肉羊甲烷排放测定与模型估测

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.13.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】研究日粮不同营养物质含量和消化性能对肉羊瘤胃甲烷排放的影响，并建立甲烷排放估测模型。【方法】选取8头月龄相近、体重（50.37±1.13） kg的成年杂交绵羊公羊（杜泊（♂）×小尾寒羊（♀）），分别饲喂8种中性洗涤纤维（neutral detergent fiber，NDF）含量不同（分别为51.83%、50.47%、44.58%、42.34%、38.20%、35.43%、30.10%和27.03%）的全混合日粮，进行8×4不完全拉丁方试验。试验分为4期，每期16 d，于第9—16天采用Sable呼吸测热系统测定甲烷，用全收粪法进行消化试验。【结果】8种日粮每千克可消化有机物的甲烷排放量（L•kg-1 DOM）分别为48.80、46.98、45.38、41.34、35.44、34.66、33.73和37.83。甲烷与NDF回归模型：CH4E/DE（%）=0.14688DNDF/DOM（%）+5.47643（R2=0.9084，P=0.0003）。甲烷与酸性洗涤纤维（ADF）回归模型：CH4 （L•kg-1 DOM）=0.14411DADF（g）+23.69940（R2=0.8367，P=0.0015）。甲烷与营养物质摄入量：CH4（L•kg-1 DOM）=-0.22260OMI（g）+0.15234CPI（g）+0.06465NDFI（g）-0.60549EEI（g）+218.23715（R2=0.9786，P=0.0077）。甲烷与可消化营养物质：CH4（L•kg-1 DOM）=0.09722DCP（g）+0.12079DNDF（g）-0.08355DADF（g）-1.71035DEE（g）+47.85414（R2=0.9776，P=0.0083）。【结论】日粮的精粗比或粗饲料含量直接影响单位可消化有机物的甲烷排放量及甲烷能/总能、甲烷能/消化能之比。在直线回归中，与其它营养物质相比，NDF和ADF与肉羊甲烷排放相关性最强。与直线回归相比，多元回归提高了甲烷估测的相关性和准确性。

关键词: 肉羊, 呼吸测热, 甲烷, 营养物质, 回归模型

Abstract: 【Objective】 This trial was designed to study the effects of dietary nutrients and their digestibility on rumen methane (CH4) emissions from sheep and develop regression models. 【Method】 Eight adult crossbreed rams (Dorper (♂) ×Small Tail Han sheep (♀)) with the body weight of (50.37±1.13) kg were fed 8 total mixed rations with different NDF content of 51.83%, 50.47%, 44.58%, 42.34%, 38.20%, 35.43%, 30.10% and 27.03%, respectively. The experiment design was 8×4 incomplete Latin square which lasted for 4 periods and each period lasted for 16 d. CH4 was measured by sable open-circuit respiration calorimetry system with 3 sheep once and digestive trials were conducted by total feces collection method during the last 8 d of each period. 【Result】 CH4 per kg digestive organic matter (L•kg-1 DOM) of 8 diets was 48.80, 46.98, 45.38, 41.34, 35.44, 34.66, 33.73 and 37.83, respectively. Methane regressed to NDF, ADF, nutrient intake and digestive nutrients were CH4E/DE (%)=0.14688DNDF/DOM (%)+5.47643 (R2=0.9084, P=0.0003), CH4 (L•kg-1 DOM)=0.14411DADF(g)+23.69940 (R2=0.8367, P=0.0015), CH4 (L•kg-1 DOM)=-0.22260OMI (g)+0.15234CPI (g)+0.06465NDFI (g)-0.60549EEI (g)+218.23715 (R2=0.9786, P=0.0077) and CH4 (L•kg-1 DOM)=0.09722DCP (g)+0.12079DNDF (g)-0.08355DADF (g)-1.71035DEE (g)+47.85414 (R2=0.9776, P=0.0083), respectively.【Conclusion】CH4 (L•kg-1 DOM), CH4E/GE and CH4E/DE were affected by the ratio of forage to concentrate (F﹕C) or dietary roughage content. In the linear regression models, NDF and ADF were more reliable than other nutrients to estimate methane emissions with higher precision. Compared with the linear regression models, the multiple regression models clearly provided a higher accuracy and a stronger correlation.

Key words: sheep, respiration calorimetry, methane, nutrients, regression models

赵一广, 刁其玉, 刘洁, 姜成钢, 邓凯东, 屠焰. 肉羊甲烷排放测定与模型估测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(13): 2718-2727.

ZHAO Yi-Guang, DIAO Qi-Yu, LIU Jie, JIANG Cheng-Gang, DENG Kai-Dong, TU Yan. Estimation and Regression Models of Methane Emissions from Sheep[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(13): 2718-2727.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.13.016

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2012/V45/I13/2718

参考文献

[1]李胜利, 金鑫, 范学珊, 黄文明, 曹志军. 反刍动物生产与碳减排措施. 动物营养学报, 2010, 22(1): 2-9.

Li S L, Jin X, Fan X S, Huang W M, Cao Z J. Ruminant production and carbon emission reduction measures. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2010, 22(1): 2-9. (in Chinese)

[2]Moe P W, Tyrrell H F. Methane production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 1979, 62(6): 1583-1586.

