中国农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (11): 2092-2108.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.11.002
收稿日期:
2022-01-27
接受日期:
2022-03-14
出版日期:
2022-06-01
发布日期:
2022-06-16
通讯作者:
常金华,崔江慧
作者简介:
徐晓,E-mail: 基金资助:
XU Xiao(),REN GenZeng,ZHAO XinRui,CHANG JinHua(
),CUI JiangHui(
)
Received:
2022-01-27
Accepted:
2022-03-14
Online:
2022-06-01
Published:
2022-06-16
Contact:
JinHua CHANG,JiangHui CUI
摘要:
【目的】 通过对高粱种质资源穗部表型多样性与遗传变异规律的研究,筛选高粱优异种质,丰富高粱穗部相关性状的遗传信息,为现有种质资源的保护、高效利用及新品种的选育等提供参考。【方法】 以320份来源于中国各地的高粱种质为供试材料,对其在2个不同生态环境下的12个穗部性状(粒长、粒宽、千粒重、籽粒硬度、籽粒容重、角质率、穗粒重、穗长、穗柄长、穗柄直径、一级枝梗长和一级枝梗数)进行精准鉴定。运用相关性分析、主成分分析、聚类分析等方法对高粱种质资源进行综合评价,并根据综合评价F值及目标性状筛选出不同突出特点的优异高粱种质。【结果】 各数量性状分布频次呈中间高两边低的分布趋势,籽粒硬度、穗粒重和籽粒容重、角质率2年间的频次分布和曲线走势分别在保定和晋中试验点较为相似,多数性状只在一个年份或单个试验点呈正态分布;除穗长和一级枝梗数外,其余性状的均值在同年两点间存在差异;12个穗部性状的平均多样性指数(H')分布范围为1.72—2.11,其中,籽粒硬度的多样性指数均值最高,一级枝梗长的多样性指数均值最低;籽粒硬度、角质率、穗粒重、一级枝梗长和一级枝梗数的变异系数均高于30.00%;所提取的4个主成分累计贡献率为65.39%;聚类分析将320份种质划分为3个类群,第Ⅰ类可作为筛选工艺(帚)用高粱的种质类,第Ⅱ类适用于粒用(酿造)高粱优异种质的选育,第Ⅲ类为穗部性状表现较差的种质;依据综合得分F值及目标性状筛选出具有不同突出特点的29份优异种质。【结论】 参试高粱种质资源穗部性状表型变异丰富,多样性程度较高;角质率和一级枝梗长的变异系数较高;粒长、粒宽、籽粒硬度、籽粒容重和穗粒重受环境条件影响较大,一级枝梗长相对稳定;筛选出优异种质29份。
徐晓,任根增,赵欣蕊,常金华,崔江慧. 中国高粱地方品种和育成品种穗部表型性状精准鉴定及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(11): 2092-2108.
XU Xiao,REN GenZeng,ZHAO XinRui,CHANG JinHua,CUI JiangHui. Accurate Identification and Comprehensive Evaluation of Panicle Phenotypic Traits of Landraces and Cultivars of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2092-2108.
表1
参试材料偏度、峰度和K-S检验"
性状 Trait | 年份 Year | 保定 Baoding | 晋中 Jinzhong | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
偏度Skewness | 峰度 Kurtosis | 显著性值 Sig. | 偏度Skewness | 峰度 Kurtosis | 显著性值 Sig. | ||
粒长 GL (mm) | 2020 | 0.18 | 1.00 | 0.07* | -0.28 | -0.21 | 0.01 |
2021 | 0.26 | 0.48 | 0.20* | 0.99 | 2.92 | 0.22* | |
均值Average | -0.06 | 0.58 | 0.20* | 0.56 | 0.90 | 0.03 | |
粒宽 GW (mm) | 2020 | 0.77 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
2021 | -0.28 | -0.32 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.00 | |
均值Average | -0.04 | -0.29 | 0.20* | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.05* | |
千粒重 TGW (g) | 2020 | -0.11 | -0.11 | 0.20* | -0.32 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
2021 | 0.46 | 0.12 | 0.00 | -0.32 | -0.60 | 0.20* | |
均值Average | 0.34 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.01 | -0.36 | 0.20* | |
籽粒硬度 GH (N) | 2020 | 0.41 | -0.01 | 0.03 | 0.62 | 0.09 | 0.00 |
2021 | 0.73 | 0.97 | 0.02 | 0.31 | 0.74 | 0.03 | |
均值Average | 0.48 | 0.07 | 0.05* | 0.39 | 0.22 | 0.08* | |
籽粒容重 GD (kg·L-1) | 2020 | -0.34 | 0.02 | 0.01 | -0.55 | -0.06 | 0.00 |
2021 | -0.28 | 1.78 | 0.00 | -0.82 | 0.64 | 0.00 | |
均值Average | -0.35 | 0.57 | 0.01 | -0.55 | 0.52 | 0.02 | |
角质率 CR (%) | 2020 | -0.52 | 0.24 | 0.09* | 0.08 | -1.10 | 0.00 |
2021 | 0.05 | -1.06 | 0.01 | 0.06 | -1.09 | 0.00 | |
