Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2019, Vol. 18 Issue (9): 1980-1995    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62119-7
Crop Science Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Transcriptomic profiling of sorghum leaves and roots responsive to drought stress at the seedling stage
ZHANG Deng-feng, ZENG Ting-ru, LIU Xu-yang, GAO Chen-xi, LI Yong-xiang, LI Chun-hui, SONG Yan-chun, SHI Yun-su, WANG Tian-yu, LI Yu
 
Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
Drought stress affects the growth and productivity of crop plants including sorghum.  To study the molecular basis of drought tolerance in sorghum, we conducted the transcriptomic profiling of sorghum leaves and roots under drought stress using RNA-Seq method.  A total of 510, 559, and 3 687 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in leaves, 3 368, 5 093, and 4 635 DEGs in roots responding to mild drought, severe drought, and re-watering treatments were identified, respectively.  Among them, 190 common DEGs in leaves and 1 644 common DEGs in roots were responsive to mild drought, severe drought, and re-watering environment.  Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis revealed that the GO categories related to drought tolerance include terms related to response to stimulus especially response to water deprivation, abscisic acid stimulus, and reactive oxygen species.  The major transcription factor genes responsive to drought stress include heat stress transcription factor (HSF), ethylene-responsive transcription factor (ERF), Petunia NAM, Arabidopsis ATAF1/2 and CUC2 (NAC), WRKY transcription factor (WRKY), homeodomain leucine zipper transcription factor (HD-ZIP), basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor (bHLH),  and V-myb myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog transcription facotr (MYB).  Functional protein genes for heat shock protein (HSPs), late-embryogenesis-abundant protein (LEAs), chaperones, aquaporins, and expansins might play important roles in sorghum drought tolerance.  Moreover, the genomic regions enriched with HSP, expansin, and aquaporin genes responsive to drought stress could be used as powerful targets for improvement of drought tolerance in sorghum and other cereals.  Overall, our results provide a genome-wide analysis of DEGs in sorghum leaves and roots under mild drought, severe drought, and re-watering environments.  This study contributes to a better understanding of the molecular basis of drought tolerance of sorghum and can be useful for crop improvement.
 
Keywords:  sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)        transcriptomic profiling        drought        leaves        roots  
Received: 04 May 2018   Accepted:
Fund: This work was carried out with the support of Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and the Major Projects of Genetically Modified Organisms, China (2016ZX08003004).
Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence WANG Tian-yu, Tel: +86-10-62186632, E-mail: wangtianyu@caas.cn; LI Yu, Tel: +86-10-62131196, E-mail: liyu03@caas.cn   

Cite this article: 

ZHANG Deng-feng, ZENG Ting-ru, LIU Xu-yang, GAO Chen-xi, LI Yong-xiang, LI Chun-hui, SONG Yan-chun, SHI Yun-su, WANG Tian-yu, LI Yu. 2019. Transcriptomic profiling of sorghum leaves and roots responsive to drought stress at the seedling stage. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 18(9): 1980-1995.

