Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2015, Vol. 14 Issue (9): 1903-1910    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61056-5
Agricultural Economics And Management Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Productivity effect and overuse of pesticide in crop production in China
 ZHANG Chao, Guanming Shi , SHEN Jian, HU Rui-fa
1、School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
2、Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  Chinese farmers are often accused of overusing pesticides that play a crucial role in enhancing crop yield by reducing losses to crop pests. Pesticide overuse has caused a series of negative health and environmental externalities. This paper quantifies the productivity effect and the optimal amount of pesticides in rice, cotton and maize production in China from the economic perspective. Using survey data collected in 2012 and 2013, both Cobb-Douglas and Weibull damage control specifications are used to estimate the production function. Results show that pesticides have statistically significant productivity effect on crop yield. On the condition of Weibull damage control specifications, the marginal products of 1 kg of the active ingredients of pesticides for rice, cotton and maize are 71.06, 22.73 and 98.45 kg, respectively. However, 57, 64 and 17% of the actual amount of pesticides are overused for rice, cotton and maize, respectively. Moreover, the productivity effect of pesticides would be overestimated using Cobb-Douglas specification without incorporating a damage control agent.

Abstract  Chinese farmers are often accused of overusing pesticides that play a crucial role in enhancing crop yield by reducing losses to crop pests. Pesticide overuse has caused a series of negative health and environmental externalities. This paper quantifies the productivity effect and the optimal amount of pesticides in rice, cotton and maize production in China from the economic perspective. Using survey data collected in 2012 and 2013, both Cobb-Douglas and Weibull damage control specifications are used to estimate the production function. Results show that pesticides have statistically significant productivity effect on crop yield. On the condition of Weibull damage control specifications, the marginal products of 1 kg of the active ingredients of pesticides for rice, cotton and maize are 71.06, 22.73 and 98.45 kg, respectively. However, 57, 64 and 17% of the actual amount of pesticides are overused for rice, cotton and maize, respectively. Moreover, the productivity effect of pesticides would be overestimated using Cobb-Douglas specification without incorporating a damage control agent.
Keywords:  productivity effect       damage control agent       pesticide overuse       marginal product  
Received: 23 September 2014   Accepted:
Fund: 

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71173014 and 71210004), and the China Scholarship Council (201306030053).

Corresponding Authors:  HU Rui-fa, Tel: +86-10-68918707, Fax: +86-10-68918451, E-mail: ruifa@bit.edu.cn     E-mail:  ruifa@bit.edu.cn
About author:  ZHANG Chao, E-mail: zhangchao9501@163.com;

Cite this article: 

ZHANG Chao, Guanming Shi , SHEN Jian, HU Rui-fa. 2015. Productivity effect and overuse of pesticide in crop production in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(9): 1903-1910.

Antle J M, Pingali P L. 1994. Pesticides, productivity, andfarmer health: A Philippine case study. American Journalof Agricultural Economics, 76, 418-430

Blackwell M, Pagoulatos A. 1992. The econometrics of damagecontrol. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74,1040-1044

Carrasco-Tauber C, Moffitt L J. 1992. Damage controleconometrics: Functional specification and pesticideproductivity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,74, 158-162

Carvalho F P. 2006. Agriculture, pesticides, food security andfood safety. Environmental Science and Policy, 9, 685-692

Cooper J, Dobson H. 2007. The benefits of pesticides tomankind and the environment. Crop Protection, 26,1337-1348

Crissman C C, Cole D C, Carpio F. 1994. Pesticide use and farmworker health in Ecuadorian potato production. AmericanJournal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 593-597

Dasgupta S, Meisner C, Huq M. 2007. A pinch or a pint?Evidence of pesticide overuse in Bangladesh. Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 58, 91-114

Ding G D, Bao Y X. 2014. Revisiting pesticide exposure andchildren’s health: Focus on China. Science of the TotalEnvironment, 472, 289-295

Eom Y. 1994. Pesticide residue risk and food safety valuation:A random utility approach. American Journal of AgriculturalEconomics, 76, 760-771

FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). 2013. FAO STAT.United Nations.

Ghimire N, Woodward R T. 2013. Under- and over-use ofpesticides: An international analysis. Ecological Economics,89, 73-81

Grovermann C, Schreinemachers P, Berger T. 2013.Quantifying pesticide overuse from farmer and societalpoints of view: An application to Thailand. Crop Protection,53, 161-168

 Hao G F, Yang G F. 2013. Pest control: Risks of biochemicalpesticides. Science, 342, 799.

Huang J K, Qiao F B, Zhang L X, Rozelle S. 2000. Farmpesticide, rice production, and human health. Economy andEnvironment Program for Southeast Asia Working Paper,No. RR2000051. Singapore.

Huang J K, Hu R F, Rozelle S, Qiao F B, Pray C E. 2002.Transgenic varieties and productivity of smallholder cottonfarmers in China. The Australian Journal of Agricultural andResource Economics, 46, 367-387

Huang J K, Rozelle S. 1996. Technological change:Rediscovering the engine of productivity growth in China’srural cconomy. Journal of Development Economics, 49,337-369

Lansink A O, Carpentier A. 2001. Damage control productivity:an input damage abatement approach. Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 52, 11-22

Lichtenberg E, Zilberman D. 1986. The econometrics of damagecontrol: Why specification matters. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 68, 261-273

Lin J Y. 1994. Impact of hybrid rice on input demand andproductivity. Agricultural Economics, 10, 153-164

MOA (Ministry of Agriculture of China). 2012. China AgricultureYearbook. China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)

NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China). 2013. ChinaRural Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing.(in Chinese)

NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China). 2014. ChinaStatistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing. (inChinese)

Pimentel D, Acquay H, Biltonen M, Rice P, Silva M, NelsonJ, Lipner V, Giordano S, Horowitz A, D′Amore M. 1992.Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use.BioScience, 42, 750-760

Popp J, Petö K, Nagy J. 2013. Pesticide productivity and foodsecurity. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development,33, 243-255

Skevas T, Stefanou S E, Lansink A O. 2013. Do farmersinternalise environmental spillovers of pesticides inproduction? Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64, 624-640

Snelder D J, Masipiqueña M D, de Snoo G R. 2008. Riskassessment of pesticide usage by smallholder farmers in theCagayan Valley (Philippines). Crop Protection, 27, 747-762

Verger P J P, Boobis A R. 2013. Reevaluate pesticides for foodsecurity and safety. Science, 341, 717-718

Widawsky D, Rozelle S, Jin S, Huang J. 1998. Pesticideproductivity, host-plant resistance and productivity in China.Agricultural Economics, 19, 203-217

Xu R, Kuang R P, Pay E, Dou H, de Snoo G. 2008. Factorscontributing to overuse of pesticides in western China.Environmental Sciences, 5, 235-249
No related articles found!
No Suggested Reading articles found!