





中国农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 152-163.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.01.011
李慧1(
),韩占品1,贺丽霞2(
),杨亚苓1,尤书燕2,邓琳2,王春国2
收稿日期:2020-04-12
接受日期:2020-06-29
出版日期:2021-01-01
发布日期:2021-01-13
联系方式:
李慧,E-mail: lihui@tjau.edu.cn。
基金资助:
LI Hui1(
),HAN ZhanPin1,HE LiXia2(
),YANG YaLing1,YOU ShuYan2,DENG Lin2,WANG ChunGuo2
Received:2020-04-12
Accepted:2020-06-29
Published:2021-01-01
Online:2021-01-13
摘要:
【目的】在前期从花椰菜中筛选、鉴定出多个逆境胁迫应答相关ERF(Ethylene-responsive factors)转录因子的基础上,对其中一个未知功能的转录因子BraERF023a进行克隆,并阐释其在盐及干旱胁迫条件下的表达特征及功能。【方法】对花椰菜中的BraERF023a进行克隆,采用MEGA 6等生物学软件对其序列特征进行分析,采用qRT-PCR方法分析BraERF023a在盐及干旱胁迫条件下的表达特征,进而构建过表达载体并转化拟南芥,对BraERF023a过表达转基因拟南芥株系在盐及干旱胁迫下的表型、生存率进行观察、分析。【结果】序列分析证实,花椰菜BraERF023a编码区长度为597 bp,编码含198个氨基酸的蛋白质,其内含有一个AP2保守结构域。BraERF023a在十字花科芸薹属植物中具有很高保守性。转录表达模式分析显示,盐及干旱胁迫条件均可显著诱导花椰菜BraERF023a的表达。进一步的功能分析显示,在盐及干旱胁迫处理条件下,过表达BraERF023a的转基因拟南芥株系比野生型对照生长势更好,植株生存率更高,盐及干旱耐受能力明显增强。【结论】BraERF023a在花椰菜响应盐及干旱胁迫中发挥重要的正向调控作用,过表达BraERF023a可显著提高转化株对盐及干旱的胁迫耐受。
李慧,韩占品,贺丽霞,杨亚苓,尤书燕,邓琳,王春国. 花椰菜BraERF023a的克隆及在响应盐和干旱胁迫中的功能[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(1): 152-163.
LI Hui,HAN ZhanPin,HE LiXia,YANG YaLing,YOU ShuYan,DENG Lin,WANG ChunGuo. Cloning and Functional Analysis of BraERF023a Under Salt and Drought Stresses in Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis)[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(1): 152-163.
表1
BraERF023a克隆、载体构建和定量RT-PCR分析引物序列"
| 引物名称 Primer name | 引物序列 Primer sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|
| BraERF023a-F | ATGCTGAGTACAGTGAGTGAAACC |
| BraERF023a-R | TCACAGACACGCCATGAACTG |
| Nco I-BraERF023a-F | CCATGGATGCTGAGTACAGTGAGTG |
| BstE II-BraERF023a-R | GGTCACCTCACAGACACGCCAT |
| qBraERF023a-F | CCACCACTTACCAACGAAC |
| qBraERF023a-R | AAGATCCGAGCCAAATCCG |
| 35S-F | AACAGAACTCGCCGTAAAG |
| BraActin-F | GCTCCTCTTAACCCAAAGGC |
| BraActin-R | CACACCATCACCAGAATCCAGC |
| AtActin-F | GGTAACATTGTGCTCAGTGGTGG |
| AtActin-R | AACGACCTTAATCTTCATGCTGC |
图3
农杆菌及拟南芥转化株中BraERF023a的分子鉴定 a:分别采用BraERF023a特异扩增引物及BraERF023a与载体序列组合引物对农杆菌阳性克隆进行菌液PCR的检测结果,M:DNA marker,1—6:6个阳性克隆特异引物PCR检测结果,1′—6′:6个阳性克隆组合引物PCR检测结果。b:分别采用BraERF023a特异扩增引物及BraERF023a与载体序列组合引物对拟南芥转化株的单株PCR检测结果,M:DNA marker,1—10:10个单株特异引物PCR检测结果,1′—10′:10个单株组合引物PCR检测结果。c:不同BraERF023a过表达拟南芥转化株系中BraERF023a表达水平的qRT-PCR检测结果,CK:对照组,L3/L4/L6/L8/L9:BraERF023a过表达拟南芥株系"
表2
过表达BraERF023a转基因拟南芥表型分析"
| 表型Phenotype | 对照CK | L4 | L8 | L9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株高 Stem length (cm) | 43.125±2.780c | 56.750±3. 862a | 51.125±1.0307ab | 49.625±3.0923b |
| 抽薹时间 Bolting time (d) | 26.00±2.4495b | 32.00±2.4495a | 29±1.9148a | 31.00±1.2583a |
| 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 1.2375±0.0727b | 1.7800±0.2191a | 1.6300±0.1551a | 1.7125±0.1059a |
| 主茎 Stem (number) | 5.75±0.9574c | 6.75±1.0708ab | 6.25±0.5000b | 7.775±0.5774a |
| 一级分枝 Primary branch (number) | 13.75±2.630b | 15.00±2.449ab | 16.00±3.742a | 13.75±5.132b |
