大豆地方种质资源鲜籽粒可溶性糖含量的全基因组关联分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.11.003

中国农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (11): 2079-2091.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.11.003

所属专题：专题——大豆抗病性、产量与品质的相关性

• 专题：大豆抗病性、产量与品质的相关性 • 上一篇下一篇

大豆地方种质资源鲜籽粒可溶性糖含量的全基因组关联分析

张玉梅¹(), 丁文涛²^,³(), 蓝新隆¹, 李清华⁴, 胡润芳¹, 郭娜²^,³, 林国强¹(), 赵晋铭²^,³()

¹ 福建省农业科学院作物研究所/福建省特色旱作物品种选育工程技术研究中心/福建省蔬菜遗传育种重点实验室，福州 350013
² 生物育种钟山实验室，南京 210014
³ 南京农业大学农学院/国家大豆生物育种产教融合创新平台/农业农村部大豆生物学与遗传育种重点实验室/作物遗传与种质创新全国重点实验室，南京 210095
⁴ 莆田市农业科学研究所，福建莆田 351106

收稿日期:2022-11-28 接受日期:2023-01-03 出版日期:2024-06-01 发布日期:2024-06-07
通信作者:
林国强，E-mail：542057656@qq.com。
赵晋铭，E-mail：jmz3000@126.com
联系方式: 张玉梅，E-mail：zym1122@126.com。丁文涛，E-mail：wentaoding@126.com。张玉梅和丁文涛为同等贡献作者。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2021YFD1201605); 福建省自然科学基金(2020J011372); 福建省属公益类科研院所基本科研专项(2022R1031006); 福建省财政专项(FJVRC2020-02); 福建省财政专项(CXTD2021011-2)

Genome Wide Association Analysis of Soluble Sugar Content in Fresh Seeds of Soybean Landraces

ZHANG YuMei¹(), DING WenTao²^,³(), LAN XinLong¹, LI QingHua⁴, HU RunFang¹, GUO Na²^,³, LIN GuoQiang¹(), ZHAO JinMing²^,³()

¹ Crop Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Engineering Research Center for Characteristic Dry Crop Varieties Breeding/Fujian Key Laboratory of Vegetable Genetics and Breeding, Fuzhou 350013
² Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory (ZSBBL), Nanjing 210014
³ College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University/National Innovation Platform for Soybean Breeding and Industry-Education Integration/Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetics and Breeding for Soybean, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Nanjing 210095
⁴ Putian Agricultural Sciences Research Institute, Putian 351106, Fujian

Received:2022-11-28 Accepted:2023-01-03 Published:2024-06-01 Online:2024-06-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】可溶性糖含量是鲜食大豆重要的品质性状之一，研究大豆鲜籽粒可溶性糖含量的遗传变异，深入解析可溶性糖含量的遗传机制，为鲜食大豆种质创新及品质育种提供依据。【方法】利用来自东北大豆生态区、北方大豆生态区、黄淮海大豆生态区和南方大豆生态区的133份大豆地方种质，在2021年连江春季、福清春季和秋季3个环境下对鲜籽粒可溶性糖含量进行表型测定，结合82 187个高质量SNP标记，基于混合线性模型MLM（Q+K）对可溶性糖含量进行全基因组关联分析，挖掘可溶性糖含量显著相关的SNP位点，并以显著SNP位点为中心，两端各扩展119.07 kb连锁不平衡衰减距离为候选区间，根据候选区间内基因的注释和组织表达信息预测候选基因。【结果】3个环境下，鲜籽粒可溶性糖含量的变异范围为3.37—33.84 mg·g^-1，遗传变异系数为24.59%—32.69%，可溶性糖含量遗传率为68.14%。通过全基因组关联分析，连江春季、福清春季和秋季3个环境下分别检测到与鲜籽粒可溶性糖含量显著关联的SNP有6、8和22个，表型变异解释率为12.43%—29.27%，以表型变异解释率较高的9个显著SNP位点所在的候选区间进行搜索，共获得86个基因，结合基因注释和组织表达信息，进一步筛选到9个候选基因，主要涉及转录因子、糖蛋白家族和糖类合成转运等生物学过程。其中，Glyma.01g016500、Glyma.13g042100、Glyma.16g131800和Glyma.16g155300在大豆种子及荚中表达水平较高，可作为大豆鲜籽粒可溶性糖的最具潜力候选基因。【结论】通过全基因组关联分析，检测到36个与鲜籽粒可溶性糖含量显著关联的SNP，进一步筛选出9个候选基因可能参与大豆鲜籽粒可溶性糖含量的调控，其中，Glyma.01g016500、Glyma.13g042100、Glyma.16g131800和Glyma.16g155300可作为调控大豆鲜籽粒可溶性糖含量的关键目标基因。

