中国农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (21): 4393-4404.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.21.009

• 豇豆“两虫一病”绿色防控研究与实践创新 • 上一篇    下一篇

新型驱虫网对豆大蓟马的防控效果和对田间小气候的影响

赵瀚洋1(), 李奕宏1,2, 许曙光3, 吴跃民4, 吴圣勇1,5()   

  1. 1 三亚中国农业科学院国家南繁研究院,海南三亚 572024
    2 河北科技师范学院/河北省作物逆境生物学重点实验室,河北秦皇岛 066600
    3 江苏恒源园艺用品集团有限公司,江苏常州 213169
    4 辽宁省农业农村发展服务中心,沈阳 110032
    5 中国农业科学院植物保护研究所/植物病虫害综合治理全国重点实验室,北京 100193
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-22 接受日期:2025-08-12 出版日期:2025-11-01 发布日期:2025-11-06
  • 通信作者:
    吴圣勇,E-mail:
  • 联系方式: 赵瀚洋,E-mail:1169263624@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2024YFD1400100); 海南省重点研发计划(ZDYF2025XDNY121); 三亚中国农业科学院国家南繁研究院“南繁专项”(YDLH2503)

Control Effect of New Insect-Repellent Screen on Megalurothrips usitatus and Its Impact on the Microclimate in the Field

ZHAO HanYang1(), LI YiHong1,2, XU ShuGuang3, WU YueMin4, WU ShengYong1,5()   

  1. 1 National Nanfan Research Institute (Sanya), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya 572024, Hainan
    2 Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology/Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology, Qinhuangdao 066600, Hebei
    3 Jiangsu Hengyuan Horticultural Supplies Group Co., Ltd., Changzhou 213169, Jiangsu
    4 Liaoning Agricultural and Rural Development Service Center, Shenyang 110032
    5 Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Beijing 100193
  • Received:2025-06-22 Accepted:2025-08-12 Published:2025-11-01 Online:2025-11-06

摘要:

【目的】评价新型驱虫网对豆大蓟马(Megalurothrips usitatus)的防控效果,并明确其对田间小气候环境的影响,为防控豇豆蓟马提供新的技术支持。【方法】在室内和田间测定新型驱虫网和普通防虫网对豆大蓟马的阻隔效果,并采用光照计、风速仪和温湿度记录仪分别测定驱虫网、普通防虫网和露地3种处理下的光照强度、通风和温湿度变化,分析驱虫网对田间小气候的影响。驱虫网田间应用2个月后,利用气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)检测其驱虫挥发物的种类、含量及挥发量。【结果】室内结果表明,在一个月内,新型驱虫网笼对豆大蓟马成虫的阻隔率总体呈现缓慢下降的趋势,其对蓟马的阻隔率(52.81%—67.11%)显著高于普通防虫网笼的阻隔率(46.32%—51.23%)。田间结果表明,在豇豆开花结荚期调查的一个月内,驱虫网、普通防虫网(透孔率均为69.40%)和露地豇豆的豆大蓟马成虫数量分别为4.3—7.4、6.2—11.1和7.8—14.2头/花。驱虫网内豆大蓟马种群数量总体上处于较低水平,且显著低于普通防虫网和露地豇豆蓟马数量。驱虫网、普通防虫网和露地3种处理下的光照强度(分别为11 900—73 800、11 400—73 100、12 000—73 900 lx)、风速(分别为0.16—1.38、0.12—1.39和0.20—1.47 m·s-1)、日环境温度(分别为18.73—25.75、19.50—25.62、19.51—26.00 ℃)和日平均相对湿度(分别为65.00%—72.15%、66.32%—73.78%、62.10%—69.66%)均无显著差异。在豇豆开花盛期的1 d内,驱虫网、普通防虫网和露地的温度和相对湿度变化趋势分别呈现倒“U”形和正“U”形,其中,3种处理下的温度在午后(13:00—16:00)达到最高值,相对湿度在午后(14:00—15:00)降至最低。GC-MS分析显示,驱虫网挥发物成分中含有与薄荷脑和柠檬烯高匹配度的化合物,其匹配度分别为79.50%和80.00%,应用2个月后的挥发率分别为98.47%和92.86%。【结论】新型驱虫网对豆大蓟马阻隔效果优于普通防虫网,表现出物理阻隔与生物驱避的双重效果,同时对田间小气候环境几乎无影响。新型驱虫网的开发和应用为豇豆蓟马防控提供了新的手段。

关键词: 豆大蓟马, 驱虫网, 阻隔率, 防虫效果, 小气候环境

Abstract:

【Objective】The objective of this study is to evaluate the control effect of a new type of insect-repellent screen on Megalurothrips usitatus, and to clarify its effect on the microclimate environment in the field, so as to provide new technical support for the control of cowpea thrips. 【Method】The barrier effects of a new type of insect-repellent screen and conventional insect-proof screen on M. usitatus were investigated under laboratory and field conditions. Light intensity, ventilation, temperature, and humidity were measured using the illuminometer, anemometer, and thermo-hygrometer, respectively, under three treatments of insect-repellent screen, conventional insect-proof screen and open field. The effect of insect-repellent screen on the field microclimate was further analyzed based on the observed data. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GS-MS) was employed to detect the types, contents of insect-repellent volatile compounds in the screen after two months of field application. 【Result】The laboratory results showed that the barrier rate of the new insect-repellent screen cage against M. usitatus adults generally exhibited a slowly declining trend within one month. The barrier rate of the insect-repellent screen was 52.81%-67.11%, significantly higher than that of the conventional insect-proof screen (46.32%-51.23%). Field results indicated that within one month of investigation during the flowering and pod-setting stage of cowpeas, the adult populations of M. usitatus in the insect-repellent screen, conventional insect-proof screen (both with a porosity of 69.40%), and open field were 4.3-7.4, 6.2-11.1 and 7.8-14.2 individuals/flower, respectively. The overall trend of population in the insect-repellent screen remained at a lower level, significantly lower than that in the conventional insect-proof screen and open-field cowpeas. No significant differences were observed among the three treatments (insect-repellent screen, conventional insect-proof screen, and open field) in terms of light intensity (11 900-73 800, 11 400-73 100, and 12 000- 73 900 lx, respectively), wind speed (0.16-1.38, 0.12-1.39, and 0.20-1.47 m·s-1, respectively), daily mean temperature (18.73-25.75, 19.50-25.62, and 19.51-26.00 ℃, respectively), and daily mean relative humidity (65.00%-72.15%, 66.32%-73.78%, and 62.10%-69.66%, respectively). During a single day at the full blooming stage of cowpea, the temperature and relative humidity under all three treatments exhibited an inverted “U”-shaped and a positive “U”-shaped trend, respectively. Specifically, the temperature reached the highest value in the afternoon (13: 00-16: 00), while the relative humidity dropped to the lowest value in the afternoon (14: 00-15: 00). GC-MS analysis revealed that the volatile components of the insect-repellent screen contained compounds with high similarity to menthol and limonene, with similarity scores of 79.50% and 80.00%, and the volatilization rates after two months of application were 98.47% and 92.86%, respectively. 【Conclusion】The barrier effect of the new insect-repellent screen against M. usitatus is better than conventional insect-proof screen, showing dual effects of physical barrier and biological repellence, and has negligible impact on the field microclimate environment. The development and application of the new insect-repellent screen provides a novel approach for integrated control of cowpea thrips.

Key words: Megalurothrips usitatus, insect-repellent screen, barrier rate, insect-proof effect, microclimate environment