Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2020, Vol. 19 Issue (11): 2815-2828    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63208-7
Special Issue: 农业生态环境-遥感合辑Agro-ecosystem & Environment—Romote sensing
Agro-ecosystem & Environment Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Comparison of machine learning algorithms for mapping mango plantations based on Gaofen-1 imagery
LUO Hong-xia1, 2, 3, DAI Sheng-pei1, 2, 3, LI Mao-fen1, 3, LIU En-ping1, ZHENG Qian1, HU Ying-ying1, YI Xiao-ping2 
1 Institute of Scientific and Technical Information, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Practical on Tropical Crops Information Technology in Hainan, Haikou 571000, P.R.China
2 Land Use Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Natural Resources of China, Chinese Land Survey and Planning Institute, Beijng 100101, P.R.China
3 Key Laboratory of Agricultural Remote Sensing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100100, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Mango is a commercial crop on Hainan Island, China, that is cultivated to develop the tropical rural economy.  The development of accurate and up-to-date maps of the spatial distribution of mango plantations is necessary for agricultural monitoring and decision management by the local government.  Pixel-based and object-oriented image analysis methods for mapping mango plantations were compared using two machine learning algorithms (support vector machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF)) based on Chinese high-resolution Gaofen-1 (GF-1) imagery in parts of Hainan Island.  To assess the importance of different features on classification accuracy, a combined layer of four original bands, 32 gray-level co-occurrence (GLCM) texture indices, and 10 vegetation indices were used as input features.  Then five different sets of variables (5, 10, 20, and 30 input variables and all 46 variables) were classified with the two machine learning algorithms at object-based level.  Results of the feature optimization suggested that homogeneity and variance were very important variables for distinguishing mango plantations patches.  The object-based classifiers could significantly improve overall accuracy between 2–7% when compared to pixel-based classifiers.  When there were 5 and 10 input variables, SVM showed higher classification accuracy than RF, and when the input variables exceeded 20, RF showed better performances.  After the accuracy achieved saturation points, there were only slightly classification accuracy improvements along with the numbers of feature increases for both of SVM and RF classifiers.  The results indicated that GF-1 imagery can be successfully applied to mango plantation mapping in tropical regions, which would provide a useful framework for accurate tropical agriculture land management. 
Keywords:  mango plantations        GLCM texture        SVM        RF        GF-1  
Received: 02 December 2019   Accepted:
Fund: This research was funded by the Opening Foundation Program of Land Use Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Natural Resources of China, the Hainan Provincial Key Laboratory of Practical Research on Tropical Crops Information Technology, China (RDZWKFJJ2019001), the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (1630072020006, 1630072017004 and 1630072019001), the Natural Science Foundation of Hainan, China (619MS100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31601211), and the Demonstration and Pilot Projects for Comprehensive Rural Reform, China (XXSNZG19-02).
Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence DAI Sheng-pei, Tel: +86-898-66969285, E-mail: shengpeidai@gmail.com    
About author:  LUO Hong-xia, Mobile: +86-15595700506, E-mail: 120081008 @163.com;

Cite this article: 

LUO Hong-xia, DAI Sheng-pei, LI Mao-fen, LIU En-ping, ZHENG Qian, HU Ying-ying, YI Xiao-ping. 2020. Comparison of machine learning algorithms for mapping mango plantations based on Gaofen-1 imagery. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(11): 2815-2828.

Baatz M, Schape A. 2000. Multiresolution segmentation: An optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. In: Proceedings of the Angewandte Geographische Informations Verarbeitung XII. Salzburg, Austria. pp. 12–23.
Chang S, Wu B F, Yan N N, Zhu J J, Wen Q, Xu F. 2018. A refined crop drought monitoring method based on the Chinese GF-1 wide field view data. Sensors, 18, 1297.
Chen B Q, Li X P, Xiao X M, Zhao B, Dong J W, Kou W L, Qin Y W, Yang C, Wu Z X, Sun R, Lan G Y, Xie G S. 2016. Mapping tropical forests and deciduous rubber plantations in Hainan Island, China by integrating PALSAR 25-m and multi-temporal Landsat images. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 50, 117–130.
