Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2020, Vol. 19 Issue (6): 1625-1634    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63193-8
Special Issue: 园艺-栽培生理/资源品质合辑Horticulture — Physiology · Biochemistry · Cultivation
Horticulture Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Pearprocess: A new phenotypic tool  for stone cell trait evaluation in pear fruit
XUE Yong-song*, XU Shao-zhuo*, XUE Cheng, WANG Run-ze, ZHANG Ming-yue, LI Jia-ming, ZHANG Shao-ling, WU Jun
Center of Pear Engineering Technology Research, State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  
The content of stone cells is an important factor for pear breeding as a high content indicates severely reduced fruit quality in terms of fruit taste.  Although the frozen-HCl method is currently a common method used to evaluate stone cell content in pears, it is limited in incomplete separation of stone cell and pulp and is time consuming and complicated.  Computer-aided research is a promising strategy in modern scientific research for phenotypic data collection and is increasingly used in studying crops.  Thus far, we lack a quantitative tool that can effectively determine stone cell content in pear fruit.  We developed a program, Pearprocess, based on an imaging protocol using computer vision and image processing algorithms applied to digital images.  Using photos of hand-cut sections of pear fruit stained with phloroglucin-HCl (Wiesner’s reagent), Pearprocess can extract and analyze image-based data to quantify the stone cell-related traits measured in this study: number, size, area and density of stone cell.  We quantified these traits for 395 pear accessions by Pearprocess and revealed large variation in different pear varieties and species.  The number of stone cells varied greatly from value of 138 to 2 866, the density of stone cells ranged from 0.0019 to 0.0632 cm2 cm–2, the distribution of stone cell area ranged from 0.06 to 2.02 cm2, and the stone cell size was between 2e-4 and 1e-3 cm2.  Moreover, trait data were correlated with fruit taste data.  We found that stone cell density is likely the most important factor affecting the taste of pear fruit.  In summary, Pearprocess is a new cost-effective web-application for semi-automated quantification of two-dimensional phenotypic traits from digital imagery using an easy imaging protocol.  This simpler, feasible and accurate method to evaluate stone cell traits of fruit is a promising new tool for use in evaluating future germplasms for crop breeding programs.
 
Keywords:  Pearprocess software        quantitative tool        stone cell traits  
Received: 03 December 2019   Accepted:
Fund: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31725024), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD1000200), the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-28), and the earmarked fund for Jiangsu Agricultural Industry Technology System, China (JATS 2018-277).
Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence WU Jun, E-mail: wujun@njau.edu.cn   
About author:  XUE Yong-song, E-mail: 2017104036@njau.edu.cn; XU Shao-zhuo, E-mail: 2018204011@njau.edu.cn; * These authors contributed equally to this study.

Cite this article: 

XUE Yong-song, XU Shao-zhuo, XUE Cheng, WANG Run-ze, ZHANG Ming-yue, LI Jia-ming, ZHANG Shao-ling, WU Jun. 2020. Pearprocess: A new phenotypic tool  for stone cell trait evaluation in pear fruit. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(6): 1625-1634.

