黄土丘陵沟壑区典型小流域SCS-CN方法初损率取值研究

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.20.011

中国农业科学 ›› 2011, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (20): 4240-4247.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.20.011

• 土壤肥料·节水灌溉·农业生态环境 • 上一篇下一篇

黄土丘陵沟壑区典型小流域SCS-CN方法初损率取值研究

周淑梅, 雷廷武

1.中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所/黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室
2.中国科学院研究生院
3.中国农业大学水利与土木工程学院

收稿日期:2010-09-16 出版日期:2011-10-15 发布日期:2011-04-18
通讯作者: 通信作者雷廷武，Tel：029-87018013；E-mail：tingwu@ms.iswc.ac.cn
作者简介:周淑梅，E-mail: shumei1984@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（40635027）

Calibration of SCS-CN Initial Abstraction Ratio of a Typical Small Watershed in the Loess Hilly-Gully Region

ZHOU Shu-Mei, LEI Ting-Wu

1.中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所/黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室
2.中国科学院研究生院
3.中国农业大学水利与土木工程学院

Received:2010-09-16 Online:2011-10-15 Published:2011-04-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】初损率是SCS-CN方法进行流域地表径流预报的基础输入参数之一，影响着径流模拟精度。论文通过研究确定黄土丘陵沟壑区典型小流域初损率取值，为SCS-CN方法在该地区的适用性评价提供参考。【方法】SCS-CN方法中，初损率定义为初损量（Ia）与流域最大蓄水能力（S）的比值，通常取标准值0.2。然而，已有研究表明不同区域初损率取值存在差异。论文选取黄土丘陵沟壑区桥子西沟小流域1987—2006年14场典型降雨事件，采用反算法（BC）和事件分析法（EA）确定流域初损率。【结果】结果表明，两种方法计算初损率均小于标准值0.2，事件分析法计算值（0.17）与反算法计算值（0.1）相比略偏大。初损率取0.1、0.17和0.2分别计算研究降雨事件径流深，采用皮尔逊相关系数（r）、模型效率系数（E）、相对误差（RE）、绝对误差（AE）和图形拟合5种评价标准分析模拟结果，确定研究流域初损率为0.1。论文采用两种算法计算桥子西沟流域初损率，结果与标准值显著不同，初步推断是研究流域与SCS-CN方法最初研发区域地质地貌及气候条件存在较大差异所致。【结论】不同区域应用SCS-CN方法时，需利用当地观测数据率定研究流域初损率，才能进行流域地表水文模拟。

关键词: SCS-CN, 初损率, 小流域, 黄土丘陵沟壑区

Abstract: 【Objective】 The initial abstraction ratio, as one of the basic inputs of SCS-CN method, plays an important role in watershed rainfall-runoff simulation. In this study, attempt was made to determine the initial abstraction ratio of a typical small watershed in the Loess hilly-gully region, in order to supply some references for regional applicability assessment of SCS-CN method. 【Method】In SCS-CN method, the proportion of initial abstraction (Ia) to the maximum retention (S) is defined as initial abstraction ratio, which was believed to have a standard value of 0.2. However, many studies indicate that variations of the ratio exist in different regions. In this study, 14 typical rainstorms in 1987-2006 in Qiaozi-West watershed were selected to calculate the initial abstraction ratio using Back Calculation (BC) and Event Analysis (EA) methods.【Result】Results showed that most of the values calculated by the two methods were lower than the standard value of 0.2. Moreover, the value (0.17) determined by EA method was a little higher than that (0.1) by BC method. By assigning 0.1, 0.17 and 0.2 to initial abstraction ratio, the runoff depth of each study event was calculated, respectively. Through five evaluation criteria of Pearson correlation coefficient (r), model efficiency coefficient (E), relative error (RE), absolute error (AE) and curve fitting, 0.1 was found to be the appropriate value for the watershed initial abstraction ratio. The results indicated that the derived initial abstraction ratio by the two methods differed markedly from the standard value. This may be due to the discrepancies in geologic, geomorphologic and climatic circumstances between the loess hilly-gully region and the originally intended areas of SCS-CN method. 【Conclusion】 It is essential to calibrate the initial abstraction ratio using locally observed data prior to SCS-CN method application.

