中国农业科学

• • 上一篇    

最新录用:基于消费者喜好性评价宰后不同阶段羊肉食用品质差异

葛岳1,张德权1,李少博1,陈丽1,郑晓春1,梁策1,颜统晶1,李金活2,王振宇1*
  

  1. 1中国农业科学院农产品加工研究所/农业农村部农产品质量安全收贮运管控重点实验室,北京 1001932河北金宏清真肉类有限公司,河北保定071000
  • 发布日期:2022-05-11

Eating Quality Evaluation of Lamb in Different Postmortem Phases Based on Consumers’ Sensory Preferences

GE Yue1, ZHANG DeQuan1, LI ShaoBo1, Chen Li1, ZHENG XiaoChun1, LIANG Ce1,YAN TongJing1, LI JinHuo2, WANG ZhenYu1*   

  1. 1 Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Agro-Products Quality and Safety Control in Storage and Transport Process, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193; 2Hebei Jinhong Halal Meat Co., Ltd, Baoding, 071000, Hebei
  • Online:2022-05-11

摘要: 【目的】基于消费者喜好性评价,探究宰后不同阶段羊肉食用品质差异,明确僵直前期、最大僵直期、解僵成熟期羊肉涮制、烤制、煮制、炒制特性,为我国羊肉食用品质科学评价和优质羊肉生产提供参考。【方法】选取8月龄小尾寒羊僵直前期、最大僵直期、解僵成熟期的牡蛎、外脊、霖肉、米龙4个部位肉,经涮制、烤制、煮制、炒制后进消费者喜好性评价,对羊肉的嫩度、多汁性、风味、总体喜好进行评分,利用线性判别分析确定羊肉食用品质综合评价方程(Meat Quality, 4 variables , MQ4)和等级划分方法,分析不同烹饪方式下宰后不同阶段羊肉消费者喜好性评分和食用品质等级。【结果】羊肉涮制后,僵直前期外脊和米龙嫩度、风味、总体喜好、食用品质综合得分MQ4)高于最大僵直期和解僵成熟期的样品P0.05,宰后不同阶段牡蛎和霖肉消费者评分差异不显著P0.05。羊肉烤制后,僵直前期牡蛎和解僵成熟期米龙的嫩度总体喜好性、MQ4评分高于最大僵直期的样品P0.05宰后不同阶段外脊和霖肉消费者评分差异不显著P0.05。羊肉煮制后,解僵成熟期的霖肉多汁性、总体喜好性评分高于僵直前期和最大僵直期的样品P0.05),宰后不同阶段牡蛎、外脊、米龙消费者评分差异不显著P0.05)。羊肉炒制后,僵直前期和解僵成熟期的牡蛎嫩度、总体喜好性、MQ4评分高于最大僵直期的样品P0.05),僵直前期的外脊嫩度、风味、总体喜好性、MQ4评分高于最大僵直期和解僵成熟期的样品P0.05,宰后不同阶段的霖肉和米龙消费者评分差异不显著(P0.05)。僵直前期5星级:0%8.33%4星级:47.83%72.22%)与解僵成熟期5星级:0%8.70%4星级:52.78%58.33%的羊肉经涮制、烤制、煮制、炒制后优级(5星级)和良好级(4星级)的比例高于最大僵直期的样品(5星级:0%4星级:35.90%47.83%),僵直前期与解僵成熟期的羊肉没有出现消费者不满意(2星级)的样品,最大僵直期的羊肉烤制和煮制后分别有4.17%4.35%的样品为2星级。【结论】基于消费者喜好性评价研究,僵直前期和解僵成熟期的羊肉经涮制、烤制、煮制、炒制烹饪后的食用品质得分、优级和良好级肉的比例高于最大僵直期的样品,僵直前期和解僵成熟期的羊肉均受消费者的青睐


关键词: 羊肉, 食用品质, 消费者评价, 宰后不同阶段, 烹饪方式

Abstract: 【ObjectiveThe eating quality of lamb in pre-rigor, rigor mortis and post-rigor phases was investigated using consumers’ sensory evaluation to understand the differences of eating quality characteristics of lamb in different postmortem phases under instant boiling, roasting, boiling and stir-frying conditions, which was expected to provide reference for lamb quality evaluation and high-quality meat production.MethodThe oyster cut, short loin, knuckle and silverside in per-rigor, rigor mortis and post-rigor phases were obtained from Small-tail Han sheep (male, 8 months old). The sensory attributes (including tenderness, juiciness, flavor and overall liking) of lamb after instant boiling, roasting, boiling and stir-frying were evaluated by consumers. The MQ4 (Meat Quality, 4 variables) equation and the grades boundaries were determined by linear discriminant analysis, which were used to analyze the preference score and eating quality grade of lamb.ResultAfter instant boiling, the short loin and silverside in pre-rigor had higher tenderness, flavor and MQ4 scores than those in rigor mortis and post-rigor phases (P0.05), and there was no significant difference in consumers’ scores of oyster cut and knuckle in different postmortem phases (P0.05). After roasting, the oyster cut in per-rigor and the silverside in post-rigor phase had higher tenderness, juiciness, overall liking and MQ4 scores than those in rigor mortis (P0.05), and there was no significant difference in consumers’ scores of short loin and knuckle in different postmortem phases (P0.05). After boiling, the juiciness and overall liking scores of knuckle in post-rigor were higher than those in per-rigor and rigor mortis phases (P0.05), and there was no significant difference in consumers’ scores of oyster cut, short loin and silverside in different postmortem phases (P0.05). After stir-frying, the tenderness, overall liking and MQ4 scores of oyster cut in pre-rigor and post-rigor were higher than those in rigor mortis, and the tenderness, flavor, overall liking and MQ4 scores of short loin in pre-rigor were higher than those in rigor mortis and post-rigor (P0.05). There was no significant difference in consumers’ scores of knuckle and silverside in different postmortem phases (P0.05). The premium quality (4star) and good quality (5star) samples were higher in pre-rigor (5star: 0%-8.33%; 4star: 47.83%-72.22%) and post-rigor (5star: 0%-8.70%: 4star: 52.78%-58.33%) There were no unsatisfactory quality (2star) samples in pre-rigor and post-rigor phases, while 4.17% and 4.35% of the samples in rigor mortis were 2star after roasting and boiling respectively. ConclusionIn general, pre-rigor and post-rigor lamb had a superior eating quality to rigor mortis lamb based on consumers’ sensory evaluation, and pre-rigor and post-rigor lamb were preferred by Chinese consumers.


Key words: lamb, eating quality, consumers’ sensory evaluation, different postmortem phases, cooking methods