玉米自然群体苗期耐盐性鉴定及耐盐相关基因分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.20.005

中国农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (20): 4085-4099.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.20.005

所属专题：专刊——盐碱地智慧监测与生态化利用

玉米自然群体苗期耐盐性鉴定及耐盐相关基因分析

武书羽¹(), 衡燕芳¹^,²(), 于太飞¹(), 王世佳³, 于思佳³, 李园², 胡正¹, 张辉¹, 孙现军¹^,³(), 黎亮¹^,²(), 姜奇彦¹^,⁴()

¹ 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/作物基因资源与育种全国重点实验室，北京 100081
² 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/作物分子育种国家工程研究中心，北京 100081
³ 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/农业农村部粮食作物基因资源评价利用重点实验室，北京 100081
⁴ 国家盐碱地综合利用技术创新中心，山东东营 257347

收稿日期:2025-07-16 接受日期:2025-09-23 出版日期:2025-10-16 发布日期:2025-10-14
通信作者:
姜奇彦，E-mail：jiangqiyan@caas.cn。
黎亮，E-mail：liliang05@caas.cn。
孙现军，E-mail：sunxianjun@caas.cn。
联系方式: 武书羽，E-mail：vv01296@163.com。衡燕芳，E-mail：hengyanfang@caas.cn。于太飞，E-mail：yutaifei@caas.cn。武书羽、衡燕芳和于太飞为同等贡献作者。
基金资助:
中国农业科学院科技创新创新工程项目(CAAS ZDRW202201); 中国农业科学院科技创新创新工程项目(01-ICS-02); 中国农业科学院科技创新创新工程项目(Y2025YC08); 山东省重点研发计划(ZDYF2023LZGC001); 山东省重点研发计划(2024SFGC0404); 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(Y2025JC23); 江苏省现代作物生产协同创新中心和现代作物生产省部共建协同创新中心项目(CIC-MCP)

Identification of Salt Tolerance in Maize Natural Populations at the Seedling Stage and Analysis of Salt Tolerance-Associated Genes

WU ShuYu¹(), HENG YanFang¹^,²(), YU TaiFei¹(), WANG ShiJia³, YU SiJia³, LI Yuan², HU Zheng¹, ZHANG Hui¹, SUN XianJun¹^,³(), LI Liang¹^,²(), JIANG QiYan¹^,⁴()

¹ Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, Beijing 100081
² Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/The National Engineering Center for Crop Molecular Breeding, Beijing 100081
³ Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Grain Crop Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081
⁴ National Center of Technology Innovation for Comprehensive Utilization of Saline-Alkali Land, Dongying 257347, Shandong

Received:2025-07-16 Accepted:2025-09-23 Published:2025-10-16 Online:2025-10-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】土壤盐渍化严重影响玉米生长发育，导致其产量下降。研究不同玉米自交系材料耐盐性，挖掘玉米耐盐相关优异等位变异，为玉米耐盐性遗传改良提供重要的SNP位点信息及候选基因资源。【方法】以包含238份自交系的自然群体为材料，对生长20 d的玉米自交系幼苗（三叶期）进行300 mmol·L^-1 NaCl溶液处理，盐胁迫处理40 d后调查其生物量、水分含量和盐害表型。通过全基因组关联分析（genome-wide association study，GWAS）挖掘玉米耐盐相关优异等位变异。【结果】通过对该玉米自然群体苗期进行耐盐性鉴定，依据盐害率将材料划分为5个耐盐等级：高耐盐材料（1级）22份、耐盐材料（2级）93份、中耐材料（3级）62份、盐敏感材料（4级）41份、高敏感材料（5级）20份。不同耐盐等级材料份数呈正态分布特征，高耐与高敏材料合计占比17.6%，中间等级材料占比82.4%。经统计分析，盐害率与盐胁迫条件下植株的鲜重、干重、水分含量呈显著负相关性，各调查指标离散程度大，材料间差异显著。通过全基因组关联分析，共鉴定出40个与玉米耐盐性相关的SNP位点。进一步分析发现，在第1和第10染色体中各存在一个与玉米耐盐性显著相关的SNP位点，分析这两个位点上下游100 kb置信区间的候选基因，在该区间含有18个功能基因，其中有9个具有功能注释的功能基因和9个未知基因。【结论】从238份玉米自交系自然群体材料中鉴选获得高耐盐材料（1级）22份。挖掘出40个与玉米苗期耐盐性相关的SNP位点，筛选出2个与玉米苗期耐盐性显著相关的关键SNP位点，获得2个耐盐相关的候选基因ZmSTYK46和Zm00001eb004810，ZmSTYK46编码丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶，Zm00001eb004810功能未知。

