斜纹夜蛾对乙基多杀菌素的抗性监测及抗性遗传方式

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.18.008

中国农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (18): 4048-4055.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.18.008

• 专题：面向农业害虫精准防控的机制解析、技术优化与决策支撑 • 上一篇下一篇

斜纹夜蛾对乙基多杀菌素的抗性监测及抗性遗传方式

李皓¹^,²(), 高新菊³(), 卢鹏¹^,², 詹千缘⁴, 王然², 苏奇¹(), 渠成²()

¹ 长江大学农学院，湖北荆州 434025
² 北京市农林科学院植物保护研究所，北京 100097
³ 河南省农业科学院植物保护研究所，郑州 450002
⁴ 孝感市农业科学院，湖北孝感 432000

收稿日期:2026-04-02 接受日期:2026-05-10 出版日期:2026-09-16 发布日期:2026-09-20
通信作者:
苏奇，E-mail：qsu@yangtzeu.edu.cn。
渠成，E-mail：quch1990@sina.com。
联系方式: 李皓，E-mail：an1052465448@qq.com。高新菊，E-mail：gaoxj19@126.com。李皓和高新菊为同等贡献作者。
基金资助:
国家特色蔬菜产业技术体系(CARS-24-C-03)

Resistance Monitoring and Inheritance of Resistance to Spinetoram in Spodoptera litura

LI Hao¹^,²(), GAO XinJu³(), LU Peng¹^,², ZHAN QianYuan⁴, WANG Ran², SU Qi¹(), QU Cheng²()

¹ College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, Hubei
² Institute of Plant Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097
³ Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002
⁴ Xiaogan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xiaogan 432000, Hubei

Received:2026-04-02 Accepted:2026-05-10 Published:2026-09-16 Online:2026-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】明确田间斜纹夜蛾（Spodoptera litura）种群对乙基多杀菌素（spinetoram）的抗性现状及抗性机制，为田间抗性预警和综合抗性治理策略的制定提供科学依据。【方法】于2023—2024年，采集我国23个斜纹夜蛾田间种群，采用浸叶法测定其对乙基多杀菌素的抗性水平；以广西南宁高抗种群（NN）和敏感品系（SS）为亲本，设置正交、反交及混交试验，通过对各处理F₁代幼虫进行生物测定，明确其抗性遗传模式；测定马来酸二乙酯（diethyl maleate，DEM）、胡椒基丁醚（piperonyl butoxide，PBO）和磷酸三苯酯（triphenyl phosphate，TPP）等增效剂的增效作用，并测定抗性种群NN和敏感品系SS的羧酸酯酶（CarE）、谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶（GST）和细胞色素P450单加氧酶（P450）活性。【结果】田间抗性监测结果显示，不同地理种群斜纹夜蛾对乙基多杀菌素的抗性存在显著差异。2023年广西南宁（NN）、福建福州（FZ）种群和2024年海南三亚（SY）、云南昆明（KM）、山东潍坊（WF）、河南许昌（XC）种群均表现出高水平抗性，抗性倍数介于43.3—107.8，其中2023年广西南宁（NN）和2024年海南三亚（SY）的抗性倍数分别达106.8和107.8；2023年浙江宁波（NB）、湖北荆州（JZ）种群和2024年福建福州（FZ）、湖北荆州（JZ）、广东广州（GZ）、湖南长沙（CS）、江苏南京（NJ）、上海（SH）、广西桂林（GL）种群对乙基多杀菌素产生中等水平抗性，抗性倍数介于10.3—31.8；2023年浙江杭州（HZ）种群和2024年江西南昌（NC）、安徽合肥（HF）、北京（BJ）和浙江杭州（HZ）种群产生低水平抗性，抗性倍数介于5.0—8.9。抗性遗传方式结果表明，抗性种群NN对乙基多杀菌素的抗性为常染色体介导的不完全隐性遗传。增效剂马来酸二乙酯和磷酸三苯酯的增效比分别为1.8和1.5，对抗性种群NN的抗性具有抑制作用；NN种群中GST和CarE活性分别为敏感品系SS的4.1和3.5倍。【结论】我国多个地区的斜纹夜蛾种群已对乙基多杀菌素产生抗性，GST和CarE活性增强是其抗性形成的重要因素。

