Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 10-22.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.01.02

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Identification of QTL/Segments Related to Agronomic Traits Using CSSL Population Under Multiple Environments

XIANG Shi-hua, WANG Wu-bin, HE Qing-yuan, YANG Hong-yan, LIU Cheng, XING Guang-nan, ZHAO Tuan-jie, GAI Jun-yi   

  1. Soybean Research Institute, Nanjing Agricultural University/National Center for Soybean Improvement/MOA Key Laboratory for Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General) / National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing 210095
  • Received:2014-06-11 Online:2015-01-01 Published:2015-01-01

Abstract: 【Objective】 The present study was aimed to take a first step of the improvement of the previously reported chromosome segment substitution line (CSSL) population SojaCSSLP1, and to explore superior QTL/gene-alleles related to some agronomic traits from the wild parent (Glycine soja Sieb. et Zucc.) for broadening the genetic basis of cultivated soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). 【Method】 The SojaCSSLP1, with the wild soybean N24852 as donor parent and the cultivated soybean NN1138-2 as recurrent parent, was treated with adding markers and removing a number of lines with segment of single marker, the new population was designated as SojaCSSLP2. By using the new population, the QTL/segments for flowering time (FT), plant height (PH), node number (NN), pod number per plant (PN), 100-seed weight (100SW) and seed weight per plant (PSW) were detected through joint comparisons among CSSLs significantly different from the recurrent parent based on QTL mapping with the methods of single marker analysis (SMA), interval mapping (IM), inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) and mixed linear composite interval mapping (MCIM), for experiments in three years each with two locations. 【Result】SojaCSSLP2 was composed of 150 CSSLs, of which 130 ones were the same as SojaCSSLP1, added 40 new SSR markers into the previous molecular map, resulted in the average genetic distance and the number of lines with genetic distance more than 30 cM between adjacent markers reduced from 16.15 cM and 32 to 12.91 cM and 17, respectively. The total length of the genetic map increased by 103.52 cM in comparison to the original map (2 063.04 cM). The genome component of NN1138-2 in CSSLs ranged from 79.45% to 99.70% with an average of 94.62% in SojaCSSLP2. Tested in three years and two locations, 4, 5, 5, 7, 14 and 3 working QTL/segments were identified for FT, PH, NN, PN, 100SW and PSW, respectively, with the improved population. Of those, 15 QTL/segments were joint working QTL which could be detected in more than one environment. The directions of additive effects for wild alleles were consistent with that expected from the parental phenotypes except segment of Sct_190-Sat_293 for NN. Among the QTL, the individual QTL could explain 5% to 64% of the phenotypic variation. There were 3, 2 and 2 QTL/fragments that interacted with locations for PH, NN and NP, respectively, and the interactions associated with Fengyang could increase the value of phenotype, which may be due to its higher latitude than that of Nanjing. These detected loci distributed on 26 substituted segments, among them seven related to more than one trait, which might be the genetic basis of correlation among the traits. Compared with the results in the literature, 3, 3, 2, 2, 8 and 2 QTL could also be detected in other cultivated soybeans for FT, PH, NN, 100SW and PSW, respectively, indicating allele differentiation happened not only between wild and cultivated but also among cultivated soybeans. The other 18 loci/segments were newly discovered in the wild soybean.【Conclusion】 The genetic base of FT, PH and NN are much simpler than that of 100SW. There was a large effect QTL (PV<10%) in the former, while the later is controlled by many small effect loci (PV<10%) with complicated genetic bases. Using the wild soybean, the novel alleles with the capability of broadening the genetic base of cultivated soybean can be explored.

Key words: wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. et Zucc.), cultivated soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), chromosome segment substitution line (CSSL), agronomic trait

