苏丹草-黑麦草轮作制中氮、磷、钾肥施用效果研究

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.07.012

中国农业科学 ›› 2010, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 1414-1422 .doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.07.012

• 土壤肥料·节水灌溉·农业生态环境 • 上一篇下一篇

苏丹草-黑麦草轮作制中氮、磷、钾肥施用效果研究

李文西,鲁剑巍,陈防,李小坤

（华中农业大学资源与环境学院）

收稿日期:2009-08-13 修回日期:2009-09-27 出版日期:2010-04-01 发布日期:2010-04-01
通讯作者: 鲁剑巍

Effect of N, P, K Application on Yield, Nutrient and Water Utilization Under Sudangrass and Ryegrass Rotation Regime

LI Wen-xi, LU Jian-wei, CHEN Fang, LI Xiao-kun

（华中农业大学资源与环境学院）

Received:2009-08-13 Revised:2009-09-27 Online:2010-04-01 Published:2010-04-01
Contact: LU Jian-wei

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】为苏丹草-黑麦草轮作制中合理利用养分、水分及培肥土壤提供理论依据。【方法】连续3年盆栽试验研究苏丹草（Sorghum sudanense）-黑麦草（Lolium L.）轮作制中氮、磷、钾肥对饲草产量、养分吸收、水分利用及土壤养分的影响。【结果】氮、磷、钾肥配施显著增加饲草产量,2005/2006、2006/2007、2007/2008年度的饲草总量分别为1 690.0、2 091.3、1 770.7 g/pot。与CK处理（NPK配施）相比,不施氮处理（PK）的饲草产量分别减少700.7%、1 256.9%、856.3%,不施磷处理（NK）分别减少426.3%、384.9%、792.3%,不施钾处理（NP）分别减少15.9%、4.4%、10.6%。氮、磷、钾肥配施促进饲草的养分吸收,3个年度NPK处理的总吸氮（N）量分别为6.36、4.91、6.85 g/pot,总吸磷（P）量分别为0.79、1.01、0.82 g/pot,总吸钾（K）量分别为11.58、6.36、5.62 g/pot,养分利用效率显著高于其它处理。3个年度NPK处理水分生产率分别为16.5、16.1、16.2 kg•m-3,明显高于其它处理。轮作体系下,土壤有机质,NP、NK、NPK处理的全氮,NP、PK、NPK处理的速效磷,NK、PK处理的缓效钾、速效钾均上升;土壤pH,NP、NPK处理的缓效钾、速效钾下降,而PK处理的全氮、NK处理的速效磷基本稳定。【结论】苏丹草-黑麦草轮作体系下,合理配施氮、磷、钾肥能持续获得高产、促进饲草养分吸收和有效改善土壤肥力。

关键词: 苏丹草-黑麦草轮作, 氮、磷、钾肥, 养分吸收, 水分生产率, 土壤养分

Abstract: 【Objective】 Sudangrass and ryegrass rotation is a new type of cropping system in Jianghan Plain, which developed very fast in recent years. So it is essential to understand the optimum nutrient and water management measures in this new system.【Method】 Effect of NPK fertilizer on yield of forage grass, nutrition and water utilization under sudangrass and ryegrass rotation was studied through continuous pot experiments for three years. 【Result】 The results showed that NPK combination could obviously improve the yield of forage grass, and the total yield in the period of 2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2007-2008 was 1 690.0 g/pot, 2 091.3 g/pot, 1 770.7 g/pot, and yield in PK treatment (No N) was 700.7%, 1 256.9%, 856.3% lower than that of NPK treatment, and yield in NK treatment (No P) was 426.3%, 384.9%, 792.3% lower than that of NPK treatment, and yield for NP treatment were 15.9%, 4.4%, 10.6% lower than that of NPK treatment, respectively. NPK combination could improve nutrition uptake, and total N uptake in the period of 2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2007-2008 were 6.36 g/pot, 4.91 g/pot, 6.85 g/pot, and was 10.0 times, 14.8 times, 10.6 times higher than that of PK treatment, and was 3.7 times, 1.8 times, 5.1 times higher than that of NK treatment, respectively, but was similar to NP treatment. Total P uptake were 0.79 g/pot, 1.01 g/pot, 0.82 g/pot, and was 4.6 times, 6.8 times, 5.3 times higher than that of PK treatment, and was 2.4 times, 2.3 times, 2.9 times higher than that of NK treatment, respectively, but was similar to NP treatment. Total K uptake were 11.58 g/pot, 6.36 g/pot, 5.62 g/pot, and was 5.2 times, 8.4 times, 4.9 times higher than that of PK treatment, and 3.9 times, 2.3 times, 3.9 times higher than that of NK treatment, and were 80.9%, 57.4%, 200.5% higher than that of NP treatment, respectively. Water productivity in three years was 16.5 kg•m-3, 16.1 kg•m-3, 16.2 kg•m-3, and was 3.8 times, 5.4 times, 4.2 times higher than that of PK treatment, and was 2.3 times, 1.3 times, 2.6 times higher than that of NK treatment, and was 16.4%, 8.8%, 22.4% higher than that of NP treatment, respectively. In this rotation, soil pH degraded, but soil organic matter all upgraded. Soil total N in NP, NK, NPK treatments upgraded, but soil total N in PK was steady. Soil extractable P in NP, PK and NPK treatments upgraded obviously, and soil extractable P in NK increased slightly. Soil available K in NK and PK treatments upgraded obviously, but available K in NP and NPK degraded. 【Conclusion】 NPK combination increased yield of forage, improved nutrient uptake and soil fertility in sudangrass and ryegrass rotation system.