关键词: 大豆, 鲜籽粒, 可溶性糖含量, 全基因组关联分析, 候选基因

Abstract:

【Objective】Soluble sugar content is one of the important quality traits of vegetable soybean. The genetic variation and genetic mechanism of soluble sugar content in fresh soybean seeds were studied to provide a basis for germplasm innovation and quality breeding of vegetable soybean.【Method】Using 133 soybean landraces from the Northeast region, the North region, the Huanghuaihai region and the South region, the soluble sugar content of fresh seeds was determined in the three environments of Lianjiang in spring, Fuqing in spring and autumn, in 2021. In combination with 82 187 high-quality SNP markers, the whole genome association analysis of soluble sugar content was conducted based on the mixed linear model MLM (Q+K), and the SNP loci with significantly related to soluble sugar content were identified. The candidate intervals were selected by the significant SNP loci and the extension of 119.07 kb linkage disequilibrium decay distance at both ends. The candidate genes were predicted according to the annotation and tissue expression information of the genes in the candidate intervals.【Result】The variation range of soluble sugar content in fresh seeds under three environments was 3.37-33.84 mg·g^-1, the genetic variation coefficient was 24.59%-32.69%, and the heritability of soluble sugar content was 68.14%. 6, 8 and 22 SNPs were significantly associated with the soluble sugar content of fresh seeds were detected in Lianjiang in spring, Fuqing in spring and autumn, respectively, and phenotypic variation was 12.43%-29.27%. A total of 86 genes were obtained in the candidate regions of 9 significant SNP loci with higher interpretation rate of phenotypic variation, and 9 candidate genes were further screened by gene annotation and tissue expression information. These candidate genes are mainly involved in biological processes such as transcription factors, glycoprotein families and carbohydrate synthesis and transport. Among them, Glyma.01g016500, Glyma.13g042100, Glyma.16g131800 and Glyma.16g155300 were more highly expressed in soybean seeds and pods, which can be used as the most potential candidate genes for soluble sugar in fresh soybean seeds.【Conclusion】Through genome-wide association analysis, 36 SNPs significantly associated with soluble sugar content in fresh seeds were detected, and 9 candidate genes were further screened out, which may be involved in the regulation of soluble sugar content in fresh soybean seeds. Among them, Glyma.01g016500, Glyma.13g042100, Glyma.16g131800 and Glyma.16g155300 can be the key candidate genes for regulating soluble sugar content in fresh soybean seeds.

Key words: soybean, fresh seeds, soluble sugar contents, genome wide association analysis, candidate genes

张玉梅, 丁文涛, 蓝新隆, 李清华, 胡润芳, 郭娜, 林国强, 赵晋铭. 大豆地方种质资源鲜籽粒可溶性糖含量的全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(11): 2079-2091.

ZHANG YuMei, DING WenTao, LAN XinLong, LI QingHua, HU RunFang, GUO Na, LIN GuoQiang, ZHAO JinMing. Genome Wide Association Analysis of Soluble Sugar Content in Fresh Seeds of Soybean Landraces[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(11): 2079-2091.