均值Average | -0.16 | -0.50 | 0.05* | 0.15 | -1.08 | 0.00 | |
穗粒重 KWP (g) | 2020 | 0.31 | -0.51 | 0.00 | 0.13 | -0.52 | 0.20* |
2021 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.20* | 2.00 | 8.54 | 0.00 | |
均值Average | 0.26 | -0.09 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.00 | |
穗长 MPL (cm) | 2020 | 1.18 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 2.25 | 0.00 |
2021 | 1.62 | 7.89 | 0.00 | 1.17 | 3.18 | 0.00 | |
均值Average | 1.28 | 5.04 | 0.00 | 1.30 | 3.89 | 0.00 | |
穗柄长 PNL (cm) | 2020 | 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.20* | -0.09 | 0.17 | 0.20* |
2021 | 0.36 | -0.24 | 0.01 | 0.20 | -0.24 | 0.20* | |
均值Average | 0.30 | -0.34 | 0.01 | 0.04 | -0.54 | 0.00 | |
穗柄直径 PND (mm) | 2020 | -0.15 | -0.31 | 0.20* | 0.12 | -0.63 | 0.01 |
2021 | 0.11 | 0.95 | 0.20* | -0.02 | 0.14 | 0.20* | |
均值Average | -0.16 | 0.06 | 0.20* | 0.00 | -0.31 | 0.00 | |
一级枝梗长 PBL (cm) | 2020 | 3.05 | 15.93 | 0.00 | 3.01 | 14.88 | 0.00 |
2021 | 2.74 | 16.13 | 0.00 | 2.12 | 10.07 | 0.00 | |
均值Average | 3.27 | 19.38 | 0.00 | 2.99 | 16.46 | 0.00 | |
一级枝梗数 PBN | 2020 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 1.18 | 1.78 | 0.00 |
2021 | 1.21 | 2.68 | 0.00 | 0.89 | 1.03 | 0.00 | |
均值Average | 0.66 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 0.36 | 0.00 |
表2
2年两点间12个数量性状基本参数及多样性"
性状 Trait | 试验点 Environment | 平均值Mean | 标准差SD | 极差 Range | 变异系数 CV (%) | 多样性指数 H′ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
粒长 GL (mm) | E1 | 4.35c | 0.45 | 2.94 | 10.43 | 2.03 |
E2 | 5.49a | 0.71 | 4.59 | 12.87 | 2.07 | |
E3 | 4.19c | 0.31 | 1.70 | 7.31 | 2.08 | |
E4 | 4.89b | 0.60 | 4.40 | 12.19 | 2.01 | |
均值Average | 4.73 | 0.37 | 2.56 | 10.70 | 2.06 | |
粒宽 GW (mm) | E1 | 3.37bc | 0.31 | 1.68 | 9.09 | 2.00 |
E2 | 3.85a | 0.37 | 1.99 | 9.62 | 2.08 | |
E3 | 3.26c | 0.29 | 1.82 | 8.99 | 2.01 | |
E4 | 3.50b | 0.31 | 1.94 | 8.78 | 2.03 | |
均值Average | 3.49 | 0.18 | 1.03 | 9.12 | 2.07 | |
千粒重 TGW (g) | E1 | 23.53b | 4.14 | 23.15 | 17.59 | 2.05 |
E2 | 21.73d | 3.86 | 20.87 | 17.74 | 2.03 | |
E3 | 24.76a | 4.88 | 24.62 | 19.72 | 2.08 | |
E4 | 22.15c | 4.45 | 21.54 | 20.09 | 2.07 | |
均值Average | 23.04 | 3.22 | 17.10 | 18.79 | 2.08 | |
籽粒硬度 GH (N) | E1 | 5.46c | 1.50 | 8.01 | 27.48 | 2.07 |
E2 | 4.51d | 1.59 | 9.26 | 35.30 | 2.03 | |
E3 | 6.56a | 2.14 | 11.01 | 32.72 | 2.05 | |
E4 | 5.87b | 1.50 | 9.60 | 25.48 | 2.05 | |
均值Average | 5.60 | 1.18 | 6.51 | 30.25 | 2.11 | |
籽粒容重 GD (kg·L-1) | E1 | 0.63b | 0.05 | 0.26 | 7.20 | 2.07 |
E2 | 0.56d | 0.07 | 0.53 | 12.13 | 2.01 | |
E3 | 0.67a | 0.06 | 0.31 | 9.61 | 2.03 | |
E4 | 0.62c | 0.06 | 0.39 | 10.04 | 2.00 | |
均值Average | 0.62 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 9.75 | 2.04 | |
角质率 CR (%) | E1 | 57.30a | 17.77 | 88.00 | 31.01 | 2.03 |
E2 | 51.60b | 24.09 | 89.50 | 46.68 | 2.04 | |
E3 | 47.09c | 23.52 | 87.00 | 49.95 | 1.98 | |