Chung Y, Chuang M, Shiu Y S. 2016. A comparative analysis of machine learning with WorldView-2 pan-sharpened imagery for tea crop mapping. Sensors, 16, 594–617.
Duro D C, Franklin S E, Duve M G. 2012. A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learing algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT-5 HRG imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 18, 259–272.
Evans T L, Costa M, Tomas W M, Camilo A R. 2014. Large-scale habitat mapping of the Brazilian Pantanal wetland: A synthetic aperture radar approach. Remote Sensing of Environment, 155, 89–108.
Foody G M. 2004. Thematic Map Comparison: Evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 7, 627–633.
Fu B L, Wang Y Q, Campbell A, Li Y, Zhang B, Yin S B, Xing Z F, Jin X M. 2017. Comparison of object-based and pixel-based random forest algorithm for wetland vegetation mapping using high spatial resolution GF-1 and SAR data. Ecological Indicators, 73, 105–117.
Ghosh A, Joshi P K. 2014. A comparison of selected classification algorithms for mapping bamboo patches in Lower Gangetic Plains using very high resolution WorldView 2 imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 26, 298–311.
Guru D S, Shivamurthy H G. 2013. Segmentation of mango region from mango tree image. In: Prasath R, Kathirvalavakumar T, eds., Mining Intelligence and Knowledge Exploration. Springer, Tamil Nadu, India, Cham. pp. 201–211.
Hao P Y, Wang L, Niu Z. 2015. Potential of multitemporal Gaofen-1 panchromatic multispectral images for crop classification: Case study in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 9, 096035.
Haralick R M, Shanmugam K S. 1974. Combined spectral and spatial processing of ERTS imagery data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 3, 3–13.
Haralick R M, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. 1973. Textural features for image classification. Studies in Media and Communication, SMC-3, 610–621.
Herold N D, Haack B N. 2006. Comparison and integration of radar and optical data for land use/cover mapping. Geocarto International, 21, 9–19.
Howard D M, Wylie B K. 2014. Annual crop type classification of the US Great Plains for 2000 to 2011. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 80, 537–549.
Jebur M N, Mohd Shafri H Z, Pradhan B, Tehrany M S. 2014. Per-pixel and object-oriented classification methods for mapping urban land cover extraction using Spot 5 imagery. Geocarto International, 29, 792–806.
Jin Y H, Liu X Q, ChenY M, Liang X. 2018. Land-cover mapping using Random Forest classification and incorporating NDVI time-series and texture: A case study of central Shandong. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39, 1–21.
Kim M, Madden M, Warner T A. 2009. Forest type mapping using object-specific texture measures from multispectral Ikonos imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 75, 819–829.
Laliberte A S, Browing D M, Rango A. 2012. A comparison of three features selection methods for object-based classification of sub-decimeter resolution UltraCam-L imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observed and Geoinformation, 15, 70–78.
Laliberte A S, Rango A. 2009. Texture and scale in object-based analysis of subdecimeter resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47, 761–770.
Li M C, Ma L, Blaschke T, Cheng L, Tiede D. 2016. A systematic comparison of different object-based classification techniques using high spatial resolution imagery in agricultural environments. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 49, 87–98.
Liu G Y, Wei Y J, Liu D B, Chen Y Y. 2015. Research advances on effect of water on leaves, yield and fruit quality of mango. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 35, 1–5. (in Chinese)
Loosvelt L, Peters J, Skriver H, De Baets B, Verhoest N E C. 2012. Impact of reducing polarimetric SAR input bn the uncertainty of crop classifications based on the random forests algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50, 4185–4200.
Ma L, Cheng L, Li M C, Liu Y X, Ma X X. 2015. Training set size, scale, and features in geographic object-based image analysis of very high resolution unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 102, 14–27.
Ma L, Fu T Y, Blaschke T, Li M C, Tiede D, Zhou Z J, Ma X H, Chen D L. 2017. Evaluation of feature selection methods for object-based land cover mapping of unmanned aerial vehicle imagery using random forest and support vector machine classifiers. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6, 51.
Mas J F, Flores J J. 2008. The application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, 617–663.
Mountrakis G, Im J, Ogole C. 2011. Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 66, 247–259.