Key words:

SCS-CN, initialabstractionratio, smallwatershed, loesshilly-gullyregion

周淑梅, 雷廷武. 黄土丘陵沟壑区典型小流域SCS-CN方法初损率取值研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(20): 4240-4247.

ZHOU Shu-Mei, LEI Ting-Wu. Calibration of SCS-CN Initial Abstraction Ratio of a Typical Small Watershed in the Loess Hilly-Gully Region[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(20): 4240-4247.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.20.011

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2011/V44/I20/4240

参考文献

[1]唐克丽. 中国水土保持. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004: 615.

Tang K L. Soil and Water Conservation in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2004: 615. (in Chinese)

[2]Shi Z H, Chen L D, Fang N F, Qin D F, Cai C F. Research on the SCS-CN initial abstraction ratio using rainfall-runoff event analysis in the Three Gorges Area, China. Catena, 2009, 77(1): 1-7.

[3]Perrin C, Michel C, Andréassian V. Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. Journal of Hydrology, 2001, 242(3/4): 275-301.

[4]Mockus V. Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall//Soil Conservation Service. United States Department of Agriculture. National Engineering Handbook Handbook, Section 4. Hydrology. Washington D C: Soil Conservation Service. United States Department of Agriculture, 1972, 10: 1-30.

[5]Ponce V M, Hawkins R H. Runoff curve number: has it reached maturity? Journal of Hydrologic Engineering,1996, 1(1): 11-19.

[6]Mishra S K, Jain M K, Pandey R P, Singh V P. Catchment area-based evaluation of the AMC-dependent SCS-CN-based rainfall-runoff models. Hydrological Processes, 2005, 19(14): 2701-2718.

[7]Mishra S K, Singh V P. SCS-CN-based hydrologic simulation package//Singh V P, Frevert D K, eds. Mathematical Models of Small Watershed Hydrology and Applications. Highlands Ranch: Water Resources Publications, 2001: 391-464.

[8]Mishra S K, Singh V P. Validity and extension of the SCS-CN method for computing infiltration and rainfall-excess rates. Hydrological Processes, 2004, 18(17): 3323-3345.

[9]Kliment Z, Kadlec J, Langhammer J. Evaluation of suspended load changes using AnnAGNPS and SWAT semi-empirical erosion models. Catena, 2008, 73(3): 286-299.

[10]Tyagi J V, Mishra S K, Singh R, Singh V P. SCS-CN based time-distributed sediment yield model. Journal of Hydrology, 2008, 352(3/4): 388-403.

[11]Mishra S K, Tyagi J V, Singh V P, Singh R. SCS-CN-based modeling of sediment yield. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 324(1/4): 301-322.

[12]Simanton J R, Hawkins R H, Mohseni-Saravi M, Renard K G. Runoff curve number variation with drainage area, Walnut Gulch, Arizona. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1996, 39(4): 1391-1394.

[13]Mishra S K, Singh V P, Sansalone J J, Aravamuthan V. A modified SCS-CN method: characterization and testing. Water Resources Management, 2003, 17(1): 37-68.

[14]Mishra S K, Jain M K, Singh V P. Evaluation of the SCS-CN-based model incorporating antecedent moisture. Water Resources Management, 2004, 18(6): 567-589.

[15]Mishra S K, Jain M K, Bhunya P K, Singh V P. Field applicability of the SCS-CN-based Mishra-Singh general model and its variants. Water Resources Management, 2005, 19(1): 37-62.

[16]Mishra S K, Sahu R K, Eldho T I, Jain M K. An improved Ia-S relation incorporating antecedent moisture in SCS-CN methodology. Water Resources Management, 2006, 20(5): 643-660.

