中国农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (22): 4601-4612.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.22.007
收稿日期:
2020-03-07
接受日期:
2020-04-11
出版日期:
2020-11-16
发布日期:
2020-11-28
通讯作者:
顾金刚
作者简介:
陈敬师,E-mail: 基金资助:
CHEN JingShi,HUANG YuYang,XIANG Jie,GUO QingHua,LI ShiGui,GU JinGang()
Received:
2020-03-07
Accepted:
2020-04-11
Online:
2020-11-16
Published:
2020-11-28
Contact:
JinGang GU
摘要: 【目的】 获得生防菌非洲哈茨木霉(Trichoderma afroharzianum)ACCC 33109高产抑菌挥发性有机物的突变菌株,并分析其碳源代谢以挖掘高产抑菌挥发性有机物的机制。【方法】 通过原生质体紫外诱变野生株ACCC 33109获得突变株,以对扣法筛选挥发性有机物抑制尖镰孢(Fusarium oxysporum)活性差异大的突变菌株,利用Omnilog表型芯片技术比较野生株ACCC 33109和突变株MU153、MU792对不同种类碳源代谢的差异特征。【结果】 野生株ACCC 33109经紫外线诱变2.0 min(致死率为76.63%)共获得828个突变株,对扣法筛选获得30个挥发性有机物对尖镰孢抑制率高于野生株的突变株,其中突变株MU153抑菌率高达53.86%,较野生株提高了16.68%,而突变株MU792的抑菌率降至15.83%。盆栽试验表明非洲哈茨木霉ACCC 33109和MU153菌株均对黄瓜具有促生作用,对黄瓜枯萎病有防治作用,与野生株ACCC 33109相比,突变株MU153对黄瓜枯萎病的相对防治效果提高了15.88%,相对于清水对照,防病效果高达89.69%。另外,紫外诱变导致突变株的菌落、菌丝、分生孢子梗和孢子形态发生了变化,相对于ACCC 33109,MU153菌丝变为絮状、生长速度快、密度大、并有色素产生,而MU792菌丝生长速度慢、密度低、菌落后期由绿色变为白色;突变株MU153和MU792分生孢子梗增大、孢子变大,且分生孢子梗基部宽度降低。紫外诱变引起突变株对碳源代谢能力的改变,相对于ACCC 33109,MU153对FF板中46种物质的代谢能力较高,包括D-阿拉伯醇、二胺乙醇、麦芽糖、熊果苷、纤维二糖和α-D-葡萄糖等,对其他50种物质的代谢能力低于ACCC 33109,包括对羟基苯乙酸、琥珀酸、琥珀酰胺酸、糖原、溴代丁二酸和L-苏氨酸等。MU792对FF板中27种物质的代谢能力较高,包括γ-羟丁酸、葡萄糖-1磷酸、β-羟丁酸、D-乳酸甲酯、D-山梨醇和丙酰胺等,对其他69种物质的代谢能力低于ACCC 33109,包括琥珀酰胺酸、N-乙酰-D-葡萄糖胺、对羟基苯乙酸、葵二酸、吐温-80和D-糖质酸。α-D-葡萄糖最利于抑菌挥发性有机物的产生,以α-D-葡萄糖为碳源时,ACCC 33109、MU153和MU792的挥发性有机物对尖镰孢的抑菌率依次为48.08%、56.17%和40.94%。【结论】 非洲哈茨木霉突变株MU153具有高产抑菌挥发性有机物的能力,以α-D-葡萄糖为碳源时抑菌效果更佳,是一株具有应用潜力的生防菌。
陈敬师,黄玉洋,向杰,郭清华,李世贵,顾金刚. 非洲哈茨木霉产抑菌挥发性有机物碳源代谢机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(22): 4601-4612.
CHEN JingShi,HUANG YuYang,XIANG Jie,GUO QingHua,LI ShiGui,GU JinGang. Carbon Source Metabolism of Trichoderma afroharzianum with High-Yield of Antifungal Volatile Organic Compounds[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(22): 4601-4612.