关键词: 玉米, 自交系, 耐盐性鉴定, 全基因组关联分析, 耐盐功能基因

Abstract:

【Objective】Soil salinization significantly impairs the growth and development of maize, resulting in reduced yields. Investigating the salt tolerance of various maize inbred lines and identifying favorable allelic variants associated with salt tolerance can provide valuable SNP markers and candidate gene resources for salt-tolerant maize varieties.【Method】This study utilized a natural population comprising 238 inbred maize lines as experimental materials. Twenty-day-old maize seedlings at the three-leaf stage were subjected to treatment with a 300 mmol·L^-1 NaCl solution, and changes in biomass, moisture contents as well as salt damage phenotypes were evaluated after 40 days of salt stress. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was subsequently performed to identify favorable allelic variants associated with salt tolerance in maize.【Result】Through salt tolerance assessment of a maize natural population at the seedling stage, the materials were categorized into five distinct salt tolerance grades based on the salt damage rate: 22 highly tolerant materials (Grade 1), 93 tolerant materials (Grade 2), 62 moderately tolerant materials (Grade 3), 41 salt-sensitive materials (Grade 4), and 20 highly sensitive materials (Grade 5). The number of materials with different salt tolerance levels shows a normal distribution characteristic, with high-tolerance and highly sensitive materials comprising 17.6% of the total, while intermediate-grade materials accounted for 82.4%. Statistical analysis revealed that the salt damage rate was significantly and negatively correlated with the fresh weight, dry weight, and moisture content of plants under salt stress. The investigated traits exhibited considerable variability, indicating substantial differences among the genotypes. Genome-wide association analysis identified a total of 40 SNP loci associated with maize salt tolerance. Further investigation revealed one significantly associated SNP locus on chromosome 1 and another on chromosome 10. Analysis of the candidate genes within the 100 Kb confidence interval upstream and downstream of these two loci identified a total of 18 functional genes, including 9 genes with functional annotations and 9 genes with unknown functions.【Conclusion】22 first-class salt-tolerant maize inbred line materials were selected from a natural population consisting of 238 lines. 40 SNP loci associated with salt tolerance in maize seedlings were identified, among which two key SNPs showed significant association with the trait. Two salt tolerance-related candidate genes, ZmSTYK46 and Zm00001eb004810, were identified. ZmSTYK46 encodes a serine/threonine protein kinase, while the function of Zm00001eb004810 remains unknown.

Key words: Zea mays L., inbred lines, salt tolerance identification, genome-wide association analysis, salt tolerance functional genes

武书羽, 衡燕芳, 于太飞, 王世佳, 于思佳, 李园, 胡正, 张辉, 孙现军, 黎亮, 姜奇彦. 玉米自然群体苗期耐盐性鉴定及耐盐相关基因分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(20): 4085-4099.

WU ShuYu, HENG YanFang, YU TaiFei, WANG ShiJia, YU SiJia, LI Yuan, HU Zheng, ZHANG Hui, SUN XianJun, LI Liang, JIANG QiYan. Identification of Salt Tolerance in Maize Natural Populations at the Seedling Stage and Analysis of Salt Tolerance-Associated Genes[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(20): 4085-4099.

图/表 12

表1

依据盐胁迫下植株表型判定盐害率标准"

盐害率 SDR (%)	植株表型 Plant phenotype
<10	生长正常或基本正常，无受害症状或叶尖干枯 Growth is within the normal range or essentially normal, with no observed symptoms of damage or dry leaf tips
10-20	第一片叶有半片及以下干枯，其余部分正常生长 The first leaf exhibits partial withering, with half or less of its surface affected, while the remainder continues to develop normally
20-30	第一片叶半片以上干枯或全部干枯，其余部分正常生长 The first leaf is more than half dried or fully desiccated, whereas the remainder of the plant continues to develop normally
30-40	第一片叶全部干枯，第二片叶半片及以下干枯，其余部分正常生长 The first leaf is entirely withered, the second leaf exhibits withering that affects half or less of its surface, and the remaining leaves are growing normally
40-50	第一片叶全部干枯，第二片叶半片以上干枯或全部干枯，其余部分正常生长 The first leaf is entirely withered, and more than half of the second leaf is either withered or fully withered as well, while the remainder of the plant exhibits normal growth
50-60	前两片叶全部干枯，叶心部分发黄未超过1/2，未干枯 The first two leaves are entirely withered, and the yellowing of the leaf center does not extend beyond one-half and remains non-withered
60-70	前两片叶全部干枯，叶心部分发黄超过1/2，未干枯 The first two leaves are entirely withered, and over half of the central portion of the leaf has turned yellow and remains non-withered
70-80	叶片基本全部干枯，茎部正常生长 The leaves are almost entirely withered, while the stems continue to grow normally
80-90	茎部受害未完全干枯 The stem is partially damaged, although it has not completely dried up
90-100	基本完全干枯 The plant has completely dried up

