电子顺磁共振波谱仪分析干红葡萄酒DPPH清除能力及其与总酚含量的关系

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.01.016

中国农业科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 135-141.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.01.016

电子顺磁共振波谱仪分析干红葡萄酒DPPH清除能力及其与总酚含量的关系

胡博然, 闻雯, 阴淑贞, 朱勇, 张奉民

1.扬州大学食品科学与工程学院，江苏扬州 225127
2.扬州大学生物科学与技术学院，江苏扬州 225009
3.扬州大学测试中心，江苏扬州 225009

收稿日期:2011-07-04 出版日期:2012-01-01 发布日期:2011-11-09
通讯作者: 胡博然，E-mail：huboran2001@yahoo.com.cn
作者简介:胡博然，E-mail：huboran2001@yahoo.com.cn
基金资助:
江苏省政府留学奖学金项目（K001）、江苏省高校产业化推进项目（JH08-24）

EPR Spectroscopy Studies on DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Activity of Dry Red Wines and Their Relationship with Total Polyphenols Content

HU Bo-Ran, WEN Wen, YIN Shu-Zhen, ZHU Yong, ZHANG Feng-Min

1.扬州大学食品科学与工程学院，江苏扬州 225127
2.扬州大学生物科学与技术学院，江苏扬州 225009
3.扬州大学测试中心，江苏扬州 225009

Received:2011-07-04 Online:2012-01-01 Published:2011-11-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】分析不同酿酒葡萄品种所酿制的干红葡萄酒抗氧化性的差异及其与总酚含量之间的关系。【方法】利用电子顺磁共振波谱仪（Electron Paramagnetic Resonance, 简称EPR）和福林-肖卡法（Folin-Ciocalteu，简称FC）分别对河北沙城产区5个单品种干红葡萄酒检测DPPH清除率和总酚含量，筛选适当的EPR试验条件。【结果】干红葡萄酒具有很强的抗氧化能力，在样品稀释200倍、反应时间5 min的条件下，各样品清除DPPH自由基的能力以赤霞珠葡萄酒为最强72.31%，宝石解百纳72.23%，梅鹿辄68.31%，西拉和增芳德分别为59.03%和56.34%。梅鹿辄、宝石解百纳和赤霞珠葡萄酒的总酚含量，分别为3 044.43、3 026.92和2 886.81 mg•L-1。西拉和增芳德葡萄酒的总酚含量相对较低，分别为2 085.51 mg•L-1和1 647.64 mg•L-1。【结论】电子顺磁共振法可以简便、快速检测干红葡萄酒的抗氧化性，不同单品种干红葡萄酒DPPH清除能力表现明显不同，自由基清除率与总酚含量之间存在线性正相关，回归方程y=0.01116x+37.327665，相关系数rGAE/DPPHequiv=0.91753。

关键词: 干红葡萄酒, 抗氧化性, DPPH, 总酚, 电子顺磁共振（EPR）

Abstract: 【Objective】 The purpose of this study was to compare the antioxidant capacities of dry red wines and analyze their relationship with total polyphenol content. 【Method】 The antioxidant properties of five monoverietal dry red wine samples (from the Shacheng viticultural region of China,) were investigated by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical as oxidants, and their total polyphenols content were analyzed by FC method. 【Result】Generally, the dry red wines which were diluted 200 folds showed high antioxidant in 5 min reaction time, the DPPH scavenging rate of Cabernet was 72.31% which was the highest, Ruby Cabernet 72.23%, Merlot 68.31%, Shiraz 59.03% and Zinfandel 56.34%；the total polyphenols content of Merlot was the highest at 3 044.43 mg•L-1, Ruby Cabernet 3 026.92 mg•L-1, Cabernet 2 886.81 mg•L-1, Shiraz 2 085.51 mg•L-1 and Zinfandel 1 647.64 mg•L-1. 【Conclusion】 It is an efficient method in detecting the antioxidant capacities of wines by EPR method. The DPPH scanvenging activity from dry red wines showed obviously difference. There was a linear correlation between the antioxidant activities and the total polyphenols content, y=0.01116x+ 37.327665, rGAE/DPPHequiv=0.91753.

Key words: dry red wines, antioxidants, DPPH , total polyphenols, EPR

胡博然, 闻雯, 阴淑贞, 朱勇, 张奉民. 电子顺磁共振波谱仪分析干红葡萄酒DPPH清除能力及其与总酚含量的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(1): 135-141.

