Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (7): 1412-1420.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.07.018

• AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY & MANAGMENT • Previous Articles    

Comparison Study on the Level of International Agricultural Modernization Based on the Method of Generation Gap of Industry Elements

HU ZhiQuan1, ZHU DianXiao1, XIN Ling1, HOU LiWei1, WANG DongYang2   

  1. 1Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 2 Institute of Food and Nutrition Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2017-04-24 Online:2018-04-01 Published:2018-04-01

Abstract: 【Objective】Agriculture modernization is an important part of achieving the ‘four Modernization Synchronization’ development in China. Gap analysis on agricultural modernization development between China and developed countries is helpful to figure out the global positioning of Chinese agricultural modernization. 【Method】 The related references sourced from FAO promoted that agricultural modernization development was a gradual principle process, which was companied with a trend of serious of basic character change. The acknowledgement of the inner principle of agricultural modernization development was the necessary precondition among international comparison. On that base, the paper promoted two core hypothesis, which contained that agricultural modernization development had the common trait, similar historical steps with corresponding characters among different countries; core index of changing rate were same in the steps of agricultural modernization according to different countries, were the base of generation gap to study the comparison of international agricultural modernization development. Therefore, the formulation of generation gap among different index was as follows: Dj=Ya-Wjb±(Xa-Xjb)/Xjb Based on the related references at home and aboard, a comprehensive index system was built to compare the agricultural modernization development, which was composed of four one-level indexes (Agricultural Economic Benefit, Transformation of Economic Structure, Rural Economic and Social Development and Agricultural sustainable development) and ten second-level indexes. The paper focused on typical countries such as USA, UK, Japan, India, Brazil, South Africa and China to make international comparison, of which, the started early agricultural modernization in the USA, the UK, and Japan could be taken as a long-time comparison in agricultural modernization development due to their historical traits in agricultural modernization development. Meanwhile, Brazil, India and South Africa could be selected as typical countries in comparison, for that the above countries were all belong to developing countries in high speed development, with the many similar opportunities, challenge, policy making and lessons.【Result】The current level of agricultural modernization development in China acted properly as the same level in the end of 1960s to the beginning of 1980s in the USA and the UK, and the beginning of 1990s’ in Japan, which had the similar developing steps in India and Brazil. With respect of sub-index, the unequilibrium agricultural modernization in China was caused by the diversification and low coupling of the core index, which restricted the overall progress of agricultural modernization.【Conclusion】The generation gap analysis was available for evaluate agricultural modernization development, which was easy access to the international comparison and could be used as a tool to analyze agricultural modernization and appraisal agricultural modernization development.

Key words: agricultural modernization, development level, generation gap method, international comparison