E4 | 45.12d | 24.97 | 95.00 | 55.35 | 1.97 | |
均值Average | 50.28 | 18.60 | 86.13 | 45.75 | 2.08 | |
穗粒重 KWP (g) | E1 | 45.30b | 13.96 | 68.45 | 30.83 | 2.02 |
E2 | 32.18c | 10.60 | 58.52 | 32.96 | 2.06 | |
E3 | 49.98a | 15.02 | 67.59 | 30.06 | 2.10 | |
E4 | 26.92d | 7.33 | 64.82 | 27.22 | 1.89 | |
均值Average | 38.59 | 8.73 | 52.05 | 30.27 | 2.07 | |
穗长 MPL (cm) | E1 | 26.56a | 6.48 | 39.58 | 24.39 | 1.96 |
E2 | 25.69ab | 5.49 | 47.76 | 21.38 | 1.98 | |
E3 | 24.90ab | 5.58 | 37.67 | 22.39 | 1.97 | |
E4 | 24.33b | 5.74 | 40.67 | 23.61 | 1.96 | |
均值Average | 25.37 | 4.77 | 39.01 | 22.94 | 1.98 | |
性状 Trait | 试验点 Environment | 平均值Mean | 标准差SD | 极差 Range | 变异系数 CV (%) | 多样性指数 H′ |
穗柄长 PNL (cm) | E1 | 50.77a | 10.93 | 65.00 | 21.53 | 2.07 |
E2 | 40.66c | 9.43 | 52.67 | 23.19 | 2.07 | |
E3 | 50.23a | 9.79 | 55.53 | 19.49 | 2.06 | |
E4 | 44.11b | 10.10 | 54.00 | 22.90 | 2.06 | |
均值Average | 46.46 | 8.10 | 37.68 | 21.78 | 2.07 | |
穗柄直径 PND (mm) 一级枝梗长 PBL (cm) | E1 | 9.43c | 1.73 | 8.70 | 18.39 | 2.09 |
E2 | 9.64b | 1.36 | 9.71 | 14.11 | 2.05 | |
E3 | 9.85a | 1.73 | 8.80 | 18.56 | 2.07 | |
E4 | 9.72bc | 1.83 | 9.40 | 16.57 | 2.07 | |
均值Average | 9.66 | 1.15 | 6.16 | 16.91 | 2.08 | |
一级枝梗长 PBL (cm) 一级枝梗数 PBN | E1 | 9.24b | 3.42 | 30.11 | 37.06 | 1.75 |
E2 | 9.82a | 2.90 | 29.17 | 29.57 | 1.84 | |
E3 | 8.80c | 3.60 | 31.60 | 40.98 | 1.76 | |
E4 | 9.39b | 2.91 | 27.17 | 30.95 | 1.86 | |
均值Average | 9.31 | 2.84 | 28.01 | 34.64 | 1.72 | |
一级枝梗数 PBN | E1 | 68.83a | 23.12 | 131.00 | 33.59 | 2.00 |
E2 | 61.55b | 18.00 | 119.67 | 29.25 | 1.95 | |
E3 | 67.37a | 20.83 | 124.00 | 30.91 | 1.92 | |
E4 | 58.19b | 15.56 | 93.35 | 26.73 | 1.99 | |
均值Average | 63.99 | 16.02 | 86.10 | 30.12 | 2.03 |
表3
12个数量性状的前4个主成分的特征值及特征向量描述"
特征向量 Eigenvectors | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
粒长GL | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.47 |
粒宽GW | -0.04 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.09 |
千粒重TGW | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.26 | 0.35 |
籽粒硬度GH | 0.24 | 0.40 | -0.14 | -0.38 |
籽粒容重GD | 0.01 | 0.41 | 0.01 | -0.29 |
角质率CR | 0.24 | 0.17 | -0.09 | -0.53 |
穗粒重KWP | -0.16 | 0.41 | -0.45 | 0.09 |
穗长MPL | 0.39 | -0.04 | -0.46 | 0.13 |
穗柄长PNL | 0.44 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.06 |
穗柄直径PND | -0.36 | 0.10 | -0.28 | 0.18 |
一级枝梗长PBL | 0.40 | -0.09 | -0.36 | 0.28 |
一级枝梗数PBN | -0.38 | 0.18 | -0.34 | 0.07 |
特征值Eigenvalues | 3.21 | 2.12 | 1.28 | 1.24 |
贡献率Contribution rate (%) | 26.67 | 17.67 | 10.70 | 10.35 |
累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 26.67 | 44.34 | 55.04 | 65.39 |
表4
各高粱种质类群的形态学性状平均值分析"
类群 Group | 粒长 GL (mm) | 粒宽 GW (mm) | 千粒重 TGW (g) | 籽粒硬度 GH (N) | 籽粒容重 GD (kg·L-1) | 角质率 CR (%) | 穗粒重 KWP (g) | 穗长 MPL (cm) | 穗柄长 PNL (cm) | 穗柄直径 PND (mm) | 一级枝梗长 PBL (cm) | 一级枝梗数 PBN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 5.02 | 3.45 | 23.29 | 6.16 | 0.62 | 56.32 | 34.93 | 29.67 | 55.34 | 8.74 | 12.17 | 51.44 |
