玉米ACO基因家族生物信息学及表达模式分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.07.008

中国农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (7): 1308-1318.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.07.008

玉米ACO基因家族生物信息学及表达模式分析

王程泽¹(), 张燕¹(), 付伟², 贾京哲¹, 董金皋¹, 申珅¹(), 郝志敏¹()

¹ 河北农业大学生命科学学院/华北作物改良与调控国家重点实验室/河北省农业微生物生物信息利用技术创新中心/河北省植物生理与分子病理学重点实验室，河北保定 071000
² 邯郸学院，河北邯郸 056005

收稿日期:2023-10-31 接受日期:2023-12-09 出版日期:2024-04-01 发布日期:2024-04-09
通信作者:
郝志敏，E-mail：haozhimin@hebau.edu.cn。
申珅，E-mail：shenshen0428@163.com
联系方式: 王程泽，E-mail：2060848550@qq.com。张燕，E-mail：2419298400@qq.com。王程泽和张燕为同等贡献作者。
基金资助:
河北省自然科学基金(C2021204112); 河北省省级科技计划(23567601H); 国家玉米产业技术体系(CARS-02)

Bioinformatics and Expression Pattern Analysis of Maize ACO Gene Family

WANG ChengZe¹(), ZHANG Yan¹(), FU Wei², JIA JingZhe¹, DONG JinGao¹, SHEN Shen¹(), HAO ZhiMin¹()

¹ College of Life Science, Hebei Agricultural University/State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation/ Hebei Bioinformatic Utilization and Technological Innovation Center for Agricultural Microbes/Hebei Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Molecular Pathology, Baoding 071000, Hebei
² Handan College, Handan 056005, Hebei

Received:2023-10-31 Accepted:2023-12-09 Published:2024-04-01 Online:2024-04-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】对玉米1-氨基环丙烷-1-羧酸氧化酶ACO基因家族进行全基因组鉴定，分析其在玉米不同器官和不同发育时期以及响应外源激素和病菌侵染中的表达模式，为明确玉米ACO基因家族功能打下基础。【方法】利用生物信息学方法，在玉米B73自交系基因组中鉴定ACO，对其基因结构、蛋白质理化性质、家族成员间的亲缘关系以及保守基序进行分析，利用实时荧光定量PCR（real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR，qRT-PCR）技术分析ZmACO基因家族的表达模式。【结果】除ZmACO11外，ZmACO家族成员均具有Fe²⁺离子结合位点和底物抗坏血酸结合位点。系统发育分析显示，ZmACO2与ScACO在同一分支，亲缘关系较近，Bootstrap值达98。基因表达分析表明，ZmACO2、5、9、15、20、35在各发育时期均活跃表达，且在叶片中呈优势表达，因此选择上述6个基因进行下一步检测。喷施乙烯利后，上述6个基因的表达均有所波动，其中ZmACO2的表达量受影响较大，变化幅度在8倍左右。在乙烯利处理的0—24 h内这6个基因的表达量存在波动，但在处理后24 h，6个基因的表达量均接近0。水杨酸处理后，ZmACO5的表达量受影响较大，变化倍数在2倍左右。其他基因的表达量在处理后24 h均接近0。ZmACO9、35在3—12 h的表达量存在波动，ZmACO2、15、20表达量呈下调趋势。在响应生物胁迫方面，接种玉米大斑病菌（Setosphaeria turcica）后，ZmACO5、9的表达量变化幅度最大，在接种后第10天，这两个基因的表达量分别升至对照组的50和60倍。接种玉米小斑病菌（Cochlibolus heterostrophus）后，ZmACO5的表达量变化幅度较大，变化倍数在40—90倍。接种立枯丝核菌（Rhizoctonia solani）后，ZmACO5、35表达量变化幅度最大，在病菌接种的第3天达到200倍。【结论】ZmACO2、5、20、35在玉米生长发育过程中表达变化最活跃；施加外源乙烯利和水杨酸可以对ZmACO的表达水平造成显著影响。病菌侵染玉米后ZmACO的表达水平产生显著变化，与生物胁迫应答关系密切。