表1

表2

图1

表3

鉴筛出的1级高耐盐和5级高敏盐材料基本信息"

自交系 Inbred lines	鲜重 Fresh weight (g)	干重 Dry weight (g)	水分含量 Moisture Content (%)	盐害率 Salt damage rate (%)	耐盐等级 Salt tolerance grade	耐盐性 Salt tolerance	类群 Group	耐盐等位变异* Salt-tolerant allelic variation
Chang7_2	6.37±1.03	0.63±0.13	90.12±1.40	1.67±0.67	1	HST	TSPT	11100
Oh43	3.25±0.57	0.30±0.02	90.87±1.81	6.67±0.27	1	HST	Lvda	11100
A3046	2.91±0.54	0.31±0.09	89.47±1.42	6.67±0.67	1	HST	Iodent	-
21N35755	7.92±0.77	0.91±0.12	88.50±0.62	11.67±1.33	1	HST	BSSS	-
M-LD656	6.11±0.96	0.61±0.11	90.00±1.39	12.00±1.69	1	HST	Lancaster	11110
LH191	6.67±0.90	0.82±0.09	87.65±1.42	13.33±1.26	1	HST	-	-
PHP76	5.10±0.79	0.50±0.09	90.12±1.29	13.33±1.33	1	HST	Iodent	-
PHG35	5.72±0.76	0.58±0.07	89.87±0.34	13.33±0.33	1	HST	BSSS	11100
M-DH969-ZW	3.37±0.91	0.36±0.06	89.44±1.52	14.00±1.66	1	HST	BSSS	01100
2004005029	3.67±0.20	0.45±0.04	87.77±0.52	15.00±1.00	1	HST	Flint	10100
LH163	7.93±1.08	0.84±0.18	89.44±0.55	16.67±1.28	1	HST	Iodent	-
WIL_18	7.86±0.69	0.82±0.06	89.60±0.22	16.67±0.67	1	HST	TSPT	01100
PHBA6	4.21±0.69	0.46±0.04	89.06±1.91	17.67±1.88	1	HST	Lancaster	11100
W22	6.38±0.44	0.67±0.04	89.44±0.80	18.33±2.93	1	HST	Lancaster	11100
Lx9801	7.43±1.01	0.83±0.20	88.88±0.88	18.33±1.41	1	HST	TSPT	11100
丹3130 Dan3130	4.40±0.33	0.46±0.05	89.54±0.49	18.33±1.26	1	HST	Lancaster	11100
WPH-PB21-303	6.17±1.04	0.70±0.11	88.65±1.27	18.33±1.33	1	HST	Flint	-
2004011031	8.20±0.26	0.99±0.07	87.91±1.12	19.00±1.54	1	HST	Iodent	10100
200B	7.81±1.10	0.89±0.12	88.59±1.08	19.33±1.35	1	HST	Flint	11100
21N35798	5.16±0.83	0.55±0.08	89.34±0.54	20.00±1.56	1	HST	Reid	11111
PHN82	3.32±0.29	0.46±0.01	86.19±1.11	20.00±1.00	1	HST	Iodent	11100
PHR58	4.93±0.41	0.49±0.05	90.12±0.52	20.00±1.66	1	HST	P78599	11100
6F629	2.18±0.32	0.38±0.01	82.44±2.06	81.67±1.33	5	HSS	BSSS	-
Dahuang46	1.10±0.48	0.19±0.07	82.39±5.35	81.67±1.01	5	HSS	TSPT	11100
LIBC_4	1.47±0.35	0.31±0.05	78.97±2.9	81.67±1.67	5	HSS	Iodent	-
F-JY201	2.13±0.29	0.43±0.08	79.56±1.49	83.33±1.33	5	HSS	Lancaster	11100
21N35812	1.94±0.04	0.42±0.04	78.45±1.64	83.33±1.26	5	HSS	BSSS	10100
PHN66	2.01±0.21	0.47±0.02	76.79±2.04	83.33±1.41	5	HSS	BSSS	-
PHRKB	1.46±0.29	0.39±0.06	73.68±1.78	83.33±1.26	5	HSS	BSSS	10000
PHR55	1.46±0.39	0.31±0.09	78.59±0.77	85.00±1.64	5	HSS	Iodent	-
LH192	1.61±0.26	0.29±0.06	82.13±1.30	85.00±1.77	5	HSS	BSSS	10100
2004010028	2.50±0.46	0.45±0.04	82.05±0.54	85.00±1.00	5	HSS	BSSS	00100
21N35716	1.85±0.45	0.49±0.06	73.33±0.81	88.33±1.41	5	HSS	Flint	10100
丹6263 Dan6263	1.26±0.27	0.31±0.04	75.66±0.34	90.00±1.89	5	HSS	Reid	11100
Baihunhuang	1.11±0.60	0.25±0.08	77.83±0.25	90.00±1.77	5	HSS	其他类型 Other	11000
WIL_3	1.72±0.27	0.43±0.05	74.98±0.13	91.67±1.41	5	HSS	Iodent	11000
LH195	0.68±0.26	0.15±0.10	77.53±0.67	91.67±2.01	5	HSS	其他类型 Other	10100
21N35655	1.62±0.11	0.56±0.12	65.75±1.02	93.33±0.67	5	HSS	Reid	11100
Shuang741	2.55±0.16	0.33±0.09	87.26±1.99	93.33±0.67	5	HSS	TSPT	11110
21N35915	0.98±0.35	0.26±0.03	73.08±1.43	93.33±1.41	5	HSS	P78599	01100
21N35658	0.66±0.17	0.21±0.02	68.35±0.07	96.67±0.67	5	HSS	Reid	-
M-LY99	0.46±0.09	0.21±0.02	53.74±0.77	100.00±0.00	5	HSS	Iodent	-

