里岔黑猪和巴里杂交猪达100 kg体重日龄校正系数研究

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.12.015

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】估计里岔黑猪及其与巴克夏杂交猪（巴里猪）达100 kg体重日龄（D100）的校正系数CF和A,并比较两种校正系数的校正效果,为里岔黑猪和其他地方猪种D100的估计提供参考。【方法】以554头里岔黑猪、941头巴里1代和755头巴里2代猪为研究对象,利用润农性能测定系统,收集它们肥育期的体重和日龄数据。根据始测日龄≥60d、始测体重≥25 kg等标准对数据进行质控,质控后的数据用于CF和A的估计。CF是两条直线斜率的比值,其中分子是体重对日龄回归直线的斜率,分母是经过终测点（终测日龄和终测体重）和原点（日龄和体重均为0）直线的斜率。A是体重对日龄一元回归方程的截距,通过拟合体重对日龄的一元回归方程直接得到。校正系数估计出来后,用方差分析来检验性别和群体对校正系数的影响,并把估计的CF和A分别代入各自的校正公式,分别计算D100,即CF和A的校正日龄（D100_CF和D100_A）。通过t检验,比较D100_CF和D100_A之间是否存在显著差异,并计算它们之间的相关系数。然后利用每个个体的体重和日龄,分别建立日龄对体重的回归方程,并根据各自的回归方程计算达100 kg体重的回归日龄（D100_reg）。通过计算D100_CF和D100_A与D100_reg之间的相关系数及其与D100_reg差值的平均数和标准差来比较CF和A的校正效果。最后用另外2个群体的校正系数来校正某个群体,计算D100_CF和D100_A与该群体D100_reg的相关系数来评估校正系数的通用性。【结果】由于性别和群体显著影响校正系数,因此需要分性别和分群体估计校正系数。里岔黑猪、巴里1代和巴里2代阉公猪（母猪）的校正系数CF分别为1.426（1.346）、1.340（1.389）和1.372（1.380）,A分别为60.65（54.15）、49.92（57.00）和54.25（57.53）。D100_CF和D100_A之间差异不显著（P = 0.3071）,它们之间的相关系数为0.9998（P<0.0001）。D100_CF和D100_A与D100_reg的相关系数均≥0.9917（P<0.0001）,它们与D100_reg差值的平均数分别为-0.1385和-0.2741d,标准差分别为2.5532和2.5446d,差异均不显著（P>0.05）。用另外2个群体的校正系数来校正某个群体,D100_CF和D100_A与该群体D100_reg的相关系数均≥0.9793（P<0.0001）。【结论】本研究估计的D100校正系数CF和A与国家生猪产业体系使用的CF和A有较大差异。CF和A的校正效果没有显著差异,在适当的结测体重范围内,它们的校正效果都非常好。在研究的3个群体中,用另外2个群体的校正系数来校正某个群体的校正效果也非常好,说明里岔黑猪D100的校正系数可以为其他地方猪种D100的估计提供参考。

关键词: 里岔黑猪, 达100 kg体重日龄, 校正系数CF, 校正系数A

Abstract:

