中国农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (6): 1231-1243.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.06.007

• 植物保护 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种诱虫灯下异色瓢虫的种群动态和迁飞状态分析

杜梦园1(), 侯艳红1(), 刘迪1, 陈莉1, 范志业1, 王文豪1, 沈海龙1, 王参观1, 李世民1, 黄建荣2(), 陈琦1()   

  1. 1 漯河市农业科学院/农业农村部植物保护郾城野外科学观测研究站,河南漯河 462300
    2 河南省农业科学院植物保护研究所/河南省0号昆虫雷达野外科学观测研究站,郑州 450002
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-24 接受日期:2025-12-19 出版日期:2026-03-16 发布日期:2026-03-24
  • 通信作者:
    陈琦,E-mail:
    黄建荣,E-mail:
  • 联系方式: 杜梦园,E-mail:du8880330@163.com。侯艳红,E-mail:402056286@qq.com。杜梦园和侯艳红为同等贡献作者。
  • 基金资助:
    河南省现代农业产业技术体系(HARS-22-01-Z4); 河南省0号昆虫雷达野外科学观测研究站开放基金、河南省科技计划联合基金(232301420028); 河南省农业科学院基础性科研工作(2025JC12)

Analysis of Population Dynamics and Migration Status of Harmonia axyridis Under Searchlight Trap and Ground Light Trap

DU MengYuan1(), HOU YanHong1(), LIU Di1, CHEN Li1, FAN ZhiYe1, WANG WenHao1, SHEN HaiLong1, WANG CanGuan1, LI ShiMin1, HUANG JianRong2(), CHEN Qi1()   

  1. 1 Luohe Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Yancheng Field Scientific Observation and Research Station for Plant Protection of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Luohe 462300, Henan
    2 Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Entomological Radar Station Zero of Henan Province for Field Scientific Observation and Research, Zhengzhou 450002
  • Received:2025-11-24 Accepted:2025-12-19 Published:2026-03-16 Online:2026-03-24

摘要:

【目的】明确异色瓢虫(Harmonia axyridis)在河南省漯河市诱虫灯下的种群动态、迁飞规律及其变化趋势,为有效保护和利用异色瓢虫进行生物防治提供数据支撑。【方法】于2015—2024年在河南省漯河市,通过高空诱虫灯与地面测报灯对异色瓢虫进行系统监测,每年3月1日至11月30日逐日分拣并统计两种诱虫灯下的异色瓢虫数量,根据两种灯下异色瓢虫的年诱虫量、月诱虫量、始见日、终见日情况,分析异色瓢虫的上灯规律和变化趋势;根据每日诱虫量占全年诱虫量的百分比以及不同季节高峰日的分布,分析异色瓢虫的种群动态;根据优化后的高空灯与地面灯诱虫数量的比值,分析异色瓢虫的迁飞规律。【结果】10年间,高空灯累计诱集异色瓢虫19 771头,地面灯诱集11 061头,高空灯的诱虫量呈显著下降趋势,地面灯诱虫量呈显著上升趋势,两种灯的诱虫量年际间呈显著负相关关系(P<0.05)。除2021—2023年地面灯诱虫量高于高空灯,其余年份均为高空灯诱虫量更多。异色瓢虫在高空灯下被监测到的时间更长,始见日比地面灯早约20 d,终见日晚约19.5 d。高空灯下存在特大诱虫高峰日,而地面灯无此现象。异色瓢虫在高空灯下有3个高峰期:5月下旬至6月中旬、7月中下旬、9月下旬至10月中旬,其中5月下旬至6月中旬的诱虫量最多,地面灯高峰日集中在6月上旬至8月中旬,无明显高峰期,其中7月下旬至8月中旬的诱虫量最多。空地比值显示异色瓢虫有3个迁飞高峰期,分别为5月下旬至6月上旬、7月上中旬、9月中旬至10月下旬,其中10月份异色瓢虫的迁飞强度最高。近10年异色瓢虫的南迁量明显减少,年度内迁飞天数呈显著减少趋势(P<0.01)。【结论】高空灯和地面灯下的年诱异色瓢虫量和数量动态有较大差异,高空灯诱集虫口的高峰期更明显、突增突减性更强;高空灯下的始见日早,终见日晚,其在监测异色瓢虫迁飞方面更具优势;受全球变暖的影响,异色瓢虫在漯河的发生量正在增加,而迁飞量正在减少。高空灯和地面灯联用,可以更精准地分析迁飞行为,量化迁飞强度。

关键词: 异色瓢虫, 高空诱虫灯, 地面测报灯, 种群动态, 迁飞状态

Abstract:

【Objective】The objective of this study is to clarify the population dynamics and migration patterns of Harmonia axyridis under light traps in Luohe City, Henan Province, analyze their changing trends, and to provide data support for the effective protection and utilization of H. axyridis for biological control. 【Method】From 2015 to 2024, systematic monitoring of H. axyridis was conducted in Luohe City, Henan Province, using searchlight traps and ground light traps. From March 1 to November 30 each year, the number of H. axyridis under the two types of traps was sorted and counted daily. Based on the annual and monthly trapping amounts, as well as the first and last capture dates under the two traps, the patterns and trends of H. axyridis phototaxis were analyzed. The population dynamics of H. axyridis were examined based on the daily trapping percentage relative to the annual total and the distribution of peak occurrence days across different seasons. Additionally, the migration patterns of H. axyridis were analyzed using the optimized ratio of trapping amounts between searchlight traps and ground light traps. 【Result】Over the 10-year period, the searchlight traps accumulated a total of 19 771 H. axyridis individuals, while the ground light traps accumulated 11 061 individuals. The number of insects caught by the searchlight traps showed a significant decreasing trend, whereas the number caught by the ground light traps showed a significant increasing trend. The annual catches of the two types of traps exhibited a significant negative correlation (P<0.05). Except for the years 2021-2023, when the ground light traps captured more individuals than the searchlight traps, the searchlight traps captured more individuals in all other years. H. axyridis was detected over a longer period under the searchlight traps, with the first occurrence date approximately 20 days earlier and the last occurrence date about 19.5 days later compared to the ground light traps. There were exceptionally high peak capture days under the searchlight traps, while no such phenomenon was observed under the ground light traps. Under the searchlight traps, H. axyridis exhibited three peak periods: late May to mid-June, mid- to late July, and late September to mid-October, with the highest capture occurring from late May to mid-June. The peak capture days for the ground light traps were concentrated from early June to mid-August, with no distinct peak periods, though the highest capture occurred from late July to mid-August. The air-to-ground ratio indicated three migration peaks for H. axyridis: late May to early June, early to mid-July, and mid-September to late October, with the highest migration intensity observed in October. Over the past decade, the southward migration of H. axyridis has significantly decreased, and the annual migration days have shown a significant declining trend (P<0.01). 【Conclusion】There are notable differences in the annual capture numbers and population dynamics of H. axyridis between searchlight traps and ground light traps. The peak periods under searchlight traps are more distinct and exhibit sharper increases and decreases. The earlier first occurrence and later last occurrence dates under searchlight traps make them more advantageous for monitoring H. axyridis migration. Influenced by global warming, the occurrence of H. axyridis in Luohe is increasing, while its migration is decreasing. The combined use of searchlight traps and ground light traps allows for a more precise analysis of migration behavior and quantification of migration intensity.

Key words: Harmonia axyridis, searchlight trap, ground light trap, population dynamics, migration status