表1
盆栽试验设计"
处理Treatment | |
---|---|
无菌水对照CK1 | 等量无菌水 Sterile ddH2O |
病原菌对照CK2 | ACCC 37438孢子悬浮液 ACCC 37438 spore suspension (1.0×10 7 conidia/g soil) |
处理1 Treatment 1 | ACCC 33109孢子悬浮液ACCC 33109 spore suspension (1.0×10 7 conidia/g soil) |
处理2 Treatment 2 | ACCC 37438和ACCC 33109孢子混合液 ACCC 37438 and ACCC 33109 spore suspensions (each at 1.0×10 7 conidia/g soil) |
处理3 Treatment 3 | MU153孢子悬浮液MU153 spore suspension (1.0×10 7 conidia/g soil) |
处理4 Treatment 4 | ACCC 37438和MU153孢子混合液ACCC 37438 and MU153 spore suspensions (each at 1.0×10 7 conidia/g soil) |
表2
黄瓜枯萎病发病率、病情指数和相对防治效果"
处理 Treatment | 发病率 Incidence rate (%) | 病情指数 Disease index | 相对防治效果 Relative control effect (%) |
---|---|---|---|
无菌水对照CK1 | 0 | 0 | - |
病原菌对照CK2 | 88.89±19.24 | 52.78±4.81 | - |
处理1 Treatment 1 | 0 | 0 | - |
处理2 Treatment 2 | 33.33±0 | 13.89±4.82 | 73.81±8.59 |
处理3 Treatment 3 | 0 | 0 | - |
处理4 Treatment 4 | 22.22±19.24 | 5.55±4.81 | 89.69±9.01 |
表3
非洲哈茨木霉ACCC 33109、MU153和MU792的分生孢子梗相关数据"
参数Parameter | ACCC 33109 | MU153 | MU792 |
---|---|---|---|
瓶梗长度Phialide length (μm) | 9.44±1.60 | 10.61±2.15 | 8.95±2.03 |
瓶梗最宽处Phialide maximum width (μm) | 3.00±0.33 | 2.71±0.39 | 2.55±0.28 |
瓶梗长/宽Phialide length/width ratio | 3.16±0.65 | 3.99±1.01 | 3.58±0.99 |
瓶梗基部宽度Phialide base width (μm) | 2.19±0.33 | 2.03±0.34 | 1.79±0.28 |
支持细胞宽度Supporting cell width (μm) | 2.68±0.45 | 2.72±0.42 | 2.56±0.37 |
支持细胞长度Supporting cell length (μm) | 10.68±3.49 | 12.73±3.46 | 11.43±3.93 |
孢子长度Conidium length (μm) | 2.93±0.44 | 3.09±0.40 | 3.04±0.40 |
孢子宽度Conidium width (μm) | 2.36±0.22 | 2.44±0.19 | 2.58±0.34 |
孢子长/宽Conidium length/width ratio | 1.24±0.17 | 1.27±0.15 | 1.19±0.16 |
图6
非洲哈茨木霉碳源代谢热图(26℃, 7 d) 1:水Water;2:吐温-80 Tween-80;3:N-乙酰-D-半乳糖胺N-Acetyl-D-galactosamine;4:N-乙酰-D-葡萄糖胺N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine;5:N-乙酰-D-甘露糖胺N-Acetyl-D-mannosamine;6:核糖醇Ribitol;7:扁桃苷Amygdalin;8:D-阿拉伯糖D-Arabinose;9:L-阿拉伯糖L-Arabinose;10:D-阿拉伯醇 D-Arabinol;11:熊果苷Arbutin;12:纤维二糖Cellobiose;13:α-环糊精α-Cyclodextrins;14:β-环糊精β-Cyclodextrin;15:糊精Dextrin;16:1-赤藓糖醇1-Erythritol;17:D-果糖D-Fructose;18:L-岩藻糖L-Trehalose;19:α-D-半乳糖α-D-Galactose;20:D-半乳糖醛酸D-Galacturonic acid;21:龙胆二糖Gentiobiose;22:D-葡萄糖酸D-Gluconic acid;23:D-葡萄糖胺D-Glucosamine;24:α-D-葡萄糖α-D-Glucose;25:葡萄糖-1磷酸Glucose-1- phosphate;26:葡糖苷酸Glucosiduronide;27:D-葡萄糖醛酸D-Glucuronic acid;28:甘油Glycerol;29:糖原Glucogen;30:肌醇Inositol;31:D-2-酮-D-葡萄糖酸D-2-Ketone-D-gluconic