中国农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (21): 4451-4466.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.21.014

• 豇豆“两虫一病”绿色防控研究与实践创新 • 上一篇    下一篇

2020—2025年海南冬春季豇豆害虫种类调查及其发生危害规律

吴明月1(), 甫秋梅1, 黄圣琳2,3, 罗丰1, 刘勇1, 史彩华4, 张友军3, 孔祥义1(), 谢文2,3()   

  1. 1 三亚市热带农业科学研究院,海南三亚 572000
    2 三亚中国农业科学院国家南繁研究院,海南三亚 572024
    3 中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所/蔬菜生物育种全国重点实验室,北京 100081
    4 湖北文理学院现代农业研究院,湖北襄阳 441053
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-02 接受日期:2025-08-25 出版日期:2025-11-01 发布日期:2025-11-06
  • 通信作者:
    孔祥义,E-mail:
    谢文,E-mail:
  • 联系方式: 吴明月,E-mail:wumingyuecaas2021@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2024YFD1400100); 三亚崖州湾科技城科技专项(SCKJ-JYRC-2023-46); 三亚崖州湾科技城科技专项(SKJC-2022-PTDX-017); 海南省科技专项(ZDYF2024XDNY250)

Investigation on Species Composition and Damage Dynamics of Cowpea Pests in Hainan Winter-Spring Cropping System (2020-2025)

WU MingYue1(), FU QiuMei1, HUANG ShengLin2,3, LUO Feng1, LIU Yong1, SHI CaiHua4, ZHANG YouJun3, KONG XiangYi1(), XIE Wen2,3()   

  1. 1 Sanya Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Sanya 572000, Hainan
    2 National Nanfan Research Institute (Sanya), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya 572024, Hainan
    3 Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Beijing 100081
    4 Institute of Advanced Agricultural Science, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441053, Hubei
  • Received:2025-07-02 Accepted:2025-08-25 Published:2025-11-01 Online:2025-11-06

摘要:

【目的】明确海南豇豆主产区主要害虫种类及发生危害规律,揭示不同种植模式和管理措施对害虫群落结构的影响,为制定精准防控策略提供理论依据。【方法】通过植株目测法与色板诱集法,于2020—2025年对海南豇豆种植区冬春季豇豆上害虫种类及优势种进行系统调查,并对比不同管理模式(施药与未施药)及不同种植模式(露地、半围网、全围网)下害虫的种群动态。【结果】(1)共发现海南豇豆害虫16种,隶属6目9科,其中未施药豇豆田害虫种类丰富(6目9科16种),以豆大蓟马、花蓟马、三叶草斑潜蝇、甜菜夜蛾、豆蚜为主;常规施药田害虫种类减少(4目5科10种),仅蓟马和斑潜蝇为主要害虫。(2)无论施药与否,蓟马和斑潜蝇在豇豆全生育期均有发生,蓟马种群数量显著较高,在苗期少、爬蔓期持续增长、开花期伴随花期高峰呈现多个蓟马种群高峰;斑潜蝇于2021年1—3月大量发生,2024—2025年仅零星发生危害。(3)露地和半围网种植模式下,害虫种类相近,均以蓟马和斑潜蝇为主,其中蓟马以豆大蓟马为优势种,斑潜蝇以三叶草斑潜蝇为优势种,蓟马一般在次年1月左右暴发,半围网模式偶有年份叶螨暴发;相比露地和半围网种植模式,全围网种植模式下害虫种类相对较少,仅蓟马占比高达约66%,温度较高的生长后期(即次年1—3月)烟粉虱和二斑叶螨种群数量上升明显。总之,蓟马在豇豆整个生育期危害最重,影响其产量与品质,偶有年份斑潜蝇和二斑叶螨亦造成较重危害,其他害虫危害较轻。【结论】海南豇豆害虫种类较多,以蓟马类害虫危害最重,露地种植模式害虫发生较重,围网田块害虫危害相对较轻;围网可有效阻隔部分害虫,但全围网种植模式受高温高湿等微环境影响,烟粉虱、叶螨等害虫在豇豆生育后期暴发概率较大。

关键词: 豇豆, 害虫种类, 优势种, 发生规律, 种植管理模式, 海南省

Abstract:

【Objective】This study aimed to identify the species composition and population dynamics of major pests in the main cowpea-producing areas of Hainan, and to evaluate the effects of different planting patterns and cultivation managements on the pest community structure, thus providing a theoretical basis for developing precise control strategies. 【Method】Systematic investigations were conducted on the pest species and dominant pests on cowpeas during the winter-spring seasons from 2020 to 2025 in Hainan cowpea planting areas, using plant visual inspection and colored sticky trap methods. The population dynamics of pests were compared under different management practices (non-pesticide-treated and conventionally pesticide-treated) and different cultivation modes (open-field, semi-enclosed, and fully-enclosed). 【Result】(1) A total of 16 pest species infesting cowpea were identified in Hainan Province, which belonged to 6 orders, 9 families. In non-pesticide-treated cowpea fields, a higher diversity of pests was observed (6 orders, 9 families, 16 species), with the dominant species being Megalurothrips usitatus, Frankliniella intonsa, Liriomyza trifolii, Spodoptera exigua, and Aphis craccivora. In contrast, conventional pesticide-treated fields exhibited reduced pest diversity (4 orders, 5 families, 10 species), with thrips and leafminers remaining as the predominant pests. (2) Regardless of pesticide application, thrips and leafminers were present throughout the entire cowpea growth cycle. Thrips populations were significantly higher, showing low numbers at the seedling stage, a continuous increase during vine elongation, and multiple population peaks during the flowering stage coinciding with bloom. Leafminers were abundant from January to March in 2021, but caused only sporadic damage during 2024-2025. (3) Under both open-field and semi-enclosed planting modes, the pest species composition was similar, primarily consisting of thrips and leafminers, with M. usitatus as the dominant thrips species and L. trifolii as the dominant leafminer species. Thrips outbreaks generally occurred around January of the following year, while spider mite outbreaks were occasionally observed in semi-enclosed planting mode in certain years. Compared with open-field and semi-enclosed modes, the species of pests in the fully-enclosed planting mode were relatively few, and only thrips accounted for approximately 66% of the total pest population. During the later growth stages under higher temperatures (i.e., January to March of the following year), populations of Bemisia tabaci and Tetranychus urticae increased significantly. In conclusion, thrips caused the most severe damage throughout the cowpea growth cycle, significantly affecting both yield and quality. In some years, leafminers and T. urticae also inflicted considerable damage, while other pests were less detrimental. 【Conclusion】There are many kinds of pests in cowpea in Hainan, among which thrips are the most serious. The occurrence of pests in open-field planting mode is more serious, and the damage of pests in net-enclosed field is relatively light. The net-enclosed mode can effectively block some pests, but the fully-enclosed planting mode is affected by the micro-environment such as high temperature and high humidity, and the probability of outbreak of B. tabaci, T. urticae and other pests in the late growth stage of cowpea is large.

Key words: cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), pest species, dominant species, occurrence pattern, planting and management mode, Hainan Province