图/表 7

表1

图1

图2

表2

表3

显著标记关联的基因信息"

标记 Marker	物理位置 Position (bp)	染色体 Chromosome	等位变异 Allelic	关联基因 Associated gene	位置与变异 Region and variant
AX-90523492	1643221	1	T>C	Glyma.01g015600	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.01g015800	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.01g015900	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.01g016100	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.01g016500	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.01g016800	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.01g016900	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.01g017000	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.01g017200	外显子，同义突变Exon, synonymous
				Glyma.01g017300	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.01g017400	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.01g018300	基因上游Upstream
AX-90375080	4456132	6	A>G	Glyma.06g057700	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.06g058000	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.06g058100	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.06g058500	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.06g058600	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.06g059000	内含子突变Intron variant
				Glyma.06g059500	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.06g059700	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.06g060200	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.06g060300	基因上游Upstream
AX-90399131	41556768	6	G>A	Glyma.06g245400	基因下游Downstream
AX-90414763	90414763	6	T>C	Glyma.06g245500	基因下游Downstream
AX-90521281	90521281	6	G>T	Glyma.06g245600	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.06g245700	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.06g245800	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.06g245900	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.06g246000	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.06g246100	上游基因突变Upstream gene variant
				Glyma.06g246200	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.06g246300	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.06g246400	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.06g246500	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.06g246600	外显子，非同义突变Exon, nonsynonymous
				Glyma.06g246800	外显子，同义突变Exon, synonymous
				Glyma.06g246900	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.06g247100	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.06g247200	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.06g247300	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.06g247600	基因上游Upstream
AX-90515230	18936718	8	C>T	Glyma.08g230100	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.08g230600	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.08g230800	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.08g230900	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.08g231000	内含子突变Intron variant
				Glyma.08g231400	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.08g231500	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.08g231600	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.08g231800	基因上游Upstream
AX-90350462	13577053	13	A>G	Glyma.13g042100	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.13g042200	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.13g042300	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.13g042600	外显子，同义突变Exon synonymous
				Glyma.13g042700	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.13g042800	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.13g042900	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.13g043000	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.13g043500	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.13g043600	基因上游Upstream
AX-90345551	28826370	16	C>T	Glyma.16g131800	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.16g131900	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.16g132000	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.16g132100	基因间变异Intergenic region
				Glyma.16g132200	基因间变异Intergenic region
				Glyma.16g132500	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.16g132600	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.16g132700	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.16g132800	基因上游Upstream
AX-90351400	31631250	16	C>T	Glyma.16g155100	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.16g155200	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.16g155300	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.16g155400	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.16g155500	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.16g155600	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.16g155700	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.16g155800	基因下游Downstream
				Glyma.16g156100	外显子，非同义突变Exon, nonsynonymous
				Glyma.16g156200	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.16g156300	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.16g156400	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.16g156500	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.16g156600	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.16g156700	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.16g156800	基因上游Upstream
				Glyma.16g157100	基因上游Upstream