acid;32:α-D-乳糖α-D-Galactose;33:乳果糖Lactulose;34:麦芽糖醇Maltitol;35:麦芽糖Maltose;36:麦芽三糖Maltotriose;37:D-甘露醇D-Mannitol;38:D-甘露糖D-Mannose;39:D-松三糖D-Melezitose;40:D-蜜二糖D-Melibiose;41:α-甲基-D-半乳糖苷α-Methyl-D-galactoside;42:β-甲基-D-半乳糖苷β-Methyl-D-galactoside;43:α-甲基-D-葡萄糖苷α-Methyl-D-glucoside;44:β-甲基-D-葡萄糖苷β-Methyl-D-glucoside;45:异麦芽酮糖Isomaltulose;46:D-阿洛酮糖D-Psicose;47:D-棉子糖D-Raffinose;48:L-鼠李糖L-Rhamnose;49:D-核糖D-Ribose;50:水杨苷Salicin;51:景天庚酮糖Sedoheptulose;52:D-山梨醇D-Sorbitol;53:L-山梨糖L-Sorbose;54:水苏糖Tachyose;55:蔗糖Sucrose;56:D-塔格糖D-Tagatose;57:D-海藻糖D-Trehalose;58:松二糖Turanose;59:木糖醇Xylitol;60:D-木糖D-Xylose;61:γ-氨基丁酸γ-Aminobutyric acid;62:溴代丁二酸Bromosuccinic acid;63:富马酸Fumaric acid;64:β-羟丁酸β-Hydroxybutyric acid;65:γ-羟丁酸 γ-Hydroxybutyric acid;66:对羟基苯乙酸4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid;67:α-酮戊二酸α-Ketoglutaric acid;68:D-乳酸甲酯D-Methyl lactate;69:L-乳酸L-Lactic acid;70:D-苹果酸D-Malic acid;71:L-苹果酸L-Malic acid;72:奎尼酸Quinic acid;73:D-糖质酸D-Saccharic acid;74:葵二酸 Sebacic acid;75:琥珀酰胺酸Succinamic acid;76:琥珀酸Succinic acid;77:琥珀酸单甲酯Succinic acid monomethyl ester;78:N-酰-谷氨酸 N-Acetyl-glutamic acid;79:丙酰胺Propanamide;80:L-丙氨酸L-Alanine;81:L-丙酰胺-谷氨酸L-Alanyl-glycine;82:L-天冬氨酰L-Aspartyl;83:L-天冬氨酸L-Aspartic acid;84:L-谷氨酸L-Glutamic acid;85:谷氨酰-L-谷氨酸Glutamyl-L-glutamic acid;86:L-鸟氨酸L-Ornithine;87:L-苯基丙氨酸L-Phenylalanine;88:L-脯氨酸L-Proline;89:L-焦谷氨酸L-Pyroglutamic acid;90:L-丝氨酸L-Serine;91:L-苏氨酸L-Threonine;92:二胺乙醇Diethanolamine;93:腐胺Putrescine;94:腺苷Adenosine;95:鸟苷Guanosine;96:5-磷酸腺苷Adenosine 5-phosphate"
表4
非洲哈茨木霉ACCC 33109代谢能力高于MU792低于MU153的物质"
编号Number | 底物 Substrate | 面积Area | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACCC 33109 | MU153 | MU792 | ||
1 | 麦芽三糖Maltotriose | 59165 | 62095 | 57507 |
2 | 甘油Glycerol | 60735 | 61987 | 58852 |
3 | β-甲基-D-葡萄糖苷β-Methyl-D-glucoside | 58513 | 58843 | 57838 |
4 | 1-赤藓糖醇1-Erythritol | 57976 | 58760 | 53527 |
5 | D-核糖D-Ribose | 56959 | 58054 | 56236 |
6 | D-海藻糖D-Trehalose | 56009 | 57807 | 50790 |
7 | N-乙酰-D-葡萄糖胺N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine | 56061 | 57514 | 46953 |
8 | α-D-乳糖α-D-Lactose | 56331 | 57189 | 55604 |
9 | 糊精Dextrin | 54890 | 57178 | 50037 |
10 | α-D-半乳糖α-D-Galactose | 53950 | 56233* | 51843 |
11 | 肌醇Inositol | 54608 | 55987 | 51558 |
12 | D-果糖D-Fructose | 54745 | 55594 | 50364 |
13 | α-D-葡萄糖α-D-Glucose | 52286 | 55493 | 50449 |
