Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2021, Vol. 20 Issue (7): 1907-1920    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63420-7
Special Issue: 动物营养合辑Animal Nutrition
Animal Science · Veterinary Medicine Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Effects of rearing system (floor vs. cage) and sex on performance, meat quality and enteric microorganism of yellow feather broilers
WANG Lai-di1, ZHANG Yang1, KONG Ling-ling1, WANG Zhi-xiu1, BAI Hao2, JIANG Yong1, BI Yu-lin1, CHANG Guo-bin1, CHEN Guo-hong1
1 Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Animal Genetic, Breeding and Molecular Design, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, P.R.China
2 Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, Ministry of Education/Institutes of Agricultural Science and Technology Development, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  

为了探究黄羽肉鸡的高效饲养模式,本研究以雪山草鸡为研究素材,按照2×2完全随机试验探究2种饲养方式以及性别对雪山草鸡生长性能、肉品质以及肠道微生物的影响。本试验将200只体重相近的雪山草鸡公母各半,按照性别和饲养方式随机分为四组,饲养方式分为笼饲和平养。结果表明,雄性肉鸡和笼养肉鸡比雌性肉鸡和平养肉鸡表现出更好的生产性能(P<0.001)和更高的全净膛率(P<0.001)。饲养模式和性别的交互作用对胸肌率和腿肌率有影响(P<0.05),雌性平养肉鸡胸肌率和腿肌率最高(P<0.02)。无论是雌鸡还是雄鸡,在笼养模式下肉鸡腹脂率均高于平养模式(P<0.01)。相比于其他组,雌性笼养肉鸡的胸肌肉品质较好(P<0.05)。雄性肉鸡的胸肌pH值低于雌性肉鸡,且与腿肌pH值的结果趋势一致,笼养肉鸡胸肌pH值高于平养肉鸡,而腿肌的pH值与此相反。肉品质指标的差异与肉鸡活动量差异有一定的关系。福利指标结果显示,平养模式下肉鸡的羽毛质量优于笼养肉鸡(P<0.01),步态得分无显著影响(P>0.05)。基于16S rRNA扩增测序的肠道菌群结果显示,各组肠道菌群中以厚壁菌门、变形菌门和拟杆菌门为主,盲肠菌群组成相对稳定。平养模式下鸡只肠道菌群的多样性较笼养模式更为丰富,但alpha多样性在各组间无显著差异(P>0.06)。肠道中拟杆菌门与厚壁菌门的比例、幽门螺杆菌和罗姆布茨菌的丰度等可能影响肉鸡的生产性能。综合看来,笼养模式以及雄性雪山鸡的选择可获得高效的生产性能,这可能与相关肠道菌群丰度差异有一定的关系,而平养模式下鸡只羽毛质量更好,肠道微生物群种类更为丰富,生产中可根据具体市场需求进行选择。




Abstract  
This study investigated the effects of floor and cage rearing systems on performance, meat quality, and enteric microorganisms of male and female yellow feather broilers.  Two hundred Xueshan chickens (42 days old; 100 of each sex) were divided into four groups, according to sex and rearing system (stainless-steel cage or litter floor).  Male and cage-reared broilers exhibited better (P<0.001) performance and higher (P≤0.001) eviscerated percentage than female and floor-reared broilers.  The interaction between rearing system and sex had an effect (P<0.05) on the percentage of breast and thigh muscles.  Female floor-reared broilers presented the highest (P<0.02) percentage of breast and thigh muscles among all the groups.  In both sexes, the abdominal fat content in cage-reared broilers was higher (P<0.01) than that in floor-reared broilers.  Female cage-reared broilers exhibited better (P<0.05) meat quality of breast muscle than other groups.  An analysis of welfare observations indicated that the feather quality of floor-reared broilers was better (P<0.01) than that of cage-reared broilers, whereas the gait scores were not significantly affected (P>0.05) by rearing system.  The enteric microbiota assessment by 16S rRNA amplicon-based sequencing showed that Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes were the most prevalent phyla in both rearing systems, and that the cecum was relatively stable in terms of microbiome composition.  Floor-reared broilers exhibited a richer diversity of bacteria in the intestinal tract than cage-reared broilers, while alpha diversity was not significantly different (P>0.05) among the groups.  The ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes and the abundance of Helicobacter and Romboutsia could potentially affect the production of broilers.  These findings indicate that cage rearing improved the production of male Xueshan broilers, which may be due to the difference in enteric microbiota between cage and floor rearing systems. 
