节水抗旱稻旱优113号的根系生长对土壤水分亏缺的响应

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.22.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】揭示土壤水分亏缺条件下节水抗旱稻根系的形态和生理指标的变化规律，阐明其节水抗旱的特异性生理基础。【方法】2015和2016年利用盆栽试验，以节水抗旱稻旱优113号（HY113）和高产水稻扬两优6号（YLY6）为试验材料，通过设置淹灌（对照）和干旱（土壤水势-38 kPa左右）处理，研究干旱对节水抗旱稻与高产水稻根系形态结构和生理指标的影响及其与地上部生物量积累的关系。【结果】与淹灌相比，干旱处理显著降低了两个水稻品种的地上、地下干物质积累量，同时显著降低了节水抗旱稻HY113的根冠比（由0.18降为0.12），高产水稻YLY6的根冠比无显著变化。干旱处理下，两个品种的水稻根系活力均显著增加，但HY113的增加幅度显著高于YLY6，乳熟期HY113在2015和2016两年的平均增幅为38.7%，而YLY6为22.8%，其中2015年乳熟期HY113的根系活力从86 µg·g^-1·h^-1增加至174 µg·g^-1·h^-1。干旱处理下，HY113和YLY6的根系吸收面积均显著减小，但HY113的减小幅度显著低于YLY6。与高产水稻YLY6相比，节水抗旱稻HY113的根数、根体积和根干重均较少，总干物质积累量较少，但其根系活力和根系有效吸收面积较大。【结论】节水抗旱稻HY113具有根量少，但根系吸收效率高的特点，其在缺水条件下能维持较高的根系活力和根系吸收面积；在遭遇水分亏缺时HY113可通过减小根冠比，使得更多的干物质留在地上部分以保证籽粒产量。

关键词: 节水抗旱稻, 水分亏缺, 根冠比, 根系特性

Abstract: 【Objective】 The objective of this paper is to reveal root morphological and physiological changing characteristics of water-saving and drought-resistant rice under soil water deficit condition, and to illuminate its specific physiological basis of water-saving and drought-resistance. 【Method】 Pot experiments were conducted in 2015 and 2016, and one water-saving and drought-resistant rice genotype (HY113) and one high-yielding rice genotype (YLY6) were used under two water treatments, including flooding irrigation and drought treatment. The drought effects on root morphological and physiological traits of the two rice genotypes and their relationship with aboveground biomass accumulation were studied.【Result】Compared with flooding irrigation, drought stress significantly reduced the dry matter accumulation of the two rice genotypes, and the root-shoot ratio of HY113 was also decreased significantly (from 0.18 to 0.12), while the root-shoot ratio of YLY6 was not changed. Under drought stress, the root activity of the two rice genotypes both increased significantly. In 2015 and 2016, the average increase percentage of HY113 was 38.7% at milky stage, while that of YLY6 was 22.8%, and the root activity of HY113 increased from 86 μg·g^-1·h^-1 to 174 μg·g^-1·h^-1at milky stage in 2015. Drought treatment also significantly reduced the root absorption area of both two genotypes, but the reduction percentage of HY113 was significantly lower than that of YLY6. Compared with high-yielding rice YLY6, HY113 had smaller root number, root volume and root dry weight, and the total dry matter accumulation was also significantly lower, but its root activity and root absorption area were greater. 【Conclusion】The water-saving and drought-tolerant rice genotype HY113 possesses less root biomass but higher root uptake efficiency, and it could reduce the root-shoot ratio under drought condition to make more dry matter stay in the aboveground part, so that the relatively high grain yield could be maintained.

Key words: water-saving and drought-resistant rice, water deficit, root-shoot ratio, root characteristics

补红英，宋维周，曹凑贵，李萍. 节水抗旱稻旱优113号的根系生长对土壤水分亏缺的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(22): 4277-4289.

BU HongYing, SONG WeiZhou, CAO CouGui, LI Ping. Root Growth Responses to Soil Water Deficit for a Water-Saving and Drought-Resistant Rice Genotype Hanyou113[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(22): 4277-4289.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.22.004

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2017/V50/I22/4277

参考文献

[1] 罗利军, 梅捍卫, 余新桥, 刘鸿艳, 冯芳君. 节水抗旱稻及其发展策略. 科学通报, 2011, 56(11): 804-811.

LUO L J, MEI H W, YU X Q, LIU H Y, FENG F J. Water-saving and drought-resistant rice and its development strategy. Science Bulletin, 2011, 56(11): 804-811. (in Chinese)

[2] Cassman K G, Dobermann A, Waiters D T. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2003, 28(1): 315-358.

[3] Tilman D K, Cassman K G, Matson P A. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 2002, 418(8): 671-677.

[4] 茆智. 水稻节水灌溉及其对环境的影响. 中国工程科学, 2002, 4(7): 8-16.

Mao Z. Rice water-saving irrigation and its impact on environment. China Engineering Science, 2002, 4(7): 8-16. (in Chinese)

[5] 董桂春, 王余龙, 王坚刚, 单玉华, 马爱京, 杨洪, 张传胜, 蔡惠荣. 不同类型水稻品种间根系性状差异. 作物学报,2002, 28(6): 749-755.