[1]    吴晓雷, 王永军, 贺超英, 陈受宜, 盖钧镒, 王学臣. 大豆重要农艺性状的QTL分析. 遗传学报, 2001, 28(10): 947-955.
Wu X L, Wang Y J, He Y C, Chen S Y, Gai J Y. QTLs Mapping of some agronomic traits of soybean. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 2001, 28(10): 947-955. (in Chinese)
[2]    Eshed Y, Zamir D. A genomic library of Lycopersicon pennellii in L. esculentum: A tool for fine mapping of genes. Euphytica, 1994, 79(3): 175-179.
[3]    Wan X Y, Weng J F, Zhai H Q, Wang J K, Lei C L, Liu X L, Guo T, Jiang L, Su N, Wan J M. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis for rice grain width and fine mapping of an identified QTL allele gw-5 in a recombination hotspot region on chromosome 5. Genetics, 2008, 179(4): 2239-2252.
[4]    Alpert K B, Tanksley S D. High-resolution mapping and isolation of a yeast artificial chromosome contig containing fw2.2: A major fruit weight quantitative trait locus in tomato. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 1996, 93(26): 15503-15507.
[5]    Wang W, He Q, Yang H, Xiang S, Zhao T, Gai J. Development of a chromosome segment substitution line population with wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. et Zucc.) as donor parent. Euphytica, 2013, 189(2): 293-307.
[6]    盖钧镒, 邱家驯, 赵团结. 大豆品种南农493-1和南农1138-2与其衍生新品种的亲缘关系及其育种价值分析. 南京农业大学学报, 1997, 20(1): 1-8.
Gai J Y, Qiu J X, Zhao T J. An analysis of genetic relationship of Nannong493-1 and Nannong 1138-2 with their derivative cultivars and their potential in future breeding. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 1997, 20(1): 1-8. (in Chinese)
[7]    Song Q, Jia G, Zhu Y, Grant D, Nelson R T, Hwang E Y, Hyten D L, Cregan P B. Abundance of SSR motifs and development of candidate polymorphic SSR markers (BARCSOYSSR_1.0) in soybean. Crop Science, 2010, 50: 1950-1960.
[8]    盖钧镒.作物育种学各论. 第二版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 235-236.
Gai J Y. Plant Breeding (Species). 2nd Ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006: 235-236. (in Chinese)
[9]    Van Berloo R. GGT 2.0: Versatile software for visualization and analysis of genetic data. Journal of Heredity, 2008, 99(2): 232-236.
[10]   Manly K F, Cudmore J R H, Meer J M. Map Manager QTX, cross-platform software for genetic mapping. Mammalian Genome, 2001, 12(12): 930-932.
[11]   Li H H, Ye G Y, Wang J K. A modified algorithm for the improvement of composite interval mapping. Genetics, 2007, 175(1): 361-374.
[12]   Yang J, Hu C, Hu H, Yu R, Xia Z, Ye X, Zhu J. QTLNetwork: Mapping and visualizing genetic architecture of complex traits in experimental populations. Bioinformatics, 2008, 24(5): 721-723.
[13]   Song Q J, Marek L F, Shoemaker R C, Lark K G, Concibido V C, Delannay X, Specht J E, Cregan P B. A new integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2004, 109(1): 122-128.
[14]   吕祝章, 杨建华, 李玉环, 常汝镇, 邱丽娟. 大豆农艺性状的QTL分析. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(6): 2838-2841.
Lü Z Z, Yang J H, Li Y H, Chang R Z, Qiu L J. QTL analys is of agronomic traits in soybean. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 2010, 38(6): 2838-2841. (in Chinese)
[15]   张军, 赵团结, 盖钧镒. 大豆育成品种农艺性状QTL与SSR标记的关联分析. 作物学报, 2008, 34(12): 2059-2069.
Zhang J, Zhao T J, Gai J Y. Association analysis of agronomic trait QTLs with SSR markers in released soybean cultivars. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(12): 2059-2069. (in Chinese)
[16]   Su C F, Lu W G, Zhao T J, Gai J Y. Verification and fine-mapping of QTLs conferring days to flowering in soybean using residual heterozygous lines. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(6): 499-508.
[17]   Reinprecht Y, Poysa V W, Yu K F, Rajcan I, Ablett G R, Pauls K P. Seed and agronomic QTL in low linolenic acid, lipoxygenase-free soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) germplasm. Genome, 2006, 49(12): 1510-1527.
[18] 周蓉, 陈海峰, 王贤智, 张晓娟, 单志慧, 吴学军, 邱德珍, 伍宝朵, 沙爱华, 杨中路, 周新安. 不同发育阶段大豆株高和茎粗QTL的动态分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2010, 11(3): 349-359.
Zhou R, Chen H F, Wang X Z, Zhang X J, Shan Z H, Wu X J, Qiu D Z, Wu B D, Sha A H, Yang Z L, Zhou X A. Dynamic analysis of QTL for plant height and stem diameter at different developmental stages in soybean. Journal of Plant Genetic Resource, 2010, 11(3): 345-359. (in Chinese)
[19]   Kabelka E A, Diers B W, Fehr W R, LeRoy A R, Baianu I C, You T, Neece D J, Nelson R L. Putative alleles for increased yield from soybean plant introductions. Crop Science, 2004, 44(3): 784-791.
[20]   Orf J H, Chase K, Jarvik T, Mansur L M, Cregan P B, Adler F R, Lark K G. Genetics of soybean agronomic traits: I. Comparison of three related recombinant inbred populations. Crop Science, 1999, 39(6): 1652-1656.
[21]   Liu W, Kim M, Van K, Lee Y H, Li H, Liu X, Lee S H. QTL identification of yield-related traits and their association with flowering and maturity in soybean. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 2011, 14(1): 65-70.
[22]   周斌, 邢邯, 陈受宜, 盖钧镒. 大豆重组自交系群体NJRIKY遗传图谱的加密及其应用效果. 作物学报, 2010, 36(1): 36-46.