Alexandersson E, Fraysse L, Sjovall-Larsen S, Gustavsson S, Fellert M, Karlsson M, Johanson U, Kjellbom P. 2005. Whole gene family expression and drought stress regulation of aquaporins. Plant Molecular Biology, 59, 469–484.
Agre P. 2006. The aquaporin water channels. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 3, 5–13.
Asthir B. 2015. Mechanisms of heat tolerance in crop plants. Biologia Plantarum, 59, 620–628.
Barrs H D, Weatherley P E. 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 15, 413–428.
Bartels D, Sunkar R. 2005. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 24, 23–58.
Chen Y H, Han Y Y, Zhang M, Zhou S, Kong X Z, Wang W. 2016. Overexpression of the wheat expansin gene TaEXPA2 improved seed production and drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco plants. PLoS ONE, 11, e0153494.
Cho H, Cosgrove D J. 2002. Regulation of root hair initiation and expansin gene expression in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 14, 3237–3253.
Cosgrove D J. 2000. Loosening of plant cell walls by expansins. Nature, 4017, 321–326.
Dugas D V, Monaco M K, Olson A, Klein R R, Kumari S, Ware D, Klein P E. 2011. Functional annotation of the transcriptome of Sorghum bicolor in response to osmotic stress and abscisic acid. BMC Genomics, 12, 1471–2164.
Finkelstein R. 2013. Abscisic acid synthesis and response. The Arabidopsis Book, 11, e0166.
Fracasso A, Trindade L, Amaducci S. 2016. Drought stress tolerance strategies revealed by RNA-Seq in two sorghum genotypes with contrasting WUE. BMC Plant Biology, 16, 115.
Hirayama T, Shinozaki K. 2010. Research on plant abiotic stress responses in the post-genome era: Past, present and future. The Plant Journal, 61, 1041–1052.
Hussain S S, Iqbal M T, Arif M A, Amjad M. 2011. Beyond osmolytes and transcription factors: Drought tolerance in plants via protective proteins and aquaporins. Biologia Plantarum, 55, 401–413.
Kakumanu A, Ambavaram M M R, Klumas C, Krishnan A, Batlang U, Myers E, Grene R, Pereira A. 2012. Effects of drought on gene expression in maize reproductive and leaves meristem tissue revealed by RNA-Seq. Plant Physiology, 160, 846–867.
Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg S L. 2013. TopHat2: Accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biology, 14, R36.
Kim H J, Nam H G, Lim P O. 2016. Regulatory network of NAC transcription factors in leaves senescence. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 33, 48–56.
Koskull-Doring P V, Scharf K D, Nover L. 2007. The diversity of plant heat stress transcription factors. Trends in Plant Science, 12, 452–457.
Kotak S, Vierling E, Baumlein H, Koskull-Doring P V. 2007. A novel transcriptional cascade regulating expression of heat stress proteins during seed development of Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 19, 182–195.
Kreps J A, Wu Y, Chang H S, Zhu T, Wang X, Harper J. 2002. Transcriptome changes for Arabiodpsis in response to salt, osmotic, and cold stress. Plant Physiology, 130, 2129–2141.
Langridge P, Paltridge N, Fincher G. 2006. Functional genomics of abiotic stress tolerance in cereals. Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics, 4, 343–354.
Li P C, Cao W, Fang H M, Xu S H, Yin S Y, Zhang Y Y, Lin D Z, Wang J A, Chen Y F, Xu C W Yang Z F. 2017. Transcriptomic profiling of the maize (Zea mays L.) leaves response to abiotic stresses at the seedling stage. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 290.
Livak K J, Schmittgen T D. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(–Delta Delta C) method. Methods, 25, 402–408.
Mao H D, Wang H W, Liu S X, Li Z G, Yang X H, Yan J B, Li J S, Phan Tran L S, Qin F. 2015. A transposable element in a NAC gene is associated with drought tolerance in maize seedlings. Nature Communications, 6, 8326.
Mawlong I, Ali K, Srinivasan R, Rai R D, Tyagi A. 2015. Functional validation of a drought-responsive AP2/ERF family transcription factor-encoding gene from rice in Arabidopsis. Molecular Breeding, 35, 163.
Merkouropoulos G, Shirsat A H. 2003. The unusual Arabidopsis extensin gene AtExt1 is expressed throughout plant development and is induced by a variety of biotic and abiotic stresses. Planta, 217, 356–366.
Mizoi J, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. 2012. AP2/ERF family transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1819, 86–96.