Ⅱ | 4.67 | 3.62 | 24.79 | 6.50 | 0.65 | 61.02 | 46.18 | 25.97 | 43.54 | 10.04 | 8.59 | 68.80 |
Ⅲ | 4.51 | 3.44 | 21.62 | 4.88 | 0.61 | 42.75 | 36.69 | 23.71 | 42.16 | 9.95 | 8.26 | 67.97 |
表5
不同突出特点的29份高粱的12个表型性状基本参数"
序号a No. | 粒长 GL (mm) | 粒宽 GW (mm) | 千粒重 TGW (g) | 籽粒 硬度 GH (N) | 籽粒 容重 GD (kg·L-1) | 角质率 CR (%) | 穗粒重 KWP (g) | 穗长 MPL (cm) | 穗柄长 PNL (cm) | 穗柄 直径 PND (mm) | 一级枝梗长 PBL (cm) | 一级枝梗数PBN | 突出特点/建议用途 Outstanding features /Recommended uses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 | 5.03 | 3.53 | 22.68 | 3.37 | 0.62 | 30.67 | 41.22 | 19.83 | 50.81 | 7.97 | 7.15 | 57.63 | 低硬度,高容重/酿造Ⅰ Low grain hardness, high grain density/ Brewing sorghum Ⅰ |
40 | 5.30 | 3.58 | 25.08 | 6.70 | 0.60 | 34.34 | 36.67 | 25.54 | 55.95 | 8.95 | 9.93 | 53.65 | 高硬度,高容重/酿造Ⅱ High grain hardness, high grain density/Brewing sorghum Ⅱ |
43 | 4.58 | 3.50 | 23.60 | 6.40 | 0.65 | 27.69 | 39.16 | 20.67 | 43.05 | 9.04 | 6.94 | 58.65 | 高硬度,高容重/酿造Ⅱ High grain hardness, high grain density/Brewing sorghum Ⅱ |
45 | 5.38 | 3.62 | 31.26 | 7.16 | 0.61 | 49.32 | 47.30 | 22.37 | 42.71 | 10.03 | 8.32 | 64.36 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
51 | 4.21 | 3.78 | 27.33 | 6.64 | 0.68 | 58.71 | 43.33 | 23.63 | 43.29 | 9.99 | 7.27 | 56.67 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
65 | 4.54 | 3.57 | 25.65 | 3.82 | 0.62 | 24.66 | 41.92 | 24.21 | 40.18 | 10.58 | 8.79 | 71.89 | 低硬度,高容重/酿造Ⅰ Low grain hardness, high grain density/Brewing sorghum Ⅰ |
77 | 4.98 | 3.85 | 28.39 | 6.80 | 0.65 | 75.77 | 49.60 | 21.02 | 38.79 | 10.04 | 8.03 | 84.78 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
132 | 5.26 | 3.66 | 26.68 | 6.79 | 0.67 | 27.50 | 47.34 | 25.01 | 32.99 | 11.26 | 8.36 | 65.54 | 高硬度,高容重/酿造Ⅱ High grain hardness, high grain density/Brewing sorghum Ⅱ |
150 | 4.86 | 3.85 | 22.57 | 6.07 | 0.65 | 15.38 | 39.05 | 19.98 | 45.14 | 7.98 | 7.64 | 51.65 | 高硬度,高容重/酿造Ⅱ High grain hardness, high grain density/Brewing sorghum Ⅱ |
167 | 5.17 | 3.59 | 26.30 | 6.50 | 0.65 | 78.52 | 48.03 | 22.43 | 46.28 | 9.52 | 8.60 | 66.41 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
176 | 5.05 | 3.99 | 26.04 | 5.21 | 0.61 | 50.88 | 48.95 | 33.33 | 56.96 | 9.67 | 9.99 | 50.80 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
186 | 4.21 | 3.78 | 27.33 | 6.64 | 0.68 | 58.71 | 63.33 | 23.63 | 43.29 | 9.99 | 7.27 | 56.67 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
187 | 4.96 | 3.64 | 31.17 | 5.14 | 0.65 | 53.28 | 51.88 | 28.44 | 50.38 | 9.85 | 8.21 | 63.81 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
193 | 5.09 | 3.63 | 29.69 | 7.04 | 0.68 | 51.52 | 46.83 | 25.00 | 54.35 | 8.18 | 12.52 | 58.58 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
197 | 5.18 | 3.66 | 27.83 | 7.04 | 0.67 | 34.60 | 52.31 | 23.03 | 42.23 | 11.75 | 6.79 | 73.34 | 高硬度,高容重/酿造Ⅱ High grain hardness, high grain density/Brewing sorghum Ⅱ |