14 | 麦芽糖Maltose | 50178 | 54487 | 48708 |
15 | N-乙酰-谷氨酸N-Acetyl-glutamic acid | 53022 | 53290 | 51819 |
16 | L-鼠李糖L-Rhamnose | 51683 | 52537 | 49096 |
17 | D-葡萄糖胺D-Glucosamine | 51967 | 52333 | 49382 |
18 | 腺苷Adenosine | 51170 | 51702 | 50163 |
19 | 吐温-80 Tween-80 | 48707 | 51471* | 41716 |
20 | 扁桃苷Amygdalin | 49287 | 50321 | 44435 |
21 | 鸟苷Guanosine | 47915 | 49703 | 41058 |
22 | 腐胺Putrescine | 49574 | 49667 | 45904 |
23 | D-葡萄糖醛酸D-Gluconic acid | 46310 | 48453** | 44423 |
24 | D-苹果酸D-Malic acid | 47934 | 48074 | 46185 |
25 | L-阿拉伯糖L-Arabinose | 46014 | 47723 | 40849 |
26 | 核糖醇Ribitol | 45415 | 46865 | 41124 |
27 | N-乙酰-D-甘露糖胺N-Acetyl-D-mannosamine | 42902 | 44170 | 39655 |
28 | 二胺乙醇Diethanolamine | 38883 | 43295 | 35369 |
29 | 葡糖苷酸Glucosiduronide | 38550 | 39477 | 31867 |
[1] |
SCHALCHLI H, TORTELLA G R, RUBILAR O, PARRA L, HORMAZABAL E, QUIROZ A . Fungal volatiles: An environmentally friendly tool to control pathogenic microorganisms in plants. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2014,36(1):144-152. DOI: 10.3109/ 07388551.2014.946466.
doi: 10.3109/07388551.2014.946466 pmid: 25198437 |
[2] |
SCHALCHLI H, HORMAZABAL E, BECERRA J, BIRKETT M, ALVEAR M, VIDAL J, QUIROZ A . Antifungal activity of volatile metabolites emitted by mycelial cultures of saprophytic fungi. Chemistry and Ecology, 2011,27(6):503-513. DOI: 10.1080/ 02757540.2011.596832.
doi: 10.1080/02757540.2011.596832 |
[3] | 李梅云, 李天飞, 王革, 刘开启 . 木霉对烟草黑胫病菌的拮抗机制. 植物保护学报, 2002,29(4):309-312. DOI: 10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2002.04.005. |
LI M Y, LI T F, WANG G, LIU K Q . Antagonistic mechanism of Trichoderma spp. against Phytophthora nicotianae. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 2002,29(4):309-312. DOI: 10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2002.04.005. (in Chinese) | |
[4] |
SAWANT I S, WADKAR P N, GHULE S B, SALUNKHE V P, CHAVAN V, SAWANT S D . Induction of systemic resistance in grapevines against powdery mildew by Trichoderma asperelloides strains. Australasian Plant Pathology, 2020,49:107-117. DOI: 10.1007/s13313-020-00679-8.
doi: 10.1007/s13313-020-00679-8 |
[5] |
PRABHAKARAN N, PRAMEELADEVI T, SATHIYABAMA M, KAMIL D . Screening of different Trichoderma species against agriculturally important foliar plant pathogens. Journal of Environmental Biology, 2015,36(1):191-198.