DONG G C, WANG Y L, WANG J G, Shan Y H, MA A J, YANG H, ZHANG C S, CAI H R. Study on the differences of root traits between various types of varieties in rice(Oryza sativa L. ). Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2002, 28 (6): 749-755. (in Chinese)

[6] 杨建昌. 水稻根系形态生理与产量、品质形成及养分吸收利用的关系. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(1): 36-46.

YANG J C. Relationships of rice root morphology and physiology with the formation of grain yield and quality and the nutrient absorption and utilization. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(1): 36-46. (in Chinese)

[7] 刘骞, 齐宏伟. 水稻根系研究进展. 种子世界, 2009(11): 33-35.

LIU Q, QI H W. Advances in rice root research. Seed World, 2009(11): 33-35. (in Chinese)

[8] LUO L J. Breeding for water-saving and drought-resistance rice (WDR) in China. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2010, 61(13): 3509-3517.

[9] CHU G , CHEN T T, WANG Z Q, YANG J C, ZHANG J H. Reprint of “Morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with water productivity in water-saving and drought- resistant rice”. Field Crops Research, 2014, 165(6): 36-48.

[10] 张耗, 剧成欣, 陈婷婷, 曹转勤, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 节水灌溉对节水抗旱水稻品种产量的影响及生理基础. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(23): 4782-4793.

ZHANG H, JU C X, CHEN T T, CAO Z Q, WANG Z Q, YANG J C. Effect of water-saving irrigation on the grain yield of water-saving and drought-resistance rice and its physiological bases. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(23): 4782-4793. (in Chinese)

[11] 张耗, 黄钻华, 王静超, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 江苏中籼水稻品种演进过程中根系形态生理性状的变化及其与产量的关系. 作物学报, 2011, 37(6): 1020-1030.

ZHANG H, HUANG Z H, WANG J C, WANG Z Q, YANG J C. Changes in morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with grain yield during the evolution of mid-season indica rice cultivars in Jiangsu province. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(6): 1020-1030. (in Chinese)

[12] 褚光, 周群, 薛亚光, 颜晓元, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 栽培模式对杂交粳稻常优5号根系形态生理性状和地上部生长的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(7): 1245-1258.

CHU G, ZHOU Q, XUE Y G, YAN X Y, LIU L J, YANG J C. Effects of cultivation patterns on root morph-physiological traits and aboveground development of japonica hybrid rice cultivar changyou 5. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(7): 1245-1258. (in Chinese)

[13] 杨彩玲, 刘立龙, CHUNG N T, 秦华东, 赵泉, 陈德威, 徐世宏, 黄敏, 江立庚. 土壤水分对免耕水稻根系生长的影响. 华中农业大学学报, 2016, 35(1): 8-16.

YANG C L, LIU L L, CHUNG N T, QIN H D, ZHAO Q, CHEN D W, XU S H, HUANG M, JIANG L G. Effects of soil moisture on root growth of no-tillage rice. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2016, 35(1): 8-16. (in Chinese)

[14] 陈达刚, 周新桥, 李丽君, 刘传光, 张旭, 陈友订. 华南主栽高产籼稻根系形态特征及其与产量构成的关系. 作物学报, 2013, 39(10): 1899-1908.

CHEN D G, ZHOU X Q, LI L J, LIU C G, ZHANG X, CHEN Y D. Relationship between root morphological characteristics and yield components of major commercial indica rice in South China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(10): 1899-1908. (in Chinese)

[15] 徐国伟, 吕强, 陆大克, 王贺正, 陈明灿. 干湿交替灌溉耦合施氮对水稻根系性状及籽粒库活性的影响. 作物学报, 2016, 42(10): 1495-1505.

XU G W , LÜ Q, LU D K, WANG H Z, CHEN M C. Effect of wetting and drying alternative irrigation coupling with nitrogen application on root characteristic and grain-sink activity. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016, 42(10): 1495-1505. (in Chinese)

[16] 蔡昆争, 骆世明, 段舜山. 水稻根系在根袋处理条件下对氮养分的反应. 生态学报, 2003, 23(6): 1109-1116.

CAI K Z, LUO S M, DUAN S S. The response of the rice root system to nitrogen conditions under root confinement. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(6): 1109-1116. (in Chinese)

[17] PENG S B, HUANG J L, ZHONG X H, YANG J C, WANG G H, ZOU Y B, ZHANG F S, ZHU Q S, Buresh R J, Witt C. Challenge and opportunity in improving fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2002, 1(7): 776-785.

[18] 胡艳丽, 毛志泉, 沈向, 张黎黎. 影响农作物根系冗余影响因子探讨. 现代农业科技, 2008(23): 13-15.

HU Y L, MAO Z Q, SHEN X, ZHANG L L. Discussion on influencing factors of crop roots redundancy. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2008(23): 13-15. (in Chinese)

[19] 蔡昆争, 骆世明, 段舜山. 水稻群体根系特征与地上部生长发育和产量的关系. 华南农业大学学报, 2005, 25(6): 1-4.

