中国农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (8): 1560-1574.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.08.011

• 园艺 • 上一篇    下一篇

厚皮甜瓜种质材料果实质地品质评价

杨亚恒1(), 贾培龙1, 乜兰春1(), 赵文圣1(), 赵佳腾1, 王金祥1, 刘杰2   

  1. 1 河北农业大学园艺学院/河北省蔬菜种质创新与利用重点实验室/河北省绿色高效蔬菜产业省部共建协同创新中心,河北保定 071000
    2 廊坊市瑞海农业技术有限公司,河北廊坊 065000
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-11 接受日期:2024-03-12 出版日期:2024-04-16 发布日期:2024-04-24
  • 通信作者:
    乜兰春,E-mail:
    赵文圣,E-mail:
  • 联系方式: 杨亚恒,E-mail:y19980411@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省现代农业产业技术体系蔬菜创新团队(HBCT2023100208)

Evaluation of Fruit Texture Quality in Melon

YANG YaHeng1(), JIA PeiLong1, NIE LanChun1(), ZHAO WenSheng1(), ZHAO JiaTeng1, WANG JinXiang1, LIU Jie2   

  1. 1 Horticulture College, Hebei Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Vegetable Germplasm and Utilization of Hebei Province/ Ministry of Education of China-Hebei Province Joint Innovation Center for Efficient Green Vegetable Industry, Baoding 071000, Hebei
    2 Langfang Ruihai Agriculture Technicl Co., Ltd, Langfang 065000, Hebei
  • Received:2023-08-11 Accepted:2024-03-12 Published:2024-04-16 Online:2024-04-24

摘要:

【目的】对厚皮甜瓜种质资源果实质地进行评价,为建立厚皮甜瓜果实质地评价标准和选育优良品种提供参考和依据。【方法】应用质构多面剖析法(TPA,质地参数包括TPA硬度、弹性、咀嚼性、内聚性和回复性)、穿刺试验(puncture test,质地参数包括穿刺硬度、脆度和黏附性)和感官评价法(感官硬度、感官脆度、多汁性、紧实度、果肉粗细)对278份厚皮甜瓜种质果实质地进行评价。经相关性分析、逐步回归分析和因子分析,建立感官评价指标与质构仪测试指标间的关系模型,明确厚皮甜瓜果实质地评价重要指标,并通过聚类分析,对厚皮甜瓜种质材料进行分类。【结果】厚皮甜瓜果实质地的质构仪评价指标和感官评价指标之间存在显著相关性。以仪器评价的硬度、脆度、黏附性、弹性、咀嚼性、内聚性和回复性为自变量,分别建立了感官硬度、感官脆度、多汁性、紧实度和果肉粗细的预测模型。质构仪测试指标的因子分析中筛选出3个公因子,累计方差贡献率为89.377%。第1公因子反映了果肉的咀嚼特性,第2公因子反映了果肉的黏附性,第3公因子反映了果肉的回复性。咀嚼性、黏附性和回复性是影响厚皮甜瓜果实质地的重要参数。278份厚皮甜瓜种质按质地指标分为3大类群,第Ⅰ类群特点是硬度、脆度、紧实度最高,果肉最粗,多汁性最低;第Ⅲ类群的特点是硬度、脆度、紧实度最低,果肉最细,多汁性最高;第Ⅱ类群的特点是各项指标处于中间水平。每一大类群又可分为两个亚类。【结论】质构仪测试指标能够反映厚皮甜瓜果实质地品质,咀嚼性、黏附性和回复性是评价厚皮甜瓜果实质地的重要指标。

关键词: 厚皮甜瓜, 种质材料, 果实质地, 质构剖面分析, 穿刺试验, 感官评价

Abstract:

【Objective】The aim of this study was to evaluate the fruit texture of melon (Cucumis melo L. subsp. melo) germplasm resources, so as to provide reference and basis for establishing fruit texture evaluation standards and breeding excellent varieties of melon. 【Method】Texture profile analysis (TPA) (including TPA hardness, springiness, chewiness, cohesiveness and resilience), puncture test (PT) (including puncture hardness, crispness and adhesiveness) and sensory evaluation method (sensory hardness, sensory crispness, juiciness, compactness and pulp texture quality) were performed to evaluate the texture of 278 melon germplasms. Through correlation analysis, stepwise regression analysis and factor analysis, the relationship model between sensory evaluation indexes and texture analyzer test indexes were established, and the important indexes of fruit texture evaluation in melon were defined. 278 melon germplasm resources were classified according to the indexes of fruit texture. 【Result】There was a significant correlation between texture analyzer test indexes and sensory evaluation indexes of fruits texture in melon. The prediction models of sensory hardness, sensory crispness, juiciness, compactness and pulp texture quality were established relying on the independent variables of hardness, crispness, adhesiveness, springiness, chewiness, cohesiveness and resilience evaluated by the texture analyzer, respectively. Three common factors were selected from the factor analysis of texture analyzer test indexes, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 89.377%. The first common factor reflected the chewiness of pulp, the second common factor reflected the adhesiveness of pulp, and the third common factor reflects the resilience of pulp. Chewiness, adhesiveness and resilience were important parameters affecting the fruit texture of melon. According to the texture indexes, 278 melon were divided into three groups, and each group could be divided into two subcategories. The group I was characterized by the highest hardness, crispness and compactness, the coarsest pulp and the lowest juiciness. The group III was characterized by the lowest hardness, crispness and compactness, the thinnest pulp and the highest juiciness. The group II was characterized by an intermediate level of each index. 【Conclusion】Texture analyzer test indexes could reflect the texture quality of melon fruits. Chewiness, adhesiveness and resilience were important indexes to evaluate the melon fruit texture.

Key words: melon (Cucumis melo L. subsp. melo), germplasm materials, fruit texture, texture profile analysis, puncture test, sensory evaluation