表3

表4

图3

参考文献 44

[1]	黄美. 我国大豆地方品种群体籽粒可溶性糖含量的遗传变异和QTL关联定位研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2012.
	HUANG M. Genetic variability and QTL association mapping of seed soluble sugar content in Chinese landrace populations soybean[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese)
[2]	王一璞, 武国瑞, 杨万明, 杜维俊, 赵晋忠, 岳爱琴, 张永坡, 高春艳, 王敏. 不同类型大豆籽粒可溶性糖组分含量比较. 山西农业科学, 2020, 48(5): 700-703, 726.
	WANG Y P, WU G R, YANG W M, DU W J, ZHAO J Z, YUE A Q, ZHANG Y P, GAO C Y, WANG M. Comparison of soluble sugar components content in different types of soybean seeds. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(5): 700-703, 726. (in Chinese)
[3]	张玉梅, 胡润芳, 林国强. 菜用大豆品质性状研究进展. 大豆科学, 2013, 32(5): 698-702.
	ZHANG Y M, HU R F, LIN G Q. Research advance on quality traits of vegetable soybean. Soybean Science, 2013, 32(5): 698-702. (in Chinese)
[4]	HU R F, ZHANG Y M, CHEN Y H, LIN G Q. Dynamic metabolic profiling in vegetable soybean seed development. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 2018, 30(2): 90-98.
[5]	HOU A, CHEN P, ALLOATTI J, LI D, MOZZONI L, ZHANG B, SHI A. Genetic variability of seed sugar content in worldwide soybean germplasm collections. Crop Science, 2009, 49(3): 903-912.
[6]	张秋英, 李彦生, 刘长锴, 田博文, 涂冰洁, 毛健伟. 菜用大豆食用品质关键组分及其积累动态研究. 作物学报, 2015, 41(11): 1692-1700. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01692
	ZHANG Q Y, LI Y S, LIU C K, TIAN B W, TU B J, MAO J W. Key components of eating quality and their dynamic accumulation in vegetable soybean varieties [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(11): 1692-1700. (in Chinese)
[7]	KUMAR V, RANI A, GOYAL L, PRATAP D, BILLORE S D, CHAUHAN G S. Evaluation of vegetable-type soybean for sucrose, taste-related amino acids, and isoflavones contents. International Journal of Food Properties, 2011, 14(5): 1142-1151.
[8]	SHANMUGASUNDARAM S, CHENG S T, HUANG M T. Quality requirement and improvement of vegetable soybean. Vegetable Soybean: Research Needs for Production and Quality Improvement. 1991: 30-42.
[9]	王丹英, 汪自强, 方勇, 徐律平. 菜用大豆食味品质及其与内含物关系研究. 金华职业技术学院学报, 2002, 2(3): 15-17, 61.
	WANG D Y, WANG Z Q, FANG Y, XU J P. Studies on the relationship between vegetable soybean eating quality and its components. Journal of Jinhua College of Profession and Technology, 2002, 2(3): 15-17, 61. (in Chinese)
[10]	WANG Y Q, CHEN P Y, ZHANG B. Quantitative trait loci analysis of soluble sugar contents in soybean. Plant Breeding, 2014, 133(4): 493-498.
[11]	MEBRAHTU T, MOHAMED A. Genetic variation for green pod yield and quality among vegetable soybean genotypes. Journal of Crop Improvement, 2006, 16(1/2): 113-130.
[12]	FLINT-GARCIA S A, THORNSBERRY J M, BUCKLER E S. Structure of linkage disequilibrium in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2003, 54: 357-374.
[13]	KLOTH K J, THOEN M P M, BOUWMEESTER H J, JONGSMA M A, DICKE M. Association mapping of plant resistance to insects. Trends in Plant Science, 2012, 17(5): 311-319. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.01.002 pmid: 22322003
[14]	ZHANG P, ZHONG KZ, SHAHID M Q, TONG H H. Association analysis in rice: From application to utilization. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 1202. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01202 pmid: 27582745
[15]	TAKAGI H, ABE A, YOSHIDA K, KOSUGI S, NATSUME S, MITSUOKA C, UEMURA A, UTSUSHI H, TAMIRU M, TAKUNO S, INNAN H, CANO L M, KAMOUN S, TERAUCHI R. QTL-seq: Rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. The Plant Journal, 2013, 74(1): 174-183. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12105 pmid: 23289725
[16]	WANG Q, TANG J, HAN B, HUANG X H. Advances in genome- wide association studies of complex traits in rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2020, 133(5): 1415-1425.
[17]	SCHMUTZ J, CANNON S B, SCHLUETER J, MA J X, MITROS T, NELSON W, HYTEN D L, SONG Q J, THELEN J J, CHENG J L, XU D, HELLSTEN U, MAY G D, YU Y, SAKURAI T, UMEZAWA T, BHATTACHARYYA M K, SANDHU D, VALLIYODAN B, LINDQUIST E, PETO M, GRANT D, SHU S Q, GOODSTEIN D, BARRY K, FUTRELL-GRIGGS M, ABERNATHY B, DU J C, TIAN Z X, ZHU L C, GILL N, JOSHI T, LIBAULT M, SETHURAMAN A, ZHANG X C, SHINOZAKI K, NGUYEN H T, WING R A, CREGAN P, SPECHT J, GRIMWOOD J, ROKHSAR D, STACEY G, SHOEMAKER R C, JACKSON S A. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature, 2010, 463(7278): 178-183.