| 二级分枝 Secondary branch (number) | 5.00±0.816a | 5.00±1.155a | 5.75±2.602a | 6.00±1.15a |
| 果荚长 Pod length (mm) | 18.000±1.0475a | 17.153±1.3553a | 17.600±1.2035a | 18.028±0.8587a |
| [1] |
FEDOROFF N V, BATTISTI D S, BEACHY R N, COOPER P J M, FISCHHOFF D A, HODGES C N, KNAUF V C, LOBELL D, MAZUR B J, MOLDEN D, REYNOLDS M P, RONALD P C, ROSEGRANT M W, SANCHEZ P A, VONSHAK A, ZHU J K. Radically rethinking agriculture for the 21st century. Science, 2010,327(5967):833-834.
doi: 10.1126/science.1186834 pmid: 20150494 |
| [2] |
邵文靖, 敖特根白音, 郎明林. AP2/ERF转录因子对植物非生物胁迫的应答机制研究进展. 分子植物育种, 2020. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20200226.2306.014.html.
doi: 10.1111/pbr.12645 pmid: 31598026 |
|
SHAO W J, AO T G B Y, LANG M L. Mechanism of AP2/ERF transcription factor response to plant abiotic stress. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20200226.2306.014.html.(in Chinese)
doi: 10.1111/pbr.12645 pmid: 31598026 |
|
| [3] |
SINGH K B, FOLEY R C, LUIS OATE-FÁNCHEZ. Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2002,5(5):430-436.
doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00289-3 |
| [4] |
JOFUKU K D, DEN BOER B G, VAN MONTAGU M, OKAMURO J K. Control of Arabidopsis flower and seed development by the homeotic gene APETALA2. The Plant Cell, 1994,6(9):1211-1225.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.9.1211 pmid: 7919989 |
| [5] |
ALLEN M D, YAMASAKI K, OHME-TAKAGI M, TATENO M, SUZUKI M. A novel mode of DNA recognition by a beta- sheet revealed by the solution structure of the GCC-box binding domain in complex with DNA. The EMBO Journal, 1998,17(18):5484-5496.
doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.18.5484 pmid: 9736626 |
| [6] |
NAKANO T, SUZUKI K, FUJIMURA T, SHINSHI H. Genome-wide analysis of the ERF gene family in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiology, 2006,140(2):411-432.
doi: 10.1104/pp.105.073783 pmid: 16407444 |
| [7] |
SAKUMA Y, LIU Q, DUBOUZET J G, ABE H, SHINOZAKI K, YAMAGUCHI-FHINOZAKI K. DNA-binding specificity of the ERF/AP2 domain of Arabidopsis DREBs, transcription factors involved in dehydration- and cold-inducible gene expression. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2002,290(3):998-1009.
doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.6299 pmid: 11798174 |
| [8] |
KRIZEK B A. AINTEGUMENTA utilizes a mode of DNA recognition distinct from that used by proteins containing a single AP2 domain. Nucleic Acids Research, 2003,31(7):1859-1868.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg292 pmid: 12655002 |
| [9] |
YAMAGUCHI-FHINOZAKI K, SHINOZAKI K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2006,57(1):781-803.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105444 |
| [10] |
HATTORI Y, NAGAI K, FURUKAWA S, SONG X J, KAWANO R, SAKAKIBARA H, WU J H, MATSUMOTO T, YOSHIMURA A, KITANO H, MATSUOKA M, MORI H, ASHIKARI M. The ethylene response factors SNORKEL1 and SNORKEL2 allow rice to adapt to deep water. Nature, 2009,460(7258):1026-1030.