Keywords:  cage rearing        yellow feather broilers        performance        meat quality        microbiome  
Received: 31 March 2020   Accepted:
Fund: This work was supported by the National Science & Technology Pillar Program of China (2015BAD03B03), the National Natural Science Youth Fund of China (31802057), and the priority academic program development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, China.
Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence CHANG Guo-bin, E-mail: passioncgb@163.com; CHEN Guo-hong, E-mail: ghchen@yzu.edu.cn   
About author:  WANG Lai-di, E-mail: yzwanglaidi@163.com

Cite this article: 

WANG Lai-di, ZHANG Yang, KONG Ling-ling, WANG Zhi-xiu, BAI Hao, JIANG Yong, BI Yu-lin, CHANG Guo-bin, CHEN Guo-hong. 2021. Effects of rearing system (floor vs. cage) and sex on performance, meat quality and enteric microorganism of yellow feather broilers. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(7): 1907-1920.

Anderson S. 2007. Determination of fat, moisture, and protein in meat and meat products by using the FOSS FoodScan Near-Infrared Spectrophotometer with FOSS Artificial Neural Network Calibration Model and Associated Database: Collaborative study. Journal of Aoac International, 90, 1073–1083.
Le Bihan-Duval E, Debut M, Berri C M, Sellier N, Sante-Lhoutellier V, Jego Y, Beaumont C. 2008. Chicken meat quality: Genetic variability and relationship with growth and muscle characteristics. BMC Genetics, 9, 53.
Caporaso J G, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman F D, Costello E K, Fierer N, Pena A G, Goodrich J K, Gordon J I, Huttley G A, Kelley S T, Knights D, Koenig J E, Ley R E, Lozupone C A, McDonald D, Muegge B D, Pirrung M, Reeder J, et al. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Methods, 7, 335–336.
Castellini C, Mugnai C, Dal Bosco A. 2002. Effect of organic production system on broiler carcass and meat quality. Meat Science, 60, 219–225.
Chen J L, Zhao G P, Zheng M Q, Wen J, Yang N. 2008. Estimation of genetic parameters for contents of intramuscular fat and inosine-5´-monophosphate and carcass traits in Chinese Beijing-You chickens. Poultry Science, 87, 1098–1104.
Chen S, Xiang H, Zhang H, Zhu X, Wang D, Wang J, Yin T, Liu L, Kong M, Li H, Zhao X. 2019. Rearing system causes changes of behavior, microbiome, and gene expression of chickens. Poultry Science, 98, 3365–3376.
Chen X, Jiang W, Tan H Z, Xu G F, Zhang X B, Wei S, Wang X Q. 2013. Effects of outdoor access on growth performance, carcass composition, and meat characteristics of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 92, 435–443.
Daliri E B, Wei S, Oh D H, Lee B H. 2017. The human microbiome and metabolomics: Current concepts and applications. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57, 3565–3576.
DeSantis T Z, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie E L, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P, Andersen G L. 2006. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72, 5069–5072.
Diaz Carrasco J M, Casanova N A, Fernandez Miyakawa M E. 2019. Microbiota, gut health and chicken productivity: What is the connection? Microorganisms, 7, 374.
Díaz-Sánchez S, Perrotta A R, Rockafellow I, Alm E J, Okimoto R, Hawken R, Hanning I. 2019. Using fecal microbiota as biomarkers for predictions of performance in the selective breeding process of pedigree broiler breeders. PLoS ONE, 14, e0216080.
Edgar R C. 2013. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nature Methods, 10, 996–998.
Edgar R C, Haas B J, Clemente J C, Quince C, Knight R. 2011. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics, 27, 2194–2200.
Hua J S, Zheng P Y, Bow H. 1999. Species differentiation and identification in the genus of Helicobacter. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 5, 7–9.
Isaacson R, Kim H B. 2012. The intestinal microbiome of the pig. Animal Health Research Reviews, 13, 100–109.