关键词: 斜纹夜蛾, 乙基多杀菌素, 抗性监测, 不完全隐性遗传, 增效作用, 抗性治理

Abstract:

【Objective】This study aims to clarify the current resistance status and underlying mechanisms of field populations of Spodoptera litura to spinetoram, and to provide a scientific basis for field resistance monitoring and the development of integrated resistance management (IRM) strategies.【Method】From 2023 to 2024, 23 field populations of S. litura were collected across China. The resistance levels to spinetoram were determined using the leaf-dipping method. The highly resistant Nanning (NN) population and the susceptible strain (SS) were subjected to reciprocal crosses and mass crosses, and the F₁ progeny larvae were bioassayed to analyze the resistance inheritance pattern. The synergistic effects of piperonyl butoxide (PBO), diethyl maleate (DEM), and triphenyl phosphate (TPP) were evaluated, and the activities of carboxylesterase (CarE), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (P450) were measured in both the NN and SS strains.【Result】Field resistance monitoring revealed significant variation in spinetoram resistance among different geographic populations of S. litura. High-level resistance (43.3- to 107.8-fold) was detected in populations from Nanning (Guangxi) and Fuzhou (Fujian) in 2023, and from Sanya (Hainan), Kunming (Yunnan), Weifang (Shandong), and Xuchang (Henan) in 2024. Notably, the resistance ratios for the Nanning (2023) and Sanya (2024) populations reached 106.8- and 107.8-fold, respectively. Moderate resistance levels were observed in the 2023 Ningbo (Zhejiang) and Jingzhou (Hubei) populations, as well as the 2024 Fuzhou (Fujian), Jingzhou (Hubei), Guangzhou (Guangdong), Changsha (Hunan), Nanjing (Jiangsu), Shanghai, and Guilin (Guangxi) populations, with resistance ratios ranging from 10.3- to 31.8-fold. Low resistance levels were found in the 2023 Hangzhou (Zhejiang) population and the 2024 Nanchang (Jiangxi), Hefei (Anhui), Beijing, and Hangzhou (Zhejiang) populations, with resistance ratios between 5.0- and 8.9-fold. Inheritance analysis showed that resistance to spinetoram in the NN population was controlled by an autosomal, incompletely recessive gene. The synergists DEM and TPP exhibited synergistic ratios of 1.8 and 1.5, respectively, suppressing resistance in the NN population. Moreover, the activities of GST and CarE in the NN population were 4.1- and 3.5-fold higher than those in the susceptible strain, respectively.【Conclusion】Resistance to spinetoram has developed in S. litura populations across multiple regions. Enhanced activities of GST and CarE play important roles in the resistance of S. litura to spinetoram.

Key words: Spodoptera litura, spinetoram, resistance monitoring, incompletely recessive inheritance, synergism, resistance management

李皓, 高新菊, 卢鹏, 詹千缘, 王然, 苏奇, 渠成. 斜纹夜蛾对乙基多杀菌素的抗性监测及抗性遗传方式[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(18): 4048-4055.

LI Hao, GAO XinJu, LU Peng, ZHAN QianYuan, WANG Ran, SU Qi, QU Cheng. Resistance Monitoring and Inheritance of Resistance to Spinetoram in Spodoptera litura[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(18): 4048-4055.