[17]Mishra S K, Pandey R P, Jain M K, Singh V P. A Rain duration and modified AMC-dependent SCS-CN procedure for long duration rainfall-runoff events. Water Resources Management, 2008, 22(7): 861-876.

[18]Woodward D E, Hawkins R H, Jiang R, Hjelmfelt, J A T, Van Mullem J A, Quan Q D. Runoff curve number method: examination of the initial abstraction ratio. World Water and Environmental Resources Congress. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 2003.

[19]Lim K J, Engel B A, Muthukrishnan S, Harbor J. Effects of initial abstraction and urbanization on estimated runoff using CN technology. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2006, 42(3): 629-643.

[20]Baltas E A, Dervos N A, Mimikou M A. Technical Note: Determination of the SCS initial abstraction ratio in an experimental watershed in Greece. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2007, 11(6): 1825-1829.

[21]刘贤赵, 康绍忠, 刘德林, 张晓萍. 基于地理信息的SCS模型及其在黄土高原小流域降雨-径流关系中的应用. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(5): 93-97.

Liu X Z, Kang S Z, Liu D L, Zhang X P. SCS Model based on geographic information and its application to simulating rainfall-runoff relationship at small watershed level in the Loess Plateau. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2005, 21(5): 93-97. (in Chinese)

[22]Huang M B, Gallichand J, Wang Z L, Goulet M. A modification to the Soil Conservation Service curve number method for steep slopes in the Loess Plateau of China. Hydrological Processes, 2006, 20(3): 579-589.

[23]Huang M B, Gallichand J, Dong C Y, Wang Z L, Shao M A. Use of soil moisture data and curve number method for estimating runoff in the Loess Plateau of China. Hydrological Processes, 2007, 21(11): 1471-1481.

[24]王英, 黄明斌. 径流曲线法模型参数在黄土地区的优化研究. 水土保持通报, 2008, 28(1): 54-58.

Wang Y, Huang M B. Optimizing parameters of SCS-CN method for application in the Loess Plateau. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 28(1): 54-58. (in Chinese)

[25]张钰娴, 穆兴民, 王飞. 径流曲线数模型(SCS-CN)参数λ在黄土丘陵区的率定. 干旱地区农业研究, 2008, 26(5): 124-128.

Zhang Y X, Mu X M, Wang F. Calibration and validation to parameter ? of soil conservation service curve number method in hilly region of the Loess Plateau. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2008, 26(5): 124-128. (in Chinese)

[26]Zheng M G, Cai Q G, Cheng Q J. Modelling the runoff-sediment yield relationship using a proportional function in hilly areas of the Loess Plateau, North China. Geomorphology, 2008, 93(3/4): 288-301.

[27]Nash J E, Sutcliffe J V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 1970, 10(3): 282-290.

[28]Aron G, Lakatos D F, Miller A C. Infiltration formula based on SCS Curve Number. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 1977, 103(4): 419-427.

[29]Hadley J L. Near real-time runoff estimation using spatially distributed radar rainfall data[D]. Texas: A&M University, 2003.

黄土丘陵沟壑区典型小流域SCS-CN方法初损率取值研究

Calibration of SCS-CN Initial Abstraction Ratio of a Typical Small Watershed in the Loess Hilly-Gully Region

PDF

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	龚世飞,丁武汉,居学海,肖能武,叶青松,黄进,李虎. 典型农业小流域面源污染源解析与控制策略——以丹江口水源涵养区为例[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(18): 3919-3931.
[2]	张羽2，李悦，秦晓波，孔范龙，郗敏，李玉娥. 亚热带农业小流域水系溶存甲烷浓度和扩散通量研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(20): 3968-3980.
[3]	徐小军, 何丙辉, 胡恒, 熊明彪, 杨文兵, 李振林. 新生水土流失对汶川震区土壤水分入渗的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(12): 2520-2529.