Nakashima K, Ito Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki Y. 2009. Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis and grasses. Plant Physiology, 149, 88–95.
Nakashima K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. 2014. The transcriptional regulatory network in the drought response and its crosstalk in abiotic stress responses including drought, cold, and heat. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 170.
Nambara E, Marion-Poll A. 2005. Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 56, 165–185.
Neumann P M. 2008. Coping mechanisms for crop plants in drought-prone environments. Annals of Botany, 101, 901–907.
Paterson A H, Bowers J E, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J,
Gundlach H, Haberer G, Hellsten U, Mitros T, Poliakov A, Schmutz J, Spannagl M, Tang H, Wang X, Wicker T, Bharti A, Chapman J, Feltus F, Gowik U, Grigoriev I, et al. 2009. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature, 457, 551–556.
Rooney W L, Blumenthal J, Bean B, Mullet J E. 2007. Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock. Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining, 1, 147–157.
Poroyko V, Spollen W G, Hejlek L G, Hernandez A G, LeNoble M E, Davis G, Nguyen H T, Springer G K, Sharp R R, Bohnert H J. 2007. Comparing regional transcript profiles from maize primary roots under well-watered and low water potential conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58, 279–289.
Pratt L H, Liang C, Shah M, Sun F, Wang H M, Reid S P, Gingle A R, Paterson A H, Wing R, Dean R, Klein R, Nguyen H T, Ma H M, Zhao X, Morishige D T, Mullet J E, Cordonnier-Pratt M M. 2005. Sorghum expressed sequence tags identify signature genes for drought, pathogenesis, and skotomorphogenesis from a milesonte set of 16,801 unique transcripts. Plant Physiology, 139, 869–884.
Scharf K, Hohfeld I, Nover L. 1998. Heat stress response and heat stress transcription factors. Journal of Biosciences, 23, 313–329.
Schimid M, Davison T S, Henz S R, Pape U J, Demar M, Vingron M, Scholkopf B, Weigel D, Lohmann J U. 2005. A gene expression map of Arabidopsis thaliana development. Nature Genetics, 37, 501–506.
Shi W, Muthurajan R, Rahman H, Selvam J, Peng S, Zou Y, Jagadish K. 2013. Source-sink dynamics and proteomic reprogramming under elevated night temperature and their impact on rice yield and grain quality. New Phytologist, 197, 825–837.
Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. 2007. Gene network involved in drought stress response and tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58, 221–227.
Sun H Y, Li L C, Lou Y F, Zhao H S, Yang Y H, Wang S N, Gao Z M. 2017. The bamboo aquaporin gene PeTIP4;1-1 confers drought and salinity tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Reporter, 36, 597–609.
Trapnell C, Williams B A, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren M J, Salzberg S L, Wold B J, Pachter L. 2010. Transcript assembly and abundance estimation from RNA-Seq reveals thousands of new transcripts and switching among isoforms. Nature Biotechnology, 28, 511–515.
Umezawa T, Fujita M, Fujita Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. 2006. Engineering drought tolerance in plants: Discovering and tailoring genes to unlock the future. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 17, 113–122.
Urano K, Maruyama K, Jikumaru Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki Y, Shinozaki K. 2017. Analysis of plant hormone profiles in response to moderate dehydration stress. The Plant Journal, 90, 17–36.
Zheng J, Zhao J F, Tao Y Z, Wang J H, Liu Y J, Fu J J, Jin Y, Gao P, Zhang J P, Bai Y F, Wang G Y. 2004. Isolation and analysis of water stress induced genes in maize seedlings by subtractive PCR and cDNA macroarray. Plant Molecular Biology, 55, 807–823.
 
[1] LU Jing, Sun Mei-hong, MA Qi-jun, KANG Hui, LIU Ya-jing, HAO Yu-jin, YOU Chun-xiang . MdSWEET17, a sugar transporter in apple, enhances drought tolerance in tomato[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(9): 2041-2051.
[2] ZONG Na, LI Xing-juan, WANG Lei, WANG Ying, WEN Hong-tao, LI Ling, ZHANG Xia, FAN Yun-liu, ZHAO Jun. Maize ABP2 enhances tolerance to drought and salt stress in transgenic Arabidopsis[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(11): 2379-2393.
No Suggested Reading articles found!