关键词: 玉米ACO基因家族, 实时荧光定量PCR, 基因表达, 乙烯利, 水杨酸, 玉米大斑病菌, 玉米小斑病菌, 立枯丝核菌

Abstract:

【Objective】The objective of this study is to perform the genome-wide identification of the maize ACO (1-aminocyclopropane- 1-carboxylate oxidase) gene family, analyze its expression patterns in different organs and developmental stages of maize, as well as in response to exogenous hormones and pathogen infection, and to lay the foundation for clarifying the function of the maize ACO gene family.【Method】Using bioinformatics methods, the ACO was identified in the genome of maize B73 inbred line, and its gene structure, protein physicochemical properties, phylogenetic relationships among family members, and conserved motifs were analyzed. The expression patterns of the ZmACO gene family were analyzed using real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) technology.【Result】Except for ZmACO11, all members of the ZmACO family have Fe²⁺ binding sites and substrate ascorbic acid binding sites. The phylogenetic tree showed that ZmACO2 and ScACO are in the same branch and have a close genetic relationship, with a Bootstrap value of 98. The gene expression analysis indicated that ZmACO2, 5, 9, 15, 20 and 35 were actively expressed at various developmental stages and exhibited dominant expression in leaves, so the six genes mentioned above were selected for the next step of testing. Spraying ethephon resulted in fluctuations in the expression of all six genes mentioned above, the expression level of ZmACO2 was significantly affected, with a variation multiple of about 8 times. The expression levels of these six genes fluctuated within 0-24 h of ethephon treatment. But after 24 h of treatment, all gene expression levels were close to 0. After salicylic acid treatment, the expression level of ZmACO5 was significantly affected, with a variation multiple of about 2 times. The expression levels of other genes were close to 0 at 24 h after treatment. The expression levels of ZmACO9, 35 fluctuated between 3 to 12 h, and the expression levels of ZmACO2, 15, 20 showed a downward trend. In response to biological stress, the expression levels of ZmACO5, 9 showed the greatest changes after inoculation with the Setosphaeria turcica, and on the 10th day after inoculation, the expression levels of these two genes increased by 50 and 60 times, respectively, compared to the control group. After inoculation with the Cochlibolus heterostrophus, the expression level of ZmACO5 changed significantly, with a variation multiple of 40-90 times. After inoculation with Rhizoctonia solani, the expression levels of ZmACO5, 35 showed the greatest changes, reaching 200 times on the 3rd day of inoculation.【Conclusion】The expression changes of ZmACO2, 5, 20 and 35 are most active during the growth and development of maize; The application of exogenous ethephon and salicylic acid can significantly affect the expression level of ZmACO genes. The expression level of ZmACO genes significantly changes after bacterial infection in maize, which is closely related to the response to biological stress.

Key words: maize ACO gene family, qRT-PCR, gene expression, ethephon, salicylic acid, Setosphaeria turcica, Cochlibolus heterostrophus, Rhizoctonia solani

王程泽, 张燕, 付伟, 贾京哲, 董金皋, 申珅, 郝志敏. 玉米ACO基因家族生物信息学及表达模式分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(7): 1308-1318.

WANG ChengZe, ZHANG Yan, FU Wei, JIA JingZhe, DONG JinGao, SHEN Shen, HAO ZhiMin. Bioinformatics and Expression Pattern Analysis of Maize ACO Gene Family[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(7): 1308-1318.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.07.008