序号a No. | 粒长 GL (mm) | 粒宽 GW (mm) | 千粒重 TGW (g) | 籽粒 硬度 GH (N) | 籽粒 容重 GD (kg·L-1) | 角质率 CR (%) | 穗粒重 KWP (g) | 穗长 MPL (cm) | 穗柄长 PNL (cm) | 穗柄 直径 PND (mm) | 一级枝梗长 PBL (cm) | 一级枝梗数PBN | 突出特点/建议用途 Outstanding features /Recommended uses |
198 | 5.28 | 3.60 | 28.10 | 5.82 | 0.63 | 52.80 | 46.04 | 19.50 | 43.22 | 10.87 | 7.33 | 67.71 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
201 | 4.56 | 3.48 | 25.78 | 8.68 | 0.67 | 60.73 | 63.27 | 27.22 | 36.24 | 11.01 | 7.11 | 59.62 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
220 | 4.67 | 3.69 | 25.63 | 5.67 | 0.66 | 79.47 | 58.00 | 28.65 | 49.33 | 9.70 | 6.81 | 52.68 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
226 | 4.29 | 3.56 | 26.59 | 6.00 | 0.64 | 64.05 | 43.29 | 24.22 | 45.00 | 10.91 | 8.71 | 81.44 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
229 | 5.00 | 3.59 | 23.21 | 6.98 | 0.61 | 22.39 | 32.71 | 29.60 | 63.16 | 7.80 | 15.66 | 36.52 | 高硬度,高容重/酿造Ⅱ High grain hardness, high grain density/Brewing sorghum Ⅱ |
234 | 4.83 | 3.48 | 28.81 | 6.46 | 0.70 | 56.07 | 46.52 | 23.46 | 46.65 | 9.35 | 9.46 | 66.17 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
235 | 4.70 | 3.71 | 23.32 | 4.93 | 0.62 | 53.37 | 44.62 | 23.02 | 38.10 | 12.38 | 7.53 | 94.87 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
237 | 4.70 | 3.58 | 25.43 | 3.92 | 0.61 | 35.27 | 30.91 | 29.73 | 55.43 | 9.95 | 9.33 | 53.68 | 低硬度,高容重/酿造Ⅰ Low grain hardness, high grain density/Brewing sorghum Ⅰ |
239 | 4.98 | 3.60 | 24.50 | 6.67 | 0.58 | 34.38 | 24.78 | 30.23 | 57.86 | 8.70 | 8.49 | 55.81 | 高硬度,高容重/酿造Ⅱ High grain hardness, high grain density/Brewing sorghum Ⅱ |
250 | 4.98 | 3.85 | 28.39 | 6.80 | 0.65 | 75.77 | 49.6 | 21.02 | 38.79 | 10.04 | 8.03 | 84.78 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
263 | 5.53 | 3.62 | 30.58 | 3.87 | 0.60 | 35.27 | 42.14 | 28.68 | 52.55 | 10.38 | 6.51 | 60.86 | 低硬度,高容重/酿造Ⅰ Low grain hardness, high grain density/Brewing sorghum Ⅰ |
265 | 5.31 | 3.64 | 23.08 | 7.75 | 0.64 | 55.95 | 32.00 | 42.24 | 65.49 | 9.05 | 14.94 | 45.90 | 穗长、穗柄长、一级枝梗长较长/帚用 The main panicle length, panicle neck length, and primary branches length were longer/Broom sorghum |
267 | 4.70 | 3.41 | 26.47 | 5.44 | 0.65 | 52.22 | 44.46 | 27.07 | 34.50 | 10.93 | 8.65 | 71.41 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) The corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
319 | 4.58 | 3.31 | 25.21 | 4.83 | 0.61 | 49.37 | 48.14 | 22.03 | 45.22 | 9.32 | 8.13 | 60.06 | 角质率和穗粒重较高/粒用(食用) Corneous endosperm rate and kernel weight per panicle were higher/Grain (edible) sorghum |
[1] |
PANDIAN B A, SEXTON-BOWSER S, PRASAD P V V, JUGULAM M. Current status and prospects of herbicide-resistant grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Pest Management Science, 2021, 78(2): 409-415.