[18]	ZHOU Z K, JIANG Y, WANG Z, GOU Z H, LYU J, LI W Y, YU Y J, SHU L P, ZHAO Y J, MA Y M, FANG C, SHEN Y T, LIU T F, LI C C, LI Q, WU M, WANG M, WU Y S, DONG Y, WAN W T, WANG X, DING Z L, GAO Y D, XIANG H, ZHU B G, LEE S H, WANG W, TIAN Z X. Resequencing 302 wild and cultivated accessions identifies genes related to domestication and improvement in soybean. Nature Biotechnology, 2015, 33(4): 408-414. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3096 pmid: 25643055
[19]	LEE J S, KIM S M, KANG S. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci for sucrose and oligosaccharide contents in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] using 180K Axiom® SoyaSNP genotyping platform. Euphytica, 2016, 208(1): 195-203.
[20]	邱丽娟, 李英慧, 关荣霞, 刘章雄, 王丽侠, 常汝镇. 大豆核心种质和微核心种质的构建、验证与研究进展. 作物学报, 2009, 35(4): 571-579.
	QIU L J, LI Y H, GUAN R X, LIU Z X, WANG L X, CHANG R Z. Establishment, representative testing and research progress of soybean core collection and mini core collection. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(4): 571-579. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00571
[21]	LI X N, ZHANG X L, ZHU L M, BU Y P, WANG X F, ZHANG X, ZHOU Y, WANG X T, GUO N, QIU L J, ZHAO J M, XING H. Genome-wide association study of four yield-related traits at the R6 stage in soybean. BMC Genetics, 2019, 20(1): 39. doi: 10.1186/s12863-019-0737-9 pmid: 30922237
[22]	SHANMUGAVELAN P, KIM S Y, KIM J B, KIM H W, CHO S M, KIM S N, KIM S Y, CHO Y S, KIM H R. Evaluation of sugar content and composition in commonly consumed Korean vegetables, fruits, cereals, seed plants, and leaves by HPLC-ELSD. Carbohydrate Research, 2013, 380: 112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2013.06.024 pmid: 24021435
[23]	PURCELL S, NEALE B, TODD-BROWN K, THOMAS L, FERREIRA M A, BENDER D, MALLER J, SKLAR P, DE BAKKER P I, DALY MJ, SHAM P C. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 2007, 81(3): 559-575.
[24]	ZHANG X L, DING W T, XUE D, LI X N, ZHOU Y, SHEN J C, FENG J Y, GUO N, QIU L J, XING H, ZHAO J M. Genome-wide association studies of plant architecture-related traits and 100-seed weight in soybean landraces. BMC Genomic Data, 2021, 22(1): 10. doi: 10.1186/s12863-021-00964-5 pmid: 33676409
[25]	TURNER S D. qqman: An R package for visualizing GWAS results using Q-Q and Manhattan plots. Journal of Open Source Software, 2018, 3(25): 731.
[26]	CINGOLANI P. Variant annotation and functional prediction: SnpEff. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2022, 2493: 289-314. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2293-3_19 pmid: 35751823
[27]	WEN S Y, NEUHAUS H E, CHENG J T, BIE Z L. Contributions of sugar transporters to crop yield and fruit quality. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2022, 73(8): 2275-2289. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac043 pmid: 35139196
[28]	JIANG G L, RUTTO L K, REN S X, BOWEN R A, BERRY H, EPPS K. Genetic analysis of edamame seed composition and trait relationships in soybean lines. Euphytica, 2018, 214(9): 1-10.
[29]	宋雯雯, 李继存, 赵云, 周静, 黄新阳, 曾海燕, 杨光明, 李素真, 吴存祥, 韩天富. 中国大豆微核心种质光温综合反应敏感性的鉴定. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21(1): 146-153. doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20190606004
	SONG W W, LI J C, ZHAO Y, ZHOU J, HUANG X Y, ZENG H Y, YANG G M, LI S Z, WU C X, HAN T F. Identification of photothermal comprehensive responses in Chinese soybean mini core collection. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2020, 21(1): 146-153. (in Chinese)
[30]	MAJOR D J, JOHNSON D R, TANNER J W, ANDERSON I C. Effects of daylength and temperature on soybean development. Crop Science, 1975, 15(2): 174-179.
[31]	郁晓敏, 袁凤杰, 傅旭军, 朱丹华. 浙江大豆核心亲本可溶性糖含量分析. 中国粮油学报, 2015, 30(7): 19-22.