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2024/V57/I7/1308

图/表 7

表1

表2

表3

图1

图2

图3

图4

参考文献 39

[1]	柳兵, 张辰, 王宇琪, 赵仁贵. 玉米自交系I18人工接种大斑病菌的mRNA表达分析. 东北农业科学, 2019, 44(5): 43-47.
	LIU B, ZHANG C, WANG Y Q, ZHAO R G. Analysis of mRNA expression of maize inbred line I18 after artificial inoculating with Setosphaeria turcica. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 44(5): 43-47. (in Chinese)
[2]	BURG S P, BURG E A. Ethylene action and the ripening of fruits. Science, 1965, 148(3674): 1190-1196. pmid: 14280001
[3]	BLEECKER A B, KENDE H. Ethylene: A gaseous signal molecule in plants. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 2000, 16: 1-18. pmid: 11031228
[4]	WEN C K. Ethylene in Plants. Netherlands: Springer, 2015.
[5]	刘畅宇, 陈勋, 龙雨青, 陈娅, 刘湘丹, 周日宝. 乙烯生物合成及信号转导途径中介导花衰老相关基因的研究进展. 生物技术通报, 2019, 35(3): 171-182. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2018-0923
	LIU C Y, CHEN X, LONG Y Q, CHEN Y, LIU X D, ZHOU R B. Research advances in genes involved in ethylene biosynthesis and signal transduction during flower senescence. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(3): 171-182. (in Chinese)
[6]	李栀恩. 番茄ACC氧化酶家族基因的表达研究及其在果实乙烯合成过程中的功能分析[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2012.
	LI Z E. Characterization and function analysis of ACC oxidase gene family in ethylene biosynthesis in tomato fruit[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2012. (in Chinese)
[7]	MATTOO A K, ACHILEA O, FUCHS Y, CHALUTZ E. Membrane association and some characteristics of the ethylene forming enzyme from etiolated pea seedlings. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1982, 105(1): 271-278. pmid: 7092853
[8]	MCGARVEY D J, CHRISTOFFERSEN R E. Characterization and kinetic parameters of ethylene-forming enzyme from avocado fruit. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1992, 267(9): 5964-5967. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)42649-X
[9]	SLATER A, MAUNDERS M J, EDWARDS K, SCHUCH W, GRIERSON D. Isolation and characterisation of cDNA clones for tomato polygalacturonase and other ripening-related proteins. Plant Molecular Biology, 1985, 5: 137-147. doi: 10.1007/BF00015677 pmid: 24306649
[10]	PAN G, LOU C F. Isolation of an 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase gene from mulberry (Morus alba L.) and analysis of the function of this gene in plant development and stresses response. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2008, 165(11): 1204-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.02.012
[11]	金太成, 郎晨婧, 孟大伟, 王悦, 吴艳菊, 杨丽萍. 非生物胁迫激活ABA途径ACO3基因的表达. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(16): 5330-5334.
	JIN T C, LANG C J, MENG D W, WANG Y, WU Y J, YANG L P. Abiotic stress activate the expression of ACO3 gene in the ABA pathway. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020, 18(16): 5330-5334. (in Chinese)
[12]	LOVE J, BJORKLUND S, VAHALA J, HERTZBERG M, KANGASJARVI J, SUNDBERG B. Ethylene is an endogenous stimulator of cell division in the cambial meristem of Populus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(14): 5984-5989.
[13]	WEI H L, XUE Y J, CHEN P Y, HAO P B, WEI F, SUN L, YANG Y L. Genome-wide identification and functional investigation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase (ACO) genes in cotton. Plants, 2021, 10(8): 1699.
[14]	冯志聪, 邹航, 果弘毅, 钟非, 陈艳红, 余春梅, 连博琳, 张健, 刘国元. 旱柳、杞柳ACO基因家族的全基因组鉴定及表达分析. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2022, 43(2): 10-19.
	FENG Z C, ZOU H, GUO H Y, ZHONG F, CHEN Y H, YU C M, LIAN B L, ZHANG J, LIU G Y. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of ACO gene family in Salix matsudana and Salix integra. Journal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Edition), 2022, 43(2): 10-19. (in Chinese)
[15]	WOODSON W R, PARK K Y, DRORY A, LARSEN P B, WANG H. Expression of ethylene biosynthetic pathway transcripts in senescing carnation flowers. Plant Physiology, 1992, 99(2): 526-532. doi: 10.1104/pp.99.2.526 pmid: 16668918
[16]	朱家红, 李超燕, 范鸿雁, 胡福初, 罗志文, 张治礼. 菠萝ACC氧化酶基因AcACO1的克隆与表达分析. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2018, 37(1): 339-344.
	ZHU J H, LI C Y, FAN H Y, HU F C, LUO Z W, ZHANG Z L. Cloning and expression analysis of ACC oxidase gene AcACO1 in pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.). Genomics and Applied Biology, 2018, 37(1): 339-344. (in Chinese)
[17]	雷明, 王加宾, 李志英, 徐立. 蜻蜓凤梨AfACO1基因的克隆及乙烯响应特性分析. 西北农业学报, 2018, 27(12): 1795-1803.
	LEI M, WANG J B, LI Z Y, XU L. Cloning and expression analysis of AtfACO1 response to exogenous ethephon treatment in Aechmea fasciata. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2018, 27(12): 1795-1803. (in Chinese)
[18]	余建, 刘长英, 赵爱春, 王传宏, 蔡雨翔, 余茂德. 桑树1-氨基环丙烷-1-羧酸氧化酶基因(MnACO)启动子功能分析. 作物学报, 2017, 43(6): 839-848.
	YU J, LIU C Y, ZHAO A C, WANG C H, CAI Y X, YU M D. Functional analysis of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase gene’s promoter in mulberry. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017, 43(6): 839-848. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.00839
[19]	金乌云. 甜瓜ACO基因家族成员的鉴定及CmACO7和CmACO8基因的克隆[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学, 2017.
	JIN W Y. Identification of ACO gene family members and cloning of CmACO7 and CmACO8 gene in melon[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University, 2017. (in Chinese)
[20]	杨利艳, 边璐, 史瑞翔, 王创云, 邓妍, 张丽光, 赵丽, 郭虹霞, 秦丽霞, 王美霞. 玉米ACO家族的全基因组鉴定与表达分析. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2022, 45(3): 109-116.
	YANG L Y, BIAN L, SHI R X, WANG C Y, DENG Y, ZHANG L G, ZHAO L, GUO H X, QIN L X, WANG M X. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of ACO family in maize. Journal of Natural Sciences of Hunan Normal University, 2022, 45(3): 109-116. (in Chinese)