doi: 10.1002/ps.6644 |
[2] | 卢庆善. 高粱学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999: 25-26. |
LU Q S. Sorghum. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1999: 25-26. (in Chinese) | |
[3] |
BILLOT C, RAMU P, BOUCHET S, CHANTEREAU J, DEU M, GARDES L, NOYER J L, RAMI J F, RIVALLAN R, LI Y, LU P, WANG T Y, FOLKERTSMA R T, ARNAUD E, UPADHYAYA H D, GLASZMANN J C, HASH C T. Massive sorghum collection genotyped with SSR markers to enhance use of global genetic resources. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(4): e59714.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059714 |
[4] | 唐三元, 谢旗. 高粱-小作物大用途. 生物技术通讯, 2019, 35(5): 1. |
TANG S Y, XIE Q. Sorghum-big use of small crops. Biotechnology Communication, 2019, 35(5): 1. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 尹美强, 王栋, 王金荣, 兰敏, 赵娟, 董淑琦, 宋喜娥, ALAM Sher, 原向阳, 王玉国, 温银元. 外源一氧化氮对盐胁迫下高粱种子萌发及淀粉转化的影响. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(22): 3209-4128. |
YIN M Q, WANG D, WANG J R, LAN M, ZHAO J, DONG S Q, SONG X E, ALAM S, YUAN X Y, WANG Y G, WEN Y Y. Effects of exogenous nitric oxide on seed germination and starch transformation of sorghum seeds under salt stress. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(22): 3209-4128. (in Chinese) | |
[6] | 徐令旗, 郭晓红, 吕艳东, 兰宇辰, 王骞, 张佳柠, 王海泽, 郑桂萍. 旱直播对水稻穗部性状、产量和经济效益的影响. 干旱地区农业究, 2021, 39(5): 186-192. |
XU L Q, GUO X H, LÜ Y D, LAN Y C, WANG Q, ZHANG J N, WANG H Z, ZHENG G P. Effects of dry direct seeding on panicle characters, yield and economic benefits of rice. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2021, 39(5): 186-192. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 曹雄, 梁晓红, 黄敏佳, 申登高, 李占林. 不同种植密度对高粱成穗数、产量及其构成因素的影响. 农学学报, 2015, 5(9): 12-16. |
CAO X, LIANG X H, HUANG M J, SHEN D G, LI Z L. Effects of planting density on effective ears, yield and yield component factors of sorghum. Journal of Agriculture, 2015, 5(9): 12-16. (in Chinese) | |
[8] |
CUEVAS H E, ROSA-VALENTIN G, HAYES C M, ROONEY W L, HOFFMANN L. Genomic characterization of a core set of the USDA-NPGS Ethiopian sorghum germplasm collection: implications for germplasm conservation, evaluation, and utilization in crop improvement. BMC Genomics, 2017, 18(1): 108.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3475-7 |
[9] | 高杰, 封广才, 李晓荣, 李青风, 彭秋. 贵州不同地区高粱种质资源表型多样性与聚类分析. 作物杂志, 2020(6): 54-60. |
GAO J, FENG G C, LI X R, LI Q F, PENG Q. Phenotypic diversity and clustering analysis of sorghum germplasm resources in different regions of Guizhou province. Crops, 2020(6): 54-60. (in Chinese) | |
[10] | 周瑜, 李泽碧, 黄娟, 吴毓, 张亚勤, 张志良, 张晓春. 高粱种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(3): 654-664. |
ZHOU Y, LI Z B, HUANG J, WU Y, ZHANG Y Q, ZHANG Z L, ZHANG X C. Genetic diversity of sorghum germplasms based on phenotypic traits. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2021, 22(3): 654-664. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | ZHENG J C, LIU T, QIAN Y C, LI J Q, LIU Y L, CHENG S, XU Z S, ZHAN Q W. Assessment of genetic diversity of sweet sorghum collection using phenotypic variation and SSR markers. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2021, 53(1): 145-153. |
[12] | 李春宏, 狄佳春, 颜伟, 郭文琦, 朱银, 殷剑美, 王立, 韩晓勇, 蒋璐, 张培通. 江苏省高粱种质资源的收集及多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21(5): 1175-1185. |
LI C H, DI J C, YAN W, GUO W Q, ZHU Y, YIN J M, WANG L, HAN X Y, JIANG L, ZHANG P T. Collection and diversity analysis of sorghum germplasm resource in Jiangsu province. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2020, 21(5): 1175-1185. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | 李海明, 刘绍东, 张思平, 李阳, 陈静, 马慧娟, 沈倩, 赵新华, 李存东, 庞朝友. 陆地棉种质资源花铃期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(3): 102-116. |
LI H M, LIU S D, ZHANG S P, LI Y, CHEN J, MA H J, SHEN Q, ZHAO X H, LI C D, PANG C Y. Identification and indices screening of drought tolerance at flowering and boll setting stage in upland cotton germplasm resources. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(3): 102-116. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 孟珊, 狄佳春, 苏彩霞, 朱银, 徐婷婷, 朱小品, 杨欣, 邹淑琼, 汪巧玲, 颜伟. 江苏省扁豆地方种质资源遗传多样性评价. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(5): 1258-1272. |
