Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2012, Vol. 12 Issue (6): 993-1001    DOI: 10.1016/S1671-2927(00)8623
ANIMAL SCIENCE · VETERINARY SCIENCE Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Improving Geese Production Performance in “Goose-Fish” Production System by Competitive Reduction of Pathogenic Bacteria in Pond Water
 YANG Xi-wen, JIANG Dan-li, SUN Ai-dong, SHI Zhen-dan
1.Department of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, P.R.China
2.Institute of Food Safety and Quality, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, P.R.China
3.Institute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  This study investigated whether competitive reduction of pathogenic bacteria growth in pond water alleviates lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contamination and improves geese production performances in the “goose-fish” production system, thereby providing the potential for an improved technique for ecological water fowl production. In the first experiment, 240 Magang goslings of 15-d age were randomly and equally allocated into 16 “yard and pond” pens using a 2×2 factorial design with 4 replications per treatment. In the 55-d experimental period, the goslings received 2 main treatments: supplementation of Bacillus subtilis spores in the feed and addition of photosynthetic bacteria (PSB) to the pond water. Both B. subtilis spores and PSB treatments significantly suppressed water counts of Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli, Salmonella and Shigella, and LPS concentrations in pond water and in gosling blood (P<0.05). As the result, the two treatments significantly improved gosling weight gain and carcass quality, marked by enhanced breast and leg muscle percentages and reduced subcutaneous fat proportions (P<0.05). Moreover, the improved effects of B. subtilis spores and PSB treatments were additive. In the second experiment, 1 160 adult geese were induced to start egg laying from May throughout the summer months. The geese were separated equally into control and experimental flocks to fit into 2 integration production units, with a density of 1 bird m-2 meter on pond water. Experimental flock geese were treated with B. subtilis spores in feed and PSB in the pond water for the duration of the study. Such treatment combination significantly depressed the growth of E. coli, Salmonella and Shigella in the pond water and reduced LPS concentrations both in pond water and in geese blood (P<0.01). As a result, egg fertility, fertile and set egg hatchabilities were all improved in the treated flock. Results from both growing goslings and breeding geese demonstrated that water bacteria pollution can be competitively reduced by supplementation with B. subtilis spores via the feed and addition of PSB in pond water, each of which reduces LPS contamination to geese and improves production performances. Microecological agents such as B. subtilis spores and PSB improve water quality and provide a simple ecological technique for the “water fowl-fish” integrative production system.

Abstract  This study investigated whether competitive reduction of pathogenic bacteria growth in pond water alleviates lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contamination and improves geese production performances in the “goose-fish” production system, thereby providing the potential for an improved technique for ecological water fowl production. In the first experiment, 240 Magang goslings of 15-d age were randomly and equally allocated into 16 “yard and pond” pens using a 2×2 factorial design with 4 replications per treatment. In the 55-d experimental period, the goslings received 2 main treatments: supplementation of Bacillus subtilis spores in the feed and addition of photosynthetic bacteria (PSB) to the pond water. Both B. subtilis spores and PSB treatments significantly suppressed water counts of Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli, Salmonella and Shigella, and LPS concentrations in pond water and in gosling blood (P<0.05). As the result, the two treatments significantly improved gosling weight gain and carcass quality, marked by enhanced breast and leg muscle percentages and reduced subcutaneous fat proportions (P<0.05). Moreover, the improved effects of B. subtilis spores and PSB treatments were additive. In the second experiment, 1 160 adult geese were induced to start egg laying from May throughout the summer months. The geese were separated equally into control and experimental flocks to fit into 2 integration production units, with a density of 1 bird m-2 meter on pond water. Experimental flock geese were treated with B. subtilis spores in feed and PSB in the pond water for the duration of the study. Such treatment combination significantly depressed the growth of E. coli, Salmonella and Shigella in the pond water and reduced LPS concentrations both in pond water and in geese blood (P<0.01). As a result, egg fertility, fertile and set egg hatchabilities were all improved in the treated flock. Results from both growing goslings and breeding geese demonstrated that water bacteria pollution can be competitively reduced by supplementation with B. subtilis spores via the feed and addition of PSB in pond water, each of which reduces LPS contamination to geese and improves production performances. Microecological agents such as B. subtilis spores and PSB improve water quality and provide a simple ecological technique for the “water fowl-fish” integrative production system.
Keywords:  bacteria growth      lipopolysaccharide      geese production performance      B. subtilis spores      photosynthetic bacteria  
Received: 25 January 2011   Accepted:
Fund: 

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30871795), the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System, China (CARS-43-16), the Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Research Grant, China (2010B020306004).

Corresponding Authors:  SHI Zhen-dan, Tel/Fax: +86-25-84390956, E-mail: zdshi@jaas.ac.cn     E-mail:  zdshi@jaas.ac.cn
About author:  YANG Xi-wen, Tel: +86-20-85285069, E-mail: yangxiwen0713@163.com

Cite this article: 

YANG Xi-wen, JIANG Dan-li, SUN Ai-dong, SHI Zhen-dan. 2012. Improving Geese Production Performance in “Goose-Fish” Production System by Competitive Reduction of Pathogenic Bacteria in Pond Water. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(6): 993-1001.