[21]	朱丽颖, 陈凯, 汪耀富, 李泽锋, 谢小东, 潘婷, 杨小年, 蒲文宣, 曹培健, 杨军, 罗朝鹏. 烟草ACO基因家族鉴定和二氯喹啉酸药害条件下的表达分析. 烟草科技, 2022, 55(9): 10-18.
	ZHU L Y, CHEN K, WANG Y F, LI Z F, XIE X D, PAN T, YANG X N, PU W X, CAO P J, YANG J, LUO C P. Identification of tobacco ACO gene family and its expression analysis under quinclorac phytotoxicity. Tobacco Technology, 2022, 55(9): 10-18. (in Chinese)
[22]	GAO Y, LI J, PAN X K, LIU D R, NAPIER R, DONG L Y. Quinclorac resistance induced by the suppression of the expression of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) synthase and ACC oxidase genes in Echinochloa crus-galli var. zelayensis. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2018, 146: 25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2018.02.005
[23]	朱璇, 侯媛媛, 王英, 齐会楠. 水杨酸处理对杏果实呼吸速率和乙烯生物合成的影响. 食品研究与开发, 2013, 34(24): 251-253.
	ZHU X, HOU Y Y, WANG Y, QI H N. Effect of salicylic acid treatment on respiratory rate and ethylene biosynthesis of apricot fruits. Food Research and Development, 2013, 34(24): 251-253. (in Chinese)
[24]	田世平, 罗云波, 宫钦钦, 刘红. 病菌侵染对番茄果实乙烯生成, ACC合成酶和脂氧合酶活性的影响. 植物病理学报, 2002, 32(2): 159-164.
	TIAN S P, LUO Y B, GONG Q Q, LIU H. Effect of fungal infection on ethylene production, ACC synthase and lipoxygenase activity in tomato fruits. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 2002, 32(2): 159-164. (in Chinese)
[25]	李文彬, 李春强, 孙建波, 彭明. 枯萎病菌侵染后香蕉乙烯形成酶基因MaACO及乙烯响应因子MaERF1表达水平分析. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2014, 33(5): 1013-1018.
	LI W B, LI C Q, SUN J B, PENG M. Expression analysis of MaACO and MaERF1 in banana infected by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. Genomics and Applied Biology, 2014, 33(5): 1013-1018. (in Chinese)
[26]	ZHAO S S, HONG W, WU J G, WANG Y, JI S Y, ZHU S Y, WEI C H, ZHANG J S, LI Y. A viral protein promotes host SAMS1 activity and ethylene production for the benefit of virus infection. eLife, 2017, 6: e27529. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27529
[27]	FAN X T, MATTHEIS J P, FELLMAN J K. Inhibition of apple fruit 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase activity and respiration by acetylsalicylic acid. Journal of Plant Physiology, 1996, 149(3/4): 469-471. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80151-9
[28]	CHEN H M, SUN J J, LI S, CUI Q Z, ZHANG H M, XIN F J, WANG H S, LIN T, GAO D L, WANG S H, LI X, WANG D H, ZHANG Z H, XU Z H, HUANG S W. An ACC oxidase gene essential for cucumber carpel development. Molecular Plant, 2016, 9(9): 1315-1327. doi: S1674-2052(16)30131-9 pmid: 27403533
[29]	KAHANA A, SILBERSTEIN L, KESSLER N, GOLDSTEIN R S, PERL-TREVES R. Expression of ACC oxidase genes differs among sex genotypes and sex phases in cucumber. Plant Molecular Biology, 1999, 41(4): 517-528. pmid: 10608661
[30]	BINNIE J E, MCMANUS M T. Characterization of the 1- aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) oxidase multigene family of Malus domestica Borkh. Phytochemistry, 2009, 70(3): 348-360. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.01.002
[31]	RUPERTI B, BONGHI C, RASORI A, RAMINA A, TONUTTI P. Characterization and expression of two members of the peach 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase gene family. Physiologia Plantarum, 2001, 111(3): 336-344. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1110311.x
[32]	王爱勤, 杨丽涛, 王自章, 韦宇拓, 何龙飞, 李杨瑞. 甘蔗ACC氧化酶全长cDNA的克隆及序列分析. 广西植物, 2006, 26(2): 194-199.
	WANG A Q, YANG L T, WANG Z Z, WEI Y T, HE L F, LI Y R. Cloning and sequencing of full-length cDNA encoding ACC oxidase in sugarcane. Guihaia, 2006, 26(2): 194-199. (in Chinese)
[33]	NING Q, JIAN Y N, DU Y F, LI Y F, SHEN X M, JIA H T, ZHAO R, ZHAN J M, YANG F, JACKSON D, LIU L, ZHANG Z X. An ethylene biosynthesis enzyme controls quantitative variation in maize ear length and kernel yield. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 5832. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26123-z pmid: 34611160
[34]	刘晓庆. 玉米籽粒响应乙烯利处理的生理及分子机制研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2018.
	LIU X Q. The physiological and molecular mechanism of maize kernel development after ethephon treatment[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[35]	WANG C Q, DAI S Y, ZHANG Z L, LAO W Q, WANG R Y, MENG X Q, ZHOU X. Ethylene and salicylic acid synergistically accelerate leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2021, 63(5): 828-833. doi: 10.1111/jipb.v63.5
[36]	YU X D, XU Y R, YAN S P. Salicylic acid and ethylene coordinately promote leaf senescence. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2021, 63(5): 823-827. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13074
[37]	DERKSEN H, RAMPITSCH C, DAAYF F. Signaling cross-talk in plant disease resistance. Plant Science, 2013, 207: 79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.03.004 pmid: 23602102
[38]	李光哲, 李玲美, 姚展鹏, 柳福丹. 乙烯和水杨酸信号转导在拟南芥对聚乙二醇胁迫应答中的相互作用. 沈阳师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(2): 214-219.
	LI G Z, LI L M, YAO Z P, LIU F D. Interaction between ethylene- and salicylic acid-signaling in Arabidopsis response to polyethylene glycol stress. Journal of Shenyang Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 35(2): 214-219. (in Chinese)
[39]	WANG X Y, MENG H C, TANG Y X, ZHANG Y S, HE Y X, ZHOU G J, MENG X Z. Phosphorylation of an ethylene response factor by MPK3/MPK6 mediates negative feedback regulation of pathogen- induced ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 2022, 49(8): 810-822. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2022.04.012

