中国农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (24): 5299-5314.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.24.015

• 农业经济与农村发展 • 上一篇    

全球农业农村现代化的演变趋势与影响因素

王维(), 陈秧分*()   

  1. 中国农业科学院农业经济与发展研究所, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-25 接受日期:2025-07-11 出版日期:2025-12-16 发布日期:2025-12-22
  • 通信作者:
    陈秧分,E-mail:
  • 联系方式: 王维,E-mail:ww_20001231@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目(21&ZD093); 教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目(23JZD008); 中国农业科学院科学中心重大任务(CAAS-CSAERD-202402); 中国农业科学院科技创新工程项目(10-IAED-04-2025)

Evolutionary Trends and Influencing Factors of Global Agricultural and Rural Modernization

WANG Wei(), CHEN YangFen*()   

  1. Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2025-03-25 Accepted:2025-07-11 Published:2025-12-16 Online:2025-12-22

摘要:

【目的】农业农村现代化需要立足世界一般规律与中国特色,从全球视角探究其演变趋势与影响因素对于中国推进乡村全面振兴具有重要意义。【方法】本研究构建了包含农业现代化和农村现代化两个维度的评价指标体系,在测度2000—2022年152个国家农业农村发展水平的基础上,运用三维核密度估计和空间基尼系数揭示全球农业农村现代化的演变趋势,并借助最优参数地理探测器对社会经济因素和农业因素的作用强度及交互作用影响力进行识别。【结果】在过去20多年间,全球农业农村现代化水平呈现稳步提升态势,低收入国家与中等收入国家的差距逐年收敛,但与高收入国家的差距依然巨大。中国农业农村现代化建设成效斐然,国际排名由第78名跃升至第57名。从一般规律看,经济发展水平始终是农业农村现代化发展的关键驱动力;产业结构和农产品贸易开放的作用日益凸显;农业技术进步的贡献依然重要,但呈边际递减趋势;而农地利用结构的影响则具有长期性与复杂性。从差异性情况看,信息化水平是低收入和中低收入国家实现追赶的首要驱动力,对中高收入和高收入国家的影响则逐渐减弱;人口老龄化水平成为阻碍中等收入国家农业农村现代化发展的主导制约因素,而对高收入国家的影响相对较小;环境保护力度在不同收入国家组别之间呈明显分化效应。低收入国家组中两两因素产生负向交互作用的比例显著下降,中低收入国家组的各因素间交互作用已全部转变为正向协同效应,中高收入和高收入国家组的各因素间则普遍存在协同增强效应,意味着全球农业农村现代化时空分异是社会经济因素与农业因素共同作用的结果。【结论】中国在推进乡村全面振兴过程中,应坚持农业现代化与农村现代化“双轮驱动”,统筹经济发展、社会进步和环境保护三者之间的关系,最终实现城乡融合发展。

关键词: 农业农村现代化, 农业现代化, 农村现代化, 全球规律, 中国特色

Abstract:

【Objective】Agricultural and rural modernization needs to be grounded in both general global patterns and unique Chinese characteristics. From a global perspective, investigating its evolutionary trends and influencing factors is of great significance for advancing China's comprehensive rural revitalization. 【Method】This study constructed an evaluation index system incorporating two dimensions: agricultural modernization and rural modernization. Based on the measurement of agricultural and rural development levels in 152 countries from 2000 to 2022, three-dimensional kernel density estimation and spatial Gini coefficient were employed to reveal the evolutionary trends of global agricultural and rural modernization. Furthermore, the optimal-parameter geographical detector was utilized to identify the intensity and interaction effects of socio-economic and agricultural factors. 【Result】Over the past two decades, global agricultural and rural modernization level has shown a steady upward trend. The gap between low-income and middle-income countries has been narrowing annually, yet a substantial gap with high-income countries persists. China has made remarkable progress in its agricultural and rural modernization, with its international ranking climbing from 78th to 57th. Regarding general patterns, economic development level remained a key driver. The roles of industrial structure and agricultural trade openness have become increasingly prominent. The contribution of agricultural technological progress remained important but exhibited a diminishing marginal trend, while the impact of agricultural land use structure was characterized by long-term complexity. In terms of differentiated patterns, informatization level was the primary driver for low- and lower-middle-income countries to achieve catch-up, whereas its influence diminished in upper-middle- and high-income countries. Population aging has become the dominant constraint hindering agricultural and rural modernization in middle-income countries, with a relatively minor impact on high-income countries. Environmental protection intensity showed significant differentiated effects across different income groups. The proportion of negative interaction effects between factors in low-income country groups has significantly decreased. Interaction effects among factors in lower-middle-income country groups have entirely transitioned to positive synergistic effects. Synergistic enhancement effects were prevalent among factors in upper-middle-income and high-income country groups. This indicated that the spatial-temporal differentiation of global agricultural and rural modernization was a result of the combined influence of socio-economic and agricultural factors. 【Conclusion】In advancing comprehensive rural revitalization, China should adhere to a "dual-driven" approach of concurrently promoting agricultural modernization and rural modernization. It was crucial to coordinate the relationships among economic development, social progress, and environmental protection to ultimately achieve integrated urban-rural development.

Key words: agricultural and rural modernization development, agricultural modernization, rural modernization, global patterns, Chinese characteristics