doi: 10.1038/nature08258 pmid: 19693083 |
| [11] |
NIE J, WEN C, XI L, LV S H, ZHAO Q C, KOU Y P, MA N, ZHAO L J, ZHOU X F. The AP2/ERF transcription factor CmERF053 of chrysanthemum positively regulates shoot branching, lateral root, and drought tolerance. Plant Cell Reports, 2018,37(7):1049-1060.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-018-2290-9 pmid: 29687169 |
| [12] | 翟莹, 赵艳, 杨晓杰, 孙天国, 张军, 姚雅男. 大豆乙烯响应因子GmERF6的功能分析. 生物技术通报, 2013(12):73-77. |
| ZHAI Y, ZHAO Y, YANG X J, SUN T G, ZHANG J, YAO Y N. Functional analysis of soybean ethylene-response factor GmERF6. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2013(12):73-77. (in Chinese) | |
| [13] |
LI Y, ZHANG H, ZHANG Q, LIU Q C, ZHAI H, ZHAO N, HE S Z. An AP2/ERF gene, IbRAP2-12, from sweet potato is involved in salt and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Science, 2019,281:19-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.01.009 pmid: 30824052 |
| [14] |
SEO Y J, PARK J B, CHO Y J, JUNG C, SEO H S, PARK S K, NAHM B H, SONG J T. Overexpression of the ethylene-responsive factor gene BrERF4 from Brassica rapa increases tolerance to salt and drought in Arabidopsis plants. Molecule Cells, 2010,30(3):271-277.
doi: 10.1007/s10059-010-0114-z |
| [15] |
PARK H Y, SEOK H Y, WOO D H, LEE S Y, TARTE V N, LEE E H, LEE C H, MOON Y H. AtERF71/HRE2 transcription factor mediates osmotic stress response as well as hypoxia response in Arabidopsis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2011,414(1):135-141.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.09.039 |
| [16] |
LEE J H, HONG J P, OH S K, LEE S, CHOI D, KIM W T. The ethylene-responsive factor like protein 1 (CaERFLP1) of hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) interacts in vitro with both GCC and DRE/CRT sequences with different binding affinities: possible biological roles of CaERFLP1 in response to pathogen infection and high salinity conditions in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Molecular Biology, 2004,55(1):61-81.
doi: 10.1007/s11103-004-0417-6 |
| [17] |
YI S Y, KIM J H, JOUNG Y H, LEE S, KIM W T, YU S H, CHOI D. The pepper transcription factor CaPF1 confers pathogen and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 2004,136(1):2862-2874.
doi: 10.1104/pp.104.042903 pmid: 15347795 |
| [18] |
HUANG Z J, ZHANG Z J, ZHANG X L, ZHANG H B, HUANG D F, HUANG R F. Tomato TERF1 modulates ethylene response and enhances osmotic stress tolerance by activating expression of downstream genes. FEBS Letter, 2004,573(1):110-116.
doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.07.064 |
| [19] |
ZHANG H W, HUANG Z J, XIE B Y, CHEN Q, TIAN X, ZHANG X L, ZHANG H B, LU X Y, HUANG D F, HUANG R F. The ethylene-, jasmonate-, abscisic acid- and NaCl-responsive tomato transcription factor JERF1 modulates expression of GCC box-containing genes and salt tolerance in tobacco. Planta, 2004,220(2):262-270.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-004-1347-x |
| [20] | XU Z S, XIA L Q, CHEN M, CHENG X G, ZHANG R Y, LI L C, ZHAO Y X, LU Y, NI Z Y, LIU L, QIU Z G, MA Y Z. Isolation and molecular characterization of the Triticum aestivum L. ethylene- responsive factor 1 (TaERF1) that increases multiple stress tolerance. Plant Molecule Biology, 2007,65(6):719-732. |
| [21] |
LI H, WANG Y, WU M, LI L H, LI C, HAN Z P, YUAN J Y, CHEN C B, SONG W Q, WANG C G. Genome-wide identification of AP2/ERF transcription factors in cauliflower and expression profiling of the ERF family under salt and drought stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017,8:946.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00946 pmid: 28642765 |
| [22] | MIZOI J, SHINOZAKI K, YAMAGUCHI-SHINOZAKI K. AP2/ERF family transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochimica Biophysica Acta, 2012,1819(2):86-96. |
| [23] |
WU L J, CHEN X L, REN H Y, ZHANG Z J, ZHANG H W, WANG J Y, WANG X C, HUANG R F. ERF protein JERF1 that transcriptionally modulates the expression of abscisic acid biosynthesis-related gene enhances the tolerance under salinity and cold in tobacco. Planta, 2007,226(4):815-825.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-007-0528-9 |
| [24] |
CHENG M C, LIAO P M, KUO W W, LIN T P. The Arabidopsis ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 regulates abiotic stress- responsive gene expression by binding to different cis-acting elements in response to different stress signals. Plant Physiology, 2013,162(2):1566-1582.
