Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2013, Vol. 12 Issue (1): 159-168    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60216-6
Soil & Fertilization · Irrigation · Agro-Ecology & Environment Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
DetectingAgro-Droughts in Southwest of China Using MODIS Satellite Data
 ZHANG Feng, ZHANG Li-wen, WANG Xiu-zhen , HUNG Jing-feng
1.Institute of Agricultural Remote Sensing & Information Application, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, P.R.China
2.The Provinical Key Laboratories of Agricultural Remote Sensing and Information System, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310058, P.R.China
3.Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Ecological Health, Ministry of Education/College of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, P.R.China
4.Institute of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) has proven to be typically employed to assess terrestrial vegetation conditions. However, one limitation of NDVI for drought monitoring is the apparent time lag between rainfall deficit and NDVI response. To better understand this relationship, time series NDVI (2000-2010) during the growing season in Sichuan Province and Chongqing City were analyzed. The vegetation condition index (VCI) was used to construct a new drought index, time-integrated vegetation condition index (TIVCI), and was then compared with meteorological drought indices-standardized precipitation index (SPI), a multiple-time scale meteorological-drought index based on precipitation, to examine the sensitivity on droughts. Our research findings indicate the followings: (1) farmland NDVI sensitivity to precipitation in study area has a time lag of 16-24 d, and it maximally responds to the temperature with a lag of about 16 d. (2) We applied the approach to Sichuan Province and Chongqing City for extreme drought monitoring in 2006 and 2003, and the results show that the monitoring results from TIVCI are closer to the published China agricultural statistical data than VCI. Compared to VCI, the best results from TIVCI3 were found with the relative errors of -4.5 and 6.36% in 2006 for drought affected area and drought disaster area respectively, and 5.11 and -5.95% in 2003. (3) Compared to VCI, TIVCI has better correlation with the SPI, which indicates the lag and cumulative effects of precipitation on vegetation. Our finding proved that TIVCI is an effective indicator of drought detection when the time lag effects between NDVI and climate factors are taken into consideration.

Abstract  The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) has proven to be typically employed to assess terrestrial vegetation conditions. However, one limitation of NDVI for drought monitoring is the apparent time lag between rainfall deficit and NDVI response. To better understand this relationship, time series NDVI (2000-2010) during the growing season in Sichuan Province and Chongqing City were analyzed. The vegetation condition index (VCI) was used to construct a new drought index, time-integrated vegetation condition index (TIVCI), and was then compared with meteorological drought indices-standardized precipitation index (SPI), a multiple-time scale meteorological-drought index based on precipitation, to examine the sensitivity on droughts. Our research findings indicate the followings: (1) farmland NDVI sensitivity to precipitation in study area has a time lag of 16-24 d, and it maximally responds to the temperature with a lag of about 16 d. (2) We applied the approach to Sichuan Province and Chongqing City for extreme drought monitoring in 2006 and 2003, and the results show that the monitoring results from TIVCI are closer to the published China agricultural statistical data than VCI. Compared to VCI, the best results from TIVCI3 were found with the relative errors of -4.5 and 6.36% in 2006 for drought affected area and drought disaster area respectively, and 5.11 and -5.95% in 2003. (3) Compared to VCI, TIVCI has better correlation with the SPI, which indicates the lag and cumulative effects of precipitation on vegetation. Our finding proved that TIVCI is an effective indicator of drought detection when the time lag effects between NDVI and climate factors are taken into consideration.
Keywords:  time-integrated vegetation condition index (TIVCI)       time lag       normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)       drought monitor       standardized precipitation index (SPI)  
Received: 18 June 2012   Accepted:
Fund: 

This research was supported by the National Key Technologies R&D Program of China (2011BAD32B01) and the Ph D Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (20100101110035).

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence HUANG Jin-feng, Tel: +86-571-88982830, Fax: +86-571-63370364, E-mail:erajps@163.com     E-mail:  erajps@163.com
About author:  ZHANG Feng, Mobile: 15088677853, E-mail: feng_zhang@zju.edu.cn

Cite this article: 

ZHANG Feng, ZHANG Li-wen, WANG Xiu-zhen , HUNG Jing-feng. 2013. DetectingAgro-Droughts in Southwest of China Using MODIS Satellite Data. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(1): 159-168.