Zhou B, Xing H, Chen S Y, Gai J Y. Density-enhanced genetic linkage map of RIL population NJRIKY and its impacts on mapping genes and QTLs in soybean. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(1): 36-46. (in Chinese)
[23]   Chen Q S, Zhang Z C, Liu C Y, Xin D W, Qiu H M, Shan D P, Shan C Y, Hu G H. QTL analysis of major agronomic traits in soybean. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2007, 6(4): 399-405.
[24]   Zhang D, Cheng H, Wang H, Zhang H, Liu C, Yu D. Identification of genomic regions determining flower and pod numbers development in soybean (Glycine max L.). Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 2010, 37(8): 545-556.
[25]   Han Y, Li D, Zhu D, Li H, Li X, Teng W, Li W. QTL analysis of soybean seed weight across multi-genetic backgrounds and environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2012, 125(4): 671-683.
[26]   Sun Y N, Pan J B, Shi X L, Du X Y, Wu Q, Qi Z M, Jiang H W, Xin D W, Liu C Y, Hu G H, Chen Q S. Multi-environment mapping and meta-analysis of 100-seed weight in soybean. Molecular Biology Reports, 2012, 39(10): 9435-9443.
[27]   Hoeck J A, Fehr W R, Shoemaker R C, Welke G A, Johnson S L, Cianzio S R. Molecular marker analysis of seed size in soybean. Crop Science, 2003, 43(1): 68-74.
[28]   刘玉林. 大豆遗传图谱构建及重要农艺性状QTL定位[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2011.
Liu Y L. Constructing genetic linkage map and mapping QTLs for agronomic traits in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr][D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2011.(in Chinese)
[29]   Mian M A R, Bailey M A, Tamulonis J P, Shipe E R, Carter T E, Parrott W A, Ashley D A, Hussey R S, Boerma H R. Molecular markers associated with seed weight in two soybean populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1996, 93(7): 1011-1016.
[30]   Specht J E, Chase K, Macrander M, Graef G L, Chung J, Markwell J  P, Germann M, Orf J H, Lark K G. Soybean response to water: A QTL analysis of drought tolerance. Crop Science, 2001, 41(2): 493-509.
[31]   Hyten D L, Pantalone V R, Sams C E, Saxton A M, Landau-Ellis D, Stefaniak T R, Schmidt M E. Seed quality QTL in a prominent soybean population. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2004, 109(3): 552-561.
[32]   Funatsuki H, Kawaguchi K, Matsuba S, Sato Y, Ishimoto M. Mapping of QTL associated with chilling tolerance during reproductive growth in soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2005, 111(5): 851-861.
[33]   Li D D, Pfeiffer T W, Cornelius P L. Soybean QTL for yield and yield components associated with Glycine soja alleles. Crop Science, 2008, 48(2): 571-581.
[34]   王贤智, 周蓉, 单志慧, 张晓娟, 沙爱华, 陈海峰, 邱德珍, 周新安. 不同种植密度下大豆产量性状的QTL分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2009, 31(1): 1-8.
Wang X Z, Zhou R, Shan Z H, Zhang X J, Sha A H, Chen H F, Qiu D Z, Zhou X A. Mapping QTLs associated with yield and yield components under different growing density in soybean RIL population. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Science, 2009, 31(1):1-8. (in Chinese)
[35]   李灿东, 蒋洪蔚, 张闻博, 邱鹏程, 刘春燕, 李文福, 高运来, 陈庆山, 胡国华. 大豆荚粒相关性状的QTL分析. 分子植物育种, 2008, 6(6): 1091-1100.
Li C D, Jiang H W, Zhang W B, Qiu P C, Liu C Y, Li W F, Gao Y L, Chen Q S, Hu G H. QTL analysis of seed and pod traits in soybean. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2008, 6(6): 1091-1100. (in Chinese)
[36]   Sebolt A M, Shoemaker R C, Diers B W. Analysis of a quantitative trait locus allele from wild soybean that increases seed protein concentration in soybean. Crop Science, 2000, 40(5): 1438-1444.
[37]   Hirabayashi H, Sato H, Nonoue Y, Kuno-Takemoto Y, Takeuchi Y, Kato H, Nemoto H, Ogawa T, Yano M, Imbe T, Ando I. Development of introgression lines derived from Oryza rufipogon and O. glumaepatula in the genetic background of japonica cultivated rice (O. sativa L.) and evaluation of resistance to rice blast. Breeding Science, 2010, 60(5): 604-612.
[38]   Ebitani T, Takeuchi Y, Nonoue Y, Yamamoto T, Takeuchi K, Yano M. Construction and evaluation of chromosome segment substitution lines carrying overlapping chromosome segments of indica rice cultivar in a genetic background of japonica elite cultivar ‘Koshihikari’. Breeding Science, 2005, 55(1): 65-73.
[39]   王吴彬. 野生大豆(Glycine soja Sieb. et Zucc.)染色体片段代换系群体的构建及其主要性状基因/QTL的片段定位[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011.
Wang W B. Construction of chromosome segment substitution lines of a wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. et Zucc.) and determination of gene/QTL segment location of its major traits [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2011. (in Chinese)
[1] WANG Wu-Bin, HE Qing-Yuan, YANG Hong-Yan, XIANG Shi-Hua, ZHAO Tuan-Jie, XING Guang-nan, GAI Jun-Yi. Detection of Wild Segments Associated with Number of Branches on Main Stem and Leafstalk Angle in Soybean [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(23): 4749-4758.
[2] . Stable expression of QTL for milling quality of rice (oryza stativa L.) using CSSL population [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(10): 2128-2135 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!