HU Bo-Ran, WEN Wen, YIN Shu-Zhen, ZHU Yong, ZHANG Feng-Min. EPR Spectroscopy Studies on DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Activity of Dry Red Wines and Their Relationship with Total Polyphenols Content[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(1): 135-141.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.01.016

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2012/V45/I1/135

参考文献

[1]Jackson R S. Wine Science, London: Elsevier, 2008: 686-706.

[2]Avellone G, Di Garbo V, Campisi D, De Simone R, Raneli G, Scaglione R, Licata G. Effects of moderate Sicilian red wine consumption on inflammatory biomarkers of atherosclerosis. European Joural of Clinical Nutrition, 2005, 60(1): 41-47.

[3]Mudnic I, Modun D; Rastija V, Vukovic J, Brizic I, Katalinic V, Kozina B, Medic-Saric M, Boban M. Antioxidative and vasodilatory effects of phenolic acids in wine. Food Chemistry, 2010, 119(3): 1205-1210.

[4]López-Vélez M, Martínez-Martínez F, Valle-Ribes C D. The Study of phenolic compounds as natural antioxidants in wine. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2003, 43(2): 233-244.

[5]Makris D P, Psarra E, Kallithraka S, Kefalas P. The effect of polyphenolic composition as related to antioxidant capacity in white wines. Food Research International, 2003, 36(8): 805-814.

[6]Rodrigo R, Rivera G. Renal damage mediated by oxidative stress: a hypothesis of protective effects of red wine. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 2002, 33(3): 409-422.

[7]Arnao M B. Some methodological problems in the determination of antioxidant activity using chromogen radicals: a practical case. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2000, 11(11): 419-421.

[8]Fogliano V, Verde V, Randazzo G, Ritieni A. Method for measuring antioxidant activity and its application to monitoring the antioxidant capacity of wines. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1999, 47(3): 1035-1040.

[9]Brainina K Z, Ivanova A V, Sharafutdinova E N, Lozovskaya E L, Shkarina E I. Potentiometry as a method of antioxidant activity investigation. Talanta, 2007, 71(1): 13-18.

[10]Antolovich M, Prenzler P D, Patsalides E, McDonald S, Robards K. Methods for testing antioxidant activity. Analyst, 2002, 127(1): 183-198.

[11]Geleti? I V, Balavoine G G, Efimov O N, Kulikova V S. The determination of total concentration and activity of antioxidants in foodstuffs. Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry, 2002, 28(6): 501-514.

[12]Noipa T, Srijaranai S, Tuntulani T, Ngeonate W. New approach for evaluation of the antioxidant capacity based on scavenging DPPH free radical in micelle systems. Food Research International, 2011, 3(44):798-806.

[13]Garcia-Alonso M, Rimbach G, Sasai M, Nakahara M, Matsugo S, Uchida Y, Rivas-Gonzalo J C, Pascual-Teresa S D. Electron spin resonance spectroscopy studies on the free radical scavenging activity of wine anthocyanins and pyranoanthocyanins. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 2005, 49(12): 1112-1119.

[14]Ukeda H, Adachi Y, Sawamura M. Flow injection analysis of DPPH radical based on electron spin resonance. Talanta, 2002, 58(6): 1279-1283.

[15]Brezová V, Polovka M, Staško A. The influence of additives on beer stability investigated by EPR spectroscopy. Spectrochimica Acta Part A, 2002, 58: 1279-1291.

[16]Polovka M, Brezov V, Stasko A. Antioxidant properties of tea investigated by EPR spectroscopy. Biophysical Chemistry, 2003, 106(1): 39-56.

[17]Staško A, Polovka M, Brezová V, Biskupi? S, Mal??k F. Tokay wines as scavengers of free radicals (an EPR study). Food Chemistry, 2006, 96(2): 185-196.

[18]Espinoza M, Olea-Azar C, Speisky H, Rodríguez J. Determination of reactions between free radicals and selected Chilean wines and transition metals by ESR and UV-vis technique. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2009, 71(5): 1638-1643.

[19]Gao L, Chu Q, Ye J. Determination of trans-Resveratrol in wines, herbs and health food by capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection. Food Chemistry, 2002, 78(2): 255-260.

[20]Staško A, Brezová V, Mazúr M, ?ertík M, Kaliňák M, Gescheidt G. A comparative study on the antioxidant properties of Slovakian and Austrian wines. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 2008, 41(10): 2126-2135.