	YU X M, YUAN F J, FU X J, ZHU D H. Analysis of seed soluble sugar content in Zhejiang soybean core collections. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2015, 30(7): 19-22. (in Chinese)
[32]	LI Y S, DU M, ZHANG Q Y, WANG G H, LIU X B. Greater differences exist in seed protein, oil, total soluble sugar and sucrose content of vegetable soybean genotypes [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] in Northeast China. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2012, 12: 1681-1686.
[33]	赵福成, 景立权, 闫发宝, 陆大雷, 王桂跃, 陆卫平. 灌浆期高温胁迫对甜玉米籽粒糖分积累和蔗糖代谢相关酶活性的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39(9): 1644-1651.
	ZHAO F C, JING L Q, YAN F B, LU D L, WANG G Y, LU W P. Effects of heat stress during grain filling on sugar accumulation and enzyme activity associated with sucrose metabolism in sweet corn. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(9): 1644-1651. (in Chinese)
[34]	任雷, 胡晓辉, 杨振超, 皱志荣, 李鹏飞. 光照强度对厚皮甜瓜糖分积累与蔗糖代谢相关酶的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 38(6): 120-126.
	REN L, HU X H, YANG Z C, ZOU Z R, LI P F. Effects of light intensity on sugar accumulation and sucrose-metabolizing enzymes in muskmelon. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Nature Science Edition), 2010, 38(6): 120-126. (in Chinese)
[35]	WU X Y, HAN W, YANG Z Q, ZHANG Y X, ZHENG Y J. The difference in temperature between day and night affects the strawberry soluble sugar content by influencing the photosynthesis, respiration and sucrose phosphatase synthase. Horticultural Science, 2021, 48(4): 174-182.
[36]	HOU J F, WANG C L, HONG X J, ZHAO J M, XUE C C, GUO N, GAI J Y, XING H. Association analysis of vegetable soybean quality traits with SSR markers. Plant Breeding, 2011, 130(4): 444-449.
[37]	SONG J F, LIU C, LI D, GU Z. Evaluation of sugar, free amino acid, and organic acid compositions of different varieties of vegetable soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr). Industrial Crops and Products, 2013, 50: 743-749.
[38]	KUMAR V, RANI A, GOYAL L, DIXIT A K, MANJAYA J G, DEV J, SWAMY M. Sucrose and raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs) in soybean seeds as influenced by genotype and growing location. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2010, 58(8): 5081-5085. doi: 10.1021/jf903141s pmid: 20353171
[39]	PAN W, HAN X, HUANG S, YU J, ZHAO Y, QU K, ZHANG Z, YIN Z, QI H, YU G, ZHANG Y, XIN D, ZHU R, LIU C, WU X, JIANG H, HU Z, ZUO Y, CHEN Q, QI Z. Identification of candidate genes related to soluble sugar contents in soybean seeds using multiple genetic analyses. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(7): 1886-1902.
[40]	LU W C, SUI M N, ZHAO X C, JIA H C, HAN D Z, YAN X F, HAN Y P. Genome-wide identification of candidate genes underlying soluble sugar content in vegetable soybean (Glycine max L.) via association and expression analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13: 930639.
[41]	王洁, 蔡昱萌, 张楠, 张雅丽. 植物蔗糖转运蛋白表达的调控因素与分子机制. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(3): 115-124. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2020-1027
	WANG J, CAI Y M, ZHANG N, ZHANG Y L. Regulatory factors and molecular mechanism of sucrose transporters’ expressions in plant. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2021, 37(3): 115-124. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2020-1027
[42]	KÜHN C, GROF C P. Sucrose transporters of higher plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2010, 13(3): 287-297.
[43]	PATIL G, VALLIYODAN B, DESHMUKH R, PRINCE S, NICANDER B, ZHAO M, SONAH H, SONG L, LIN L, CHAUDHARY J, LIU Y, JOSHI T, XU D, NGUYEN H T. Soybean (Glycine max) SWEET gene family: Insights through comparative genomics, transcriptome profiling and whole genome re-sequence analysis. BMC Genomics, 2015, 16: 520. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1730-y pmid: 26162601
[44]	WANG S D, LIU S L, WANG J, YOKOSHO K, ZHOU B, YU Y C, LIU Z, FROMMER W B, MA J F, CHEN L Q, GUAN Y F, SHOU H X, TIAN Z X. Simultaneous changes in seed size, oil content and protein content driven by selection of SWEET homologues during soybean domestication. National Science Review, 2020, 7(11): 1776-1786.