MENG S, DI J C, SU C X, ZHU Y, XU T T, ZHU X P, YANG X, ZOU S Q, WANG Q L, YAN W. Genetic diversity analysis of hyacinth bean landraces collected from Jiangsu province. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2021, 22(5): 1258-1272. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 朱红兵, 何丽娟. 关于用SPSS中单样本K-S检验法进行正态分布等的一致性检验时适用条件的研究. 首都体育学院学报, 2009, 21(4): 466-470. |
ZHU H B, HE L J. A study on appropriate conditions in consistency test of normal distribution by single sample K-S check in SPSS. Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, 2009, 21(4): 466-470. (in Chinese) | |
[16] | 王晓鸣, 邱丽娟, 景蕊莲, 任贵兴, 李英慧, 李春辉, 秦培友, 谷勇哲, 李龙. 作物种质资源表型性状鉴定评价:现状与趋势. 植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23(1): 12-20. |
WANG X M, QIU L J, JING R L, REN G X, LI Y H, LI C H, QIN P Y, GU Y Z, LI L. Evaluation on phenotypic traits of crop germplasm: Status and development. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2022, 23(1): 12-20. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 张鸿燕, 方荣, 陈学军, 周坤华, 袁欣捷, 雷刚, 黄月琴. 茄子种质表型性状鉴定与黄萎病抗性评价. 核农学报, 2020, 34(8): 1645-1654. |
ZHANG H Y, FANG R, CHEN X J, ZHOU K H, YUAN X J, LEI G, HUANG Y Q. Identification of phenotypic traits and verticillium wit resistance of eggplant germplasms. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 34(8): 1645-1654. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | 戴志聪, 杜道林, 司春灿, 林英, 郝建良, 孙凤. 用扫描仪及Image J软件精确测量叶片形态数量特征的方法. 广西植物, 2009, 29(3): 342-347. |
DAI Z C, DU D L, SI C C, LIN Y, HAO J L, SUN F. A method to exactly measure the morphological quantity of leaf using Scanner and Image J software. Guihaia, 2009, 29(3): 342-347. (in Chinese) | |
[19] | 刘智, 王玲玲, 周卫东, 陈义芳, 王忠. 用Image J分析水稻胚乳淀粉粒表面几何特征的方法. 电子显微学报, 2011, 30(Z1): 466-471. |
LIU Z, WANG L L, ZHOU W D, CHEN Y F, WANG Z. The surface of the geometric characteristics analysis for rice endosperm starch granules by using Image J. Journal of Chinese Electron Microscopy Society, 2011, 30(Z1): 466-471. (in Chinese) | |
[20] | WANG Y L, WANG Y Y, XU W L, WANG C J, CUI C S, QU S P. Genetic diversity of pumpkin based on morphological and SSR marker. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2020, 52(2): 477-487. |
[21] | 关峰, 石博, 万新建, 张景云, 黄长林, 张会国, 黄国东. 江西省地方冬瓜种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23(2): 385-397. |
GUAN F, SHI B, WAN X J, ZHANG J Y, HUANG C L, ZHANG H G, HUANG G D. Genetic diversity analysis of wax gourd resources collected from Jiangxi province using phenotypic traits. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2022, 23(2): 385-397. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | 兴旺, 崔平, 潘荣, 苏宝忠. 不同国家甜菜种质资源遗传多样性研究. 植物遗传资源学报, 2018, 19(1): 76-86. |
XING W, CUI P, PAN R, SU B Z. Genetic diversity of sugar beet from different countries. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2018, 19(1): 76-86. (in Chinese) | |
[23] |
HAUPT M, SCHMID K. Combining focused identification of germplasm and core collection strategies to identify GenBank accessions for central European soybean breeding. Plant Cell and Environment, 2020, 43(6): 1421-1436.
doi: 10.1111/pce.13761 |
[24] | 高佳, 史建国, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 张吉旺. 花粒期光照强度对夏玉米根系生长和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11): 2104-2113. |
GAO J, SHI J G, DONG S T, LIU P, ZHAO B, ZHANG J W. Effect of different light intensities on root characteristics and grain yield of summer maize (Zea Mays L.). Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(11): 2104-2113. (in Chinese) | |
[25] | 史建国, 崔海岩, 赵斌, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 花粒期光照对夏玉米产量和籽粒灌浆特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(21): 4427-4434. |
SHI J G, CUI H Y, ZHAO B, DONG S T, LIU P, ZHANG J W. Effect of light on yield and characteristics of grain-filling of summer maize from flowering to maturity. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(21): 4427-4434. (in Chinese) | |
[26] |
HU L L, YU J H, LIAO W B, ZHANG G B, XIE J M, LV J, XIAO X M, YANG B L, ZHOU R H, BU R F. Moderate ammonium: nitrate alleviates low light intensity stress in mini Chinese cabbage seedling by regulating root architecture and photosynthesis. Scientia Horticulturae, 2015, 186: 143-153.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.020 |
[27] |
ALIZADEH K, FATHOLAHI S, DA SILVA J A. Variation in the fruit characteristics of local pear (Pyrus spp.) in the Northwest of Iran. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2015, 62(5): 635-641.
