中国农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (5): 985-995.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.05.005

• 耕作栽培·生理生化·农业信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

多模型解析玉米籽粒容重的营养品质贡献度与区域异质性

董金龙1,2(), 赵莹2, 余海兵1, 吕建晔2, 秦佳琦2, 梁晨2, 明博2, 李少昆1,2()   

  1. 1 安徽科技学院,安徽凤阳 233100
    2 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/作物基因资源与育种全国重点实验室,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-21 接受日期:2026-02-02 出版日期:2026-03-01 发布日期:2026-03-06
  • 通信作者:
    李少昆,E-mail:
  • 联系方式: 董金龙,E-mail:19565982502@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2023YFD2303300)

Multi-Model Elucidating of Nutritional Quality Contributions to Maize Kernel Test Weight and Regional Heterogeneity

DONG JinLong1,2(), ZHAO Ying2, YU HaiBing1, LÜ JianYe2, QIN JiaQi2, LIANG Chen2, MING Bo2, LI ShaoKun1,2()   

  1. 1 Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, Anhui
    2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2025-07-21 Accepted:2026-02-02 Published:2026-03-01 Online:2026-03-06

摘要:

【目的】 系统解析玉米籽粒容重形成过程中蛋白质、淀粉及脂肪三大营养组分的贡献率与空间分异规律,深入探究品种遗传背景、生态区域及栽培密度三者的交互作用对营养品质与容重形成的影响机制,以期为不同生态区玉米品质的定向调控提供理论依据,推动“高产-优质-高效”协同生产模式的发展。【方法】 研究覆盖我国四大玉米主产区,共采集718份代表性样品,涵盖77个主推品种以及24个种植密度梯度(37 500—127 500株/hm2)。所有样品经自然风干至标准水分后进行统一测定。采用近红外分析仪测定蛋白质、淀粉与脂肪含量,并使用容重仪测定籽粒容重。通过构建“线性效应—非线性交互—因果路径”全链条分析框架,综合运用多元线性回归、随机森林模型与结构方程模型解析各组分贡献及其因果路径,并采用三因素方差分析评估基因型、环境与栽培措施的互作效应。【结果】 蛋白质与淀粉是容重提升的核心驱动因子,其标准化路径系数分别为β=8.406和β=6.413,均达到极显著水平(P<0.001)。随机森林模型显示二者贡献率分别为28%与45%,结构方程模型进一步验证其路径系数具有高度稳健性;与之相反,脂肪贡献率仅为2%,未通过显著性检验。三因素方差分析表明,品种、生态区域与栽培密度对容重及营养品质均存在极显著主效应与交互作用。东北春玉米区以蛋白质贡献为主导(43.9%),蛋白质-淀粉协同贡献占随机森林模型总解释力的81.0%;而黄淮海夏玉米区则以淀粉贡献为主(52.9%),蛋白质-淀粉协同贡献占随机森林模型总解释力的85.0%。结构方程模型(SEM)结果显示,蛋白质对容重具有直接正向贡献,但同时通过碳氮代谢流的分配权衡对淀粉积累产生了补偿性削减,进而表现出间接负效应。这说明在籽粒发育过程中,容重的最终形成是蛋白质与淀粉在资源限制下博弈的结果,而非单一组分的线性叠加。【结论】 玉米容重形成是由蛋白质与淀粉协同驱动的生物学过程,脂肪贡献不显著。品种、生态区域与密度之间存在显著互作,同一品种在不同生态与栽培条件下调控路径各异。因此,东北产区应注重高蛋白品种选育与氮肥精准调控,黄淮海产区需强化碳同化效率与淀粉合成关键酶调控,各生态区应通过“品种-区域-措施”的精准匹配,实现玉米产量与品质的协同提升。

关键词: 玉米, 营养品质, 籽粒容重, 区域异质性, 多模型分析

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study systematically quantified the contribution rates and spatial heterogeneity of protein, starch, and fat—the three major nutritional components—to maize kernel test weight formation, and elucidated how genetic background, ecological region, and cultivation density interactively modulate both nutritional quality and test weight. The findings aim to establish a science-based foundation for region-specific optimization of maize quality and to advance an integrated “high-yield-high-quality- high-efficiency” production paradigm.【Method】 A nationwide field survey was conducted across four major maize-producing regions in China, encompassing 718 representative kernel samples from 77 leading cultivars grown under 24 distinct planting density gradients (37 500-127 500 plants/hm2). All samples were naturally air-dried to standardized moisture content (14% w.b.) prior to uniform physicochemical analysis. Protein, starch, and fat contents were determined using calibrated near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS), and test weight was measured with a certified grain test weight instrument (ISO 7971-3 compliant). To dissect the complex determinants of test weight, we implemented a hierarchical analytical framework integrating: (i) multiple linear regression to estimate independent linear effects; (ii) random forest modeling to capture nonlinear interactions and relative feature importance; and (iii) structural equation modeling (SEM) to infer directional causal pathways among traits. Three-way ANOVA was further employed to assess the main and interactive effects of cultivar, ecological region, and cultivation density on test weight and each nutritional component.【Result】 Protein (β=8.406, P<0.001) and starch (β=6.413, P<0.001) emerged as statistically robust and biologically dominant drivers of test weight, accounting for 28% and 45% of the total explained variance in the random forest model, respectively—both exhibiting high path coefficient stability in SEM (standardized coefficients ≥0.72, P<0.001). In contrast, fat showed negligible explanatory power (2%), and its effect failed to reach statistical significance (P=0.09). Three-way ANOVA confirmed highly significant (P<0.001) main effects and two- and three-way interactions among cultivar, ecological region, and density for test weight, protein, and starch—indicating strong contextual dependency. Spatially, protein contributed most strongly in the Northeast spring maize region (43.9% of model variance), whereas starch dominated in the Huang-Huai-Hai summer maize region (52.9%). Critically, the synergistic contribution of protein and starch jointly explained 81.0% and 85.0% of the total model variance in these two regions, respectively. Structural equation modeling revealed a direct positive effect of protein on test weight, but an indirect negative effect stemming from the compensatory relationship between protein and starch accumulation, which underscores the physiological trade-off in kernel sink-filling.【Conclusion】 Maize test weight formation was a biologically synergistic process driven by protein and starch, with fat playing no substantial role. Significant interactions existed among cultivar, ecological region, and density, with the same cultivar exhibiting distinct regulatory pathways under different ecological and cultivation conditions. Consequently, the Northeast region should prioritize high-protein cultivar selection and precise nitrogen management, while the Huang-Huai-Hai region should enhance carbon assimilation efficiency and regulate key starch-synthesis enzymes. All production areas should achieve a precise "cultivar-region-practice" matching strategy to synergistically improve maize yield and quality.

Key words: maize, nutritional quality, kernel test weight, regional heterogeneity, multi-model analysis