表3

表4

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表5

SNP位点置信区间的候选基因分析"

染色体 Chr.	候选基因 Candidate genes	基因注释 Gene annotation	基因功能 Gene function	基因功能结构域 Gene functional domain
Chr.1	Zm00001eb004800	未知蛋白 Uncharacterized protein	未知功能 Uncharacterized function	_
Chr.1	Zm00001eb004810	未知蛋白 Uncharacterized protein	未知功能 Uncharacterized function	_
Chr.1	Zm00001eb004820	组蛋白H2A变异体1 Histone H2A variant 1 (H2HA1)	DNA结合蛋白异二聚体化活性DNA binding protein heterodimerization activity	C端组蛋白H2A C-terminus histone H2A
Chr.1	Zm00001eb004830	未知蛋白 Uncharacterized protein	未知功能 Uncharacterized function	_
Chr.1	Zm00001eb004840	未知蛋白 Uncharacterized protein	未知功能 Uncharacterized function	_
Chr.1	Zm00001eb004850	未知蛋白 Uncharacterized protein	未知功能 Uncharacterized function	_
Chr.1	Zm00001eb004860	未知蛋白 Uncharacterized protein	未知功能 Uncharacterized function	_
Chr.10	Zm00001eb434270	3-异丙基苹果酸脱氢酶2 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase 2 (IPMDH2)	异柠檬酸/异丙基苹果酸脱氢酶，保守位点 Isocitrate/isopropylmalate dehydrogenase, conserved site	异柠檬酸/异丙基苹果酸脱氢酶 Isocitrate/isopropylmalate dehydrogenase
Chr.10	Zm00001eb434280	丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶ATG1t（ATG1t）Serine/threonine-protein kinase ATG1t (ATG1t)	丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶ATG1t，膜的整合组成部分，ATP结合（结构/区域） Serine/threonine-protein kinase ATG1t integral component of membrane ATP binding	蛋白激酶结构域 Protein kinase domain
Chr.10	Zm00001eb434290	丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶STY46（STYK46）Serine/threonine-protein kinase STY46 (STYK46)	非特异性丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶，ATP结合（结构/区域） Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase ATP binding	蛋白激酶结构域 Protein kinase domain
Chr.10	Zm00001eb434300	SKP1相互作用蛋白15（SKIP15） SKP1-interacting partner 15 (SKIP15)	SKP1相互作用蛋白15，蛋白质结合（结构/区域） SKP1-interacting partner 15 binding	_
Chr.10	Zm00001eb434310	液泡铁转运蛋白5（VIT5） Vacuolar iron transporter 5 (VIT5)	液泡铁转运蛋白，铁/锰离子跨膜转运活性 Vacuolar iron transporter iron/manganese ion transmembrane transporter activity	液泡铁转运蛋白家族 VIT family
Chr.10	Zm00001eb434320	可溶性无机焦磷酸酶（PPases） Soluble inorganic pyrophosphatase (PPases)	可溶性无机焦磷酸酶，镁离子结合（结构/区域），无机二磷酸酶活性 Soluble inorganic pyrophosphatase magnesium ion binding inorganic diphosphatase activity	无机焦磷酸酶 Inorganic pyrophosphatase
Chr.10	Zm00001eb434330	未知蛋白 Uncharacterized protein	未知功能 Uncharacterized function	_
Chr.10	Zm00001eb434350	过氧化物酶12前体（POD12）Peroxidase 12 precursor (POD12)	过氧化物酶血红素结合（结构/区域），金属离子结合（结构/区域） Peroxidase heme binding metal ion binding	过氧化物酶 Peroxidase
Chr.10	Zm00001eb434360	未知蛋白 Uncharacterized protein	未知功能 Uncharacterized function	_
Chr.10	Zm00001eb434370	未知蛋白 Uncharacterized protein	未知功能 Uncharacterized function	_
Chr.10	Zm00001eb434380	生长素响应因子13（ARF13） Auxin response factor 13 (ARF13)	DNA 结合（型）生长素响应因子 DNA binding Auxin response factor	植物特异性B3-DNA 结合结构域 Plant-specific B3-DNA binding domain