Key words: sudangrass and ryegrass rotation, N, P, K fertilizer, nutrient uptake, water productivity, soil nutrition

李文西,鲁剑巍,陈防,李小坤 . 苏丹草-黑麦草轮作制中氮、磷、钾肥施用效果研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(7): 1414-1422 .

LI Wen-xi,LU Jian-wei,CHEN Fang,LI Xiao-kun
. Effect of N, P, K Application on Yield, Nutrient and Water Utilization Under Sudangrass and Ryegrass Rotation Regime
[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(7): 1414-1422 .

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.07.012

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2010/V43/I7/1414

[1]	李前,秦裕波,尹彩侠,孔丽丽,王蒙,侯云鹏,孙博,赵胤凯,徐晨,刘志全. 滴灌施肥模式对玉米产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616.
[2]	朱长伟,孟威威,石柯,牛润芝,姜桂英,申凤敏,刘芳,刘世亮. 不同轮耕模式下小麦各生育时期土壤养分及酶活性变化特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(21): 4237-4251.
[3]	王劲松,董二伟,刘秋霞,武爱莲,王媛,王立革,焦晓燕. 行距和密度对籽粒饲用高粱产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(16): 3123-3133.
[4]	刘媛,袁亮,张水勤,赵秉强,李燕婷. 不同分子量聚天冬氨酸对小麦根系生长和养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(13): 2526-2537.
[5]	解斌,安秀红,陈艳辉,程存刚,康国栋,周江涛,赵德英,李壮,张艳珍,杨安. 不同苹果砧木对持续低磷的响应及适应性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(13): 2598-2612.
[6]	郭迎新,陈永亮,苗琪,范志勇,孙军伟,崔振岭,李军营. 洱海流域植烟土壤养分时空变异特征及肥力评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(10): 1987-1999.
[7]	靳玉婷,刘运峰,胡宏祥,穆静,高梦瑶,李先藩,薛中俊,龚静静. 持续性秸秆还田配施化肥对油菜-水稻轮作周年氮磷径流损失的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(9): 1937-1951.
[8]	赵卫松,郭庆港,苏振贺,王培培,董丽红,胡卿,鹿秀云,张晓云,李社增,马平. 马铃薯健株与黄萎病株根际土壤真菌群落结构及其对碳源利用特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(2): 296-309.
[9]	刘凯,谢英荷,李廷亮,马红梅,张奇茹,姜丽伟,曹静,邵靖琳. 减氮覆膜对黄土旱塬小麦产量及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(12): 2595-2607.
[10]	赵鹏,刘明,靳容,陈晓光,张爱君,唐忠厚,魏猛. 长期施用有机肥对潮土区甘薯碳氮积累与分配的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(10): 2142-2153.
[11]	任涛,郭丽璇,张丽梅,杨旭坤,廖世鹏,张洋洋,李小坤,丛日环,鲁剑巍. 我国冬油菜典型种植区域土壤养分现状分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(8): 1606-1616.
[12]	温延臣,李海燕,袁亮,徐久凯,马荣辉,林治安,赵秉强. 长期定位施肥对潮土剖面养分分布的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(21): 4460-4469.
[13]	王丽,王朝辉,郭子糠,陶振魁,郑洺钧,黄宁,高志源,张欣欣,黄婷苗. 黄土高原不同地点小麦籽粒矿质元素的含量差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(17): 3527-3540.
[14]	李宝鑫,杨俐苹,卢艳丽,师校欣,杜国强. 我国葡萄主产区的土壤养分丰缺状况[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(17): 3553-3566.
[15]	赵晴月,许世杰,张务帅,张哲,姚智,陈新平,邹春琴. 中国玉米主产区土壤养分的空间变异及影响因素分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(15): 3120-3133.

苏丹草-黑麦草轮作制中氮、磷、钾肥施用效果研究

Effect of N, P, K Application on Yield, Nutrient and Water Utilization Under Sudangrass and Ryegrass Rotation Regime

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0