doi: 10.1104/pp.113.221911 |
| [25] |
王佳慧, 顾凯迪, 王楚堃, 由春香, 胡大刚, 郝玉金. 苹果乙烯响应因子MdERF72对非生物胁迫的响应. 中国农业科学, 2019,52(23):4374-4385.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.23.017 |
|
WANG J H, GU K D, WANG C K, YOU C X, HU D G, HAO Y J. Analysis of apple ethylene response factor MdERF72 to abiotic stresses. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019,52(23):4374-4385. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.23.017 |
|
| [26] | ZHUO C L, LIANG L, ZHAO Y Q, GUO Z F, LU S Y, ZHOU C L. A cold responsive ethylene responsive factor from Medicago falcata confers cold tolerance by up-regulation of polyamine turnover, antioxidant protection, and proline accumulation. Plant Cell and Environment, 2018,41(9):2021-2032. |
| [27] |
BOLT S, ZUTHER E, ZINTL S, HINCHA D K, SCHMÜLLING T. ERF105 is a transcription factor gene of Arabidopsis thaliana required for freezing tolerance and cold acclimation. Plant Cell and Environment, 2017,40(1):108-120.
doi: 10.1111/pce.12838 |
| [28] | ILLGEN S, ZINTL S, ZUTHER E, HINCHA D K, SCHMÜLLING T. Characterisation of the ERF102 to ERF105 genes of Arabidopsis thaliana and their role in the response to cold stress. Plant Molecule Biology, 2020,103(3):303-320. |
| [29] |
BIELSA B, HEWITT S, REYES-CHIN-WO S, DHINGRA A, RUBIO-CABETAS M J. Identification of water use efficiency related genes in ‘garnem’ almond-peach rootstock using time-course transcriptome analysis. PLoS ONE, 2018,13(10):e0205493.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205493 pmid: 30308016 |
| [30] | KARABA A, DIXIT S, GRECO R, AHARONI A, TRIJATMIKO K R, MARSCH-MARTINEZ N, KRISHNAN A, NATARAJA K N, UDAYAKUMAR M, PEREIRA A. Improvement of water use efficiency in rice by expression of HARDY, an Arabidopsis drought and salt tolerance gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2007,104(39):15270-15275. |
| [31] | 张军辉. 葡萄灰霉病抗性QTL定位及候选基因研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2018. |
| ZHANG J H. QTL mapping and candidate gene research of grapevine Botrytis cinerea resistance[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese) | |
| [32] |
XIE Z L, NOLAN T, JIANG H, TANG B Y, ZHANG M C, LI Z H, YIN Y H. The AP2/ERF transcription factor TINY modulates brassinosteroid-regulated plant growth and drought responses in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 2019,31(8):1788-1806.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00918 pmid: 31126980 |
| [33] |
QI W W, SUN F, WANG Q J, CHEN M L, HUANG Y Q, FENG Y Q, LUO X J, YANG J S. Rice ethylene-response AP2/ERF factor OsEATB restricts internode elongation by down-regulating a gibberellin biosynthetic gene. Plant Physiology, 2011,157(1):216-228.