[1]Cartman S T, la Ragione R M, Woodward M J. 2008. Bacillus subtilis spores germinate in the chicken gastrointestinal tract. Appiedl and Environmental Microbiology, 74, 5254-5258.

[2]Casula G, Cutting S M. 2002. Bacillus probiotics: spore germination in the gastrointestinal tract. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 2344-2352.

[3]Gildberg A, Mikkelsen H, Sandaker E, Ring?E. 1997. Probiotic effect of lactic acid bacterial in the feed on growth and survival of fry of Atlantic cod (Gadusmorhua). Hydrobiologia, 352, 279-295.

[4]Han C Q, Han J. 2009. Clinical report of reduction of egg fertility in breeding ducks by over use of Florfenicol. Waterfowl World, 5, 24-25. (in Chinese)

[5]He X Q. 1989. Hygiene and Anti-Epidemic Bacteria Inspection. New China Press, Beijing. pp. 494-502 (in Chinese)

[6]van Immerseel F, de Zutter L, Houf K, Pasmans F, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R. 2009. Strategies to control Salmonella in the broiler production chain. World Poultry Science Journal, 65, 367-391.

[7]Jiang D L, Liu L, Wang C L, Chen F, Sun A D, Shi Z D. 2011. Raising on water stocking density reduced geese reproductive performances via water bacteria and lipopolysaccharide contaminations ineese-fish? production system. Agricultural Sciences in China, 10, 1459-1466.

[8]Jiang D L, Zhang X J, Pan Y J, Sun A D, Shi Z D. 2010. Effects of on water geese stocking density on in water bacteria growth, blood lipopolysaccharide concentrations and reproductive performances in geese, and gosling growth performances. In: Yang N, Li H, eds., Advances on Poultry Science Research in China. China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing. pp. 618-623. (in Chinese)

[9]Jeong S K, Cho J S, Kong I S, Jeong H D, Kim J K. 2009. Purification of aquarium water by PVA gel-immobilized photosynthetic bacteria during goldfish rearing. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 14, 238-247.

[10]Miller-Loennies S, Brade L, Brade H. 2007. Neutralizing and cross-reactive antibodies against enterobacterial lipopolysaccharide. International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 297, 321-340.

[11]Patterson J A, Burkholder K M. 2003. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poultry Science, 82, 627-631.

[12]Raetz C R H, Whitfield C. 2002. Lipopolysaccharide endotoxins. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 71, 635-700.

[13]la Ragione R M, Casula G, Cutting S M, Woodward M J. 2001. Bacillus subtilis spores competitively exclude Escherichia coli O78:K80 in poultry. Veterinary Microbiology, 79, 133-142.

[14]la Ragione R M, Woodward M J. 2003. Competitive exclusion by bacillus subtilis spores of Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis and clostridium perfringens in young chickens. Veterinary Microbiology, 94, 245-256.

[15]Santoso U, Tanaka K, Ohtani S. 1995. Effect of dried composition and Bacillus subtilis culture on growth, body hepatic lipogenic enzyme activity in female broiler chicks. British Journal of Nutriton, 14, 523-529.

[16]Star L, Nieuwland M G B, Kemp B, Parmentier H K. 2007. Effect of single or combined climatic and hygienic stress on natural and specific humoral immune competence in four layer lines. Poultry Science, 86, 1894-1903.

[17]Sund J L, Evenson C J, Strevett K A, Nairn R W, Athay D, Trawinski E. 2001. Nutrient conversions by photosynthetic bacteria in a concentrated animal feeding operation lagoon system. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30, 648-655.

[18]Teo A Y L, Tan H M. 2005. Inhibition of Clostridium perfringens by a novel strain of Bacillus subtilis isolated from the gastrointestinal tracts of healthy chickens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71, 4185-4190.

[19]Wang Q M, Yu S M. 2002. Production performance terminology and calculation methods. In: Yang N, ed., Poultry Production. 1st ed. Agriculture Press, Beijing, China. pp. 289-292. (in Chinese)

[20]Zhang X D, Jin Y F, Ying C. 2008. Influence of photosynthetic bacteria on pathogenic bacteria isolated from two fresh water fish. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 16, 659-663. (in Chinese)

[21]Zhao W H, Chen L Q, Liu X L, Huang J T, Yu Y B, He Z N. 2008. Effects of bacillus lichenifirmis and rthodopseudcmonas capsulata on the non-specific immune function of allogynogenetic crucian carp. Journal of Shanghai Fisheries University, 17, 757-760. (in Chinese)
[1] JIANGDan-li , LIULi , WANG Cong-li, CHEN Fang, SUN Ai-dong , SHI Zhen-dan. Raising on Water Stocking Density Reduces Geese ReproductivePerformances via Water Bacteria and Lipopolysaccharide Contaminationsin “Geese-Fish” Production System[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2011, 10(9): 1459-1466.
No Suggested Reading articles found!