中国农业科学 ›› 2008, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 1963-1968 .doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2008.07.011

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

粮食主产区农户采用农业新技术及其影响因素的实证分析 ——以吉林省榆树县为例

李奇峰,张海林,刘武仁,边少锋,陈 阜   

  1. 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院/农业部作物栽培与耕作学重点开放实验室
  • 收稿日期:2007-07-13 修回日期:2007-10-26 出版日期:2008-07-10 发布日期:2008-07-10
  • 通讯作者: 陈 阜

Farmers' acceptance and response to new agricultural technology based on participatory rural appraisal

Qi-Feng LI   

  1. 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院/农业部作物栽培与耕作学重点开放实验室
  • Received:2007-07-13 Revised:2007-10-26 Online:2008-07-10 Published:2008-07-10

摘要: 【目的】为粮食主产区农业新技术的普及提供参考,促进粮食生产能力的提升。【方法】采用参与性农户评估方法(PRA)对东北粮食主产区榆树县245户农户进行了分层随机抽样调查,从农业新技术的接受途径,农户主要的技术需求以及影响农户接受新技术的因素等方面进行分析。【结果】96.3%的被调查农户主要收入来源于种植业;38.4%的农户获取农业新技术主要来源是农业技术推广,64.9%的农户通过向邻居学习来获得农业技术信息;48.2%和51.4%的农户需求新型肥料和新型农机等农业新技术;90.2%的农户认为栽培粗放制约了玉米产量的提高;89.4%的农户对农技推广是很欢迎的,但有近50%的农户得不到推广服务。【结论】粮食主产区农业技术进步需要重点选育抗逆性强的高产品种,研究新型长效肥技术,研制适合单个农户的农业机械以及开发与品种配套的栽培管理模式。农业新技术的推广应注重技术的增产和增收,加大公益性技术推广服务和典型农户的示范带动。

关键词: 参与性农户评估, 农业新技术, 农业技术推广, 粮食生产, 吉林

Abstract: 【Objective】The study examined the issues of household action, policy of agricultural technology extension and development of new agricultural technologies, 【Method】We surveyed 245 farming households in the main grain producing district of Northeast China by means of participatory rural appraisal (PRA), to determine their acceptance and response to new agricultural technologies. from the analysis of farmer behavior, acceptance of agricultural technologies, type of technology in current use and types required, as well as attitude to agro-technical extension. 【Result】 Improvement in income and output were prime factors (accounting for 95 and 53% of respondents) for a farming household to accept a new technology. About 75% of farmers accepted new technologies through agricultural extension and farmer to farmer interaction. More than 96% households have already adopted new cultivars.Although new fertilizers and new agricultural vehicles or equipment are currently being used by only 2.0% and 6.5% of households about half of surveyed farmers consider them useful technologies for their future needs. For maize output, 90% of the households selected extensive cultivation and 60% poor cultivars as factors limiting their production. More than 64% of households is affected by the rising agriculture input prices and none has signed a sales contract. Although the farmers have been completely exempted from agricultural tax, more than 68% of them are still burdened by other taxes. Close to 90% of the farming households welcomed agricultural technology extension, particularly in the off season. One half of households had no access to extension services, but most farmers were satisfied with recent agricultural technology extension services. More than 93% of farmers agreed that the extension worker could deal in agricultural inputs but close to 85% felt that prices were too high.

Key words: participatory rural appraisal, grain production, new agricultural technology, extension, farmers