表5

图7

参考文献 32

[1]	CUI D Z, WU D D, SOMARATHNA Y, XU C Y, LI S, LI P, ZHANG H, CHEN H B, ZHAO L. QTL mapping for salt tolerance based on SNP markers at the seedling stage in maize (Zea mays L.). Euphytica, 2015, 203(2): 273-283.
[2]	MA L L, ZHANG M Y, CHEN J, QING C Y, HE S J, ZOU C Y, YUAN G S, YANG C, PENG H, PAN G T, et al. GWAS and WGCNA uncover hub genes controlling salt tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2021, 134(10): 3305-3318.
[3]	刘倩倩, 李冉, 周婷芳, 张泽, 上官小川, 潘越, 张德贵, 雍洪军, 李明顺, 韩洁楠. 211份玉米自交系萌发期耐盐性鉴定. 作物杂志, 2024(4): 62-70.
	LIU Q Q, LI R, ZHOU T F, ZHANG Z, SHANGGUAN X C, PAN Y, ZHANG D G, YONG H J, LI M S, HAN J N. Identification of salt tolerance of 211 maize inbred lines at germination stage. Crops, 2024(4): 62-70. (in Chinese)
[4]	CAO Y B, LIANG X Y, YIN P, ZHANG M, JIANG C F. A domestication-associated reduction in K⁺-preferring HKT transporter activity underlies maize shoot K⁺ accumulation and salt tolerance. New Phytologist, 2019, 222(1): 301-317.
[5]	CAO Y B, ZHOU X Y, SONG H F, ZHANG M, JIANG C F. Advances in deciphering salt tolerance mechanism in maize. The Crop Journal, 2023, 11(4): 1001-1010.
[6]	王明泉, 李春霞, 龚士琛, 闫淑琴, 李国良, 扈光辉, 苏俊, 任洪雷, 杨剑飞, 张翼飞, 等. 玉米自交系苗期耐盐性鉴定及筛选研究. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(12): 30-35. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17120079
	WANG M Q, LI C X, GONG S C, YAN S Q, LI G L, HU G H, SU J, REN H L, YANG J F, ZHANG Y F, et al. Salt-tolerance identification and screening of maize inbred lines at seedling stage. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(12): 30-35. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17120079
[7]	杨晓杰, 李旭业, 王海艳, 于侃超, 杨建宇. 玉米自交系耐盐种质的筛选及耐盐性评价. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(4): 19-25.
	YANG X J, LI X Y, WANG H Y, YU K C, YANG J Y. Screening of maize inbred line varieties with salt tolerance and the evaluation. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2014, 22(4): 19-25. (in Chinese)
[8]	李冉, 韩洁楠, 上官小川, 周婷芳, 张泽, 潘越, 刘倩倩, 杨波, 郝转芳, 翁建峰, 等. 玉米苗期耐盐性鉴定技术研究及耐盐自交系筛选. 植物遗传资源学报, 2024, 25(11): 1882-1894.
	LI R, HAN J N, SHANGGUAN X C, ZHOU T F, ZHANG Z, PAN Y, LIU Q Q, YANG B, HAO Z F, WENG J F, et al. Research on salt tolerance identification technique and salt tolerance inbred lines screening of maize seedling. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2024, 25(11): 1882-1894. (in Chinese)
[9]	张红雪, 史振声. 玉米耐盐性研究进展. 种子, 2015, 34(10): 47-51.
	ZHANG H X, SHI Z S. Research progress of maize salt tolerance. Seed, 2015, 34(10): 47-51. (in Chinese)
[10]	王乐, 于茗兰, 陈强, 柳雨汐, 郑晓明, 逄洪波. 全基因组关联分析在5种农作物中的应用及展望. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 53(3): 289-297.
	WANG L, YU M L, CHEN Q, LIU Y X, ZHENG X M, PANG H B. Genome-wide association study in five crops: Application and future perspectives. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 53(3): 289-297. (in Chinese)