Jiang S, Gou Z, Li L, Lin X, Jiang Z. 2018. Growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of yellow-feathered broilers fed graded levels of alfalfa meal with or without wheat. Animal Science Journal, 89, 561–569.
Jones T A, Donnelly C A, Dawkins M S. 2005. Environmental and management factors affecting the welfare of chickens on commercial farms in the United Kingdom and Denmark stocked at five densities. Poultry Science, 84, 1155–1165.
Lee C K, Barbier B A, Bottos E M, McDonald I R, Cary S C. 2012. The inter-valley soil comparative survey: the ecology of dry valley edaphic microbial communities. The ISME Journal, 6, 1046–1057.
Lee K C, Kil D Y, Sul W J. 2017. Cecal microbiome divergence of broiler chickens by sex and body weight. Journal of Microbiology, 55, 939–945.
Ley R E, Turnbaugh P J, Klein S, Gordon J I. 2006. Microbial ecology: Human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature, 444, 1022–1023.
Li H, Wen X, Alphin R, Zhu Z, Zhou Z. 2017. Effects of two different broiler flooring systems on production performances, welfare, and environment under commercial production conditions. Poultry Science, 96, 1108–1119.
Li J, Miao Z, Tian W, Yang Y, Wang J, Yang Y. 2017. Effects of different rearing systems on growth, small intestinal morphology and selected indices of fermentation status in broilers. Animal Science Journal, 88, 900–908.
Li T T, Tong A J, Liu Y Y, Huang Z R, Wan X Z, Pan Y Y, Jia R B, Liu B, Chen X H, Zhao C. 2019. Polyunsaturated fatty acids from microalgae Spirulina platensis modulates lipid metabolism disorders and gut microbiota in high-fat diet rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 131, 110558.
Liu D, Lin Y, Jiang J, Zhou H, Yang D. 2005. Effect of sex on carcass traits and muscle quality of high quality yellow broiler chickens. Chinese Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, 32, 23–25. (in Chinese)
Liu X, Zhu J, Bai H, Kong L, Gu H, Dou X. 2020. Correlation between growth characters and some immune indexes of Xueshan chicken. Chinese Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, 47, 1481–1488. (in Chinese)
Louca S, Parfrey L W, Doebeli M. 2016. Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome. Science, 353, 1272–1277.
Lumpkins B S, Batal A B, Lee M. 2008. The effect of gender on the bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tract of broilers. Poultry Science, 87, 964–967.
Ma Y, Wang W, Zhang H, Wang J, Zhang W, Gao J, Wu S, Qi G. 2018. Supplemental Bacillus subtilis DSM 32315 manipulates intestinal structure and microbial composition in broiler chickens. Scientific Report, 8, 15358.
Magoc T, Salzberg S L. 2011. FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics, 27, 2957–2963.
Mahmoud U T, Abdel-Rahman M A M, Darwish M H A, Applegate T J, Cheng H W. 2015. Behavioral changes and feathering score in heat stressed broiler chickens fed diets containing different levels of propolis. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 166, 98–105.
Mir N A, Rafiq A, Kumar F, Singh V, Shukla V. 2017. Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: A review. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 54, 2997–3009.
Paoli A, Mancin L, Bianco A. 2019. Ketogenic diet and microbiota: Friends or enemies? Genes (Basel), 10, 534.
Savory C J, Hughes B O. 2010. Behaviour and welfare. British Poultry Science, 51, 13–22.
Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett W S, Huttenhower C. 2011. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biology, 12, R60.
Shields S, Greger M. 2013. Animal welfare and food safety aspects of confining broiler chickens to cages. Animals (Basel), 3, 386–400.
Sogunle O M, Egbeyale L T, Bajomo T T, Bamigboje O V, Fanimo A O. 2008. Comparison of the performance, carcass characteristics and haematological parameters of broiler chicks reared in cage and floor. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 11, 480–483.
Stadig L M, Rodenburg T B, Reubens B, Aerts J, Duquenne B, Tuyttens F A. 2016. Effects of free-range access on production parameters and meat quality, composition and taste in slow-growing broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 95, 2971–2978.
Stanley D, Hughes R J, Moore R J. 2014. Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: Influence on health, productivity and disease. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98, 4301–4310.
