Journals
  Publication Years
  Keywords
Search within results Open Search
Please wait a minute...
For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
Large herbivores increase the proportion of palatable species rather than unpalatable species in the plant community
Yu Li, Shikui Dong, Qingzhu Gao, Yong Zhang, Hasbagan Ganjurjav, Guozheng Hu, Xuexia Wang, Yulong Yan, Fengcai He, Fangyan Cheng
2025, 24 (3): 859-870.   DOI: 10.1016/j.jia.2024.08.004
Abstract52)      PDF in ScienceDirect      
When the dominant species in a plant community are palatable, many believe that large herbivores will reduce the dominant species and promote the proportion of previously suppressed species.  However, this view may not always hold true.  We conducted a 4-year yak grazing experiment on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and tracked the plant compositions of the rotational grazing (RG) and grazing exclusion (GE) grasslands during the four years.  The results showed that in the absence of yaks under GE, the plant community was dominated by two palatable species, Kobresia pygmaea and Stipa capillata, due to their small leaf area and rapid growth strategy.  The presence of yaks under RG significantly inhibited Scapillata and over half of the forbs, while the proportion of Kpygmaea increased and it became the absolute dominant species, contradicting the view that large herbivores inhibit palatable species.  Interannually, the dominance of Kpygmaea under RG decreased in the dry year, leading to an increase in the dominance of the other eight species.  Under GE, the dominance of Kpygmaea declined notably in the dry year, while Scapillata and seven other forbs increased substantially.  Overall, these results suggest that Kpygmaea is grazing-tolerant but not drought-tolerant, whereas the other eight species are drought-tolerant but not grazing-tolerant.  At the community level, community composition shifts resulting from succession after grazing exclusion exceeded those caused by drought, drought tends to induce community species turnover while grazing tends to induce species abundance variations.  In summary, our conclusions remind ranch managers that when considering the impact of livestock on plant community composition, they should factor in local conditions and climate change rather than simply assuming that livestock will suppress the palatable species.



Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
Integrated assessment of yield, nitrogen use efficiency and ecosystem economic benefits of use of controlled-release and common urea in ratoon rice production
Zijuan Ding, Ren Hu, Yuxian Cao, Jintao Li, Dakang Xiao, Jun Hou, Xuexia Wang
2024, 23 (9): 3186-3199.   DOI: 10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.038
Abstract106)      PDF in ScienceDirect      
Controlled-release urea (CRU) is commonly used to improve the crop yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE).  However, few studies have investigated the effects of CRU in the ratoon rice system.  Ratoon rice is the practice of obtaining a second harvest from tillers originating from the stubble of the previously harvested main crop.  In this study, a 2-year field experiment using a randomized complete block design was conducted to determine the effects of CRU on the yield, NUE, and economic benefits of ratoon rice, including the main crop, to provide a theoretical basis for fertilization of ratoon rice.  The experiment included four treatments: (i) no N fertilizer (CK); (ii) traditional practice with 5 applications of urea applied at different crop growth stages by surface broadcasting (FFP); (iii) one-time basal application of CRU (BF1); and (iv) one-time basal application of CRU combined with common urea (BF2).  The BF1 and BF2 treatments significantly increased the main crop yield by 17.47 and 15.99% in 2019, and by 17.91 and 16.44% in 2020, respectively, compared with FFP treatment.  The BF2 treatment achieved similar yield of the ratoon crop to the FFP treatment, whereas the BF1 treatment significantly increased the yield of the ratoon crop by 14.81% in 2019 and 12.21% in 2020 compared with the FFP treatment.  The BF1 and BF2 treatments significantly improved the 2-year apparent N recovery efficiency, agronomic NUE, and partial factor productivity of applied N by 11.47–16.66, 27.31–44.49, and 9.23–15.60%, respectively, compared with FFP treatment.  The BF1 and BF2 treatments reduced the chalky rice rate and chalkiness of main and ratoon crops relative to the FFP treatment.  Furthermore, emergy analysis showed that the production efficiency of the BF treatments was higher than that of the FFP treatment.  The BF treatments reduced labor input due to reduced fertilization times and improved the economic benefits of ratoon rice.  Compared with the FFP treatment, the BF1 and BF2 treatments increased the net income by 14.21–16.87 and 23.76–25.96%, respectively.  Overall, the one-time blending use of CRU and common urea should be encouraged to achieve high yield, high nitrogen use efficiency, and good quality of ratoon rice, which has low labor input and low apparent N loss.

Reference | Related Articles | Metrics