基于电磁感应仪的田间土壤盐渍度及其空间分布定量评估

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2008.02.020

中国农业科学 ›› 2008, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 460-469 .doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2008.02.020

• 土壤肥料·节水灌溉·农业生态环境 • 上一篇下一篇

基于电磁感应仪的田间土壤盐渍度及其空间分布定量评估

姚荣江,杨劲松,邹平,刘广明,余世鹏

中国科学院南京土壤研究所

收稿日期:2007-05-21 修回日期:2007-06-18 出版日期:2008-02-10 发布日期:2008-02-10
通讯作者: 杨劲松

Quantitative evaluation of the field soil salinity and its spatial distribution based on electromagnetic induction instruments

Rong-jiang YAO Jing-song YANG Guang-Ming LIU Ping ZOU Shi-peng YU

中国科学院南京土壤研究所

Received:2007-05-21 Revised:2007-06-18 Online:2008-02-10 Published:2008-02-10
Contact: Jing-song YANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】阐明黄河三角洲地区土壤盐渍化空间变异特征，探讨利用电磁感应仪定量评估田间土壤盐渍化的空间分布。【方法】运用电磁感应仪(EM38和EM31)及其移动测定系统，结合GIS和地统计学方法, 研究了该地区典型地块土壤盐分与磁感表观电导率间的响应关系，分析了表观电导率的空间变异特征，并对土壤盐分空间分布进行了定量评价。【结果】土壤表观电导率与盐分含量具有良好的相关性，采用EM38h＋EM31h的优化测定组合可以提高土壤盐分的解译精度；表观电导率EM38h、EM31h的空间变异结构都表现出复合的尺度效应，较好地符合球状套合模型；EM31h的空间自相关程度强于EM38h，短程变异是构成EM38h、EM31h空间异质性的最主要部分；结构性因素是主导土壤盐分空间分布格局的最直接因素，随机性因素是加快盐分分布格局形成的重要因素。由盐渍化分级可知：研究区总体属于重度盐化土类型，且呈现一定的盐分表聚趋势；各土层中几乎不存在非盐化土，盐土与重度盐化土是最主要的土壤类型。【结论】该研究结果为不同尺度(从农田到区域)土壤属性调查与质量评价提供参考依据，并为农业水土资源的高效利用提供指导。

关键词: 电磁感应仪, 土壤盐渍度, 空间分布, 定量评价, 黄河三角洲

Abstract: Taking into account the problem of salinization existing in Lower Yellow River Delta, with the application of electromagnetic induction instruments (EM38 and EM31) and their mobile sensing system, response relation between apparent soil electrical conductivity and soil salinity in typical field of the Yellow River Delta was analyzed by using GIS and geostatistics, then the spatial variability of soil salinity characterized by apparent soil electrical conductivity was discussed and spatial distribution of soil salinity was further evaluated quantitatively. Results indicated that apparent soil electrical conductivity was well correlated with salinity, and interpretation accuracy of soil salinity at different layers could be improved when adopting the optimal combination of EM38h and EM31h. Apparent soil electrical conductivity EM38h and EM31h both exhibited moderate spatial variation, and nested spherical models were fitted for semivariance of EM38h and EM31h because of the compound scale effect of their spatial structures. Spatial autocorrelation of EM31h was better than that of EM38h, and short-range variation was the chief constitute of spatial heterogeneity for both EM38h and EM31h. Spatial distribution pattern of soil salinity was directly controlled by structural factors, while stochastic factors were of importance for the formation of spatial distribution patterns. Salinization classification showed that heavy salinized soil was the predominant soil type as a whole and soil salinity exhibited the trend of top enrichment in the study area. The predominant soil types were saline soil and heavy salinized soil while the distribution area of desalinized soil was negligible at all layers. The research results provided a reference for the survey and quality evaluation of soil properties at different scales ranging from farms to regional levels, and it could be used as the guide for the efficient utilization of agricultural water-soil resources.

Key words: electromagnetic induction instrument, soil salinization, spatial distribution, quantitative evaluation, Yellow River Delta

姚荣江,杨劲松,邹平,刘广明,余世鹏. 基于电磁感应仪的田间土壤盐渍度及其空间分布定量评估[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(2): 460-469 .

Rong-jiang YAO Jing-song YANG Guang-Ming LIU Ping ZOU Shi-peng YU. Quantitative evaluation of the field soil salinity and its spatial distribution based on electromagnetic induction instruments[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(2): 460-469 .

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2008.02.020

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2008/V41/I2/460

[1]	余维宝,李楠,寇一泓,曹新有,司纪升,韩守威,李豪圣,张宾,王法宏,张海林,赵鑫,李华伟. 山东省强筋小麦品质评价及与气象因子关系分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(22): 4383-4397.
[2]	申哲,张认连,龙怀玉,徐爱国. 基于机器学习方法的宁夏南部土壤质地空间分布研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(15): 2961-2972.
[3]	任俊波,杨雪丽,陈平,杜青,彭西红,郑本川,雍太文,杨文钰. 种间距离对玉米-大豆带状套作土壤理化性状及根系空间分布的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(10): 1903-1916.
[4]	李少华,王云鹏,王荣成,尹萍,李向东,郑方强. 玉米田桃蛀螟幼虫的空间分布型与抽样技术[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(10): 1961-1970.
[5]	孙丽娟，胡学旭，陆伟，王步军. 基于GIS的小麦籽粒品质空间分布特征和影响因子分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(5): 999-1011.
[6]	李彤，王梓廷，刘露，廖允成，刘杨，韩娟. 保护性耕作对西北旱区土壤微生物空间分布及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(5): 859-870.
[7]	陈彦清，曹永生，陈丽娜，方沩. 基于地统计分析方法的谷子种质资源品质与农艺相关性状的空间分区研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(14): 2658-2669.
[8]	苏永中1, 杨荣, 刘文杰, 杨晓, 王敏. 基于土壤条件的边缘绿洲典型灌区灌溉需水研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(6): 1128-1139.
[9]	冯国艺, 罗宏海, 姚炎帝, 杨美森, 杜明伟, 张亚黎, 张旺锋. 新疆超高产棉花叶、铃空间分布及与群体光合生产的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(13): 2607-2617.
[10]	张锦水,赵莲,陈联裙,胡潭高,董燕生 . 区域总量控制下的冬小麦种植面积空间分布优化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(21): 4384-4391 .
[11]	. 不同氮吸收效率玉米品种的根系构型差异比较：模拟与应用 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(3): 843-853 .
[12]	周海波,陈林,陈巨莲,程登发,刘勇,孙京瑞 . 基于GIS的小麦-豌豆间作对麦长管蚜种群空间格局的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(11): 3904-3913 .
[13]	邓小华,周冀衡,杨虹琦,赵松义,李晓忠,陈新联. 湖南烤烟外观质量量化评价体系的构建与实证分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(9): 2036-2044 .
[14]	刘玉华,张立峰. 不同作物种植方式产出效果的定量评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(04): 709-713 .
[15]	@赵春江$国家农业信息化工程技术研究中心. 田间小麦叶面积空间分布数学模型的建立与应用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(02): 196-196 .

基于电磁感应仪的田间土壤盐渍度及其空间分布定量评估

Quantitative evaluation of the field soil salinity and its spatial distribution based on electromagnetic induction instruments

PDF

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0