中国农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (12): 2399-2409.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.12.008
收稿日期:
2019-12-30
接受日期:
2020-03-02
出版日期:
2020-06-16
发布日期:
2020-06-25
通讯作者:
李美
作者简介:
高兴祥,E-mail:xingxiang02@163.com。|张悦丽,E-mail:yueligaoxing@163.com。
基金资助:
GAO XingXiang,ZHANG YueLi,LI Mei(),LI Jian,FANG Feng
Received:
2019-12-30
Accepted:
2020-03-02
Online:
2020-06-16
Published:
2020-06-25
Contact:
Mei LI
摘要:
【背景】播娘蒿(Descurainia sophia)是一种冬小麦田分布广泛且危害严重的阔叶杂草,双氟磺草胺则是目前冬小麦田防除阔叶杂草应用面积最大的一种ALS抑制剂类除草剂。双氟磺草胺经多年应用后,对部分区域冬小麦田播娘蒿防治效果下降,可能与当地播娘蒿对双氟磺草胺产生抗药性有关。【目的】明确山东省冬小麦田播娘蒿对双氟磺草胺的抗性水平和抗性机理,为制定小麦田播娘蒿等阔叶杂草精准区域防控提供理论依据。【方法】以播娘蒿为研究对象,在温室内采用整株生物测定法测定40个播娘蒿种群对双氟磺草胺和对比药剂苯磺隆、2甲4氯共3种除草剂的抗性水平,同时根据播娘蒿ALS基因序列,设计引物,提取对双氟磺草胺高抗的播娘蒿单株基因组DNA,测序获得序列与敏感型基因进行比对,查找突变位点,明确靶标抗性机理。【结果】抗性水平测定结果表明,40个播娘蒿种群中有32个对双氟磺草胺敏感,占80.00%,低抗、中抗和高抗种群分别有3、3和2个,JN-1、JNI-2、LY-2为低抗种群,LC-3、LY-4、YT-1为中抗种群,相对抗性指数(RI)分别为49.00、26.44、21.09,BZ-1和DZ-3属于高抗种群,RI分别为52.00和194.00。对BZ-1和DZ-3进行的ALS基因检测结果表明,BZ-1种群ALS基因第197位氨基酸发生CCT(Pro)到TCT(Ser)或CTT(Leu)突变,DZ-3种群ALS基因第574位氨基酸发生TGG(Trp)到TTG(Leu)突变。另外,40个种群中对对比药剂苯磺隆产生抗性的种群有19个,占总样点数的47.50%,低抗种群有11个,中抗种群有6个,RI分别为38.05、13.55、11.54、10.45、11.50、11.02,高抗种群为DZ-3和LY-4,RI分别为244.75和68.50;40个播娘蒿种群对另一种对比药剂2甲4氯没有产生抗药性。【结论】山东省小麦田采集的40个播娘蒿种群中已有20.00%的种群对双氟磺草胺产生抗性,且高抗双氟磺草胺的播娘蒿种群发生不同位置氨基酸取代。播娘蒿对苯磺隆的抗性仍很严重,但对激素类除草剂2甲4氯未产生抗药性。针对播娘蒿发生区域,不能单一使用双氟磺草胺,应推广多种作用机理的除草剂交替、混和使用,从而延缓和控制杂草产生抗药性,同时扩大杀草谱、降低除草剂使用量。
高兴祥,张悦丽,李美,李健,房锋. 山东省小麦田播娘蒿对双氟磺草胺抗性水平及靶标抗性机理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(12): 2399-2409.
GAO XingXiang,ZHANG YueLi,LI Mei,LI Jian,FANG Feng. Resistance Level and Mechanism of Descurainia sophia to Florasulam in Wheat Field of Shandong Province[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(12): 2399-2409.