图/表 6

表1

表2

表3

图1

表4

表5

参考文献 29

[1]	Li W, Yang W, Shi Y, Yang X, Liu S, Liao X, Shi L. Comprehensive analysis of the overexpressed cytochrome P450-based insecticide resistance mechanism in Spodoptera litura[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2024, 461: 132605. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132605
[2]	Mei W J, Yang G Q, Ye G F, Yang Y H, Wu Y D. Differential contributions of the ryanodine receptor I4723M and I4723K mutations to diamide resistance in Spodoptera litura[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2025, 208: 106292. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2025.106292
[3]	Cheng T C, Wu J Q, Wu Y Q, Chilukuri R V, Huang L H, Yamamoto K, Feng L, Li W S, Chen Z W, Guo H Z, Liu J Q, Li S L, Wang X X, Peng L, Liu D L, Guo Y B, Fu B H, Li Z Q, Liu C, Chen Y H, et al. Genomic adaptation to polyphagy and insecticides in a major east Asian noctuid pest[J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2017, 1(11): 1747-1756.
[4]	吴先福, 郭韫丽, 游秋花, 薛芳森. 中国农业昆虫与害虫防治学科研究热点与趋势分析[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2024, 44(7): 23-31, 38.
	Wu X F, Guo Y L, You Q H, Xue F S. Research hotspots and trend analysis of agricultural insects and pest control in China[J]. China Plant Protection, 2024, 44(7): 23-31, 38. (in Chinese)
[5]	Wang Y, Gao L, Moussian B. Drosophila, chitin and insect pest management[J]. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2020, 26(29): 3546-3553. doi: 10.2174/1381612826666200721002354 pmid: 32693764
[6]	Xie J, Turak R, Liu N, Zhuang Z Y, Liu X N, Song Y. Spinetoram resistance in Tuta absoluta: Selection, inheritance, biochemical mechanism and fitness cost[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2025, 215: 106659. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2025.106659
[7]	孙星, 耿韧华, 闫小龙, 杨邦保, 王冬兰, 葛静, 余向阳. 乙基多杀菌素及其代谢物在水稻上残留及长期膳食风险评估[J]. 农药学学报, 2026, 28(1): 190-196.
	Sun X, Geng R H, Yan X L, Yang B B, Wang D L, Ge J, Yu X Y. Residue and chronic dietary exposure risk assessment of spinetoram and its metabolites in rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2026, 28(1): 190-196. (in Chinese)
[8]	Mocchetti A, Steelant P, Hosseinkhani M, de Rouck S, Khajehali J, van Leeuwen T. Knockout of nAChR subunits in spider mites and their phytoseiid predators confers spinosyn cross-resistance and reveals a conserved mode of action in mites[J]. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2026, 189: 104498. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2026.104498
[9]	杨俊伟, 尹哲, 崔建臣, 赵磊, 王丽, 王洪宇, 李金萍, 董杰. 外源助剂对乙基多杀菌素防治番茄潜叶蛾幼虫的增效作用[J]. 农药, 2025, 64(11): 853-858.
	Yang J W, Yin Z, Cui J C, Zhao L, Wang L, Wang H Y, Li J P, Dong J. Synergistic effect of exogenous adjuvants on spinetoram for control of tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta) larvae[J]. Agrochemicals, 2025, 64(11): 853-858. (in Chinese)
[10]	Gutiérrez-Moreno R, Mota-Sanchez D, Blanco C A, Whalon M E, Terán-Santofimio H, Rodriguez-Maciel J C, DiFonzo C. Field-evolved resistance of the fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to synthetic insecticides in Puerto Rico and Mexico[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2019, 112(2): 792-802. doi: 10.1093/jee/toy372 pmid: 30535077
[11]	Tamilselvan R, Kennedy J S, Suganthi A. Monitoring the resistance and baseline susceptibility of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) against spinetoram in Tamil Nadu, India[J]. Crop Protection, 2021, 142: 105491. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105491
[12]	Li H S, Lin P X, Wang M Z, Dong B B, Gao C F, Wu S F. Insecticide resistance monitoring and identification of ryanodine receptor mutations driving diamide resistance in Cnaphalocrocis medinalis[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2026, 216: 106765. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2025.106765
[13]	潘飞, 秦双, 严春雨, 吉训聪, 谢圣华, 陈绵才. 斜纹夜蛾对15种杀虫剂的抗药性监测[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2014, 36(5): 1042-1047.
	Pan F, Qin S, Yan C Y, Ji X C, Xie S H, Chen M C. Monitoring on the resistance of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) to fifteen kinds of pesticides in Hainan region[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2014, 36(5): 1042-1047. (in Chinese)
[14]	章金明, 张蓬军, 黄芳, 宋亮, 刘敏, 吕要斌, 林小勇, 叶鑫业. 浙江菜区斜纹夜蛾对几类杀虫剂的敏感性[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2014, 26(1): 110-116.
	Zhang J M, Zhang P J, Huang F, Song L, Liu M, Lü Y B, Lin X Y, Ye X Y. Sensitivity to several types of insecticides in field populations of Spodoptera litura in Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2014, 26(1): 110-116. (in Chinese)