【Objective】 The aims of this study were to estimate the correction coefficients CF and A of days to 100 kg (D100) and to compare their correction powers to each other in Licha black pig and its intercross with Berkshire boars, so as to provide a reference of correction coefficients for estimating D100 in Licha black pig and other Chinese indigenous pig breeds. 【Method】 In this study, 554 Licha black pigs with pigs from its intercross with Berkshire boars, including 941 F₁ pigs and 755 F₂ pigs, were randomly selected, and their body weights and ages in days had been automatically collected everyday by Winland performance testing system during their fatting periods. The data quality control was carried out according to the criteria, such as age ≥60 days and body weight ≥25 kg at start testing. Only the data have been passed quality control, which were used to estimate CF and A. CF was the ratio of two slopes, namely, the numerator was the slope of the regression line of weight to age, and the denominator was the slope of the straight line through the end point of performance testing (age and body weight at the testing end) and the original point (both age and weight were 0). A was the intercept of the regression equation of body weight to age, which could be obtained directly by fitting a regression equation of body weight to age. After the correction coefficients were estimated, an analysis of variance was carried out to test whether gender and population had effects on them, and the estimated CF and A were substituted into their respective correction formulae to calculate D100 (D100_CF and D100_A). A t-test was used to test whether there was a significant difference between D100_CF and D100_A, and their correlation coefficient was also calculated. Then, the regression equation of body weight to age for each individual was established, and regressive D100 (D100_reg) for each individual was estimated by its regression equation. The corrected accuracies of CF and A were compared to each other by the correlation coefficients of D100_CF and D100_A with D100_reg, and the means and standard deviations of the differences of D100_CF and D100_A to D100_reg. Finally, the correction coefficients estimated from other two populations were used to estimate D100 in a certain population, and the correlation coefficients of D100_CF and D100_A with D100_reg were calculated to evaluate whether the correction coefficient estimated from one population could be used in other populations. 【Result】 Gender and population had significant effects on the correction coefficients, so it was necessary to estimate the correction coefficient for each gender in each population. CF of stags (gilts) in Licha black pig and the F₁ and F₂ of its intercross with Berkshire boars were 1.426 (1.346), 1.340 (1.389) and 1.372 (1.380), respectively, and A were 60.65 (54.15), 49.92 (57.00) and 54.25 (57.53), respectively. There was no significant difference between D100_CF and D100_A (P = 0.3071), and their correlation coefficient was 0.9998 (P <0.0001). The correlation coefficients of D100_CF and D100_A with D100_reg were equal or greater than 0.9917 (P<0.0001), there was no significant (P>0.05) between the differences of D100_CF and D100_A to D100_reg. The means of the differences were -0.1385 and -0.2741 days, and the standard deviations were 2.5532 and 2.5446 days, respectively. The correlation coefficients of D100_reg with D100_CF and D100_A, which were adjusted using the correction coefficients estimated from other two populations, were equal or greater than 0.9793 (P < 0.0001). 【Conclusion】 The correction coefficients CF and A of D100 estimated in this study were quite different from their counterparts using in National Swine Industry Technology System. There was no significant difference between the correction powers of CF and A, and both CF and A had a very high correction power under an appropriate range of body weight at the end of performance testing. In the three populations, the correction coefficients from other two populations had a very high correction power to a certain population, which indicated that the correction coefficient of D100 from Licha black pig could be used as a reference to other Chinese indigenous pig breeds.

Key words: Licha Black pig, days to 100 kg, correction coefficient CF, correction coefficient A

郑浩,涂金敏,熊秀萍,张则凯,李龙云,黄黎斌,黄智勇,肖石军,郭源梅. 里岔黑猪和巴里杂交猪达100 kg体重日龄校正系数研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(12): 2493-2501.

ZHENG Hao,TU JinMin,XIONG XiuPing,ZHANG ZeKai,LI LongYun,HUANG LiBin,HUANG ZhiYong,XIAO ShiJun,GUO YuanMei. Estimating the Correction Coefficient of Days to 100 kg in Licha Black Pig and Its Intercross with Berkshire[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(12): 2493-2501.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.12.015