引物Primer	序列Sequence (5′-3′)
ZmACO1-F/R	TGAAAACCTTGGGCTGGACA/TCACAAGCTCTGGATGGCTG
ZmACO2-F/R	CAAGATGCGTGCGAGAACTG/CGCTTGTAGTGCTCCTTGGT
ZmACO3-F/R	CATCTCCGGCGGCCTAAAA/AGTTCTTTGTCGAATACTCGGT
ZmACO4-F/R	CTACAACCCGGCTAACGAGG/GAATCTGGGCTCCTTGGCTT
ZmACO5-F/R	TACTTCATCCAGCACCACCC/TTGAACCACGGGTGCTTGCC
ZmACO6-F/R	GAGAAGATGCTGGGCGTGAT/ATAGTGGCTGACCTTGGTGC
ZmACO7-F/R	GATGATGGAGTACCGCAGGG/TGACCTTGGTGCCGTAGAAG
ZmACO8-F/R	AGCTGCTTCGAAGAGGTTATCAA/TGACGCCTACGGAAGGTTTAG
ZmACO9-F/R	TCGGGGACCTCTTGCAGATA/AGATGCCGATGGAAACCCTG
ZmACO10-F/R	AAGGTGGCAAAGTACCCCAG/GCCATCCACCTACCGTCTTT
ZmACO11-F/R	CGTCTTCCGCTCCTACATCG/CAGTGAGGTACAGAGCGAGC
ZmACO12-F/R	AGCTCTGTACCTCACTGGAGA/AAAACGCCTCTTGGTAAGCG
ZmACO15-F/R	TGCCTTCTCCATCCTCAAGTC/CGATGACGGGAACCACCATT
ZmACO20-F/R	GGGAGAGCACCTTCTTCGTC/TTCTCCGACAGCTTCTGCAC
ZmACO31-F/R	AAGAAGGTGTGCTCCGACTG/GATGTCCTCCCAGTCCAGGT
ZmACO35-F/R	CTGGGAGAGCACCTTCTTCG/GATCTCCGATGCGAACTGCT
UBQ9-F/R	TACAGTTCTACAAGGTGGACGAC/GCAGTAGTGGCGGTCGAAGT