[15]	Wang R, Fang Y, Zhang J S, Wang J D, Feng H L, Luo C. Characterization of field-evolved resistance to pyridalyl in a near-isogenic line of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella[J]. Pest Management Science, 2021, 77(3): 1197-1203.
[16]	覃耀, 杜祖仪, 宋璐丹, 马康生, 万虎, 李建洪. 褐飞虱对环氧虫啶的抗性选育和遗传方式[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(5): 288-294, 389.
	Qin Y, Du Z Y, Song L D, Ma K S, Wan H, Li J H. Resistance selection and genetic analysis of Nilaparvata lugens to cycloxaprid[J]. Plant Protection, 2023, 49(5): 288-294, 389. (in Chinese)
[17]	Guo X, Tong Y, Li R, Zhang S R, Zhang D F, Qu C, Ma X L, Wang R. Risk assessment, resistance monitoring and mechanism of field-evolved resistance to broflanilide in the tobacco cutworm, Spodoptera litura[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2026, 218: 106909. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2025.106909
[18]	Qu C, Li Y Y, Zhan Q Y, Wang J D, Luo C, Guedes R N, Wang R. Tetraniliprole risk assessment: Unveiling a hidden threat for managing a generalist herbivore[J]. Environmental Research, 2024, 256: 119273. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119273
[19]	Ming Q, Morrison W R, Zhu K Y, Campbell J F, Scully E D. Effects of synergists on the efficacy of long-lasting insecticide-incorporated netting against Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae)[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2025, 118(2): 948-958. doi: 10.1093/jee/toaf025
[20]	Shi L, Shi Y, Liu M F, Zhang Y, Liao X L. Transcription factor CncC potentially regulates the expression of multiple detoxification genes that mediate indoxacarb resistance in Spodoptera litura[J]. Insect Science, 2021, 28(5):1426-1438. doi: 10.1111/ins.v28.5
[21]	Li Y Y, Qu C, Zhang Q H, Zhang L P, Luo C, Wang R. Baseline susceptibility, cross-resistance, and sublethal effects of broflanilide, a novel meta-diamide pesticide, in Spodoptera litura[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24(6): 5351. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065351
[22]	Roush R T, Combs R L, Randolph T C, MacDonald J, Hawkins J A. Inheritance and effective dominance of pyrethroid resistance in the horn fly (Diptera: Muscidae)[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1986, 79(5): 1178-1182. pmid: 3771907
[23]	Stone B F. A formula for determining degree of dominance in cases of monofactorial inheritance of resistance to chemicals[J]. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 1968, 38(2): 325-326. pmid: 5302309
[24]	徐婷婷, 郜军艺, 陈德慧, 罗贞宝, 臧连生. 四种鳞翅目害虫幼虫期和蛹期雌雄区分的方法[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2026, 63(1): 267-273.
	Xu T T, Gao J Y, Chen D H, Luo Z B, Zang L S. Identifying the sex of the larvae and pupae of four key lepidopteran pests[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2026, 63(1): 267-273. (in Chinese)
[25]	林璐璐, 钟永志, 谢明惠, 张光玲, 陈浩梁. 安徽地区草地贪夜蛾对4种杀虫剂的敏感性监测[J]. 植物保护, 2025, 51(2): 304-308.
	Lin L L, Zhong Y Z, Xie M H, Zhang G L, Chen H L. Sensitivity monitoring of Spodoptera frugiperda to four insecticides in Anhui Province[J]. Plant Protection, 2025, 51(2): 304-308. (in Chinese)
[26]	相栋, 旺珍, 陈翰秋, 杨杰, 德庆卓嘎, 尼玛玉珍. 4种增效剂对3种小菜蛾防治药剂的增效作用[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(4): 310-316.
	Xiang D, Wang Z, Chen H Q, Yang J, Deqing Zhuoga, Nima Yuzhen. Synergisms of four synergists to three insecticides for the control of Plutella xylostella[J]. Plant Protection, 2021, 47(4): 310-316. (in Chinese)
[27]	Lu P, Li R, Guo X, Tang J, Tong Y L, Zhang S R, Su Q, Qu C, Wang R. Resistance mechanisms and fitness outcomes of tetraniliprole, one novel diamide insecticide, in a near-isogenic strain of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2026, 216(2): 106834. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2025.106834
[28]	Soman D, Radhika R, Lakshmanan B, Rajagopal A, Priya M N, Syamala K, George A. Molecular detection of benzimidazole resistance associated with the F200Y polymorphism in the β-tubulin gene of Ancylostoma caninum: First report from India[J]. Acta Parasitologica, 2025, 70(2): 90. doi: 10.1007/s11686-025-01030-1
[29]	Fu B L, Liang J J, Hu J Y, Du T H, Tan Q M, He C, Wei X G, Gong P P, Yang J, Liu S N, Huang M J, Gui L Y, Liu K, Zhou X G, Nauen R, Bass C, Yang X, Zhang Y J. GPCR-MAPK signaling pathways underpin fitness trade-offs in whitefly[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024, 121(28): e2402407121.