Sun T, Long R J, Liu Z Y. 2013. The effect of a diet containing grasshoppers and access to free-range on carcase and meat physicochemical and sensory characteristics in broilers. British Poultry Science, 54, 130–137.
Tamilvanan T, Thiagarajan M, Ramesh V, Sivakumar T. 2003. Carcass yield and quality characters of broiler chicken under cage and floor management systems fed with different processed feed and probiotics. Indian Veterinary Journal, 80, 152–155.
Tong H B, Cai J, Lu J, Wang Q, Shao D, Zou J M. 2015. Effects of outdoor access days on growth performance, carcass yield, meat quality, and lymphoid organ index of a local chicken breed. Poultry Science, 94, 1115–1121.
Wang Q, Garrity G M, Tiedje J M, Cole J R. 2007. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73, 5261–5267.
Wang W, Erf G F, Wideman Jr R F. 2002. Effect of cage vs. floor litter environments on the pulmonary hypertensive response to intravenous endotoxin and on blood-gas values in broilers. Poultry Science, 81, 1728–1737.
Xiao Y, Xiang Y, Zhou W, Chen J, Li K, Yang H. 2017. Microbial community mapping in intestinal tract of broiler chicken. Poultry Science, 96, 1387–1393.
Ye Y, Lin S, Mu H, Tang X, Ou Y, Chen J, Ma Y, Li Y. 2014. Analysis of differentially expressed genes and signaling pathways related to intramuscular fat deposition in skeletal muscle of sex-linked dwarf chickens. BioMed Research International, 55, 939–945.
Zhang H. 2012. The effects of different grazing patterns on meat quality of Xueshan chicken. Ph D thesis, Nanjing Agricultural University, China. (in Chinese)
Zhao L, Wang G, Siegel P, He C, Wang H, Zhao W, Zhai Z, Tian F, Zhao J, Zhang H, Sun Z, Chen W, Zhang Y, Meng H. 2013. Quantitative genetic background of the host influences gut microbiomes in chickens. Scientific Report, 3, 1163.
[1] XIE Lei, QIN Jiang-tao, RAO Lin, CUI Deng-shuai, TANG Xi, XIAO Shi-jun, ZHANG Zhi-yan, HUANG Lu-sheng. Effects of carcass weight, sex and breed composition on meat cuts and carcass trait in finishing pigs[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(5): 1489-1501.
[2] WANG Chuan-long, XING Guan-zhong, WANG Li-sai, LI Su-fen, ZHANG Li-yang, LU Lin, LUO Xu-gang, LIAO Xiu-dong . Effects of selenium source and level on growth performance, antioxidative ability and meat quality of broilers[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(1): 227-235.
[3] LIU Guo-qing, SUN Guang-ming, LIAO Xiu-dong, HUANG Jian-zhong, GUO Mei-jin, ZHANG Li-yang, GUO Yan-li, LU Lin, LUO Xu-gang. Effect of dietary supplementation of pyrroloquinoline quinone disodium on growth performance, meat quality and antioxidative ability of broilers[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(7): 1850-1856.
[4] ZENG Zhu, JIANG Jun-jie, YU Jie, MAO Xiang-bing, YU Bing, CHEN Dai-wen. Effect of dietary supplementation with mulberry (Morus alba L.) leaves on the growth performance, meat quality and antioxidative capacity of finishing pigs[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(1): 143-151.
[5] LI Xin, XIA An-qi, CHEN Li-juan, DU Man-ting, CHEN Li, KANG Ning, ZHANG De-quan. Effects of lairage after transport on post mortem muscle glycolysis, protein phosphorylation and lamb meat quality[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(10): 2336-2344.
[6] LIAO Xiu-dong, WEN Qian, ZHANG Ling-yan, LU Lin, ZHANG Li-yang, LUO Xu-gang. Effect of dietary supplementation with flavonoid from Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi on growth performance, meat quality and antioxidative ability of broilers[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(05): 1165-1170.
[7] DUAN Hai-tao, LI Jun-guo, XUE Min, YANG Jie, DONG Ying-chao, LIANG Ke-hong, QIN Yu-chang . Effects of conditioners (single-layer, double-layer and retention-conditioner) on the growth performance, meat quality and intestinal morphology of growing and finishing pigs[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(04): 919-927.
No Suggested Reading articles found!