[11]	姜洪真, 马伯军, 钱前, 高振宇. 全基因组关联分析(GWAS)在作物农艺性状研究中的应用. 农业生物技术学报, 2018, 26(7): 1244-1257.
	JIANG H Z, MA B J, QIAN Q, GAO Z Y. The application of genome-wide association study (GWAS) in crop agronomic traits. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2018, 26(7): 1244-1257. (in Chinese)
[12]	ZHANG H L, YU F F, XIE P, SUN S Y, QIAO X H, TANG S Y, CHEN C X, YANG S, MEI C, YANG D K, et al. A Gγ protein regulates alkaline sensitivity in crops. Science, 2023, 379(6638): eade8416.
[13]	ZHOU X Y, LI J F, WANG Y Q, LIANG X Y, ZHANG M, LU M H, GUO Y, QIN F, JIANG C F. The classical SOS pathway confers natural variation of salt tolerance in maize. New Phytologist, 2022, 236(2): 479-494.
[14]	ZHANG M, LIANG X Y, WANG L M, CAO Y B, SONG W B, SHI J P, LAI J S, JIANG C F. A HAK family Na⁺ transporter confers natural variation of salt tolerance in maize. Nature Plants, 2019, 5(12): 1297-1308.
[15]	ZHANG M, LI Y D, LIANG X Y, LU M H, LAI J S, SONG W B, JIANG C F. A teosinte-derived allele of an HKT1 family sodium transporter improves salt tolerance in maize. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2023, 21(1): 97-108.
[16]	LUO M J, ZHANG Y X, LI J N, ZHANG P P, CHEN K, SONG W, WANG X Q, YANG J X, LU X D, LU B S, et al. Molecular dissection of maize seedling salt tolerance using a genome-wide association analysis method. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2021, 19(10): 1937-1951. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13607 pmid: 33934485
[17]	李园, 范开建, 安泰, 李聪, 蒋俊霞, 牛皓, 曾伟伟, 衡燕芳, 李虎, 付俊杰, 等. 玉米自然群体自交系农艺性状的多环境全基因组预测初探. 植物学报, 2024, 59(6): 1041-1053. doi: 10.11983/CBB24087
	LI Y, FAN K J, AN T, LI C, JIANG J X, NIU H, ZENG W W, HENG Y F, LI H, FU J J, et al. Study on multi-environment genome-wide prediction of inbred agronomic traits in maize natural populations. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2024, 59(6): 1041-1053. (in Chinese)
[18]	CHOPY M, BINAGHI M, CANNAROZZI G, HALITSCHKE R, BOACHON B, HEUTINK R, BOMZAN D P, JÄGGI L, VAN GEEST G, VERDONK J C, et al. A single MYB transcription factor with multiple functions during flower development. The New Phytologist, 2023, 239(5): 2007-2025.
[19]	MENG D, HE M Y, BAI Y, XU H X, DANDEKAR A M, FEI Z J, CHENG L L. Decreased sorbitol synthesis leads to abnormal stamen development and reduced pollen tube growth via an MYB transcription factor, MdMYB39L, in apple (Malus domestica). New Phytologist, 2018, 217(2): 641-656.
[20]	FRANGEDAKIS E, YELINA N E, BILLAKURTHI K, HUA L, SCHREIER T, DICKINSON P J, TOMASELLI M, HASELOFF J, HIBBERD J M. MYB-related transcription factors control chloroplast biogenesis. Cell, 2024, 187(18): 4859-4876. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.06.039 pmid: 39047726