种群Population	LC₅₀ (95%置信限CL) (mg·L^-1)	斜率±标准误Slope±SE	卡方值（自由度）χ²(df)	抗性倍数Resistance ratio
SS	0.362 (0.204-0.515)	1.403±0.253	1.089 (3)	—
NB	9.824 (7.740-12.444)	1.964±0.258	0.556 (3)	27.1
HZ	3.204 (2.422-4.146)	1.727±0.249	1.371 (3)	8.9
FZ	18.994 (14.296-25.129)	1.611±0.242	2.228 (3)	52.5
JZ	6.095 (4.900-7.594)	2.173±0.272	0.578 (3)	16.8
NN	38.674 (29.130-53.268)	1.537±0.240	0.162 (3)	106.8
BJ	1.022 (0.817-1.281)	2.099±0.268	0.861 (3)	2.8
YZ	1.522 (1.191-2.026)	1.837±0.259	0.762 (3)	4.2
NC	1.416 (1.036-2.070)	1.370±0.233	0.130 (3)	3.9

种群Population	LC₅₀ (95%置信限CL) (mg·L^-1)	斜率±标准误Slope±SE	卡方值（自由度）χ²(df)	抗性倍数Resistance ratio
SS	0.321 (0.222-0.413)	2.269±0.358	1.314 (3)	—
HZ	1.609 (1.239-2.045)	1.880±0.254	1.661 (3)	5.0
FZ	8.779 (6.381-11.034)	2.404±0.368	0.854 (3)	27.3
JZ	7.293 (5.622-9.200)	1.957±0.261	0.944 (3)	22.7
BJ	1.967 (1.401-3.078)	1.252±0.231	1.163 (3)	6.1
NC	2.733 (2.116-3.558)	1.770±0.249	0.621 (3)	8.5
SY	34.613 (27.430-42.745)	2.230±0.284	0.611 (3)	107.8
GZ	10.192 (8.127-12.801)	2.074±0.268	2.914 (3)	31.8
CS	3.321 (2.469-4.275)	1.766±0.256	2.309 (3)	10.3
NJ	4.214 (3.344-5.245)	2.122±0.271	1.069 (3)	13.1
HF	2.162 (1.644-2.682)	2.371±0.335	1.217 (3)	6.7
SH	5.978 (4.291-7.623)	2.105±0.313	1.441 (3)	18.6
WF	17.261 (13.547-21.451)	2.141±0.278	2.053 (3)	53.8
GL	5.269 (3.923-6.600)	2.275±0.326	2.638 (3)	16.4
KM	21.339 (16.842-27.147)	1.953±0.260	1.714 (3)	66.5
XC	13.909 (10.764-18.610)	1.729±0.251	2.191 (3)	43.3

种群 Population	检测数 Number of insects	LC₅₀（95%置信限CL） (mg·L^-1)	斜率±标准误 Slope±SE	抗性倍数 Resistance ratio (RR^a)	显性度分析 Degree of dominance (D^b)
SS	600	0.359 (0.18-0.53)	0.646±0.121	—	—
NN	600	38.674 (29.130-53.268)	1.573±0.240	107.7	—
正交F₁	600	3.673 (2.879-4.667)	1.691±0.174	10.2	-0.006
反交F₁′	600	3.131 (2.518-3.870)	2.018±0.201	8.7	-0.070
混交F₁ pooled	600	3.485 (2.700-4.475)	1.592±0.168	9.7	—