环境 Environments	均值 Mean (mg·g^-1)	标准差 SD (mg·g^-1)	最小值 Min. (mg·g^-1)	最大值 Max. (mg·g^-1)	变异系数 CV (%)	显著性Significance			遗传率 h² (%)
环境 Environments	均值 Mean (mg·g^-1)	标准差 SD (mg·g^-1)	最小值 Min. (mg·g^-1)	最大值 Max. (mg·g^-1)	变异系数 CV (%)	F_G	F_E	F_G_×_E	遗传率 h² (%)
2021CLJ	8.73	2.850	3.37	19.05	32.69	3.01**	4.38**	7.20**	68.14
2021CFQ	10.74	2.641	5.68	18.79	24.59
2021QFQ	11.19	3.431	4.22	33.84	30.66
平均Mean	10.31	2.161	6.03	22.10	20.96

环境 Environments	标记 Markers	染色体 Chromosome	物理位置 Position (bp)	等位变异 Allelic	显著性 -log₁₀(P)	表型变异解释率 R² (%)
2021CLJ	AX-90503091	1	51857659	G/A	3.53	14.28
	AX-90375080	6	4456132	A/G	3.72	15.15
	AX-90439820	14	7015035	C/T	3.59	14.64
	AX-90326993	16	28742781	T/C	3.66	14.68
	AX-90345551	16	28826370	C/T	3.86	15.72
	AX-90366289	16	32782857	T/G	3.69	14.92
2021CFQ	AX-90498034	3	38220637	G/A	3.71	14.08
	AX-90388849	3	38318720	C/A	3.85	14.75
	AX-90399131	6	41556768	G/A	3.99	15.32
	AX-90305393	6	41636432	T/C	3.65	13.81
	AX-90414763	6	41661485	T/C	3.90	15.08
	AX-90521281	6	41672853	G/T	3.90	15.08
	AX-90430712	6	41739316	G/A	3.56	13.43
	AX-90491158	18	833161	A/C	3.79	14.36
2021QFQ	AX-90523492	1	1643221	T/C	4.13	19.65
	AX-90471910	2	15509622	T/G	3.73	14.71
	AX-90463831	5	37457082	G/A	4.33	16.52
	AX-90337094	8	18928439	C/G	3.87	13.99
	AX-90515230	8	18936718	C/T	4.04	16.18
	AX-90318719	8	27518867	T/G	3.52	12.43
	AX-90511533	8	34944396	C/T	3.70	13.72
	AX-90474383	9	6551732	T/G	3.58	13.30
	AX-90385515	9	6624803	A/C	3.51	13.64
	AX-90358417	9	6771694	T/A	3.81	13.83
	AX-90308466	9	6801826	C/T	3.58	13.28
	AX-90423241	9	6931879	T/C	3.57	12.90
	AX-90343217	9	6940434	C/T	3.71	13.46
	AX-90409115	9	6969624	T/C	3.73	13.94
	AX-90407481	10	3759843	G/A	3.82	14.71
	AX-90467097	10	41183218	C/T	3.69	14.45
	AX-90376167	11	32722314	A/G	3.54	12.78
	AX-90350462	13	13577053	A/G	4.35	16.45
	AX-90317931	13	18042528	T/G	3.89	13.17
	AX-90364912	15	5490816	C/T	3.91	16.89
	AX-90351400	16	31631250	C/T	6.81	29.27
	AX-90304999	18	46549803	G/A	3.69	13.49

候选基因 Candidate genes	同源基因 Homologous gene	功能注释 Function annotation
Glyma.01g016100	AT1G05670.1	PPR超家族蛋白PPR superfamily protein
Glyma.01g016500	AT4G25960.1	P-糖蛋白2 P-glycoprotein 2
Glyma.06g058600	AT5G21280.1	富含羟脯氨酸的糖蛋白Glycoprotein rich in hydroxyproline
Glyma.08g231800	AT1G30320.1	Remorin家族蛋白Remorin family protein
Glyma.13g042100	AT5G53140.1	蛋白磷酸酶2C家族蛋白Protein phosphatase 2C family proteins
Glyma.16g131800	AT4G36360.1	β-半乳糖苷酶3 β-galactosidase 3
Glyma.16g155300	AT3G60530.1	GATA转录因子GATA transcription factors
Glyma.16g156800	AT1G22710.1	蔗糖质子转运体2 Sucrose proton transporter 2
Glyma.16g157100	AT1G71880.1	蔗糖质子转运体1 Sucrose proton transporter 1

