中国农业科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 843-854.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.05.004

• 耕作栽培·生理生化·农业信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于Meta-analysis的中国北方地区免耕玉米产量效应研究

银敏华,李援农,陈朋朋,徐路全,申胜龙,王星垚   

  1. 西北农林科技大学/旱区农业水土工程教育部重点实验室,陕西杨凌 712100
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-26 出版日期:2018-03-01 发布日期:2018-03-01
  • 通讯作者: 李援农,E-mail:liyuannong@163.com
  • 作者简介:银敏华,E-mail:15109217864@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201503125,201503105)、国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2011AA100504)

Effect of No-Tillage on Maize Yield in Northern Region of China—A Meta-analysis

YIN MinHua, LI YuanNong, CHEN PengPeng, XU LuQuan, SHEN ShengLong, WANG XingYao   

  1. Northwest A&F University/Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi
  • Received:2017-06-26 Online:2018-03-01 Published:2018-03-01

摘要: 目的】定量分析免耕对中国北方地区玉米产量的时空效应和影响机制,为该地区免耕的科学应用和推广提供依据。【方法】以中国北方为研究区域,以传统耕作为对照,通过检索文献整合已发表的相关田间试验数据(截止2017年4月共获得68篇文献和82组试验数据,将数据按照区域(东北、华北和西北)、年降水量(<500 mm和≥500 mm)、年均气温(<10℃和≥10℃)、耕作模式(平作和垄作)、种植制度(连作和轮作)、是否秸秆还田、试验年份(2000年之前、2000—2009年和2010年之后)和免耕持续年限(1—2 a、3—5 a、6—9 a和≥10 a)进行分组),利用Meta-analysis方法系统探究免耕对玉米产量的时空效应与影响因素。具体分析过程包括异质性检验、综合效应量计算、发表偏倚检验、敏感性分析、累积Meta-analysis和亚组分析(影响因素分析)。【结果】与传统耕作相比,免耕总体上可显著提高玉米产量,平均增产率为3.1%(置信区间0.7%—5.5%,数据不存在发表偏倚和极端值)。2000年之前,免耕的累积增产效应不稳定(平均-0.7%—6.6%);2000年之后,免耕与传统耕作的累积产量差异逐渐由不显著变为显著。在东北地区,免耕表现出显著的增产效应(平均5.3%,置信区间1.5%—9.2%);而在华北和西北地区,免耕的增产效应不显著,分别为-2.6%—6.4%和-1.0%—6.4%。在年降水量500 mm、年均气温<10℃的地区和轮作、秸秆还田条件下,免耕的增产率显著提高,平均分别5.4%(置信区间1.7%—9.1%)3.8%(置信区间0.8%—6.7%)、4.4%(置信区间1.3%—7.5%)3.3%(置信区间0.8%—5.8%)平作和垄作下,免耕的增产效应均不显著2010年之后,免耕的增产效应显著提高(平均6.1%),且变幅较小2.5%9.7%随着免耕持续年限的延长,玉米增产率呈先增加后降低的趋势,当持续35 a时,免耕的增产效应显著且达到峰值(平均3.8%,置信区间1.6%—6.0%)。【结论】在年降水量较少或年均气温较低的区域,轮作或秸秆还田条件下,有利于发挥免耕的增产效应;东北地区较华北和西北地区更适宜免耕;3—5 a为较合理的免耕持续年限

关键词: 免耕, 产量效应, Meta-analysis, 玉米, 中国北方地区

Abstract: 【Objective】This study was conducted to reveal the influence mechanism and comprehensive effect of no-tillage on maize yield in Northern China. This study will provide valuable information for the application of no-tillage technology. 【Method】The maize in the northern region of China was taken as the research object. A total of 68 papers (including 82 available comparisons) were selected from published papers at home and abroad before May in 2017. Key information, containing experimental site, annual average precipitation, annual average temperature, cropping system, tillage pattern, experimental duration, experimental year, maize yield, standard deviation of maize yield, and replicate, were abstracted from each study. The site was divided into northwest region of China, northern region of China, and northeast region of China. The annual precipitation and average annual temperature was classified as <500 mm and ≥500 mm, <10℃ and ≥10℃, respectively. The experimental duration was split into four classes of 1-2 a, 3-5 a, 6-9 a, and ≥10 a. The tillage pattern was divided into flat planting and ridge planting. The cropping system was classified as continuous cropping and rotation cropping. Straw returning or not was also carried out. The analysis steps consist of heterogeneity test, comprehensive effect size calculation, publication bias test, sensitivity analysis, cumulative meta-analysis, and influence factor analysis. 【ResultThere were no publication bias and extreme values among the obtained data. No-tillage could significantly increase maize yield compared with traditional tillage. The average yield increasing rate was 3.1% with a confidence interval of 0.7%-5.5%. The cumulative yield increasing rate under no-tillage was unstable before 2000 with average values of -0.7%-6.6%. The differences in cumulative yield increasing rates between no-tillage and traditional tillage, however, gradually changed from non-significant to significant after 2000. No-tillage showed a significant yield increasing rate (average value of 5.3% and confidence interval of 1.5%-9.2%) in northeastern region of China, while the yield effect was not significant in northern region of China and northwestern region of China (average value of -2.6%-6.4% and -1.0%-6.4%, respectively). Maize yield under no-tillage significantly increased in the regions where annual precipitation was less than 500 mm and average annual temperature was lower than 10, and in the conditions of rotation tillage and straw returning. The average yield increasing rate was 5.4% (confidence interval of 1.7%-9.1%), 3.8% (confidence interval of 0.8%-6.7%), 4.4% (confidence interval of 1.3%-7.5%), and 3.3% (confidence interval of 0.8%-5.8%), respectively. The yield effect of no-tillage between ridge planting and flat planting was not significantly different. After 2010, the yield effect of no-tillage was significant (average value of 6.1%), and the amplitude was small (confidence interval of 2.5%-9.7%). The average yield increasing rate increased first and then decreased with the extension of the no-tillage duration. The yield effect was significant and reached the maximum (average value of 3.8% and confidence interval of 1.6%-6.0%) when no-tillage lasted for 3-5 years. 【Conclusion】It helps to improve the effect of no-tillage in northeastern region of China and in regions where annual precipitation is less and annual average temperature is lower. The reasonable no-tillage durations are 3-5 years.  

Key words: no-tillage, yield effect, Meta-analysis, maize, northern region of China