品系 Strain	处理 Treatment	LC₅₀ (95%置信限CL) (mg·L^-1)	斜率±标准误 Slope±SE	增效比 Synergistic ratio
SS	乙基多杀菌素Spinetoram	0.388 (0.290-0.504)	1.695±0.247	—
	乙基多杀菌素+胡椒基丁醚Spinetoram+PBO	0.445 (0.325-0.575)	1.756±0.259	0.9
	乙基多杀菌素+马来酸二乙酯Spinetoram+DEM	0.417 (0.282-0.550)	1.775±0.275	0.9
	乙基多杀菌素+磷酸三苯酯Spinetoram+TPP	0.351 (0.281-0.436)	2.174±0.271	1.1
NN	乙基多杀菌素Spinetoram	42.830 (32.325-55.777)	1.686±0.246	—
	乙基多杀菌素+胡椒基丁醚Spinetoram+PBO	43.340 (28.321-58.281)	1.601±0.261	1.0
	乙基多杀菌素+马来酸二乙酯Spinetoram+DEM	24.061 (18.756-30.737)	1.874±0.255	1.8
	乙基多杀菌素+磷酸三苯酯Spinetoram+TPP	29.256 (22.868-38.867)	1.819±0.257	1.5

种群 Population	谷胱甘肽S-转移酶活性 Activity of GST (U·mg^-1 protein)	羧酸酯酶活性 Activity of CarE (U·mg^-1 protein)	细胞色素P450酶活性 Activity of CYP450 (U·L^-1 protein)
SS	35.53±0.55b	4.73±0.58b	4.82±0.12b
NN	143.97±2.03a	16.71±1.10a	7.77±0.13a

斜纹夜蛾对乙基多杀菌素的抗性监测及抗性遗传方式

Resistance Monitoring and Inheritance of Resistance to Spinetoram in Spodoptera litura

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李桂香,李秀环,郝新昌,李智文,刘峰,刘西莉. 山东省多主棒孢对三种常用杀菌剂的敏感性监测及对氟吡菌酰胺的抗性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7): 1359-1370.
[2]	陈庆华,曾娟,杨玲,贾勇,李庆,封传红,陈晓娟,胡容平. 性信息素诱捕斜纹夜蛾雄蛾发育日龄结构的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(21): 3819-3827.
[3]	魏世平,吴萌,李桂龙,江春玉,刘明,陈瑞蕊,李忠佩. 腐殖酸对低浓度百菌清的缓释增效作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(1): 65-72.
[4]	张文慧, 侯海霞, 杨琼, 王淑会, 毛旭连, 刘永杰. 虫酰肼对斜纹夜蛾幼虫多巴脱羧酶基因表达的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(8): 1512-1521.
[5]	李燕, 王中康, 陈环, 冯二艳, 殷幼平. 斜纹夜蛾SpLPDI的克隆、表达及其对莱氏野村菌的免疫应答分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(7): 1359-1369.
[6]	卢梦玲, 闫超, 毛根林, 徐汉虹. 斜纹夜蛾受翻译控制肿瘤蛋白基因的克隆及表达[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(18): 3793-3799.
[7]	殷幼平, 黄姗, 宋章永, 王中康. 莱氏野村菌CQNr01微菌核的人工诱导培养[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(23): 4801-4807.
[8]	. 斜纹夜蛾核型多角体病毒基因ⅡORF13的克隆、表达与启动子活性分析 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(6): 1146-1153 .
[9]	王洪涛, 薛明, 李庆亮, 张晓, 周方园. B型烟粉虱取食诱导的烟草对斜纹夜蛾生长发育和繁殖的影响及机制探讨[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(22): 4600-4609.
[10]	王玉健,张志祥,徐汉虹,廖美德,张前锋 . α-三联噻吩对斜纹夜蛾SL细胞线粒体膜电位及细胞周期的影响#br# [J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(8): 1601-1607 .
[11]	修伟明,张逸凡,杨殿林,董双林,刘玉升 . 2个新的鳞翅目OR83b类化感蛋白基因的克隆和序列分析 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(3): 618-625 .
[12]	黄水金,秦文婧,陈琼 . 斜纹夜蛾P450基因CYP4M14和CYP4S9的克隆与mRNA表达水平研究 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(15): 3115-3124 .
[13]	. 斜纹夜蛾普通气味结合蛋白ⅠcDNA的克隆及在原核细胞中的表达[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(3): 891-899 .
[14]	. 斜纹夜蛾核型多角体病毒少多角体遗传突变株的鉴定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(10): 3088-3093 .
[15]	郭予元，梁革梅. 新乡示范区控制棉铃虫猖獗危害配套关键技术研究回顾与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(增刊): 3123-3128.