[1]    约翰·梅尔. 农业经济发展学. 北京: 农村读物出版社, 1988: 102-110.
MEL J. Agricultural Economic Development. Beijing: Rural Books Publishing House, 1988: 102-110. (in Chinese)
[2]    速水佑次郎, 弗农·拉坦. 农业发展: 国际前景.吴伟东,译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1993: 58-63.
HAYAMI Y, VERNON N. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. WU W D, Translate. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1993: 58-63. (in Chinese)
[3]    徐星明, 杨万江. 我国农业现代化进程评价. 农业现代化研究,  2000(5): 276-282.
XU X M, YANG W J. An evaluation on the progress of agricultural modernization in China. Agricultural Modernization Research, 2000(5): 276-282 . ( in Chinese)
[4]    张炳江. 层次分析法及其应用案例. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2014: 32-43.
ZHANG B J. Analytic Hierarchy Process and Some Examples of Its Applications. Beijing: Electronic Industry Press, 2014: 32-43. (in Chinese)
[5]    翟虎渠, 曾希柏, 沈贵银, 蒋和平. 现代农业科技园区评价指标体系研究. 农业现代化研究, 2003( 1): 40-44.
ZHAI H Q, ZENG X B, SHEN G Y, JIANG H P. Evaluating criterion system for modern agricultural science Technology Area. Agricultural Modernization Research, 2003(1): 40-44. (in Chinese)
[6]    辛玲, 蒋和平. 我国农业现代化发展水平评价指标体系的构建和测算. 农业现代化研究,  2010(6): 646-650.
XIN L, JIANG H P. Setting up evaluation index system and calculation development level of china agricultural modernization. Agricultural Modernization Research, 2010(6): 646-650. (in Chinese)
[7]    蒋和平, 崔凯. 我国粮食主产区农业现代化指标体系的构建和测算及发展水平评价. 农业现代化研究,  2011(6): 646-650.
JIANG H P, CUI K. Construction and measuring of agricultural modernization evaluation index system on major grain producing areas in China. Agricultural Modernization Research, 2011(6): 646-650. ( in Chinese)
[8]    郭冰阳. 中国农业现代化评价体系的研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2006.
GUO B Y. The research on evaluation system of agricultural modernization in China[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2006. (in Chinese)
[9]    林英华, 李红. 基于因子分析法的聊城市农业现代化水平评价研究. 中国农学通报, 2012(22): 403-406.
LIN Y H, LI H. Research on the level of agricultural modernization in Liaocheng---Based on factor analysis. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin , 2012(22): 403-406. (in Chinese)
[10]   杨梅. 基于因子分析的我国农业现代化水平评价. 现代商贸工业,  2011(4): 3-4.
YANG M. Evaluation of agricultural modernization level in China based on factor analysis. Modern Business Trade Industry, 2011(4): 3-4. (in Chinese)
[11]   沈琦胡, 资骏. 我国农业现代化评价指标体系的优化模型—基于聚类和因子分析法. 农业经济, 2012(5): 3-5.
SHEN Q H, ZI J. Optimization model of agricultural modernization evaluation index system based on clustering and factor analysis. Agricultural Economy, 2012(5): 3-5. (in Chinese)
[12]   杨万江. 现代农业发展阶段及中国农业发展的国际比较. 中国农村经济, 2001(1): 12-18.
YANG W J. Modern agricultural development stage and international comparison of Chinese agricultural development. Rural economy of China, 2001(1):12-18. (in Chinese)
[13]   吴振兴. 我国农业现代化的国际比较研究. 热带农业科学,  2003(2): 10-20.
WU Z X. The international comparison of Chinese agricultural modernization. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2003(2): 10-20. (in Chinese)
[14]   何传启. 中国现代化报告2012: 农业现代化研究. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012: 164-167.
He C Q. Chinese Modernization Report 2012: Agricultural Modernization Research. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2012: 164-167. (in Chinese)
[15]   Schultz T W. Transforming Traditional Agricultural. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1964: 200-203.
[16]   FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture 2000. Rome: FAO.
[17]   黄庆华. 发达国家农业现代化模式选择对重庆的启示—来自美日法三国的经验比较. 农业经济问题, 2013(4): 11-16.
HUANG Q H. The enlightenment of the choices of agricultural modernization mode in developed countries to Chongqing – the comparison of experience from the United States, Japan and France. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2013(4):11-16. (in Chinese)
[18]   王文峰. 日本、法国、巴西与中国农业现代化发展的比较. 世界农业, 2013(6): 6-11.
WANG W F. Comparison of the development of agricultural modernization in Japan, France, Brazil and China.  World Agriculture, 2013(6): 6-11. (in Chinese)
[19]   邓兰燕. 国外二元经济结构转型理论对我国的启示. 农业经济, 2013(2):10-13.
DENG L Y. The inspiration of international dual economic structure transformation theories in China. Agricultural Economy, 2013(2): 10-13. (in Chinese)
[20]   朱晓明. 中国农业现代化评价指标体系的建立与实证研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2013.
ZHU X M. The establishment of evaluation index system and empirical research of the agricultural modernization in China[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese)
[21]   ANDREOLI M. Farm sustainability evaluation: methodology and practice. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2000(77): 43-52.
[22]   QIU H J. Analysis and design of agricultural sustainability indicators system. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2007 (4): 475-486.
[23]   GERDESSEN C J. Data envelopment analysis of sustainability indicators of European agricultural systems at regional level. Agricultural Systems, 2013(118): 78-90.
[24]   CAUWENBERGH N V. SAFE—A hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2007(120): 229-242.
[25]   WANG Y C. Evaluation of development of agricultural modernization in central China, A methodological approach to assess and compare the sustainability level of an agricultural plant production systems. IERI Procedia, 2013(4): 417-424.
[26]   CHRISTOF W. A new method for assessing the sustainability of land-use systems (II): Evaluating impact indicators. Ecological Economics, 2009(68):1288-1300.
[27]   TAKASHI H. A holistic sustainability assessment tool for bioenergy using the Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) sustainability indicators. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2014(66) :70-80 .
[28]   Thiviergea M N. Environmental sustainability indicators for cash-crop farms in Quebec, Canada: A participatory approach. Ecological  Indicators, 2014(45): 677-686.
[29]   胡守勇. 新型城镇化与农业现代化的内在逻辑. 农民日报, 2014-07-30(3).
HU S Y. The internal logic between new urbanization and agricultural modernization. Farmers’ Daily, 2014-07-30(3). (in Chinese)
[30]   马玉琪. 我国城镇化与农业现代化关系实证分析. 时代经贸, 2012 (5): 3-7.
MA Y Q. An empirical analysis of the relationship between urbanization and agricultural modernization in China. Time Economy and Trade, 2012(5): 3-7. (in Chinese)
[31]   程丹, 薛莎莎, 郭丽娟, 李富忠. 城镇化与农业现代化的耦合关系研究. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(3): 1359-1361.
Cheng D, XUE S S, GUO L J, LI F Z. Coupling relationship between urbanization and agricultural modernization. Journal of Anhui Agriculture Science, 2013, 41(3): 1359-1361. (in Chinese)
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!