doi: 10.1007/s10722-015-0241-7 |
[28] | 冯国郡, 李宏琪, 叶凯, 李桂英, 涂振东, 郭建富. 甜高粱种质资源在新疆的多样性表现及聚类分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2012, 13(3): 398-405. |
FENG G J, LI H Q, YE K, LI G Y, TU Z D, GUO J F. Genetic diversity and cluster analysis of sweet sorghum germplasm in Xinjiang. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2012, 13(3): 398-405. (in Chinese) | |
[29] | 杨慧卿, 王军, 王智兰, 杜晓芬, 郭二虎, 王玉文, 袁峰, 田岗, 刘鑫, 王秋兰, 李会霞, 张林义, 彭书忠. 分蘖型谷子资源的表型和遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017, 18(4): 685-695. |
YANG H Q, WANG J, WANG Z L, DU X F, GUO E H, WANG Y W, YUAN F, TIAN G, LIU X, WANG Q L, LI H X, ZHANG L Y, PENG S Z. Analysis of phenotype and genetic diversity of foxtail millet germplasm with tillering. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2017, 18(4): 685-695. (in Chinese) | |
[30] | 王小娟, 陈健晓, 李雪峤, 伍壮生, 吴月燕, 高芳华. 13份矮生番茄种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(6): 1955-1964. |
WANG X J, CHEN J X, LI X Q, WU Z S, WU Y Y, GAO F H. Genetic diversity analysis of 13 dwarf tomato germplasm resources by phenotypic traits. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2022, 20(6): 1955-1964. (in Chinese) | |
[31] | 张学超, 任海龙, 唐式敏, 朱玲, 张胜军, 冉昪. 伊犁天山160份野苹果种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(6): 1521-1530. |
ZHANG X C, REN H L, TANG S M, ZHU L, ZHANG S J, RAN S. Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits in 160 germplasm resources of Malus sieversii(Ledeb.)M. Roem. from Tianshan in Ili. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2021, 22(6): 1521-1530. (in Chinese) | |
[32] | 李颖, 张树航, 郭燕, 张馨方, 王广鹏. 211份板栗种质资源花序表型多样性和聚类分析. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(22): 4667-4682. |
LI Y, ZHANG S H, GUO Y, ZHANG X F, WANG G P. Catkin phenotypic diversity and cluster analysis of 211 Chinese chestnut germplasms. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(22): 4667-4682. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 王洋洋,刘万代,贺利,任德超,段剑钊,胡新,郭天财,王永华,冯伟. 基于多元统计分析的小麦低温冻害评价及水分效应差异研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7): 1301-1318. |
[2] | 宋松泉,刘军,唐翠芳,程红焱,王伟青,张琪,张文虎,高家东. 种子耐脱水性的生理及分子机制研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1047-1063. |
[3] | 王秀秀,邢爱双,杨茹,何守朴,贾银华,潘兆娥,王立如,杜雄明,宋宪亮. 陆地棉种质资源表型性状综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094. |
[4] | 卞能飞, 孙东雷, 巩佳莉, 王幸, 邢兴华, 金夏红, 王晓军. 花生烘烤食用品质评价及指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 641-652. |
[5] | 沈倩,张思平,刘瑞华,刘绍东,陈静,葛常伟,马慧娟,赵新华,杨国正,宋美珍,庞朝友. 棉花出苗期耐冷综合评价体系的构建及耐冷指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(22): 4342-4355. |
[6] | 胡馨, 张职亮, 张飞, 邓波, 房伟民. 大花型茶专用菊杂交后代株系的综合评价与筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(20): 4036-4051. |
[7] | 万映伶,朱梦婷,刘爱青,金亦佳,刘燕. 中国观赏芍药表型多样性解析与资源评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(18): 3629-3639. |
[8] | 陈学森,王楠,张宗营,毛志泉,尹成苗. 关于果树种质资源与遗传育种若干问题的理解与思考[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(17): 3395-3410. |
[9] | 王劲松,董二伟,刘秋霞,武爱莲,王媛,王立革,焦晓燕. 行距和密度对籽粒饲用高粱产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(16): 3123-3133. |
[10] | 杨程,龚桂芝,彭祝春,常珍珍,易璇,洪棋斌. 基于cpInDel标记和cpSSR标记的柑橘属及近缘属植物亲缘关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(16): 3210-3223. |
[11] | 史晓龙,郭佩,任婧瑶,张鹤,董奇琦,赵新华,周宇飞,张正,万书波,于海秋. 基于花生//高粱间作模式的花生盐胁迫耐受性效应研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(15): 2927-2937. |
[12] | 沈志军, 田雨, 蔡志翔, 徐子媛, 严娟, 孙朦, 马瑞娟, 俞明亮. 基于国家果树种质南京桃资源圃的桃褐腐病抗性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(15): 3018-3028. |
[13] | 郭淑青,宋慧,柴少华,郭岩,石兴,杜丽红,邢璐,解慧芳,张扬,李龙,冯佰利,刘金荣,杨璞. 谷子生育期及穗相关性状的QTL定位[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(15): 2883-2898. |
[14] | 李婷,董远,张君,冯志前,王亚鹏,郝引川,张兴华,薛吉全,徐淑兔. 玉米杂交种穗部性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(13): 2485-2499. |
[15] | 解斌,安秀红,陈艳辉,程存刚,康国栋,周江涛,赵德英,李壮,张艳珍,杨安. 不同苹果砧木对持续低磷的响应及适应性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(13): 2598-2612. |
|