[21]Puškaš V, Jovi? S, Antov M, Tumbas V. Antioxidative activity of red wine with increased share of phenolic compounds from solid parts of grape. Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 2010, 16(1):65-71.

[22]Fang F, Li J, Zhang P, Tang K, Wang W, Pan Q, Huang W. Effects of grape variety, harvest date, fermentation vessel and wine ageing on flavonoid concentration in red wines. Food Research International, 2008, 41(1): 53-60.

[23]Li H, Wang X, Li Y, Li P, Wang H. Polyphenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of selected China wines. Food Chemistry, 2009, 112(2): 454-460.

[24]Rapisarda P, Tomaino A, Lo Cascio R, Bonina F, De Pasquale A, Saija A. Antioxidant effectiveness as influenced by phenolic content of fresh orange juices. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1999, 47(11): 4718-4723.

[25]Fernández-Pachón M S, Villaño D, García-Parrilla M C, Troncoso A M. Antioxidant activity of wines and relation with their polyphenolic composition. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2004, 513:113-118.

[26]Rice-Evans C A, Miller N J, Paganga G. Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 1996, 20(7): 933-956.

[27]Makris D P, Kallithraka S, Kefalas P. Flavonols in grapes, grape products and wines: Burden, profile and influential parameters. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2006, 19(5): 396-404.

电子顺磁共振波谱仪分析干红葡萄酒DPPH清除能力及其与总酚含量的关系

EPR Spectroscopy Studies on DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Activity of Dry Red Wines and Their Relationship with Total Polyphenols Content

PDF

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	梁迪，杨曦，郭玉蓉. 不同浓度苹果多酚对壳聚糖复合膜液理化性质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(14): 2799-2813.
[2]	赖婷，刘磊，张名位，张瑞芬，张雁，魏振承，邓媛元. 不同乳酸菌发酵对桂圆肉中酚类物质及抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(10): 1979-1989.
[3]	胡礼，王金枝，张春晖，唐春红，杜桂红，李侠，李春红. pH与反应温度对鸡骨素酶解液MRPs品质特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(18): 3689-3700.
[4]	邝敏杰，齐敏玉，何静仁，李书艺，刘刚，祝振洲，蔡红燕，冯军. 紫菜薹花色苷组分鉴定及其稳定性和抗氧化性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(20): 4067-4077.
[5]	刘琴, 张薇娜, 朱媛媛, 胡秋辉. 不同产地苦荞籽粒中多酚的组成、分布及抗氧化性比较[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(14): 2840-2852.
[6]	苏东晓1, 2, 张瑞芬1, 张名位1, 黄菲1, 2, 魏振承1, 张雁1, 遆慧慧1, 邓媛元1, 唐小俊1. 荔枝果肉酚类物质大孔树脂分离纯化工艺优化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(14): 2897-2906.
[7]	谢小焕, 赵樱, 罗薇, 许森, 曾令江, 杨春贤, 傅玉凡. 不同甘薯品种苗期茎尖醇溶提取物清除DPPH•的行为特征差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(2): 270-281.
[8]	冯倩倩, 杨维仁, 胥保华, 李成成. 不同水平维生素A对意大利蜜蜂春繁阶段群势及幼虫抗氧化性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(17): 3584-3591.
[9]	沈志军, 马瑞娟, 俞明亮, 许建兰, 蔡志翔, 倪林箭, 颜少宾. 桃三种肉色类型果实抗氧化因子的比较评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(11): 2232-2241.
[10]	张有林，张润光，钟玉. 百里香精油的化学成分、抑菌作用、抗氧化活性及毒理学特性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(9): 1888-1897.
[11]	孙卫青,周光宏,徐幸莲,彭增起 . 蒸煮腌肉色素的结构分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(9): 1912-1918 .
[12]	傅玉凡,杨春贤,赵亚特,赵文婷,刘小强,曾令江,廖志华,张启堂 . 不同叶菜型甘薯品种茎尖绿原酸含量及清除DPPH・能力[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(23): 4814-4822 .
[13]	. 骨蛋白水解物抗氧化活性及其作用模式[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(1): 238-244 .
[14]	印芳,葛红,彭克勤,赵伶俐,周玉杰,李秋香. 蝴蝶兰组培褐变与酚酸类物质及相关酶活性的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(7): 2197-2203 .
[15]	徐金瑞,张名位,刘兴华,刘章雄,张瑞芬,孙玲,邱丽娟. 黑大豆种质抗氧化能力及其与总酚和花色苷含量的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(8): 1545-1552 .