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2020/V53/I12/2493

图/表 6

表1

图1

表2

图2

图3

表3

参考文献 33

[1]	WANG K, DEWU L, JULES H-S, JIE C, CHENGKUN L, ZHENFANG W, MEIYING F, NING L, JIAN-FENG L. Genome wide association analysis reveals new production trait genes in a male duroc population. Plos One, 2015,10(9):e0139207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139207 pmid: 26418247
[2]	彭潇, 尹立林, 梅全顺, 王海燕, 刘小磊, 朱猛进, 李新云, 付亮亮, 赵书红. 猪主要经济性状的基因组选择研究. 畜牧兽医学报, 2019,50(02):215-221.
	PENG X, YIN L L, MEI Q S, WANG H Y, LIU X L, ZHU M J, LI X Y, FU L L, ZHAO S H. A study of genome selection based on the porcine major economic traits. Acta Vetrinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2019,50(02):215-221. (in Chinese)
[3]	全国畜牧兽医总站. 全国种猪遗传评估方案(试行). 北京, 2000: 60.
	National Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Service. National Pig Genetic Evaluate Scheme (test). Beijing, 2000: 60. (in Chinese)
[4]	刘望宏, 张勤, 胡军勇, 倪德斌, 熊远著. 瘦肉型种猪早期生长性状校正公式的制定及评估. 华中农业大学学报, 2010,29(4):469-474. doi: 1000-2421（2010）04-0469-06
	LIU W H, ZHANG Q, HU J Y, NI D B, XIONG Y Z. Desing and evaluation of adjusted equations for early growth performance of commercial breeding swines. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2010,29(4):469-474. (in Chinese) doi: 1000-2421（2010）04-0469-06
[5]	陈斌. 瘦肉型猪的场内遗传评估及遗传分析研究[D]. 长沙:湖南农业大学, 2005.
	CHEN B. Studies on the on-farm genetic evaluation and genetic analysis of lean type swine[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2005. (in Chinese)
[6]	张哲, 张豪, 陈赞谋, 李加琪. 种猪育种性能测定校正公式研究. 中国畜牧杂志, 2015,51(16):49-54.
	ZHANG Z, ZHANG H, CHEN Z M, LI J Q. Development of correction formula for prodcution traits in swine breeding. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2015,51(16):49-54. (in Chinese)
[7]	王林云, 蒙妙枝. 姜曲海猪断奶前后的体重校正方法. 中国畜牧杂志, 1982(2):12-13.
	WANG L Y, MENG M Z. Methods to adjust bodyweight of Jiangquhai pig before and after weaning. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 1982(2):12-13. (in Chinese)
[8]	吕凤林, 黎继华. 内江仔猪体重校正方法的研究. 四川畜牧兽医, 1993(2):1-3.
	LÜ F L, LI J H. A study of the method to adjust bodyweights of Neijiang pig. Sichuan Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 1993(2):1-3. (in Chinese)
[9]	杨岸奇, 吴买生, 向拥军, 陈斌, 李朝辉, 张善文, 刘伟, 吴攀峰. 沙子岭猪生长性状校正公式的制定. 猪业科学, 2015,32(2):132-134.
	YANG A Q, WU M S, XIANG Y J, CHEN B, LI C H, ZHANG S W, LIU W, WU P F. Formulating the adjustment formula for growth trait of Shaziling pig. Swine Industry Science, 2015,32(2):132-134. (in Chinese)
[10]	NY/T 822-2004. 中华人民共和国农业行业标准-种猪生产性能测定规程. 北京: 中华人民共和国农业部, 2004.
	NY/T 822-2004. People's Republic of China agricultural industry standards - Rules for performance testing of breeding pig. Beijing: Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China, 2004. (in Chinese)
[11]	全国生猪遗传改良计划工作小组领导办公室. 关于调整种猪达100 kg体重日龄和达100 kg体重活体背膘厚校正公式的通知. 2016. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11945 pmid: 32354962
	Leading Group of Work Office of China Swine Genetic Improvement Program. Notice on adjusting the calibration formula of days to 100 kg and backfat thickness at 100 kg in vivo for breeding pigs. 2016. (in Chinese) doi: 10.21873/invivo.11945 pmid: 32354962
[12]	GIBSON J P, QUINTON V M, SIMEDREA P. Responses to selection for growth and backfat in closed nucleus herds of Hampshire and Duroc pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 2001,81:17-23. doi: 10.4141/A99-121
[13]	HU B, MO D L, WANG X Y, LIU X H, CHEN Y S. Effects of back fat, growth rate, and age at first mating on Yorkshire and Landrace sow longevity in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016,15(12):2809-2818. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61381-3
[14]	LI F E, LEI M G, ZHENG R, ZUO B, JIANG S W, DENG C Y, XIONG Y Z. The Effects of estrogen receptor locus on reproductive tracts components and performance traits in large white×Meishan F₂ offspring. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2004,17(9):1223-1226. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2004.1223
[15]	WU P, WANG K, YANG Q, ZHOU J, CHEN D, LIU Y, MA J, TANG Q, JIN L, XIAO W, LOU P, JIANG A, JIANG Y, ZHU L, LI M, LI X, TANG G. Whole-genome re-sequencing association study for direct genetic effects and social genetic effects of six growth traits in Large White pigs. Scientific Reports, 2019,9(1):9667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45919-0 pmid: 31273229