[21]	WU J W, WANG X Y, YAN R Y, ZHENG G M, ZHANG L, WANG Y, ZHAO Y J, WANG B H, PU M L, ZHANG X S, et al. A MYB-related transcription factor ZmMYBR29 is involved in grain filling. BMC Plant Biology, 2024, 24(1): 458. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05163-9 pmid: 38797860
[22]	CAO Y B, ZHANG M, LIANG X Y, LI F R, SHI Y L, YANG X H, JIANG C F. Natural variation of an EF-hand Ca²⁺-binding-protein coding gene confers saline-alkaline tolerance in maize. Nature Communications, 2020, 11: 186.
[23]	FORESTAN C, AIESE CIGLIANO R, FARINATI S, LUNARDON A, SANSEVERINO W, VAROTTO S. Stress-induced and epigenetic- mediated maize transcriptome regulation study by means of transcriptome reannotation and differential expression analysis. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 30446.
[24]	江杰, 王胜. 我国盐碱地成因及改良利用现状. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(13): 85-87.
	JIANG J, WANG S. The cause of formation and improved utilization of saline-alkali land in China. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(13): 85-87. (in Chinese)
[25]	孙现军, 胡正, 姜雪敏, 王世佳, 陈向前, 张惠媛, 张辉, 姜奇彦. 大豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定评价与筛选. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2179-2186. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.44030
	SUN X J, HU Z, JIANG X M, WANG S J, CHEN X Q, ZHANG H Y, ZHANG H, JIANG Q Y. Identification, evaluation and screening of salt-tolerant soybean germplasm resources at seedling stage. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2179-2186. (in Chinese)
[26]	MIAO R Q, ZHANG Y, LIU X X, YUAN Y, ZANG W, LI Z Q, YAN X F, PANG Q Y, ZHANG A Q. Histone variant H2A.Z is required for plant salt response by regulating gene transcription. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2024, 47(7): 2691-2707.
[27]	GANDHIVEL V H, SOTELO-PARRILLA P, RAJU S, JHA S, GIREESH A, HARSHITH C Y, GUT F, VINOTHKUMAR K R, BERGER F, JEYAPRAKASH A A, et al. An Oryza-specific histone H4 variant predisposes H4 lysine 5 acetylation to modulate salt stress responses. Nature Plants, 2025, 11(4): 790-807.
[28]	RUDRABHATLA P, RAJASEKHARAN R. Developmentally regulated dual-specificity kinase from peanut that is induced by abiotic stresses. Plant Physiology, 2002, 130(1): 380-390. doi: 10.1104/pp.005173 pmid: 12226517
[29]	YANG Y Q, GUO Y. Unraveling salt stress signaling in plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2018, 60(9): 796-804. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12689
[30]	MITTLER R, ZANDALINAS S I, FICHMAN Y, VAN BREUSEGEM F, Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2022, 23(10): 663-679.
[31]	WANG C F, LI X M, ZHUANG Y B, SUN W C, CAO H X, XU R, KONG F J, ZHANG D J. A novel miR160a-GmARF16-GmMYC₂ module determines soybean salt tolerance and adaptation. New Phytologist, 2024, 241(5): 2176-2192.
[32]	VERMA S, NEGI N P, PAREEK S, MUDGAL G, KUMAR D. Auxin response factors in plant adaptation to drought and salinity stress. Physiologia Plantarum, 2022, 174(3): e13714.

