Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2013, Vol. 12 Issue (12): 2243-2249    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60652-8
Animal Science · Veterinary Science Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Levels of Germinable Seed in Topsoil and Yak Dung on an Alpine Meadow on the North-East Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau
 YU Xiao-jun, XU Chang-lin, WANG Fang, SHANG Zhan-huan , LONG Rui-jun
1.College of Grassland Science, Gansu Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education/Sino-U.S. Center for Grassland Ecosystem Sustainability, Lanzhou 730070, P.R.China
2.College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, P.R.China
3.International Centre for Tibetan Plateau Ecosystem Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  In order to clarify the interactive mechanism between grazing yak and alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, our study assessed seed density (by species) in the topsoil of alpine meadow with different grazing intensities in the Tianzhu area, north-eastern margins of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and their rates of occurrence in yak dung. Seed density in the topsoil of the lightly grazed, moderately grazed, heavily grazed and extremely grazed alpine meadows in November, 2010 were 1 551, 1 692, 2 660 and 1 830 grains m-2, while in the same meadows in April, 2011 densities were 1 530, 2 404, 2 530 and 2 692 grains m-2, respectively. In the cold season pasture, mean seed density in yak dung from November to April in the lightly grazed, moderately grazed, heavily grazed and extremely grazed sites were 121, 127, 187, and 120 grains kg-1 of dry yak dung. The proportion of total seed numbers in yak dung to soil seed bank in lightly grazed, moderately grazed, heavily grazed and extremely grazed alpine meadow was 1.40, 2.62, 0.69, and 0.90%. 12 species out of the 47 were not found in topsoil but were found in yak dung, 10 species out of 45 were not found in yak dung but were found in the topsoil. Endozoochorous dispersal by yaks is therefore very important for soil seed bank and plant biodiversity and population dynamics in alpine meadows.

Abstract  In order to clarify the interactive mechanism between grazing yak and alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, our study assessed seed density (by species) in the topsoil of alpine meadow with different grazing intensities in the Tianzhu area, north-eastern margins of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and their rates of occurrence in yak dung. Seed density in the topsoil of the lightly grazed, moderately grazed, heavily grazed and extremely grazed alpine meadows in November, 2010 were 1 551, 1 692, 2 660 and 1 830 grains m-2, while in the same meadows in April, 2011 densities were 1 530, 2 404, 2 530 and 2 692 grains m-2, respectively. In the cold season pasture, mean seed density in yak dung from November to April in the lightly grazed, moderately grazed, heavily grazed and extremely grazed sites were 121, 127, 187, and 120 grains kg-1 of dry yak dung. The proportion of total seed numbers in yak dung to soil seed bank in lightly grazed, moderately grazed, heavily grazed and extremely grazed alpine meadow was 1.40, 2.62, 0.69, and 0.90%. 12 species out of the 47 were not found in topsoil but were found in yak dung, 10 species out of 45 were not found in yak dung but were found in the topsoil. Endozoochorous dispersal by yaks is therefore very important for soil seed bank and plant biodiversity and population dynamics in alpine meadows.
Keywords:  alpine meadow       seeds       endozoochory       seed density       soil seed bank       yak dung  
Received: 17 September 2012   Accepted:
Fund: 

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31001029).

Corresponding Authors:  YU Xiao-jun, Tel/Fax: +86-931-7631227, Mobile: 13519440341, E-mail: yuxj@gsau.edu.cn, xjyulz@126.com     E-mail:  yuxj@gsau.edu.cn, xjyulz@126.com

Cite this article: 

YU Xiao-jun, XU Chang-lin, WANG Fang, SHANG Zhan-huan , LONG Rui-jun. 2013. Levels of Germinable Seed in Topsoil and Yak Dung on an Alpine Meadow on the North-East Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(12): 2243-2249.

[1]Blaxter K L, Graham N M, Wainman F W. 1956. Some observations on the digestibility of food by sheep andother related problems. British Journal of Nutrition, 10,69-74

[2]Bruun H H, Fritzbøger B. 2002. The past impact of livestockhusbandry on dispersal of plant seeds in the landscape ofdenmark. Ambio, 31, 425-431

[3]Cosyns E, Claerbout S, Lamoot I, Hoffmann M. 2005.Endozoochorous seed dispersal by cattle and horse in aspatially heterogeneous landscape. Plant Ecology, 178,149-162

[4]Dennis A J, Westcott D A. 2006. Reducing complexitywhen studying seed dispersal at community scales: a functional classification of vertebrate seed dispersers intropical forests. Oecologia, 149, 620-634

[5]Farrill G O, Chapman C A, Gonzalez A. 2011. Origin anddeposition sites influence seed germination and seedlingsurvival of Manilkara zapota: implications for long-distance, animal-mediated seed dispersal. Seed Science Research, 21, 305-313

[6]Gökbulak F. 2002. Effect of American bison (Bison bisonL.) on the recovery and germinability of seeds of rangeforage species. Grass and Forage Science, 57, 395-400

[7]Grime J P, Hodgson J G, Hunt R. 1988. Comparative PlantEcology. A Functional Approach to Common BritishSpecies. Uncirn Hyman, London.Holter P. 1979. Effect of dung beetles and earthworms onthe disappearance of cattle dung. Oikos, 32, 393-402

[8]Jolaosho A O, Olanite J A, Onifade O S, Oke A O. 2006.Seed in the faeces of ruminant animals grazing native pastures under semi-intensive management in Nigeria.Tropical Grasslands, 40, 79-83