pmid: 26536792 |
[6] | 邹佳迅, 范晓旭, 宋福强 . 木霉 ( Trichoderma spp.) 对植物土传病害生防机制的研究进展. 大豆科学, 2017,36(6):146-153. DOI: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.06.0970. |
ZOU J X, FAN X X, SONG F Q . Biocontrol mechanism of Trichoderma spp. against soilborn plant disease. Soybean Sciences, 2017,36(6):146-153. DOI: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.06.0970. (in Chinese) | |
[7] |
LI N, ALFIKY A, VAUGHAN M M, KANG S . Stop and smell the fungi: Fungal volatile metabolites are overlooked signals involved in fungal interaction with plants. Fungal Biology Reviews, 2016,30(3):134-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbr.2016.06.004.
doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2016.06.004 |
[8] |
KHALIL S, ALSANIUS B W . Utilisation of carbon sources by Pythium. Phytophthora an. Fusarium species as determined by Biolog® microplate assay. The Open Microbiology Journal, 2009,3(1):9-14. DOI: 10.2174/1874285800903010009.
doi: 10.2174/1874285800903010009 |
[9] | 汪汉成, 王茂胜, 黄艳飞, 王进, 商胜华, 张长青 . 烟草青枯病拮抗菌株X-60的分离鉴定及其表型组学分析. 植物病理学报, 2016,46(3):409-419. DOI: 10.13926/j.cnki.apps.2016.03.015. |
WANG H C, WANG M S, HUANG Y F, WANG J, SHANG S H, ZHANG C Q . Isolation, identification and phenotype microarrays analysis of an antagonistic bacterial strain X-60 against tobacco bacterial wilt. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 2016,46(3):409-419. DOI: 10.13926/j.cnki.apps.2016.03.015. (in Chinese) | |
[10] |
YONG F M, LIM G . Effect of carbon source on aroma production by Trichoderma viride. MIRCEN Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1986,2(4):483-487. DOI: 10.1007/bf00933371.
doi: 10.1007/BF00933371 |
[11] |
EFFMERT U, KALDERÁS J, WARNKE R, PIECHULLA B. Volatile mediated interactions between bacteria and fungi in the soil. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2012,38(6):665-703. DOI: 10.1007/s10886- 012-0135-5.
doi: 10.1007/s10886-012-0135-5 |
[12] |
LI M F, LI G H, ZHANG K Q . Non-volatile metabolites from Trichoderma spp. Metabolites, 2019,9(3):E58. DOI: 10.3390/ metabo9030058.
doi: 10.3390/metabo9030058 pmid: 30909487 |
[13] |
GHISALBERTI E L, SIVASITHAMPARAM K . Antifungal antibiotics produced by Trichoderma spp. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1991,23(11):1011-1020. DOI: 10.1016/0038-07179(91)90036-J.
doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(91)90036-J |
[14] |
NIELSEN K F, GRÄFENHAN T, ZAFARI D, THRANE U. Trichothecene production by Trichoderma brevicompactum. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2005,53(21):8190-8196. DOI: 10.1021/jf051279b.
doi: 10.1021/jf051279b pmid: 16218663 |
[15] |
RUIZ N, WIELGOSZ-COLLIN G, POIRIER L, GROVEL O, PETIT K E, MOHAMED-BENKADA M, PONT T R, BISSETT J, VÉRITÉ P, BARNATHAN G, POUCHUSA Y F. New trichobrachins, 11-residue peptaibols from a marine strain of Trichoderma longibrachiatum. Peptides, 2007,28(7):1351-1358. DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2007.05.012.
doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2007.05.012 |
[16] |
PAZ Z, GERSON U, SZTEJNBERG A . Assaying three new fungi against citrus mites in the laboratory, and a field trial. BioControl, 2007,52(6):855-862. DOI: 10.1007/s10526-006-9060-2.
doi: 10.1007/s10526-006-9060-2 |
[17] |
HARMAN G E, HOWELL C R, VITERBO A, CHET I, LORITO M . Trichoderma species-opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 2004,2(1):43-56. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro797.