[3]韩继福, 冯仰廉, 张晓明, 莫放, 赵广永, 杨雅芳. 阉牛不同日粮的纤维消化、瘤胃内VFA对甲烷产生量的影响. 中国兽医学报, 1997, 17(3): 278-280.

Han J F, Feng Y L, Zhang X M, Mo F, Zhao G Y, Yang Y F. Effects of fiber digestion and VFA in the rumen on the methane production in steers of different type of diets. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science, 1997, 17(3): 278-280. (in Chinese)

[4]冯仰廉. 肉牛营养需要和饲养标准. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2000: 18.

Feng Y L. Nutrient Requirements and Feeding Standards of Beef Cattle. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural University Press, 2000: 18. (in Chinese)

[5]Kirchgessner M, Windisch W, Mueller H L, Kreuzer M. Release of methane and of carbon dioxide by dairy cattle. Agribiological Research, 1991, 44(2/3): 91-102.

[6]Jentsch W, Schweigel M, Weissbach F, Scholze H, Pitroff W, Derno F. Methane production in cattle calculated by the nutrient composition of the diet. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 2007, 61(1): 10-19.

[7]张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. 第二版. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2003: 45-105.

Zhang L Y. Feed Analysis and Determining Technique. 2nd ed. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural University Press, 2003: 45-105. (in Chinese)

[8]熊本海, 庞之洪, 罗清尧. 饲料数据描述规范及评价进展. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2008: 160.

Xiong B H, Pang Z H, Luo Q Y. Descriptors of Attribution Data on Feedstuffs and Their Evaluation Advances. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2008: 160. (in Chinese)

[9]van Soest P J, Robertson J B, Lewis B A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74: 3583-3597.

[10]周怿, 刁其玉. 反刍动物瘤胃甲烷气体生成的调控. 草食家畜, 2008, 4: 21-24.

Zhou Y, Diao Q Y. Manipulation for the methane production in rumen. Grass-Feeding Livestock, 2008, 4: 21-24. (in Chinese)

[11]Lovett D, Lovell S, Stack L, Callan J, Finlay M, Conolly J, O’Mara F P . Effect of forage/concentrate ratio and dietary coconut oil level on methane output and performance of finishing beef heifers. Livestock Production Science, 2003, 84(2): 135-146.

[12]Lovett D K, Stack L J, Lovell S, Callan J, Flynn B, Hawkins M, O’Mara F P. Manipulating enteric methane emissions and animal performance of late-lactation dairy cows through concentrate supplementation at pasture. Journal of Dairy Science, 2005, 88(8): 2836-2842.

[13]Hindrichsen I K, Wettstein H R, Machmüller A, Kreuzer M. Methane emission, nutrient degradation and nitrogen turnover in dairy cows and their slurry at different milk production scenarios with and without concentrate supplementation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 113: 150-161.

[14]樊霞, 董红敏, 韩鲁佳, 黄光群. 肉牛甲烷排放影响因素的试验研究. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(8): 179-183.

Fan X, Dong H M, Han L J, Huang G Q. Experimental study on the factors affecting methane emission of beef cattle. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2006, 22(8): 179-183. (in Chinese)

[15]Johnson K A, Johnson D E. Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 1995, 73: 2483-2492.

[16]Aguerre M J, Wattiaux M A, Powell J M, Broderick G A, Arndt C. Effect of forage-to-concentrate ratio in dairy cow diets on emission of methane, carbon dioxide, and ammonia, lactation performance, and manure excretion. Journal of Dairy Science, 2011, 94(6): 3081-3093.

[17]游玉波. 肉牛甲烷排放测定与估算模型的研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2008: 38.

You Y B. Study on estimation and prediction models of methane emissions from beef cattle[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2008: 38. (in Chinese)

[18]娜仁花. 不同日粮对奶牛瘤胃甲烷及氮排放的影响研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2010: 3-6.

Na R H. Effects of diet composition on methane and nitrogen emissions from lactating cattle[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2010:3-6. (in Chinese)

[19]McAllister T A, Newbold C J. Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2008, 48(2): 7-13.

[20]Benchaar C, Rivest J, Pomar C, Chiquette J. Prediction of methane production from dairy cows using existing mechanistic models and regression equations. Journal of Animal Science, 1998, 76: 617-627.

[21]Mills J, Kebreab E, Yates C M, Crompton L A, Caunnell S B, Dhanoa M S, Agnew R E, France J. Alternative approaches to predicting methane emissions from dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science, 2003, 81: 3141-3150.

[22]Machmüller A. Medium-chain fatty acids and their potential to reduce methanogenesis in domestic ruminants. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 112(2/3): 107-114.

[23]Beauchemin K A, McGinn S M, Benchaar C, Holtshausen L. Crushed sunflower, flax, or canola seeds in lactating dairy cow diets: effects on methane production, rumen fermentation, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science, 2009, 92(5): 2118-2127.

[24]Boeckaert C, Mestdagh J, Vlaeminck B, Clayton D, Fievez V. Micro-algae as potent rumen methane inhibitors and modifiers of rumen lipolysis and biohydrogenation of linoleic and linolenic acid. International Congress Series, 2006, 1293: 184-188.

[25]Grainger C, Beauchemin K A. Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production? Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2011, 166: 308-320.

[26]Mao H L, Wang J K, Zhou Y Y, Liu J X. Effects of addition of tea saponins and soybean oil on methane production, fermentation and microbial population in the rumen of growing lambs. Livestock Science, 2010, 129(1/3): 56-62.