Mueller M, Segl K, Kaufmann H. 2004. Edge and region based segmentation technique for the extraction of large, man made objects in high resolution satellite imagery. Pattern Recognition, 37, 1619–1628.
Myint S W, Gober P, Brazel A, Grossman-Clarke S, Weng Q. 2011. Per-pixel vs. objectv-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 1145–1161.
NBSH (Natinal Bureau of Statistics of Hainan). 2017. Hainan Statistical Yearbook 2017. China Statistics Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
Pacifici F, Chini M, Emery W J. 2009. A neural network approach using multi-scale textural metrics from very high-resolution panchromatic imagery for urban land-use classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 1276–1292.
Pedergnana M, Marpu P R, Dalla Mura M, Benediktsson J A, Bruzzone L. 2013. A novel technique for optimal feature selection in attribute profiles based on genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51, 3514–3528.
Peña-Barragán J M, Ngugi M K, Plant R E, Six J. 2011. Object-based crop identification using multiple vegetation indices, textural features and crop phenology. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 1301–1316.
Ren C S, Ye H C, Cui B, Huang W J. 2017. Acreage estimation of mango orchards using object-oriented classification and remote sensing. Resources Science, 39, 1584–1591. (in Chinese)
Sharma R, Oza S, Ravindram A, Thanikody M, Jayaraman M, Mammen S, Mammen G. 2000. Experience in use of remote sensing for crop statistics in Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55, 110–119.
Song Q, Zhou Q B, Wu W B, Hu Q, Lu M, Liu S B. 2017. Mapping regional cropping patterns by using GF-1 WFV sensor data. Journal of Intergrative Agriculture, 16, 337–347.
Stefanski J, Mack B, Waske B. 2013. Optimization of object-based image analysis with random forests for land cover mapping. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 6, 2492–2504.
Stehman S V, Wickham J D. 2011. Pixel, block of pixels, and polygons: Choosing a spatial unit for thematic accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing, 115, 3044–3055.
Su W, Zhang C, Yang J Y, Wu H G, Deng L, Ou W H, Yue A Z, Chen M J. 2012. Analysis of wavelet packet and statistical textures for object-oriented classification of forest-agriculture ecotones using SPOT 5 imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 33, 3557–3579.
Tehrany M S, Pradhan B, Jebuv M N. 2014. A comparative assessment between object and pixel-based classification approaches for land use/land cover mapping using SPOT5 imagery. Geocarto International, 29, 351–369.
Trimble. 2014. Ecognition Developer 9.0.1 Release Notes. Trimble GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Vapnik V N, Chervonenkis A Y. 1971. On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities. Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 16, 264–280.
Verma A K, Garg P K, Hari Prasas K S. 2017. Sugarcane crop identification from LISS IV data using ISODATA, MLC, and indicesbased decision tree approach. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10, 1–17.
Watts J D, Lawrence R L, Miller P R, Montagne C. 2009. Monitoring of cropland practices for carbon sequestration purposes in north central Montana by Landsat remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 1843–1852.
Yadav I S , Rao N K S, Reddy B M C, Rawal R D, Srinivasan, V R, Sujatha N T, Bhattacharya C, Rao P P N, Ramesh K S, Elango S. 2002. Acreage and production estimation of mango orchards using Indian Remote Sensing (IRS) satellite data. Scientia Horticulturae (Amsterdam), 93, 105–123.
Ye S, Pontius R G, Rakshit R. 2018. A review of accuracy assessment for object-based image analysis: From per-pixel to per-polygon approaches. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 141, 137–147.
You J, Pei Z Y. 2015. Error modeling based on geostatistics for uncertainty analysis in crop mapping using Gaofen-1 multispectral imagery. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 9, 097096.
Zhang X M, He G J, Zhang Z M, Peng Y, Long T F. 2017. Spectral spatial multi-feature classification of remote sensing big data based on a random forest classifier for land cover mapping. Cluster Computing, 20, 2311–2321.
Zhou Q B, Yu Q Y, Liu J, Wu W B, Tang H J. 2016. Perspective of Chinese GF-1 high-resolution satellite data in agricultural remote sensing monitoring. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16, 242–251.
No related articles found!
No Suggested Reading articles found!