[1]Brown J F, Wardlow B D, Tsegaye T, Hayes M J, Reed B C.2008. The vegetation drought response index: a newintegrated approach for monitoring drought stress invegetation. GIScience and Remote Sensing, 45, 1548-1603

[2]Chen C F, Nguyen T S, Li Y C. 2011. Monitoring of soilmoisture variability in relation to rice cropping systemsin the Vietnamese Mekong Delta using MODIS data.Applied Geography, 31, 463-475

[3]Cheng Q, Zhou Q, Zhang H F, Liu F G. 2010. Spatial disparityof NDVI response in vegetation growing season toclimate change in the Three-River Headwaters Region.Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 19, 1284-1289 (in Chinese)

[4]Di L, Rundquist D C, Han L. 1994. Modeling relationshipsbetween NDVI and precipitation during vegetativegrowth cycles. International Journal of RemoteSensing, 15, 2121-2136

[5]Eidenshink J C. 1992. The 1990 conterminous U.S. AVHRRdata set. Photogrammetric Engineering and RemoteSensing, 58, 809-813

[6]Fuller D O, Prince S D. 1996. Rainfall and foliar dynamics intropical Southern Africa: potential impacts of globalclimate change on Savanna vegetation. ClimateChange, 33, 69-96

[7]Gabduwasit G, Qin Q M, Tashpolat T, Zhao L L. 2007.Modified perpendicular drought index (MPDI): a realtimedrought monitoring method. Photogrammetry andRemote Sensing, 62, 150-164

[8]Gutman G G. 1990. Towards monitoring drought from space.Journal of Climate, 3, 282-295

[9]Hou G L, Zhang H Y, Wang Y Q. 2011. Vegetation dynamicsand its relationship with climatic factors in the ChangbaiMountain natural reserve. Journal of MountainScience, 8, 865-875

[10]HuMQ, Mao F, Sun H, Hou Y Y. 2011. Study of normalizeddifference vegetation index variation and its correlationwith climate factors in the three-river-source region.International Journal of Applied Earth Observationand Geoinformation, 13, 24-33

[11]Ji L, Peters A J. 2003. Assessing vegetation response todrought in the northern Great Plains using vegetationand drought indices. Remote Sensing of Environment,87, 85-98

[12]Jiang H, APPS M J, Zhang Y L, Peng C H. 1999. Modellingthe spatial pattern of net primary productivity in Chineseforests. Ecological Modelling, 122, 275-288

[13]Karabulut M. 2003. An examination of relationshipsbetween vegetation and rainfall using maximum valuecomposite AVHRR-NDVI data. Turkish Journal ofBotany, 27, 93-101

[14]Kogan F N. 1990. Remote sensing of weather impacts on vegetation in non-homogeneous areas. InternationalJournal of Remote Sensing, 11, 1405-1419

[15]Kogan F N. 1995. Droughts of the late 1980s in the UnitedStates as derived from NOAA polar orbiting satellitedata. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,76, 655-668

[16]Lambin E F, Strahler A H. 1994. Indicator of land-coverchange for change vector analysis in multitemporalspace at coarse spatial scales. International Journalof Remote Sensing, 15, 2099-2119

[17]Liu W T, FERREIR AA. 1991. Monitoring crop productionregions in the Sao Paulo State of Brazil using normalizeddifference vegetation index. In: Proceeding of the 24thInternational Symposium on Remote Sensing ofEnvironment. vol. 2. Rio de Janeiro, 27-31 May ERIM,Chicago. pp. 447-455

[18]Los S O, Collatz G J, Bounoua L, Sellers P J, Tucker C J.2001. Global interannual variations in sea surfacetemperature and land surface vegetation, airtemperature, and precipitation. Journal of Climate, 14,1535-1549

[19]Mark R, Rick C, Mick C, Steve P, Dave T. 2001. Long-termstudies of vegetation dynamics. Science, 293, 650-655

[20]McKee T B, Doesken N J, Kleist J. 1993. The relationshipof drought frequency and duration to time scales,Preprints. In: 8th Conference on Applied Climatology.AMS, Anaheim, CA. pp. 179-184

[21]Patel N R, Chopra P, Dadhwal V K. 2007. Analyzing spatialpatterns of meteorological drought using standardizedprecipitation index. Meteorological Applications, 14,329-336

[22]Peng J B, Zhang Q Y, Bueh C. 2007. On the characteristicsand possible cause of a severe drought and heat wavein the Sichuan-Chongqing region in 2006. Climatic andEnvironmental Research, 12, 464-474

[23](in Chinese)Piao S L, Fang J Y, Zhou L M, Guo Q H, Henderson M, JiW, Li Y, Tao S. 2003. Interannual variations of monthlyand seasonal NDVI in China from 1982 to 1999. Journalof Geophysical Research, 108, 4401.

