|
|
|
|
|
| Anaerobic soil disinfestation: A chemical-independent approach to pre-plant control of plant pathogens |
| S L Strauss, D A Kluepfel |
| USDA-ARS Crops Pathology and Genetics Research Unit, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA |
|
|
|
摘要 Due to increasing regulations and restrictions, there is an urgent need to develop effective alternatives to chemical-dependent fumigation control of soilborne pests and pathogens. Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) is one such alternative showing great promise for use in the control of soilborne pathogens and pests. This method involves the application of a carbon source, irrigation to field capacity, and covering the soil with a plastic tarp. While the mechanisms of ASD are not completely understood, they appear to be a combination of changes in the soil microbial community composition, production of volatile organic compounds, and the generation of lethal anaerobic conditions. The variety of materials and options for ASD application, including carbon sources, soil temperature, and plastic tarp type, influence the efficacy of pathogen suppression and disease control. Currently, both dry (e.g., rice bran) and liquid (e.g., ethanol) carbon sources are commonly used, but with different results depending on environmental conditions. While solarization is not an essential component of ASD, it can enhance efficacy. Understanding the mechanisms that mediate biological changes occurring in the soil during ASD will facilitate our ability to increase ASD efficacy while enhancing its commercial viability.
Abstract Due to increasing regulations and restrictions, there is an urgent need to develop effective alternatives to chemical-dependent fumigation control of soilborne pests and pathogens. Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) is one such alternative showing great promise for use in the control of soilborne pathogens and pests. This method involves the application of a carbon source, irrigation to field capacity, and covering the soil with a plastic tarp. While the mechanisms of ASD are not completely understood, they appear to be a combination of changes in the soil microbial community composition, production of volatile organic compounds, and the generation of lethal anaerobic conditions. The variety of materials and options for ASD application, including carbon sources, soil temperature, and plastic tarp type, influence the efficacy of pathogen suppression and disease control. Currently, both dry (e.g., rice bran) and liquid (e.g., ethanol) carbon sources are commonly used, but with different results depending on environmental conditions. While solarization is not an essential component of ASD, it can enhance efficacy. Understanding the mechanisms that mediate biological changes occurring in the soil during ASD will facilitate our ability to increase ASD efficacy while enhancing its commercial viability.
|
|
Received: 23 March 2015
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This work was supported by the California Department of Food and Agriculture Fruit Tree, Nut Tree, and Grapevine Improvement Advisory Board, USA. |
|
Corresponding Authors:
D A Kluepfel, Tel: +1-530-7521137,Fax: +1-530-7547195, E-mail: daniel.kluepfel@ars.usda.gov
E-mail: daniel.kluepfel@ars.usda.gov
|
| About author: S L Strauss, E-mail: sarah.strauss@ars.usda.gov; |
Cite this article:
S L Strauss, D A Kluepfel.
2015.
Anaerobic soil disinfestation: A chemical-independent approach to pre-plant control of plant pathogens. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(11): 2309-2318.
|
| Agrios G N. 2005. Plant Pathology. Elsevier Academic Press,San Diego, CA.Blok W J, Lamers J G, Termorshuizen A J, Bollen G J. 2000.Control of soilborne plant pathogens by incorporating freshorganic amendments followed by tarping. Phytopathology,90, 253-259Browne G T, Lampinen B D, Holtz B A, Doll D A, UpadhyayaS K, Schmidt L S, Bhat R G, Udompetaikul V, Coates RW, Hanson B D, Klonsky K M, Gao S, Wang D, Gillis M,Gerik J S, Johnson R S. 2013. Managing the almond andstone fruit replant disease complex with less soil fumigant.California Agriculture, 67, 128-138Butler D M, Kokalis-Burelle N, Albano J P, McCollum T G,Muramoto J, Shennan C, Rosskopf E N. 2014. Anaerobicsoil disinfestation (ASD) combined with soil solarization asa methyl bromide alternative: Vegetable crop performanceand soil nutrient dynamics. Plant and Soil, 378, 365-381Butler D M, Kokalis-Burelle N, Muramoto J, Shennan C,McCollum T G, Rosskopf E N. 2012a. Impact of anaerobicsoil disinfestation combined with soil solarization on plantparasiticnematodes and introduced inoculum of soilborneplant pathogens in raised-bed vegetable production. CropProtection, 39, 33-40Butler D M, Rosskopf E N, Kokalis-Burelle N, Albano JP, Muramoto J, Shennan C. 2012b. Exploring warmseasoncover crops as carbon sources for anaerobic soildisinfestation (ASD). Plant and Soil, 355, 149-165Carpenter J, Lynch L, Trout T. 2001. Township limits on 1,3-D willimpact adjustment to methyl bromide phase-out. CaliforniaAgriculture, 55, 12-18Darby H M, Stone A G, Dick R P. 2006. Compost and manuremediated impacts on soilborne pathogens and soil quality.Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70, 347-358Ebihara Y, Uematsu S. 2014. Survival of strawberry-pathogenicfungi Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fragariae, Phytophthoracactorum and Verticillium dahliae under anaerobicconditions. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 80, 50-58Ebihara Y, Uematsu S, Nomiya S. 2010. Control of Verticilliumdahliae at a strawberry nursery by paddy-upland rotation.Journal of General Plant Pathology, 76, 7-20Fennimore S A, Serohijos R, Samtani J B, Ajwa H A, SubbaraoK V, Martin F N, Daugovish O, Legard D, Browne GT, Muramoto J, Shennan C, Klonsky K. 2013. TIF film,substrates and nonfumigant soil disinfestation maintain fruityields. California Agriculture, 67, 139-146Gamliel A, Austerweil M, Kritzman G. 2000. Non-chemicalapproach to soilborne pest management - organicamendments. Crop Protection, 19, 847-853Gao S, Hanson B D, Wang D, Browne G T, Qin R J, Ajwa H,Yates S R. 2011. Methods evaluated to minimize emissionsfrom preplant soil fumigation. California Agriculture, 65,41-46Goud J K C, Termorshuizen A J, Blok W J, van Bruggen A HC. 2004. Long-term effect of biological soil disinfestation onVerticillium wilt. Plant Disease, 88, 688-694Hanson B D, Gao S, Gerik J, Qin R, Cabrera J A, Jhala AJ, Abit M J M, Cox D, Correiar B, Wang D, Browne G T.2013. Preplant 1,3-D treatments test well for perennial cropnurseries, but challenges remain. California Agriculture,67, 181-189Hewavitharana S S, Ruddell D, Mazzola M. 2014. Carbonsource-dependent antifungal and nematicidal volatilesderived during anaerobic soil disinfestation. EuropeanJournal of Plant Pathology, 140, 39-52Katan J. 1981. Solar heating (solarization) of soil for controlof soilborne pests. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 19,211-236Katase M, Kubo C, Ushio S, Ootsuka E, Takeuchi T, MizukuboT. 2009. Nematicidal activity of volatile fatty acids generatedfrom wheat bran in reductive soil disinfestation. JapaneseJournal of Nematology, 39, 53-62Korthals G W, Thoden T C, van den Berg W, Visser J H M.2014. Long-term effects of eight soil health treatments tocontrol plant-parasitic nematodes and Verticillium dahliaein agro-ecosystems. Applied Soil Ecology, 76, 112-123Locascio S J, Gilreath J P, Dickson D W, Kucharek T A, JonesJ P, Noling J W. 1997. Fumigant alternatives to methylbromide for polyethylene-mulched tomato. Hortscience,32, 1208-1211Martin F N, Loper J E. 1999. Soilborne plant diseases causedby Pythium spp: Ecology, epidemiology, and prospects forbiological control. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 18,111-181Mazzola M. 2007. Manipulation of rhizosphere bacterialcommunities to induce suppressive soils. Journal ofNematology, 39, 213-220McCarty D G, Inwood S E E, Ownley B H, Sams C E, WszelakiA L, Butler D M. 2014. Field evaluation of carbon sourcesfor anaerobic soil disinfestation in tomato and bell pepperproduction in tennessee. Hortscience, 49, 272-280McKenry M. 2002. Field Evaluations/Input for Grower ReplantSettings and New Lines of Nematode Resistance. WalnutResearch Reports. pp. 509-516Menzies J D. 1963. Survival of microbial plant pathogens insoil. Botanical Review, 29, 79-122Messiha N A S, van Diepeningen A D, Wenneker M, vanBeuningen A R, Janse J D, Coenen T G C, TermorshuizenA J, van Bruggen A H C, Blok W J. 2007. Biological SoilDisinfestation (BSD), a new control method for potato brownrot, caused by Ralstonia solanacearum race 3 biovar 2.European Journal of Plant Pathology, 117, 403-415 Momma N. 2008. Biological soil disinfestation (BSD) of soilbornepathogens and its possible mechanisms. Japan AgriculturalResearch Quarterly, 42, 7-12Momma N, Kobara Y, Momma M. 2011. Fe2+ and Mn2+, potentialagents to induce suppression of Fusarium oxysporumfor biological soil disinfestation. Journal of General PlantPathology, 77, 331-335Momma N, Kobara Y, Uematsu S, Kita N, Shinmura A. 2013.Development of biological soil disinfestations in Japan.Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97, 3801-3809Momma N, Momma M, Kobara Y. 2010. Biological soildisinfestation using ethanol: Effect on Fusarium oxysporumf. sp. lycopersici and soil microorganisms. Journal ofGeneral Plant Pathology, 76, 336-344Momma N, Yamamoto K, Simandi P, Shishido M. 2006. Roleof organic acids in the mechanisms of biological soildisinfestation (BSD). Journal of General Plant Pathology,72, 247-252Mowlick S, Inoue T, Takehara T, Tonouchi A, Kaku N, UekiK, Ueki A. 2014. Usefulness of Japanese-radish residuein biological soil disinfestation to suppress spinach wiltdisease accompanying with proliferation of soil bacteria inthe Firmicutes. Crop Protection, 61, 64-73Mowlick S, Yasukawa H, Inoue T, Takehara T, Kaku N, UekiK, Ueki A. 2013. Suppression of spinach wilt disease bybiological soil disinfestation incorporated with Brassicajuncea plants in association with changes in soil bacterialcommunities. Crop Protection, 54, 185-193Muramoto J, Shennan C, Baird G, Zavatta M, Koike S T, BoldaM P, Daugovish O, Dara S K, Klonsky K, Mazzola M,Pugliese M. 2014. Optimizing anaerobic soil disinfestationfor california strawberries. Acta Horticulturae, 1044, 215-220.van Overbeek L, Runia W, Kastelein P, Molendijk L. 2014.Anaerobic disinfestation of tare soils contaminated withRalstonia solanacearum biovar 2 and Globodera pallida.European Journal of Plant Pathology, 138, 323-330Pullman G S, Devay J E, 1981. Effect of soil flooding andpaddy rice culture on the survival of Verticillium dahliaeand incidence of Verticillium wilt in cotton. Phytopathology,71, 1285-1289Ramos D E. 1998. Walnut Production Mannual Publication3373. University of California Division of Agriculture andNatural Resources, Oakland, CA.Runia W T, Thoden T C, Molendijk L P G, van den Berg W,Termorshuizen A J, Streminska M A, van der Wurff A WG, Feil H, Meints H, Pugliese M. 2014. Unravelling themechanism of pathogen inactivation during anaerobic soildisinfestation. Acta Horticulturae, 1044, 177-193Shennan C, Muramoto J, Lamers J, Mazzola M, Rosskopf EN, Kokalis-Burelle N, Momma N, Butler D M, Kobara Y,Pugliese M. 2014. Anaerobic soil disinfestation for soilborne disease control in strawberry and vegetable systems:Current knowledge and future directions. Acta Horticulturae,1044, 165-175Shennan C, Muramoto J, Koike S T, Daugovish O. 2009.Optimizing anaerobic soil disinfestation for non-fumigatedstrawberry prodution in California. In: Annual InternationalResearch Conference on Methyl Bormide Alternativesand Emissions Reductions. Methyl Bromide AlternativesOutreach, San Diego, CA.Shennan C, Muramoto J, Koike S T, Daugovish O. 2010.Optimizing Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation for Non-FumigatedStrawberry Production in California. California StrawberrCommission Annual Production Research Report 2010-2011 pp. 113-121Stover R H. 1955. Flood-fallowing for eradication of Fusariumoxysporum F. cubense: III. Effect of oxygen on fungussurvival. Soil Science, 80, 397-412Strauss S L, Stover J K, Kluepfel D A. 2015. Impact of biologicalamendments on Agrobacterium tumefaciens survival in soil.Applied Soil Ecology, 87, 39-48Subbarao K V, Hubbard J C, Koike S T, 1999. Evaluation ofbroccoli residue incorporation into field soil for Verticilliumwilt control in cauliflower. Plant Disease, 83, 124-129Termorshuizen A J, van Rijn E, van der Gaag D J, AlabouvetteC, Chen Y, Lagerlof J, Malandrakis A A, Paplomatas EJ, Ramert B, Ryckeboer J, Steinberg C, Zmora-NahumS. 2006. Suppressiveness of 18 composts against 7pathosystems: Variability in pathogen response. SoilBiology & Biochemistry, 38, 2461-2477Wang Q, Garrity G M, Tiedje J M, Cole J R. 2007. Nativebayesian classifer for rapid assignment of rRNA sequencesinto the new bacterial taxonomy. Applied and EnvironmentalMicrobiology, 73, 5261-5267Yakabe L E, Parker S R, Kluepfel D A. 2014. Incidence ofAgrobacterium tumefaciens biovar 1 in and on ‘Paradox’(Juglans hindsii×Juglans regia) walnut seeds collectedfrom commercial nurseries. Plant Disease, 98, 766-770Yonemoto K, Hirota K, Mizuguchi S, Sakaguchi K. 2006.Utilization of the sterilization by soil reduction in an open airfield and its efficacy against Fusarium wilt of strawberry. In:Shikoku Plant Defense, Shikoku, 41, 15-24 (in Japanese)Zavatta M, Shennan C, Muramoto J, Mazzola M. 2014.Evaluating C-sources for anaerobic soil disinfestation.In: Annual International Conference on Methyl BromideAlternatives and Emissions Reductions. Methyl BromideAlternatives Outreach, Orlando, CA, USA. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
