[1] |
BIJMA P, MUIR W M, VAN ARENDONK J A M. Multilevel selection 1: Quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection. Genetics, 2007, 175(1): 277-288. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.062711.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.062711
pmid: 17110494
|
[2] |
MUIR W, SCHINCKEL A. Incorporation of competitive effects in breeding programs to improve productivity and animal well being//7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Montpellier, France, 2002: 14-07.
|
[3] |
MUIR W M, BIJMA P, SCHINCKEL A. Multilevel selection with kin and non-kin groups, experimental results with Japanese quail (coturnix japonica). Evolution, 2013, 67(6): 1598-1606. doi: 10.1111/evo.12062.
doi: 10.1111/evo.12062
pmid: 23730755
|
[4] |
HERRERA-CÁCERES W, SÁNCHEZ J P. Selection for feed efficiency using the social effects animal model in growing Duroc pigs: Evaluation by simulation. Genetics, Selection, Evolution: GSE, 2020, 52(1): 53. doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00572-4.
doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00572-4
|
[5] |
国家畜禽遗传资源委员会组. 中国畜禽遗传资源志-家禽志. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011.
|
|
National Livestock and Poultry Genetic Resources Committee. Animal Genetic Resources in China. Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
|
[6] |
SCHMIDT-NIELSEN K S. Scaling:Why is Animal Size So Important? New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
|
[7] |
THIRUVENKADAN A K, PRABAKARAN R, PANNEERSELVAM S. Broiler breeding strategies over the decades: An overview. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 2011, 67(2): 309-336. doi: 10.1017/S0043933911000328.
doi: 10.1017/S0043933911000328
|
[8] |
MUIR W M, AGGREY S E. Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology. Wallingford: CABI, 2003. doi: 10.1079/9780851996608.0000.
doi: 10.1079/9780851996608.0000
|
[9] |
党李苹, 周雯馨, 刘瑞芳, 白云, 王哲鹏. 略阳乌鸡体重和产蛋数性状遗传参数估计. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(17): 3620-3628. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.17.018.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.17.018
|
|
DANG L P, ZHOU W X, LIU R F, BAI Y, WANG Z P. Estimation of genetic parameters of body weight and egg number traits of Lueyang black-boned chicken. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(17): 3620-3628. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.17.018. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.17.018
|
[10] |
郭军, 曲亮, 窦套存, 王星果, 沈曼曼, 胡玉萍, 王克华. 应用随机回归模型估计蛋鸡体重遗传参数. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(11): 2297-2304. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.11.015.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.11.015
|
|
GUO J, QU L, DOU T C, WANG X G, SHEN M M, HU Y P, WANG K H. Using random regression models to estimate genetic parameters on body weights in layers. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(11): 2297-2304. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.11.015. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.11.015
|
[11] |
ASK B, CHRISTENSEN O F, HEIDARITABAR M, MADSEN P, NIELSEN H M. The predictive ability of indirect genetic models is reduced when culled animals are omitted from the data. Genetics, Selection, Evolution: GSE, 2020, 52(1): 8. doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-0527-x.
doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-0527-x
pmid: 32041518
|
[12] |
PILES M, DAVID I, RAMON J, CANARIO L, RAFEL O, PASCUAL M, RAGAB M, SÁNCHEZ J P. Interaction of direct and social genetic effects with feeding regime in growing rabbits. Genetics, Selection, Evolution: GSE, 2017, 49(1): 58. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0333-2.
doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0333-2
|
[13] |
DAVID I, SÁNCHEZ J P, PILES M. Longitudinal analysis of direct and indirect effects on average daily gain in rabbits using a structured antedependence model. Genetics, Selection, Evolution: GSE, 2018, 50(1): 25. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0395-9.
doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0395-9
pmid: 29747574
|
[14] |
CHU T T, HENRYON M, JENSEN J, ASK B, CHRISTENSEN O F. Statistical model and testing designs to increase response to selection with constrained inbreeding in genomic breeding programs for pigs affected by social genetic effects. Genetics, Selection, Evolution: GSE, 2021, 53(1): 1. doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00598-8.
doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00598-8
pmid: 33397289
|
[15] |
ELLEN E D, VISSCHER J, VAN ARENDONK J A M, BIJMA P. Survival of laying hens: Genetic parameters for direct and associative effects in three purebred layer lines. Poultry Science, 2008, 87(2): 233-239. doi: 10.3382/ps.2007-00374.
doi: 10.3382/ps.2007-00374
pmid: 18212365
|
[16] |
WALSH B, LYNCH M. Evolution and Selection of Quantitative Traits. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198830870.001.0001.
doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198830870.001.0001
|
[17] |
HEIDARITABAR M, BIJMA P, JANSS L, BORTOLUZZI C, NIELSEN H M, MADSEN P, ASK B, CHRISTENSEN O F. Models with indirect genetic effects depending on group sizes: A simulation study assessing the precision of the estimates of the dilution parameter. Genetics, Selection, Evolution: GSE, 2019, 51(1): 24. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0466-6.
doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0466-6
pmid: 31146682
|
[18] |
VILLANUEVA R A M, CHEN Z J. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2019, 17(3): 160-167. doi: 10.1080/15366367.2019.1565254.
doi: 10.1080/15366367.2019.1565254
|
[19] |
MEYER K. WOMBAT: A tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2007, 8(11): 815-821. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2007.B0815.
doi: 10.1631/jzus.2007.B0815
|
[20] |
BIJMA P. The quantitative genetics of indirect genetic effects: A selective review of modelling issues. Heredity, 2014, 112 (1): 61-69. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2013.15.
doi: 10.1038/hdy.2013.15
pmid: 23512010
|
[21] |
ELLEN E D, RODENBURG T B, ALBERS G A A, BOLHUIS J E, CAMERLINK I, DUIJVESTEIJN N, KNOL E F, MUIR W M, PEETERS K, REIMERT I, SELL-KUBIAK E, VAN ARENDONK J A M, VISSCHER J, BIJMA P. The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock. Frontiers in Genetics, 2014, 5: 377. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00377.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00377
pmid: 25426136
|
[22] |
CHEN C Y, MISZTAL I, TSURUTA S, HERRING W O, HOLL J, CULBERTSON M. Influence of heritable social status on daily gain and feeding pattern in pigs. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2010, 127(2): 107-112. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2009.00828.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2009.00828.x
pmid: 20433518
|
[23] |
BESTMAN M, RUIS M, HEIJMANS J, MIDDELKOOP K V. 马闯, 马海艳译. 蛋鸡的信号: 禽业养殖管理实用指南. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2014.
|
|
BESTMAN M, RUIS M, HEIJMANS J, MIDDELKOOP K V. Layer Signals:A Practical Guide for Poultry-Oriented Management. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2014. (in Chinese)
|
[24] |
NIELSEN H M, ASK B, MADSEN P. Social genetic effects for growth in pigs differ between boars and gilts. Genetics, Selection, Evolution: GSE, 2018, 50(1): 4. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0375-0.
doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0375-0
pmid: 29390956
|
[25] |
仲伟鹏, 罗坤, 孟宪红, 陈宝龙, 隋娟, 孔杰, 曹宝祥, 邢群, 栾生. 限制投喂环境下中国对虾体重的间接遗传效应分析. 中国水产科学, 2018, 25(6): 1245-1251. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1118.2018.18015.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1118.2018.18015
|
|
ZHONG W P, LUO K, MENG X H, CHEN B L, SUI J, KONG J, CAO B X, XING Q, LUAN S. An analysis of the indirect genetic effect on the body weight of Fenneropenaeus chinensis under restrictive feeding conditions. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 2018, 25(6): 1245-1251. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1118.2018.18015. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1118.2018.18015
|
[26] |
BRICHETTE I, REYERO M I, GARCı́A C. A genetic analysis of intraspecific competition for growth in mussel cultures. Aquaculture, 2001, 192(2/3/4): 155-169. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00439-7.
doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00439-7
|
[27] |
ALEMU S W, BERG P, JANSS L, BIJMA P. Estimation of indirect genetic effects in group-housed mink (Neovison vison) should account for systematic interactions either due to kin or sex. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2016, 133(1): 43-50. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12163.
doi: 10.1111/jbg.12163
pmid: 25900536
|
[28] |
NÄTT D, AGNVALL B, JENSEN P. Large sex differences in chicken behavior and brain gene expression coincide with few differences in promoter DNA-methylation. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(4): e96376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096376.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096376
|
[29] |
MOROI S, NISHIMURA K, IMAI N, KUNISHIGE K, SATO S, GOTO T. Rapid behavioral assay using handling test provides breed and sex differences in tameness of chickens. Brain and Behavior, 2019, 9(10): e01394. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1394.
doi: 10.1002/brb3.1394
|
[30] |
CANARIO A, BIJMA P. Pig growth is affected by social genetic effects and social litter effects that depend on group size// Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetic Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP). 1-6 August 2010, Leipzig, Germany, 2010: 87-87.
|
[31] |
NIELSEN H, ASK B, CHRISTENSEN O, JANSS L, HEIDARITABAR M, MADSEN P. Social genetic effects for growth in Landrace pigs with varying group sizes//Proceedings of the 11th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 2018: 11-16.
|
[32] |
POULSEN B G, ASK B, NIELSEN H M, OSTERSEN T, CHRISTENSEN O F. Prediction of genetic merit for growth rate in pigs using animal models with indirect genetic effects and genomic information. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2020, 52: 58. doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00578-y.
doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00578-y
|