[16]	GUO Y, QIU H, XIAO S, WU Z, YANG M, YANG J, REN J, HUANG L. A genome-wide association study identifies genomic loci associated with backfat thickness, carcass weight, and body weight in two commercial pig populations. Journal of Applied Genetics, 2017,58(4):499-508. doi: 10.1007/s13353-017-0405-6 pmid: 28890999
[17]	ABELL C E, MABRY J W, DEKKERS J C M, STALDER K J. Genetic and phenotypic relationships among reproductive and post- weaning traits from a commercial swine breeding company. Livestock Science, 2012,145(1-3):183-188. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.01.017
[18]	KUHLERS D L, JUNGST S B. Correlated responses in reproductive and carcass traits to selection for 200-day weight in Landrace pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 1993,71(3):595-601. doi: 10.2527/1993.713595x pmid: 8463145
[19]	于虹, 雷蕾, 崔超, 王涛. 里岔黑猪品种选育标准技术规范. 猪业科学, 2017,34(3):126-126.
	YU H, LEI L, CUI C, WANG T. Standard technical specification for breeding of Licha black pig. Swine Industry Science, 2017,34(3):126-126. (in Chinese)
[20]	黑立新, 朱应民, 张淑二, 张敏, 刘展生. 里岔黑猪保种现状及研究进展. 养殖与饲料, 2018,5:17-20.
	HEI L X, ZHU Y M, ZHANG S E, ZHANG M, LIU Z S. Current situation of breed conservation and research progress of Licha black pig. Animals Breeding and Feed, 2018,5:17-20. (in Chinese)
[21]	李龙云, 肖石军, 黄黎斌, 黄智勇, 涂金敏, 熊秀萍, 郭源梅, 黄路生. 巴克夏和里岔黑猪不同杂交组合生产性能的比较研究. 畜牧兽医学报, 2018,49(01):26-35.
	LI L Y, XIAO S J, HUANG L B, HUANG Z Y, TU J M, XIONG X P, GUO Y M, HUANG L S. Comparative studies on the productive performances among different crosses of Berkshire and Licha black pig. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2018,49(01):26-35. (in Chinese)
[22]	刘艳花, 郭建华, 李书勋, 纪志和. 关于加快里岔黑猪新品种研究开发的思考. 山东畜牧兽医, 2017,38(06):20-21.
	LIU Y H, GUO J H, LI S X, JI Z H. Thoughts on accelerating the research and development of new breed using Licha black pig. Shandong Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2017, 38(06):20-21. (in Chinese)
[23]	陈鹏, 杨在宾, 张庆, 姜淑贞. 里岔黑猪与“杜长大”三元猪生长性能和免疫性能的对比研究. 猪业科学, 2017,34(1):131-133.
	CHEN P, YANG Z B, ZHANG Q, JIANG S Z. Comparative the growth and immunity performances of Licha black pig to Duroc× Landrace×Yorkshire pigs. Swine Industry Science, 2017,34(1):131-133. (in Chinese)
[24]	GUO J F, WU Y, HU H M, WANG J Y. Studies on carcass performance and meat quality and its changes with body weight of finishing pigs. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2008,21(2):460-463.
[25]	CHOI Y M, OH H K. Carcass performance, muscle fiber, meat quality, and sensory quality characteristics of crossbred pigs with different live weights. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 2016,36(3):389-396. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.3.389 pmid: 27433110
[26]	PARK M J, HA D M, SHIN H W, LEE S H, KIM W K, HA S H, YANG H S, JEONG J Y, JOO S T, LEE C Y. Growth Efficiency, Carcass Quality Characteristics and Profitability of 'High'-Market Weight Pigs. Journal of Animal Science & Technology, 2007,49(4):459-470.
[27]	KIM Y S, KIM S W, WEAVER M A, LEE C Y. Increasing the pig market weight: world trends, expected consequences and practical considerations. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2005,18(4):590-600. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2005.590
[28]	CORREA J A, FAUCITANO L, LAFOREST J P, RIVEST J, MARCOUX M. Effects of slaughter weight on carcass composition and meat quality in pigs of two different growth rates. Meat Science, 2006,72(1):91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.06.006 pmid: 22061378
[29]	PARK B C, LEE C Y. Feasibility of increasing the slaughter weight of finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science & Technology, 2011,53(3):211-222.
[30]	NSIF. Guidelines for Uniform Swine Improvement Programs. Washington D. C. USA. 1996.
[31]	YUN H C, MAHBOOB A, CHO C I, CHOI J G, CHOI I S, CHOI T J, CHO K H, PARK B H. Genetic parameters of pre-adjusted body weight growth and ultrasound measures of body tissue development in three seedstock pig breed populations in Korea. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2015,28(12):1696-1702. doi: 10.5713/ajas.14.0971 pmid: 26580436
[32]	GUO Y, HUANG Y, HOU L, MA J, CHEN C, AI H, HUANG L, REN J. Genome-wide detection of genetic markers associated with growth and fatness in four pig populations using four approaches. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2017,49(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0295-4
[33]	BOLLEN P J, MADSEN L W, MEYER O, RITSKES-HOITINGA J. Growth differences of male and female Gottingen minipigs during ad libitum feeding: a pilot study. Laboratory Animal, 2005,39(1):80-93.