反应组分Reaction component	反应体系Reaction system	终浓度Final concentration
2×Fast Super EvaGreen Master Mix	10 μL	1×
正向引物Forward primer	1 μL	0.1-0.5 μmol·L^-1 each
反向引物Reverse primer	1 μL	0.1-0.5 μmol·L^-1 each
cDNA (500 ng·μL^-1) template	1 μL
H₂O	补足至20 μL Make up to 20 μL

名称 Name	基因号 Gene ID	氨基酸长度 Size (aa)	开放阅读框 ORF (bp)	基因定位 Gene mapping	分子量 Molecular weight (Da)	等电点 Isoelectric point
ZmACO1	Zm00001d036955	293	1024	scaffold_6:114257252-114258119(+)	33323.18	6.01
ZmACO2	Zm00001d020686	326	1484	scaffold_7:128315057-128316692(-)	36437.57	5.18
ZmACO3	Zm00001d024852	315	1259	scaffold_10:90656251-90657509(-)	35020.67	5.42
ZmACO4	Zm00001d024851	315	948	scaffold_10:90634003-90634950(-)	35020.67	5.42
ZmACO5	Zm00001d011208	317	1532	scaffold_8:142565914-142567685(+)	34646.05	5.06
ZmACO6	Zm00001d004718	310	1234	scaffold_2:133578506-133580227(+)	34557.35	5.13
ZmACO7	Zm00001d000163	313	1451	scaffold_4:209050198-209052191(-)	35045.80	5.01
ZmACO8	Zm00001d005927	226	681	scaffold_2:193010237-193011059(+)	25466.25	6.22
ZmACO9	Zm00001d039575	376	1526	scaffold_3:8204808-8206696(+)	40606.00	5.77
ZmACO10	Zm00001d015860	234	705	scaffold_5:127015024-127015847(+)	26546.42	6.23
ZmACO11	Zm00001d044978	123	372	scaffold_9:9100281-9102917(-)	13700.64	9.47
ZmACO12	Zm00001d046848	260	793	scaffold_9:108298093-108299643(-)	29077.46	9.52
ZmACO15	Zm00001d024853	356	1599	scaffold_10:90488171-90489769(+)	39417.55	6.03
ZmACO20	Zm00001d052136	323	1330	scaffold_4:180604677-180607029(-)	35551.08	4.97
ZmACO31	Zm00001d024843	314	945	scaffold_10:90456450-90457394(-)	34836.40	5.09
ZmACO35	Zm00001d018211	317	1342	scaffold_5:216633702-216636170(+)	35295.88	4.89