doi: 10.1104/pp.111.179945 |
| [34] |
NAKANO T, FUJISAWA M, SHIMA Y, ITO Y. The AP2/ERF transcription factor SlERF52 functions in flower pedicel abscission in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2014,65:3111-3119.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru154 |
| [35] |
SCARPECI T E, FREA V S, ZANOR M I, VALLE E M. Overexpression of AtERF019 delays plant growth and senescence, and improves drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2017,68(3):673-685.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw429 pmid: 28204526 |
| [36] |
潘健, 温海帆, 何欢乐, 连红莉, 王刚, 潘俊松, 蔡润. 黄瓜ERF基因家族鉴定及其在雌花芽分化中的表达分析. 中国农业科学, 2020,53(1):133-147.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.01.013 |
|
PAN J, WEN H F, HE H L, LIAN H L, WANG G, PAN J S, CAI R. Genome-wide identification of cucumber ERF gene family and expression analysis in female bud differentiation. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020,53(1):133-147. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.01.013 |
| [1] | 鲁雪莉, Syeda Wajeeha Gillani, 孟晨, 李晓彬, 宋奕汝, 柏雨, 王菊英, 冯晓菲, 刘晨晨, 李义强, 徐宗昌. 不同类型盐胁迫对狼尾草种子萌发的影响及钠调控转录组研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1400-1419. |
| [2] | 张志林, 刘荣, 宗绪晓, 郝晓鹏, 杨涛. 蚕豆多时期耐盐性综合评价与衣康酸缓解萌发期盐胁迫研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1172-1188. |
| [3] | 陈敏, 焦紫岚, 乔承彬, 许昊, 张碧, 马东花, 孔维儒, 王敬文, 宋佳伟, 罗成科, 李培富, 田蕾. 不同亚种水稻种质资源对盐胁迫的形态生理响应及适应策略[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 705-722. |
| [4] | 滕梦鑫, 徐亚, 何静, 汪奇, 乔飞, 李敬阳, 李新国. 香蕉Ca2+-ATPase基因家族的鉴定及功能分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(7): 1418-1433. |
| [5] | 王文娟, 师尚礼, 康文娟, 杜媛媛, 殷辰. 干旱胁迫下陇中紫花苜蓿对外源精胺的生理响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(4): 676-691. |
| [6] | 吕缓缓, 李如月, 刘青松, 许蕾, 徐嫣然, 于浩洁, 郭长虹, 龙瑞才. 紫花苜蓿MsKTI3基因克隆及耐盐功能分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(21): 4497-4511. |
| [7] | 包明芳, 秦燕, 陈彩锦, 张尚沛, 张国辉, 沙晓弟. 111份紫花苜蓿种质资源苗期表型抗旱性鉴定评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(19): 3825-3836. |
| [8] | 刘文龙, 常译方, 李文宇, 孙丽娟, 郑长英. 蛹期干旱胁迫对韭菜迟眼蕈蚊交配及虱螨脲敏感性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(14): 2793-2804. |
| [9] | 邓立成, 李程, 赫磊, 安红强, 王才林, 张亚东, 赵长江, 路凯. 耐盐南粳品种苗期盐胁迫应答的生理特性及其耐盐相关基因分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(12): 2275-2290. |
| [10] | 张颖, 石婷瑞, 曹瑞, 潘文秋, 宋卫宁, 王利, 聂小军. ICARDA引进-小麦苗期抗旱性的全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(9): 1658-1673. |
| [11] | 王语, 张渝鹏, 朱冠亚, 廖航烯, 侯文峰, 高强, 王寅. 局部供氮对干旱胁迫下玉米苗期生长发育和水氮利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(5): 919-934. |
| [12] | 裴书瑶, 曹红霞, 张泽宇, 赵方洋, 李志军. 盆栽番茄对NaCl和Na2SO4微咸水灌溉的生理响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(3): 570-583. |
| [13] | 张荣, 刘淋茹, 付凯霞, 武紫君, 宋一凡, 王璐媛, 侯阁阁, 贺利, 冯伟, 段剑钊, 王永华, 郭天财. 干旱胁迫下外源褪黑素对冬小麦小花发育及碳营养代谢的调控[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(23): 4644-4657. |
| [14] | 邵嘉朱, 吕雯, 廖鑫琳, 袁歆瑜, 宋振, 蒋冬花. 大豆根际促生菌的分离、鉴定及其耐盐促生作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(21): 4248-4263. |
| [15] | 代瑛姿, 郭宏扬, 杨志峰, 王宪璞, 许丽丽. 葡萄转录因子VvERF2耐盐功能鉴定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(2): 336-348. |
|
||