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro797 pmid: 15035008 |
[18] |
LORITO M, WOO S L, HARMAN G E, MONTE E . Translational research on Trichoderma: From omics to the field. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2010,48:395-417. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114314.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114314 pmid: 20455700 |
[19] | RAUT I, BADEA-DONI M, CALIN M, OANCEA F, VASILESCU G, SESAN T E, JECU L . Effect of volatile and non-volatile metabolites from Trichoderma spp. against important phytopathogens. Revista de Chimie-Bucharest-Original Edition, 2014,65(11):1285-1288. |
[20] |
BELÉN RUBIO M, PARDAL A J, CARDOZA R E, GUTIÉRREZ S, MONTE E, HERMOSA R . Involvement of the transcriptional coactivator ThMBF1 in the biocontrol activity of Trichoderma harzianum. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2017,8:2273. DOI: 10.3389/ fmicb.2017.02273.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02273 pmid: 29201024 |
[21] |
PACHAURI S, CHATTERJEE S, KUMAR V, MUKHERJEE P K . A dedicated glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase is involved in the biosynthesis of volatile sesquiterpenes in Trichoderma virens— evidence for the role of a fungal GAPDH in secondary metabolism. Current Genetics, 2018,65(1):243-252. DOI: 10.1007/s00294-018- 0868-y.
doi: 10.1007/s00294-018-0868-y pmid: 30046843 |
[22] |
QIN W T, ZHUANG W Y . Seven new species of Trichoderma(Hypocreales) in the Harzianum and Strictipile clades. Phytotaxa, 2017,305(3):121-139. DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.305.3.1.
doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.305.3 |
[23] | 吕天晓, 徐凤花, 李世贵, 顾金刚, 姜瑞波, 牛永春 . 生防木霉菌原生质体的制备及再生研究. 生物技术通报, 2009(4):130-134. DOI: CNKI:SUN:SWJT.0.2009-04-032. |
LÜ T X, XU F H, LI S G, GU J G, JIANG R B, NIU Y C . The research on protoplast preparation and regeneration of biocontrolTrichoderma spp. strain. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2009(4):130-134. DOI: CNKI:SUN:SWJT.0.2009-04-032. (in Chinese) | |
[24] | 李书强, 李林会, 沈江浩, 景焕, 张明珠, 杜晓端, 芦国嫣 . 生防菌对黄瓜枯萎病防效及其对黄瓜诱导抗性测定. 河北科师范学院学报, 2017,31(1):53-58. DOI: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-7983.2017.01.011. |
LI S Q, LI L H, SHEN J H, JING H, ZHANG M Z, DU X D, LU G Y . Efficacy of biocontrol agents to cucumber fusarium wilt and their induced resistance. Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology, 2017,31(1):53-58. DOI: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-7983.2017.01.011. (in Chinese) | |
[25] | 袁成凌, 姚建铭, 王纪, 余增亮 . 低能离子注入在花生四烯酸(aa)高产菌株选育中的研究. 辐射研究与辐射工艺学报, 2003,21(4):237-242. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3436.2003.04.004. |
YUAN C L, YAO J M, WANG J, YU Z L . Breeding of arachidonic acid-producing strain by low-energy ion implantation. Journal of Radiation Research and Radiation Processing, 2003,21(4):237-242. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3436.2003.04.004. (in Chinese) | |
[26] |
CHEN J L, SUN S Z, MIAO C P, WU K, CHEN Y W, XU L H, GUAN H L, ZHAO L X . Endophytic Trichoderma gamsii YIM PH30019: A promising biocontrol agent with hyperosmolar, mycoparasitism, and antagonistic activities of induced volatile organic compounds on root-rot pathogenic fungi o. Panax notoginseng. Journal of Ginseng Research, 2016,40(4):315-324. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgr.2015.09.006.
doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2015.09.006 pmid: 27746683 |
[27] | 张雯雯, 国振宇, 赵晓迪, 龚明波, 李世贵, 顾金刚, 杨礼富 . 木霉菌株挥发性物质拮抗尖孢镰刀菌的效果及其鉴定. 热带作物学报, 2017,38(4):704-715. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2017.04.019. |
ZHANG W W, GUO Z Y, ZHAO X D, GONG M B, LI S G, GU J G, YANG L F . Effect and identification of volatile compounds from Trichoderma against Fusarium oxysporum. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2017,38(4):704-715. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2017.04.019. (in Chinese) | |
[28] |
LI N X, ALFIKY A, WANG W Z, ISLAM M, NOUROLLAHI K, LIU X, KANG S . Volatile compound-mediated recognition and inhibition between Trichoderma biocontrol agents an. Fusarium oxysporum. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018,9:2614. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018. 02614.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02614 pmid: 30455673 |
[29] | 詹艺舒, 李婕, 褚秀丹, 蔡志英, 纪鹏伟, 陈炳智, 江玉姬 . 一株真菌拮抗细菌Z21的筛选与鉴定及其发酵条件优化. 微生物学通报, 2020,47(5):1503-1514. DOI: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.190622. |
ZHAN Y S, LI J, CHU X D, CAI Z Y, JI P W, CHEN B Z, JIANG Y J. Screen, identification and fermentation optimization of an antifungal bacterium Z21. Microbiology China, 2020, 47(5): 1503-1514. 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.190622. (in Chinese) | |
[30] | 蔡昭宁 . 不同碳源对蛹虫草液体发酵代谢组的影响及发酵液抑菌能力探究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2016. |
CAI Z N . Effects of different carbon sources on metabolome of Cordyceps militaris fermentation and preliminary study on the antibacterial ability of the zymotic fluid[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2016. (in Chinese) | |
[31] | 吴惠贞, 夏枫耿, 陈中, 黄魁英, 林伟峰 . 碳源与罗伊氏乳杆菌LYS-1发酵上清液抑菌效果的关系. 现代食品科技, 2020,36(4):125-131. DOI: 10.13982 /j.mfst.1673-9078.2020.4.016. |
WU H Z, XIA F G, CHEN Z, HUANG K Y, LIN W F . The relation between carbon source and the antimicrobial effect of Lactobacillus reuteri fermentation supernatant. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2020,36(4):125-131. DOI: 10.13982/j.mfst.1673-9078.2020.4.016. (in Chinese) | |
[32] |
MUKHERJEE P K, MEHETRE S T, SHERKHANE P D, MUTHUKATHAN G, GHOSH A, KOTASTHANE A S, KHARE N, RATHOD P, SHARMA K K, NATH R, TEWARI A K, BHATTACHARYYA S, ARYA M, PATHAK D, WASNIKAR A R, TIWARI R K S, SAXENA D R,. A novel seed-dressing formulation based on an improved mutant strain of Trichoderma virens, and its field evaluation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2019,10:1910. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01910.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01910 pmid: 31543866 |
[1] | 车大璐,赵俐辰,程素彩,刘爱瑜,李晓宇,赵寿培,王健诚,王媛,高玉红,孙新胜. 垫料床对育肥羔羊生长性能和臭气排放的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(24): 4943-4956. |
[2] | 刘强,刘纪伟,田恬,严薇,刘兵,赵思琪,胡秋辉,丁超. 高温胁迫下糙米短期储藏气味指纹图谱变化规律的动态分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(2): 379-391. |
[3] | 王恩召,范分良,李艳玲,刘雄舵,卢玉秋,宋阿琳. 水稻根系细菌挥发性有机物对小孢根霉的非接触性抑制作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(10): 1986-1996. |
[4] | 郝青婷,张飞,吉夏洁,薛金爱,李润植. 脂肪酸环氧化酶SlEPX转基因大豆的表型分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(2): 191-200. |
[5] | 薛红丽,杨军军,汤沙,智慧,王蕊,贾冠清,乔治军,刁现民. 谷子穗顶端败育突变体sipaa1的表型分析和基因定位[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(9): 1627-1640. |
[6] | 王静, 曹建敏, 陈德鑫, 邱军, 王晓强, 冯超, 王文静. 短小芽孢杆菌AR03挥发性有机物的抑菌活性及其组分分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(10): 1908-1919. |
[7] | 梁容,秦冉,曾冬冬,郑希,金晓丽,石春海. 水稻窄卷叶突变体nrl4的表型分析与基因定位[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(20): 3863-3873. |
[8] | 蒋冬月, 李永红, 何昉, 林启鹏, 潘会堂. 黄兰开花过程中挥发性有机成分及变化规律[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(6): 1215-1225. |
|