玉米ACO基因家族生物信息学及表达模式分析

Bioinformatics and Expression Pattern Analysis of Maize ACO Gene Family

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	陈兵先, 张琪, 戴彰言, 周旭, 刘军. 水杨酸引发提高低温下水稻种子萌发活力的生理与分子效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(7): 1220-1236.
[2]	张博文, 赵丽雯, 徐璐, 李盼, 曾凡力, 孟亚南, 董金皋. 玉米大斑病菌细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶结构亚基StCks1鉴定及其基因功能分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(5): 900-908.
[3]	渠清, 刘宁, 邹金鹏, 张雅璇, 贾慧, 孙蔓莉, 曹志艳, 董金皋. 拟轮枝镰孢与玉米籽粒互作的差异基因筛选及代谢通路分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(6): 1086-1101.
[4]	邹婷, 刘丽莉, 向建华, 周定港, 吴金锋, 李莓, 李宝, 张大为, 严明理. 芸薹属植物MYBL2基因的克隆及其在A、B、C基因组中的PCR鉴别[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(3): 416-429.
[5]	罗正英, 胡鑫, 刘新龙, 吴才文, 吴转娣, 刘家勇, 曾千春. 外源海藻糖提高甘蔗幼苗抗旱能力并促进植株生长[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(21): 4208-4218.
[6]	李美璇, 张向昆, 王莉, 乔月莲, 师校欣, 杜国强. 沙地葡萄茎痘相关病毒在‘阳光玫瑰’葡萄树不同物候期和不同部位的变化规律[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(21): 4234-4244.
[7]	杨丽, 曹洪波, 张学英, 翟含含, 李辛淼, 彭佳伟, 田义, 陈海江. 桃生长势相关基因PpSAUR73功能鉴定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(20): 4072-4086.
[8]	苏佳, 赵炜, 刘丹, 王嘉, 白洪旭, 吴华伟, 薛青红, 陈晓春. 外源性马立克氏病病毒荧光定量PCR检测方法的建立[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(20): 4125-4136.
[9]	许福春, 赵静若, 张振楠, 胡改元, 龙璐. 陆地棉GhCPR5的克隆及其在抗病中的功能分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(19): 3747-3758.
[10]	曹鹏, 许建建, 李楚欣, 王新亮, 王春庆, 宋晨虎, 宋震. 柑橘黄化花叶病毒的实时定量PCR检测及其在寄主植株中的时空分布规律[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(18): 3574-3584.
[11]	邹金鹏, 岳浩峰, 李海笑, 刘峥, 刘宁, 曹志艳, 董金皋. 基于非靶向代谢组学分析StLAC2和StLAC6差异影响玉米大斑病菌的机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(16): 3110-3223.
[12]	李允静, 肖芳, 武玉花, 李俊, 高鸿飞, 翟杉杉, 梁晋刚, 吴刚. 抗逆大豆IND-ØØ41Ø-5转化体特异性定量PCR检测方法的建立及其标准化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(13): 2443-2460.
[13]	张克坤,陈可钦,李婉平,乔浩蓉,张俊霞,刘凤之,房玉林,王海波. 灌水量对限根栽培‘阳光玫瑰’葡萄果实发育与香气物质积累的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 129-143.
[14]	古丽旦,刘洋,李方向,成卫宁. 小麦吸浆虫小热激蛋白基因Hsp21.9的克隆及在滞育过程与温度胁迫下的表达特性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 79-89.
[15]	邱一蕾,吴帆,张莉,李红亮. 亚致死剂量吡虫啉对中华蜜蜂神经代谢基因表达的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1685-1694.