中国农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (19): 4374-4390.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.19.015

• 专题:基于自然的解决方案:绿色农业转型的研究范式与中国实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于自然解决方案视角下的农业文化遗产研究范式探析

肖云泽1,2(), 张宇3, 成功4(), 练子柔1, 周厚熹5()   

  1. 1 浙江工业大学公共管理学院, 中国杭州 310023
    2 浙江省舆情研究中心, 中国杭州 310023
    3 云南大学西南边疆少数民族研究中心, 中国昆明 650500
    4 美国佛蒙特法学院亚美环境法研究中心, 美国南罗耀顿 VT 05068
    5 中国农业科学院农业信息研究所, 中国北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-27 接受日期:2025-12-31 出版日期:2026-10-01 发布日期:2026-10-10
  • 通信作者:
    周厚熹,E-mail:。
    成功,E-mail:
  • 联系方式: 肖云泽,E-mail:xyze@zjut.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金青年项目(20CZJ023); 智慧警务与国家安全风险治理重点实验室2025年度开放课题(ZHKFYB2504); 中央公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(JBYW-AII-2026-53)

Exploring Research Paradigms for Agricultural Heritage from the Perspective of Nature-Based Solutions

XIAO YunZe1,2(), ZHANG Yu3, CHENG Gong4(), LIAN ZiRou1, ZHOU HouXi5()   

  1. 1 School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
    2 Research Center for Public Opinions of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310023, China
    3 Institute for Minorities Studies in Southwest Border Region, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    4 U.S.-Asia Partnerships for Environmental Law, Vermont Law School, South Royalton, VT 05068, USA
    5 Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2025-08-27 Accepted:2025-12-31 Published:2026-10-01 Online:2026-10-10

摘要:

【背景】农业文化遗产是人类与自然协同演化的农业生态系统和知识体系,在当前全球粮食系统面临气候变化冲击、土地退化和生态系统服务功能下降的背景下,作为保障粮食安全和实现农业可持续发展的关键资源,其多功能价值得到广泛关注。自2023年起,中央一号文件开始将“农业文化遗产保护利用”纳入国家战略,为其制度化发展奠定了政策基础。与此同时,国际自然保护联盟提出的“基于自然的解决方案”(nature-based solutions,NbS)理念也在农业与生态治理领域快速发展,强调利用生态过程解决社会挑战。【目的】将NbS作为一种分析框架,可以深入、系统、全面地研究农业文化遗产,建立跨学科的研究范式,并为农业文化遗产的保护、监督、管理、评估、利用和研究提供国际通用的指标体系。【方法】本文以概念比较分析为工具,提出农业文化遗产是NbS的一种典型形态,能够有效应对粮食安全、生态系统退化与乡村社会脆弱性等问题。结合IUCN NbS全球标准中的8项准则与28项评估指标,采用指标评价法,对全球重要农业文化遗产(Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems,GIAHS)和中国重要农业文化遗产名录中的代表性案例进行系统实证分析。【结果】在NbS的8项准则的每个类别之内,以全球农业文化遗产和中国农业文化遗产各3个案例,尽可能涉及更广泛的地域,更多样的生态系统,更异质的生计类型,共计16个全球农业文化遗产和18个中国农业文化遗产。这些案例支撑了28项指标的所有相关内容,显示出农业文化遗产在生态系统服务、生物多样性保育、农田治理、气候韧性、社区参与等方面高度契合NbS标准,且NbS指标体系具有适用于农业文化遗产评估与政策规划的可行性。【结论】从概念结构、价值目标和系统属性来看,农业文化遗产与NbS之间具有高度契合性,农业文化遗产是NbS的子集。因此,可以采用NbS的原则、准则和指标体系对农业文化遗产进行分析与讨论,从而为农业文化遗产的保护、监督、管理、利用和评估提供全球适用的分析框架。该研究为农业文化遗产融入全球NbS政策体系与农业绿色转型提供了研究范式与实证路径。

关键词: 农业文化遗产, 基于自然的解决方案(NbS), 全球重要农业文化遗产(GIAHS), 农业可持续发展, 生态系统服务

Abstract:

【Background】Agricultural heritage systems are agroecosystems and knowledge systems co-evolved by humans and nature. At a time when global food systems are being challenged by climate change, land degradation, and declining ecosystem service functions, their multifunctional values have attracted growing attention as a key resource for safeguarding food security and advancing sustainable agricultural development. Since 2023, China’s No. 1 Central Documents have incorporated the “conservation and utilization of agricultural cultural heritage” into the national strategy, laying a policy foundation for its institutionalized development. Meanwhile, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has rapidly promoted the concept of nature-based solutions (NbS) in the fields of agriculture and ecological governance, emphasizing the use of ecosystem processes to address societal challenges.【Objective】Using NbS as an analytical framework could enable a deeper, more systematic, and more comprehensive examination of agricultural heritage systems, help establish an interdisciplinary research paradigm, and provide an internationally applicable indicator system for the conservation, monitoring, management, evaluation, utilization, and research of agricultural heritage systems.【Method】Employing conceptual comparative analysis, this paper proposes that agricultural heritage systems constitute a prototypical form of NbS and could effectively address challenges, such as food security, ecosystem degradation, and rural social vulnerability. Drawing on the eight criteria and 28 indicators of the IUCN Global Standard for NbS, an indicator-based evaluation method was applied to conduct a systematic empirical analysis of representative cases selected from Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) and from China’s list of Important Agricultural Cultural Heritage.【Result】Within each category of the eight NbS criteria, three GIAHS cases and three Chinese cases were selected, aiming to cover a wider range of regions, more diverse ecosystems, and more heterogeneous livelihood types, for a total of 16 GIAHS cases and 18 Chinese cases. These cases substantiated all relevant components of the 28 indicators, demonstrating that agricultural heritage systems align closely with the NbS Standard in terms of ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, farmland governance, climate resilience, community participation, and related dimensions. The NbS indicator system also proved feasible for the evaluation and policy planning of agricultural heritage systems.【Conclusion】In terms of conceptual structure, value objectives, and system attributes, agricultural heritage systems exhibited a high degree of congruence with NbS; agricultural heritage systems could be regarded as a subset of NbS. Accordingly, NbS principles, criteria, and indicators could be adopted to analyze and discuss agricultural heritage systems, providing a globally applicable analytical framework for their conservation, monitoring, management, utilization, and evaluation. This study offers a research paradigm and an empirical pathway for integrating agricultural heritage systems into the global NbS policy architecture and for promoting green transformation in agriculture.

Key words: agricultural heritage, nature-based solutions (NbS), Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS), sustainable agriculture, ecosystem services