[9]Jones R M, Bunch G A. 1995. Yield and populationdynamics of Chamaecrista rotundifoliacv. Wynn incoastal south-eastern Queensland as affected by stockingrate and rainfall. Tropical Grasslands, 29, 65-73

[10]Jones R M, Bunch G A. 1999. Levels of seeds in faeces of cattle grazing speargrass (Heteropogon contortus)pastures oversown with legumes in southern subtropicalQueensland. Tropical Grasslands, 33, 11-17

[11]Jones R M, Kerridge P C, Mclean R W. 1993. Populationdynamics of Siratro and shrubby stylo in south-east Queensland as affected by phosphorus, soil type,stocking rate and rainfall. Tropical Grasslands, 27, 65-74

[12]Jones R M, Neto M S. 1987. Recovery of pasture seeds ingested by ruminants. 3. The effects of the seed in dietand quality on seed recovery from sheep. AustralianJournal of Experimental Agriculture, 27, 253-256

[13]Jones R M, Noguchi M, Bunch G A. 1991. Levels of germinable seed in topsoil and cattle faeces in legume-grass and nitrogen-fertilized pastures in south-east Queensland. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 42, 953-968

[14]Kaneda S, Yamashita N, Uchida T, Shimano S, Miyoshi N,Sasaki M, Enami Y. 2006. Effects of ivermectin in dungpats on earthworm (Megascolecidae) populations and patdegradation in Japanese grassland. Applied Soil Ecology,31, 280-285

[15]Levey D J, Tewksbury J J, Bolker B M. 2008. Modellinglong-distance seed dispersal in heterogeneous landscapes. Journal of Ecology, 96, 599-608

[16]Long R J, Apori S O, Castro F B, Ørskov E R. 1999. Feedvalue of native forages of the Tibetan Plateau of China.Animal Feed Science and Technology, 80, 101-113

[17]Lovell R D, Jarvis S C. 1996. Effect of cattle dung on soilmicrobial biomass C and N in a permanent pasture soil.Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 28, 291-299

[18]Malo J E. 2000. Hardseededness and the accuracy of seedbank estimates obtained through germination. WebEcology, 1, 70-75

[19]Malo J E, Súarez F. 1995. Herbivorous mammals as seeddispersers in a Mediterranean dehesa. Oecologia, 104,246-255

[20]Malo J E, Súarez F. 1996. New insights into pasture diversity: The consequences of seed dispersal inherbivore dung. Biodiversity Letters, 3, 54-57

[21]Mcivor J G. 2004. Pasture management in semi-arid tropicalwoodlands: levels of germinable seeds in soil andfaeces of cattle grazing Stylosanthes pastures. Tropical Grasslands, 38, 129-139

[22]Mouissie A M, Van Der V, Veen G F, Diggelen R V. 2005.Ecological correlates of seed survival after ingestion by fallow deer. Functional Ecology, 19, 284-290

[23]Neto M S, Jones R M, Ratcliff A D. 1987. Recovery of pasture seed ingested by ruminants. 1. Seed of six tropical pasture species fed to cattle, sheep and goats. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 27, 239- 246.

[24]Ozer Z. 1979. The influence of passage through the sheep on the seeds of meadow plants. Weed Research, 19, 247- 254.

[25]Pakeman R J, Digneffe G, Small J L. 2002. Ecological correlates of endozoochory by herbivores. Functional Ecology, 16, 296-304

[26]Thompson K, Bakker J P, Bekker R M. 1997. The Soil Seed Banks of NW Europe: Methodology, Density and Longevity. Cambridge University Press, UK.

[27]Traba J, Levassor C, Peco B. 2003. Restoration of species richness in abandoned Mediterranean grasslands: seeds in cattle dung. Restoration Ecology, 11, 378-384

[28]Traveset A. 1998. Effect of seed passage through vertebrate frugivores’ guts on germination: a review. Perspectives in plant ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 1, 151-190

[29]Welch D. 1985. Studies in the grazing of heather moorland in north-east Scotland. IV. Seed dispersal and plant establishment in dung. Journal of Applied Ecology, 22, 416-472

[30]Yokoyama K, Kai H, Koga T, Aibe T. 1991. N mineralization and microbial populations in cow dung, dung balls and underlying soil affected by paracoprid dung beetles. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 23, 649-953

[31]Yu X J. 2010. The role and mechanism of yak dung on maintenance for Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau alpine grassland health. PhD thesis, Gansu Agricultural University, China. (in Chinese)

[32]Yu X J, Long R J, Wang F, Shang Z H, Xu C L. 2012. Effect of yak and Tibetan sheep on the recovery and germinability of seeds of the Qinghai-Tibetanan Plateau alpine meadow species. The Rangeland Journal, 34, 249-255

[33]Zhang R C. 1989. Yak in China. The Press of Gansu Science and Technology, Lanzhou. (in Chinese)
[1] WANG Qiang, LIU Hong-zhi, SHI Ai-min, HU Hui, LIU Li, WANG Li, YU Hong-wei. Review on the processing characteristics of cereals and oilseeds and their processing suitability evaluation technology[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017, 16(12): 2886-2897.
[2] Alphonse Nahayo, Morris O. Omondi, ZHANG Xu-hui, LI Lian-qing, PAN Gen-xing, Stephen Joseph . Factors influencing farmers’ participation in crop intensification program in Rwanda[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017, 16(06): 1406-1416.
[3] SUN Le-xiu, LIU Shuang-xi, WANG Jin-xing, WU Cheng-lai, LI Yan, ZHANG Chun-qing. The effects of grain texture and phenotypic traits on the thin-layer drying rate in maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(2): 317-325.
No Suggested Reading articles found!