盐害率 SDR (%)	耐盐等级 Salt tolerance grade	耐盐性 Salt tolerance
0≤SDR≤20	1级 Grade 1	高耐 High salt tolerance
20<SDR≤40	2级 Grade 2	耐盐 Salt tolerance
40<SDR≤60	3级 Grade 3	中耐 Moderately salt tolerance
60<SDR≤80	4级 Grade 4	敏感 Salt sensitivity
80<SDR≤100	5级 Grade 5	高敏 High salt sensitivity

指标 Index	平均值 Average value	标准差 Standard deviation	变异系数 Coefficient of variation (%)
盐胁迫条件下鲜重 Fresh weight under salt stress (g)	3.53	1.62	45.89
盐胁迫条件下干重 Dry weight under salt stress (g)	0.46	0.16	34.78
盐胁迫条件下水分含量 Moisture content under salt stress (%)	85.61	4.63	5.41
盐害率 Salt damage rate (%)	46.14	21.69	47.01

玉米自然群体苗期耐盐性鉴定及耐盐相关基因分析

Identification of Salt Tolerance in Maize Natural Populations at the Seedling Stage and Analysis of Salt Tolerance-Associated Genes

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王亚菲, 闫鹏, 薛金涛, 董学瑞, 孟凡琦, 郭丽娜, 罗艺, 张娟, 董志强, 卢霖. 乙烯利-甜菜碱-水杨酸合剂对高温胁迫下玉米根系建构、生理功能和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1439-1455.
[2]	叶美金, 吴雷, Lohani Md Nahibuzzaman, 尹丽, 胡欣荣, 刘亚西, 蒋云峰, 陈国跃, 蒲至恩, 李阳, 李婷, 邹亚亚, 吴佳怡, 马建. 基于GWAS的中国地方小麦成熟胚大小位点的鉴定及其遗传效应解析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1157-1171.
[3]	王佳诺, 陈桂平, 李盼, 王丽萍, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文, 赵连豪. 免耕地膜两年覆盖提高绿洲灌区玉米产量的灌浆期光合生理机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[4]	周新杰, 任昊, 陈应龙, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 过氧化钙对渍涝农田夏玉米根系形态及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1203-1216.
[5]	何继航, 张擎, 吕相月, 薛吉全, 徐淑兔, 刘建超. 不同保绿型玉米杂交种氮效率评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1217-1230.
[6]	李永娟, 张悦彤, 王艺博, 赵长江, 宋洁, 陈雪丽, 姚钦. 生物炭施用对大豆轮连作系统土壤固氮微生物nifH基因丰度及群落组成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1272-1285.
[7]	杨丽娟, 陈丝雨, 赵薇, 朱玲, 郭磊, 马丽娜, 马瑞敏, 张娟. 全基因组重测序揭示静原鸡羽色的遗传机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1348-1360.
[8]	李思源, 李鸿萍, 常洪庆, 张森焱, 栗思佳, 崔欣飞, 乔泼, 曾波, 刘桂珍, 刘天学, 汤继华, 李潮海. 增密对不同株高玉米品种产量和农艺性状动态变化的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 967-984.
[9]	董金龙, 赵莹, 余海兵, 吕建晔, 秦佳琦, 梁晨, 明博, 李少昆. 多模型解析玉米籽粒容重的营养品质贡献度与区域异质性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 985-995.
[10]	王勇胜, 牛丽, 王长杰, 马立花, 廉潇潇, 孟亚雄, 马小乐, 姚立蓉, 张宏, 杨轲, 李葆春, 王化俊, 司二静, 汪军成. 冬小麦千粒重的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(3): 499-514.
[11]	陈桂平, 韦金贵, 郭瑶, 李盼, 王菲儿, 仇海龙, 冯福学, 殷文. 宽窄行与增密对绿洲灌区玉米光合特性及资源利用的协同效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(2): 278-291.
[12]	张志勇, 谭世超, 熊淑萍, 马新明, 韦一昊, 王小纯. 水氮周年优化对豫北灌区小麦玉米轮作系统产量和氮迁移的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(2): 336-353.
[13]	李云丽, 刁邓超, 刘雅睿, 孙玉晨, 孟祥宇, 邬陈芳, 汪妤, 吴建辉, 李春莲, 曾庆东, 韩德俊, 郑炜君. 小麦苗期耐热性全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(9): 1663-1683.
[14]	韦文华, 李盼, 邵冠贵, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 范虹, 何蔚, 柴强, 殷文, 赵连豪. 西北灌区青贮玉米产量及品质对减量灌水与有机无机肥配施的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(8): 1521-1534.
[15]	薛钰琦, 赵继玉, 孙旺胜, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 不同氮素形态对夏玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(8): 1535-1549.