|
|
|
|
|
| Relationships between temperature-light meteorological factors and seedcotton biomass per boll at different boll positions |
| WU You, ZHAO Wen-qing, MENG Ya-li, WANG You-hua, CHEN Bing-lin, ZHOU Zhi-guo |
| Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology Ecology and Production Management, Ministry of Agriculture/Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production (JCIC-MCP), Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, P.R.China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Cotton growth and development are determined and influenced by cultivars, meteorological conditions, and management practices. The objective of this study was to quantify the optimum of temperature-light meteorological factors for seedcotton biomass per boll with respect to boll positions. Field experiments were conducted using two cultivars of Kemian 1 and Sumian 15 with three planting dates of 25 April (mean daily temperature (MDT) was 28.0 and 25.4°C in 2010 and 2011, respectively), 25 May (MDT was 22.5 and 21.2°C in 2010 and 2011, respectively), and 10 Jun (MDT was 18.7 and 17.9°C in 2010 and 2011, respectively), and under three shading levels (crop relative light rates (CRLR) were 100, 80, and 60%) during 2010 and 2011 cotton boll development period (from anthesis to boll open stages). The main meteorological factors (temperature and light) affected seedcotton biomass per boll differently among different boll positions and cultivars. Mean daily radiation (MDR) affected seedcotton biomass per boll at all boll positions, except fruiting branch 2 (FB2) fruting node 1 (FN1). However, its influence was less than temperature factors, especially growing degree-days (GDD). Optimum mean daily maximum temperature (MDTmax) for seedcotton biomass per boll at FB11FN3 was 29.9–32.4°C, and the optimum MDR at aforementioned position was 15.8–17.5 MJ m–2. Definitely, these results can contribute to future cultural practices such as rational cultivars choice and distribution, simplifying field managements and mechanization to acquire more efficient and economical cotton management.
|
|
Received: 21 June 2017
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471444, 31401327), the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of China (Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture Production, 201203096), and the Jiangsu Overseas Research and Training Program for University Prominent Young and Middle-aged Teachers and President , China (2016). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence ZHOU Zhi-guo, Tel/Fax: +86-25-84396813, E-mail: giscott@njau.edu.cn
|
| About author: WU You, Mobile: +86-15805156706, E-mail: jywuyou@yeah.net;
|
Cite this article:
WU You, ZHAO Wen-qing, MENG Ya-li, WANG You-hua, CHEN Bing-lin, ZHOU Zhi-guo.
2018.
Relationships between temperature-light meteorological factors and seedcotton biomass per boll at different boll positions. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 17(06): 1315-1326.
|
Anjum R, Soomro A R, Bano S, Chang M A, Leghari A M. 2002. Fruiting position impact on seedcotton yield in American cotton. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 4, 153–155.
Arshad M, Wajid A, Maqsood M, Hussain K, Aslam M, Ibrahim M. 2007. Response of growth, yield and quality of different cotton cultivars to sowing dates. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 44, 208–212.
Bauer P J, Foulk J A, Gamble G R, Sadler E J. 2009. A comparison of two cotton cultivars differing in maturity for within-canopy fiber property variation. Crop Science, 49, 651–657.
Bauer P J, May O L, Camberato J J. 1998. Planting date and potassium fertility effects on cotton yield and fiber properties. Journal of Production Agriculture, 11, 415–420.
Bednarz C W, Nichols R L. 2005. Phenological and morphological components of cotton crop maturity. Crop Science, 45, 1497–1503.
Boquet D J, Clawson E L. 2009. Cotton planting date: Yield, seedling survival, and plant growth. Agronomy Journal, 101, 1123–1130.
Cao T V, Oumarou P, Gawrysiak G, Klassou C, Hau B. 2011. Short-season cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) may be a suitable response to late planting in sub-Saharan regions. Fuel & Energy Abstracts, 120, 9–20.
Chen J, Lv F, Liu J, Ma Y, Wang Y, Chen B, Meng Y, Zhou Z. 2013. Effect of late planting and shading on cellulose synthesis during cotton fiber secondary wall development. PLoS ONE, 9, e105088.
Chen J, Lv F, Liu J, Ma Y, Wang Y, Chen B, Meng Y, Zhou Z, Oosterhuis D M. 2014. Effects of different planting dates and low light on cotton fibre length formation. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 36, 2581–2595.
Dai J, Dong H. 2014. Intensive cotton farming technologies in China: Achievementschallenges and countermeasures. Field Crops Research, 155, 99–110.
Davidonis G H, Johnson A S, Landivar J A, Fernandez C J. 2004. Cotton fiber quality is related to boll location and planting date. Agronomy Journal, 96, 42–47.
Dong H, Li W, Tang W, Li Z, Zhang D, Niu Y. 2006. Yield, quality and leaf senescence of cotton grown at varying planting dates and plant densities in the Yellow River Valley of China. Field Crops Research, 98, 106–115.
Dusserre J, Crozat Y, Warembourg F R, Dingkuhn M. 2002. Effects of shading on sink capacity and yield components of cotton in controlled environments. Agronomie, 22, 307–320.
Gormus O, Yucel C. 2002. Different planting date and potassium fertility effects on cotton yield and fiber properties in the Cukurova region, Turkey. Field Crops Research, 78, 141–149.