Brahem M, Renard C M G C, Gouble B, Bureau S, Le Bourvellec C. 2017. Characterization of tissue specific differences in cell wall polysaccharides of ripe and overripe pear fruit. Carbohydrate Polymers, 156, 152–164.
Brosnan T, Sun D W. 2002. Inspection and grading of agricultural and food products by computer vision systems - A review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 36, 193–213.
Cai Y P, Li G Q, Nie J Q, Lin Y, Nie F, Zhang J Y, Xu Y L. 2010. Study of the structure and biosynthetic pathway of lignin in stone cells of pear. Scientia Horticulturae, 125, 374–379.
Cao Y F, Liu F Z, Hu H J, Zhang B B. 2006. Descriptors and Data Standard for Pear (Pyrus spp.). China Agriculture Publishing Press, China. pp. 78–79. (in Chinese)
Cao Y F, Tian L M, LI L L, Gao Y. 2010. Comparison studies on the stone cell content in flesh of pear cultivars. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 22, 417–433. (in Chinese)
Choi J H, Lee S H. 2013. Distribution of stone cell in Asian, Chinese, and European pear fruit and its morphological changes. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, 86, 185–189.
Finkel E. 2009. Imaging. With ‘Phenomics,’ plant scientists hope to shift breeding into overdrive. Science, 325, 380–381.
Gomes J F S, Leta F R. 2012. Applications of computer vision techniques in the agriculture and food industry: A review. European Food Research and Technology, 235, 989–1000.
Green J M, Appel H, Rehrig E M, Harnsomburana J, Chang J F, Balint-Kurti P, Shyu C R. 2012. PhenoPhyte: A flexible affordable method to quantify 2D phenotypes from imagery. Plant Methods, 8, 1–12.
Jin Q, Yan C C, Qiu J X, Zhang N, Lin Y, Cai Y P. 2013. Structural characterization and deposition of stone cell lignin in Dangshan Su pear. Scientia Horticulturae, 155, 123–130.
Kim W S, Choi J H. 2004. Morphological characteristics of stone cells in fruit of Asian, European, and Chinese pears. HortScience, 39, 815–816.
Lee A Y, Kim S Y, Hong S J, Han Y H, Choi Y, Kim M, Yun S K, Kim G. 2019. Phenotypic analysis of fruit crops water stress using infrared thermal imaging. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 44, 87–94.
Li N, Ma Y F, Song Y Q, Tian C F, Zhang L, Li L L. 2017. Anatomical studies of stone cells in fruits of four different pear cultivars. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 19, 610–614.
Li X G, Sheng B L, Lin J, Yan Z M, Yang Q S, Chang Y H. 2004. Study on contents of stone cells in pulp of different pear species. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 4, 65–67. (in Chinese)
Li X L, Liu L, Ming M L, Hu H J, Zhang M Y, Fan J, Song B B, Zhang S L, Wu J. 2019. Comparative transcriptomic analysis provides insight into the domestication and improvement of pear (P. pyrifolia) fruit. Plant Physiology, 180, 435–452.
Lu B, Chen K S, Zhang D, Cao Y F, Yamamoto T, Teng Y W. 2007. Genetic diversity and similarity of pear (Pyrus L.) cultivars native to East Asia revealed by SSR (simple sequence repeat) markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 54, 959–971.
Mafra I, Barros A S, Nunes C, Vitorino R, Saraiva J, Smith A C, Waldron K W, Delgadillo I, Coimbra M A. 2006. Ripening-related changes in the cell walls of olive (Olea europaea L.) pulp of two consecutive harvests. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 86, 988–998.
McFarlane H E, Doring A, Persson S. 2014. The cell biology of cellulose synthesis. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 65, 69–94.
Mou Q Y, Li W X, Zhang H Y, Wang S G, Sun P. 1996. Determination of stone cell content in pear fruit and its correlation with fruit quality. Deciduous Fruits, 1, 7–9. (in Chinese)
Naik S, Patel B. 2017. Machine vision based fruit classification and grading - A review. International Journal of Computer Applications, 170, 22–34.
Nii N, Kawahara T, Nakao Y. 2008. The development of stone cells in Japanese pear fruit. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 83, 148–153.
Paul A, Ghosh S, Das A K, Goswami S, Das C S. 2020. A review on agricultural advancement based on computer vision and machine learning. In: Mandal J, Bhattacharya D, eds., Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing.Springer, Singapore. pp. 567–581.
Smith W W. 1935. The course of stone cell formation in pear fruits. Plant Physiology, 10, 587–611.
Sozzani R, Benfey P N. 2011. High-throughput phenotyping of multicellular organisms: Finding the link between genotype and phenotype. Genome Biology, 12, 219.
Tao S T, Khanizadeh S, Zhang H, Zhang S L. 2009. Anatomy, ultrastructure and lignin distribution of stone cells in two Pyrus species. Plant Science, 176, 413–419.
Tao S T, Wang D Y, Jin C, Sun W, Liu X, Zhang S L, Gao F Y, Khanizadeh S. 2015. Cinnamate-4-hydroxylase gene is involved in the step of lignin biosynthesis in Chinese white pear. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 140, 573–579.
Tian L M, Cao Y F, Gao Y, Dong X G. 2011. Effect of stone cells size and flesh texture in pear cultivars. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 38, 1225–1234. (in Chinese)
Vanholme R, Morreel K, Darrah C, Oyarce P, Grabber J H, Ralph J, Boerjan W. 2012. Metabolic engineering of novel lignin in biomass crops. New Phytologist, 196, 978–1000.
Voxeur A, Wang Y, Sibout R. 2015. Lignification: Different mechanisms for a versatile polymer. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 23, 83–90.
Wainhouse D, Cross D J, Howell R S. 1990. The role of lignin as a defense against the spruce bark beetle Dendroctonus micans: Effect on larvae and adults. Oecologia, 85, 257–265.
Wang H B, Zhu J, Wang D Y, Tao S T. 2018. Analysis of the content of pear pulp cells. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 46, 173–176. (in Chinese)
Wilkerson C G, Mansfield S D, Lu F, Withers S, Park J Y, Karlen S D, Gonzales-Vigil E, Padmakshan D, Unda F, Rencoret J, Ralph J. 2014. Monolignol ferulate transferase introduces chemically labile linkages into the lignin backbone. Science, 344, 90–93.
Wu J, Wang Y T, Xu J B, Korban S S, Fei Z J, Tao S T, Ming R, Tai S S, Khan A M, Postman J D, Gu C, Yin H, Zheng D M, Qi K J, Li Y, Wang R Z, Deng C H, Kumar S, Chagne D, Li X L, et al. 2018. Diversification and independent domestication of Asian and European pears. Genome Biology, 19, 1–16.
Wu J, Wang Z W, Shi Z B, Zhang S, Ming R, Zhu S L, Khan M A, Tao S T, Korban S S, Wang H, Chen N J, Nishio T, Xu X, Cong L, Qi K J, Huang X S, Wang Y T, Zhao X, Wu J Y, Deng C, et al. 2013. The genome of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). Genome Research, 23, 396–408.
Wu S H, Shen D X. 1985. The analysis method of pear stone cells content. China Fruits, 3, 50–51. (in Chinese)
Xue C, Yao J L, Xue Y S, Su G Q, Wang L, Lin L K, Allan A C, Zhang S L, Wu J. 2019. PbrMYB169 positively regulates lignification of stone cells in pear fruit. Journal of Experimental Botany, 70, 1801–1814.
Yan C C, Yin M, Zhang N, Jin Q, Fang Z, Lin Y, Cai Y P. 2014. Stone cell distribution and lignin structure in various pear varieties. Scientia Horticulturae, 174, 142–150.
Zhang F, Fu L S. 2014. Application of computer vision technology in agricultural field. Progress in Mechatronics and Information Technology, 462, 72–76.
Zhang Y F, Guo T J, Jiao P J, Ge Y X. 1998. Determination of Pyrus ussuriensis strains of fruit stone cell content. Special Wild Economic Animal and Plant Research, 4, 34–35. (in Chinese)
Zhao Q. 2016. Lignification: Flexibility, biosynthesis and regulation. Trends in Plant Science, 21, 713–721.
No related articles found!
No Suggested Reading articles found!