群体 Population	系数 Coefficient	性别 Gender	样本数 n	平均数 Mean	标准差 Std.	最小值 Min.	最大值 Max.
里岔黑猪 Licha black pig	A	♂	22	60.65	26.17	5.71	91.81
	A	♀	182	54.15	25.23	-32.12	138.26
	CF	♂	22	1.426	0.211	1.030	1.708
	CF	♀	182	1.346	0.191	0.870	2.082
巴里1代 F₁ of Berkshire × Licha black pig	A	♂	31	49.92	21.43	-4.58	81.33
	A	♀	613	57.00	18.77	-42.72	112.61
	CF	♂	31	1.340	0.170	0.979	1.632
	CF	♀	613	1.389	0.166	0.834	2.024
巴里2代 F₂ of Berkshire × Licha black pig	A	♂	64	54.25	19.07	-1.10	87.49
	A	♀	432	57.53	21.50	-32.12	138.26
	CF	♂	64	1.372	0.162	0.995	1.699
	CF	♀	432	1.380	0.174	0.870	2.082

群体 Population	性别 Gender	头数 No	平均数 Mean	标准差 sd.	最小值 Min.	最大值 Max.
里岔黑猪 Licha black pig	♂	22	223.25	18.52	189.96	265.41
里岔黑猪 Licha black pig	♀	182	237.80	18.89	192.90	285.89
巴里1代 F₁ of Berkshire × Licha black pig	♂	31	200.32	12.45	179.95	230.12
巴里1代 F₁ of Berkshire × Licha black pig	♀	613	209.37	15.77	171.17	268.98
巴里2代 F₂ of Berkshire × Licha black pig	♂	64	206.67	17.16	174.14	241.33
巴里2代 F₂ of Berkshire × Licha black pig	♀	432	215.44	17.46	170.05	274.46

来源群体Original population	校正系数Correction coefficient	LC	BL1	BL2
里岔黑猪 Licha black pig (LC)	A	-	0.9793	0.9794
里岔黑猪 Licha black pig (LC)	CF	-	0.9800	0.9800
巴里1代 F₁ of Berkshire × Licha black pig (BL1)	A	0.9904	-	0.9908
巴里1代 F₁ of Berkshire × Licha black pig (BL1)	CF	0.9905	-	0.9907
巴里2代 F₂ of Berkshire × Licha black pig (BL2)	A	0.9930	0.9935	-
巴里2代 F₂ of Berkshire × Licha black pig (BL2)	CF	0.9932	0.9937	-