大豆地方种质资源鲜籽粒可溶性糖含量的全基因组关联分析

Genome Wide Association Analysis of Soluble Sugar Content in Fresh Seeds of Soybean Landraces

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	叶美金, 吴雷, Lohani Md Nahibuzzaman, 尹丽, 胡欣荣, 刘亚西, 蒋云峰, 陈国跃, 蒲至恩, 李阳, 李婷, 邹亚亚, 吴佳怡, 马建. 基于GWAS的中国地方小麦成熟胚大小位点的鉴定及其遗传效应解析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1157-1171.
[2]	李永娟, 张悦彤, 王艺博, 赵长江, 宋洁, 陈雪丽, 姚钦. 生物炭施用对大豆轮连作系统土壤固氮微生物nifH基因丰度及群落组成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1272-1285.
[3]	杨丽娟, 陈丝雨, 赵薇, 朱玲, 郭磊, 马丽娜, 马瑞敏, 张娟. 全基因组重测序揭示静原鸡羽色的遗传机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1348-1360.
[4]	刘方东, 孙磊, 王吴彬, 赵晋铭, 盖钧镒. 我国大豆种植制度的变更和生态栽培区划调整的建议[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(3): 486-498.
[5]	王勇胜, 牛丽, 王长杰, 马立花, 廉潇潇, 孟亚雄, 马小乐, 姚立蓉, 张宏, 杨轲, 李葆春, 王化俊, 司二静, 汪军成. 冬小麦千粒重的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(3): 499-514.
[6]	蔡廷阳, 朱玉鹏, 李瑞东, 吴宗声, 徐一帆, 宋雯雯, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥. 苗期叶损伤对黄淮海夏大豆光合特性、荚果分布及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(2): 292-304.
[7]	吴琼, 谢香庭, 王磊, 牟勇, 李进伟. 转基因大豆DBN8205转化体特异性定量PCR方法的研发和验证[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(1): 29-40.
[8]	李云丽, 刁邓超, 刘雅睿, 孙玉晨, 孟祥宇, 邬陈芳, 汪妤, 吴建辉, 李春莲, 曾庆东, 韩德俊, 郑炜君. 小麦苗期耐热性全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(9): 1663-1683.
[9]	严孙辉, 罗程, 陈银基, 庄昕波. 细菌纤维素协同pH偏移处理对大豆分离蛋白凝胶特性与微观结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(6): 1210-1222.
[10]	高岩浩, 王婷婷, 白卫卫, 杜兴杰, 刘贤, 秦本源, 付彤, 孙宇, 高腾云, 张天留. 脂质组与转录组联合揭示南阳牛不同肌肉组织脂质特征的差异表达模式[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(6): 1239-1258.
[11]	刘路平, 胡雪洁, 祁金, 陈强, 刘智, 赵田湉, 史晓蕾, 刘兵强, 孟庆民, 张孟臣, 韩天富, 杨春燕. 大豆生育期基因E1和E2的启动子克隆及其表达模式分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(5): 840-850.
[12]	郑煜, 陈颐, 遆晋松, 史龙飞, 许校博, 李昱霖, 郭瑞. 烟草不同轮作模式碳足迹及经济效益评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(4): 733-747.
[13]	周广飞, 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 宋旭东, 张振良, 陆虎华, 郝德荣, 冒宇翔, 薛林, 陈国清. 玉米苞叶性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(3): 431-442.
[14]	张琦, 薛芙珍, 杨秀洁, 姜苏洋, 黄雪娟, 马佳怡, 张哲文, 徐杰飞. 大豆烟酰胺酶GmNIC1在盐碱胁迫下的功能研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(24): 5128-5142.
[15]	马鹤逍, 葛国龙, 张向前, 路战远, 王满秀, 戎美仁, 师晶晶, 张德健, 孙雪萍. 不同作物轮作系统对土壤易氧化有机碳和碳库活度差异性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(24): 5201-5215.