Heitholt J J. 1997. Floral bud removal from specific fruiting positions in cotton: Yield and fiber quality. Crop Science, 37, 826–832.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. Climate Changes 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contributionof Working Group I to The Fourth Assessment Report of the Ntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Jalota S K, Buttar G S, Sood A, Chahal G B S, Ray S S, Panigrahy S. 2008. Effects of sowing date, tillage and residue management on productivity of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system in northwest India. Soil & Tillage Research, 99, 76–83.
Janas K M, Cvikrová M, Pa?agiewicz A, Szafranska K, Posmyk M M. 2002. Constitutive elevated accumulation of phenylpropanoids in soybean roots at low temperature. Plant Science, 163, 369–373.
Jenkins J N, McCarty J C J, Parrott W L. 1990. Effectiveness of fruiting sites in cotton: Yield. Crop Science, 30, 365–369.
Jiang G, Meng Y, Chen B, Bian H, Zhou Z. 2006. Effects of low temperature on physiological mechanisms of cotton fiber strength forming process. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 30, 335–343. (in Chinese)
Kuai J, Zhou Z, Wang Y, Meng Y, Chen B, Zhao W. 2015. The effects of short-term waterlogging on the lint yield and yield components of cotton with respect to boll position. European Journal of Agronomy, 67, 61–74.
Lee J A. 1984. Cotton as a world crop. In: Cotton Agronomy Monogram 24. American Statistical Association, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, USA. pp. 1–25.
Li W, Zhou Z, Meng Y, Xu N, Fok M. 2009. Modeling boll maturation period, seed growth, protein, and oil content of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in China. Field Crops Research, 112, 131–140.
Liu J, Ma Y, Lv F, Chen J, Zhou Z, Wang Y, Abudukeyoumu A, Oosterhuis D M. 2013. Changes of sucrose metabolism in leaf subtending to cotton boll under cool temperature due to late planting. Field Crops Research, 144, 200–211.
Liu J, Meng Y, Chen B, Zhou Z, Ma Y, Lv F, Chen J, Wang Y. 2015a. Photosynthetic characteristics of the subtending leaf and the relationships with lint yield and fiber quality in the late-planted cotton. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 37, 1–11.
Liu J, Meng Y, Chen J, Lv F, Ma Y, Chen B, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Oosterhuis D M. 2015b. Effect of late planting and shading on cotton yield and fiber quality formation. Field Crops Research, 183, 1–13.
Lokhande S, Reddy K R. 2014. Quantifying temperature effects on cotton reproductive efficiency and fiber quality. Agronomy Journal, 106, 1275–1282.
Lv F, Liu J, Ma Y, Chen J, Abudurezikekey A, Wang Y, Chen B, Meng Y, Zhou Z. 2013. Effect of shading on cotton yield and quality on different fruiting branches. Crop Science, 53, 2670–2678.
Ma Y, Wang Y, Liu J, Lv F, Chen J, Zhou Z. 2014. The effects of fruiting positions on cellulose synthesis and sucrose metabolism during cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fiber development. PLoS ONE, 9, e89476.
Mergeai G, Demol J. 1991. Contribution to the study of the effect of various meteorological factors on production and quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fibres. Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie, 147, 113–122.
Percy R G, Cantrell R G, Zhang J. 2006. Genetic variation for agronomic and fiber properties in an introgressed recombinant inbred population of cotton. Crop Science, 46, 1311–1317.
Pettigrew W T. 1994. Source-to-sink manipulation effects on cotton lint yield and yield components. Agronomy Journal, 86, 731–735.
Pettigrew W T. 2001. Environmental effects on cotton fiber carbohydrate concentration and quality. Crop Science, 41, 1108–1113.
Reddy K R, Hodges H F, Mckinion J M, Wall G W. 1962. Temperature effects on pima cotton growth and development. Agronomy Journal, 84, 237–243.
Roussopoulos D, Liakatas A, Whittington W J. 1998. Controlled-temperature effects on cotton growth and development. Journal of Agricultural Science, 130, 451–462.
Sawan Z M, Hanna L I, Karim G A G E, Mccuistion W L. 2002. Relationships between climatic factors and flower and boll production in Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense). Journal of Arid Environments, 52, 499–516.
Shu H, Zhou Z, Xu N, Wang Y, Mi Z. 2009. Sucrose metabolism in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fibre under low temperature during fibre development. European Journal of Agronomy, 31, 61–68.
Viator R P, Nuti R C, Edmisten K L, Wells R. 2005. Predicting cotton boll maturation period using degree days and other climatic factors. Agronomy Journal, 97, 494–499.
Wrather J A, Phipps B J, Stevens W E, Phillips A S, Vories E D. 2008. Cotton planting date and plant population effects on yield and fiber quality in the Mississippi Delta. Journal of Cotton Science, 12, 1–7.
Yeates S J, Constable G A, Mccumstie T. 2010. Irrigated cotton in the tropical dry season. II: Biomass accumulation, partitioning and RUE. Field Crops Research, 116, 290–299.
Zhao D, Ooterhuis D M. 2000. Cotton responses to shade at different growth stages: Growth, lint yield and fibre quality. Experimental Agriculture, 36, 27–39.
Zhao W, Wang Y, Shu H, Li J, Zhou Z. 2012. Sowing date and boll position affected boll weight, fiber quality and fiber physiological parameters in two cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) cultivars. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7, 6073–6081.
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
