2006. Anthranilic diamides: A new class of insecticides witha novel mode of action, ryanodine receptor activation Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 84, 196-214[6] Decourtye A, Devillers J. 2010. Ecotoxicity of neonicotinoidinsecticides to bees. In: Thany S H, ed., Insect NicotinicAcetylcholine Receptors. Springer, New York. pp. 85-95[7] Fang Q, Huang C H, Ye G Y, Yao H W, Cheng J A, Akhtar Z R 2008. Differential fipronil susceptibility and metabolism intwo rice stem borers from China. Journal of EconomicEntomology, 101, 1415-1420[8] FAO 1980. Method for larvae of the rice stem borer (Chilosuppressalis Walker), FAO method No. 3. In: FAO, ed., Plant Production and Protection Paper 21: Recommended Methodsfor Measurement of Pest Resistance to Pesticides. Rome,FAO. pp. 25-28[9] Hailemichael Y, Schulthess F, Smith J, Overholt W, Chabi-OlayeA. 2008. Resource allocation and bionomics of indigenousand exotic Cotesia (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) species rearedon Sesamia calamistis. Bulletin of Entomological Research,98, 405-415[10] He Y P, Gao C F, Chen W M, Huang L Q, Zhou W J, Liu X G,Shen J L, Zhu Y C. 2008. Comparison of dose responses andresistance ratios in four populations of the rice stem borer,Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), to 20insecticides. Pest Management Science, 64, 308-315[11] Hu J, Chen W M, Zhang Z Z, Zhen X S, Jin J C, Su J Y, Gao CF, Shen J L. 2010. Insecticide resistance monitoring of Chilosuppressalis in the drainage area of the Yangtze River, China Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 24, 509-515. (in Chinese)Jiang X J, Qu M J, Denholm I, Fang J C, Jiang W H, Han Z J 2009. Mutation in acetylcholinesterase1 associated withtriazophos resistance in rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis(Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Biochemical and BiophysicalResearch Communications, 378, 269-272[12] Jones W A, Ciomperlik M A, Wolfenbarger D A. 1998. Lethaland sublethal effects of insecticides on two parasitoidsattacking Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) Biological Control, 11, 70-76[13] Lahm G P, Cordova D, Barry J D. 2009. New and selectiveryanodine receptor activators for insect control. Bioorganic& Medicinal Chemistry, 17, 4127-4133[14] Lahm G P, Selby T P, Freudenberger J H, Dubas C M, Smith BK, Cordova D, Flexner L, Clark C E, Bellin C A, HollingshausJ G. 2007. RynaxypyrTM: A new anthranilic diamide insecticideacting at the ryanodine receptor. In: Ohkawa H, MiyagawaH, Lee P W, eds., Pesticide Chemistry: Crop Protection, PublicHealth, Environmental Safety. WILEY-VCH, Weinheim. pp111-120[15] Li X, Schuler M A, Berenbaum M R. 2007. Molecular mechanismsof metabolic resistance to synthetic and natural xenobiotics Annual Review of Entomology, 52, 231-253[16] Liu H, Li S, Wang M, Zhang G. 2008. The optimized artificialdiet of the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis. Chinese Bulletinof Entomology, 45, 310-314[17] Nauen R, Stumpf N, Elbert A. 2002. Toxicological andmechanistic studies on neonicotinoid cross resistance in QtypeBemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). PestManagement Science, 58, 868-875[18] Okech S H O, Overholt W A. 1996. Comparative biology ofCotesia chilonis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on selectedAfrican gramineous stemborers. Biocontrol Science andTechnology, 6, 595-602[19] Prabhaker N, Morse J G, Castle S J, Naranjo S E, Henneberry TJ, Toscano N C. 2007. Toxicity of seven foliar insecticides tofour insect parasitoids attacking citrus and cotton pests Journal of Economic Entomology, 100, 1053-1061[20] Preetha G, Stanley J, Suresh S, Kuttalam S, Samiyappan R 2009. Toxicity of selected insecticides to Trichogrammachilonis: Assessing their safety in the rice ecosystem Phytoparasitica, 37, 209-215[21] Scharf M E, Siegfried B D, Meinke L J, Chandler L D. 2000 Fipronil metabolism, oxidative sulfone formation and toxicityamong organophosphate- and carbamate-resistant andsusceptible western corn rootworm populations. PestManagement Science, 56, 757-766[22] Sheng C F, Wang H T, Sheng S Y, Gao L D, Xuan W J. 2003. Peststatus and loss assessment of crop damage caused by the riceborers, Chilo suppressalis and Tryporyza incertulas in China Entomological Knowledge, 40, 289-294[23] Tang Q Y, Feng M G. 2007. DPS Data Processing System:Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis, and Data Mining Science Press, Beijing Tingle C C, Rother J A, Dewhurst C F, Lauer S, King W J. 2003 Fipronil: environmental fate, ecotoxicology, and human healthconcerns. Reviews of Environmental Contamination &Toxicology, 176, 1-66[24] Yang Y X, Jin S Q, Li S N, Wei F L, Zhu G N. 2008. Oral toxicityand risk of five insecticides to honeybees. Chinese Jounal ofPesticide Sciences, 10, 226-231[25] Wu G, Miyata T, Kang C Y, Xie L H. 2007. Insecticide toxicityand synergism by enzyme inhibitors in 18 species of pestinsect and natural enemies in crucifer vegetable crops. PestManagement Science, 63, 500-510 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|