[24]Quiring S M, Srinivasan G. 2010. Evaluating the utility ofthe vegetation condition index (VCI) for monitoringmeteorological drought in Texas. Agricultural andForest Meteorology, 150, 330-339

[25]Reed B C. 1993. Using remote sensing and geographicinformation systems for analyzing landscape/droughtInteractio. International Journal of Remote Sensing,14, 3489-3503

[26]Reed B C, Brown J F, Vander Z D, Loveland T R, MerchantJ W, Ohlen D O. 1994. Measuring phenologicalvariability from satellite imagery. Journal of VegetationScience, 5, 703-714

[27]Rundquist B C, Harrington J A. 2000. The effects of climaticfactors on vegetation dynamics of tallgrass andshortgrass cover. Geocarto International, 15, 33-38

[28]Shi L P, Anwar M, Jing F, Qiang C, Jian M F. 2006. NDVIbasedincrease in growth of temperate grasslands andits responses to climate changes in China. GlobalEnvironmental Change, 16, 340-348

[29]Tadesse T, Brown J, Hayes M. 2005. A new approach forpredicting drought-related vegetation stress: integratingsatellite, climate, and biophysical data over the U.S.central plains. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry andRemote Sensing, 59, 244-253

[30]Tucker C J. 1979. Red and photographic infrared linearcombinations for monitoring vegetation. RemoteSensing of Environment, 8, 127-150

[31]Wan Z,Wang P, Li X. 2004. Using MODIS land surfacetemperature and normalized difference vegetation indexproducts for monitoring drought in the southern greatplains, USA. International Journal of Remote Sensing,25, 61-72

[32]Wang J, Price K P, Rich PM. 2001. Spatial patterns of NDVIin response to precipitation and temperature in thecentral Great Plains. International Journal of RemoteSensing, 22, 3827-3844

[33]Wang J, Rich P M, Price K P. 2003. Temporal responses ofNDVI to precipitation and temperature in the centralGreat Plains, USA. International Journal of RemoteSensing, 24, 2345-2364

[34]Wang Q, Samuel A, John T, Andre G. 2005. On therelationship of NDVI with leaf area index in a deciduousforest site. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 94,244-255

[35]Hoffmann W A, Jackson R B. 2000. Vegetation-climatefeedbacks in the conversion of tropical savanna tograssland. Journal of Climate, 13, 1593-1602

[36]Wu J J, Zhou L, Zhang J, Liu M, Zhao L, Zhao F F. 2010.Analysis of relationships among vegetation conditionindices and multiple-time scale SPI of grassland ingrowing season. In: Geoinformatics, 2010 18thInternational Conference. Beijing, China. pp. 1-6

[37]Yang S Q, Yi J, Luo Z Z, Gao Y H, Xu Y J. 2010. TheApplication of remote sensing monitoring during severedrought in 2006 summer in Chongqing. ChineseAgricultural Science Bulletin, 26, 325-330

[38](in Chinese)Zeng N J, David N. 2000. The role of vegetation -Climateinteraction and interannual variability in shaping theAfrican Savanna. Journal of Climate, 13, 2665-2667

[39]Zhai J Q, Liu B, Heike H, Bu D S, Tong J, Klaus F. 2010.Dryness/wetness variations in ten large river basins ofChina during the first 50 years of the 21st century.Quaternary International, 226, 101-111

[40]Zhang W J, Lu Q F, Gao Z Q, Peng J. 2008. Response ofremotely sensed normalized difference water deviationindex to the 2006 drought of eastern sichuan basin.Science in China (Series D), 51, 748-758

[41](in Chinese)Zhang X Y, Friedi MA, Schaaf C B, Strahler A H, Hodges XY, Gao F, Reed B C, Hute A. 2003. MonitoringVegetation Phenology Using MODIS, 84, 471- 475.Zhou L M, Tucker C J, Kaufmann R K, Slayback D,Shabanov N V, Myneni R B. 2001. Variations in northernvegetation activity inferred from satellite data ofvegetation index during 1981 to 1999. Journal ofGeophysical Research, 106, 20069-20083
No related articles found!
No Suggested Reading articles found!