CAI K Z, LUO S M, DUAN S S. The relationship between roots system of rice and aboveground characteristics and yield. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2005, 25(6): 1-4. (in Chinese)

[20] MA S C, LI F M, XU B C, HUANG Z B. Effect of lowering the root/shoot ratio by pruning roots on water use efficiency and grain yield of winter wheat. Field Crops Research, 2010, 115(2): 158-164.

[21] YANG J, ZHANG H, ZHANG J. Root morphology and physiology in relation to the yield formation of rice. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2012, 11(6): 920-926.

[22] ZHANG H, XUE Y G, WANG Z Q, YANG J C, ZHANG J H. Morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with shoot growth in “super” rice. Field Crops Research, 2009, 113(1): 31-40.

[23] 蔡永萍, 杨其光, 黄义德. 水稻水作与旱作对抽穗后剑叶光合特性、衰老和根系活性的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2000, 14(4): 219-224．

CAI Y P, YANG Q G, HUANG Y D. Effects of rice cultivated under paddy and upland condition on photosynthesis and senescence of flag leaf and activity of root system after heading. Chinese Journal Rice Science, 2000, 14(4): 219-224. (in Chinese)

[24] 程兆伟, 邹应斌, 刘武. 水稻根系研究进展. 作物研究, 2006, 20(s1): 504-507.

CHENG Z W, ZOU Y B, LIU W. Advances of research on rice root systems. Crop Research, 2006, 20(s1): 504-507. (in Chinese)

[25] 蔡昆争, 吴学祝, 骆世明, 王维. 不同生育期水分胁迫对水稻根系活力、叶片水势和保护酶活性的影响. 华南农业大学学报, 2008, 29(2): 7-10.

CAI K Z, WU X Z, LUO S M, WANG W. Effects of water stress at different growth stages on root activity, leaf water potential and protective enzymes activity in rice. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2008, 29(2): 7-10. (in Chinese)

[26] 郝树荣, 郭相平, 张展羽, 王为木. 水稻根冠功能对水分胁迫及复水的补偿响应. 农业机械学报, 2010, 41(5): 52-55.

HAO S R, GUO X P, ZHANG Z Y, WANG W M. Compensation effects of water stress and re-watering on the function of root shoot. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization, 2010, 41(5): 52-55. (in Chinese)

[27] LUO L J, MEI H W, YU X Q, LIU H Y, FENG F J. Water-saving and drought-resistance rice and its development strategy. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2011, 56(11): 804-811.

[28] ZOU G H, LIU H Y, MEI H W, LIU G L, YU X Q, LI M S, WU J H, CHEN L, LUO L J. Screening for drought resistance of rice recombinant inbred populations in the field. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2007, 49(10): 1508-1516.

[29] 孙静文, 陈温福, 臧春明, 王彦荣, 吴淑琴. 水稻根系研究进展. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2002, 33(6): 174-180.

Sun J W, Chen W F, Zang C M, Wang Y R, Wu S Q. Advances of research on rice root systems. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2002, 33(6): 174-180. (in Chinese)

[30] 腾胜, 曾大力, 钱前, 国广泰史, 藤本宽, 黄大年, 朱立煌. 水稻根系活力的遗传分析. 中国水稻科学, 2002, 16(2): 119-123.

TENG S, ZENG D L, QIAN Q, GUO G T S, TENG B K, HUANG D N, ZHU L H. Genetic analysis of root activity in rice (Oryza sativa). Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2002, 16(2): 119-123. (in Chinese)

[31] Kadam N N, Yin X, Bindraban P S, Struik P C, Jagadish K S V. Does morphological and anatomical plasticity during the vegetative stage make wheat more tolerant of water deficit stress than rice. Plant Physiology, 2015, 167(4): 1389-1401.

[32] Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra S M A. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Sustainable Agriculture, 2009, 29(1): 153-188.

[33] 明东风, 袁红梅, 王玉海, 宫海军, 周伟军. 水分胁迫下硅对水稻苗期根系生理生化性状的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(12): 2510-2519.

MING D F, YUAN H M, WANG Y H, GONG H J, ZHOU W J. Effects of silicon on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of roots of rice seedlings under water stress. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(12): 2510-2519. (in Chinese)

[34] 杨长明, 杨林章, 欧阳竹. 不同养分与水分管理对水稻植株根系形态及其活力的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2004, 12(4): 82-85.

YANG C M, YANG L Z, OU Y Z. Effects of different nutrient and water regimes on the morphology and activity of rice root system. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2004, 12(4): 82-85. (in Chinese)

[35] YANG J C, ZHANG J H. Root morphology and physiology in relation to the yield formation of rice. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2012, 11(6): 920-926.

[36] ZHANG H, XUE Y G, WANG Z Q, YANG J C, ZHANA J H. An alternate wetting and moderate soil drying regime improves root and shoot growth in rice. Crop Science, 2009, 49(6): 2246-2260.