表1
40个播娘蒿种群采集地点"
序号 Number | 采集地点 Collection site | 序号 Number | 采集地点 Collection site | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BZ-1 | 滨州市邹平县台子镇 Taizi Town, Zouping County, Binzhou City | LY-2 | 临沂市郯城县胜利镇 Shengli Town, Tancheng County, Linyi City | |
BZ-2 | 滨州市惠民县胡集镇 Huji Town, Huimin County, Binzhou City | LY-3 | 临沂市费县探义镇 Tanyi Town, Fei County, Linyi City | |
DY-1 | 东营市利津县北宋镇 Beisong Town, Lijin County, Dongying City | LY-4 | 临沂市沂南县青驼镇 Qingtuo Town, Yi’nan County, Linyi City | |
DZ-1 | 德州市庆云县常家镇 Changjia Town, Qingyun County, Dezhou City | QD-1 | 青岛市莱西区河头店镇 Hetoudian Town, Laixi District, Qingdao City | |
DZ-2 | 德州市平原县恩城镇 Encheng Town, Pingyuan County, Dezhou City | QD-2 | 青岛市平度市云山镇 Yunshan Town, Pingdu County, Qingdao City | |
DZ-3 | 德州市武城县武城镇 Wucheng Town, Wucheng County, Dezhou City | RZ-1 | 日照市莒县小店镇 Xiaodian Town, Ju County, Rizhao City | |
HZ-1 | 菏泽市成武县张楼镇 Zhanglou Town, Chengwu County, Heze City | RZ-2 | 日照市五莲县西湖镇 Xihu Town, Wulian County, Rizhao City | |
HZ-2 | 菏泽市巨野县田桥镇 Tianqiao Town, Juye County, Heze City | TA-1 | 泰安市东平县大洋镇 Dayang Town, Dongping County, Taian City | |
JN-1 | 济南市长清区张夏镇 Zhangxia Town, Changqing District, Ji’nan City | TA-2 | 泰安市肥城县老城街道 Laocheng Street, Feicheng County, Taian City | |
JN-2 | 济南市历城区王舍人镇 Wangsheren Town, Licheng District, Ji’nan City | TA-3 | 泰安市宁阳县磁窑镇 Ciyao Town, Ningyang County, Taian City | |
JN-3 | 济南市章丘区刁镇 Diao Town, Zhangqiu District, Ji’nan City | WF-1 | 潍坊市潍城区于河街道 Yuhe Street, Weicheng District, Weifang City | |
JNI-1 | 济宁市汶上县郭仓镇 Guocang Town, Wenshang County, Jining City | WF-2 | 潍坊市昌邑市卜庄镇 Bozhuang Town, Changyi County, Weifang City | |
JNI-2 | 济宁市梁山县韩岗镇 Hangang Town, Liangshan County, Jining City | WF-3 | 潍坊市临朐县沂山镇 Yishan Town, Linqu County, Weifang City | |
JNI-3 | 济宁市嘉祥县疃里镇 Tuanli Town, Jiaxiang County, Jining City | WH-1 | 威海市乳山市夏村镇 Xiacun Town, Rushan County, Weihai City | |
JNI-4 | 济宁市任城区南张镇 Nanzhuang Town, Rencheng District, Jining City | YT-1 | 烟台市莱州市沙河镇 Shahe Town, Laizhou County, Yantai City | |
LC-1 | 聊城市莘县古城镇 Gucheng Town, Shen County, Liaocheng City | YT-2 | 烟台市莱阳市河头店镇 Hetoudian Town, Laiyang County, Yantai City | |
LC-2 | 聊城市阳谷县西湖镇 Xihu Town, Yanggu County, Liaocheng City | ZB-1 | 淄博市周村区南郊镇 Nanjiao Town, Zhoucun District, Zibo City | |
LC-3 | 聊城市东昌府区侯营镇 Houying Town, Dongchangfu District, Liaocheng City | ZB-2 | 淄博市临淄区齐陵街道 Qiling Street, Linzi District, Zibo City | |
LW-1 | 莱芜市莱城区口镇 Kou Town, Laicheng District, Laiwu City | ZZ-1 | 枣庄市滕州市鲍沟镇 Baogou Town, Tengzhou County, Zaozhuang City | |
LY-1 | 临沂市兰陵县卢柞镇 Luzuo Town, Lanling County, Linyi City | ZZ-2 | 枣庄市薛城区周营镇 Zhouying Town, Xuecheng District, Zaozhuang City |
表2
播娘蒿种群对双氟磺草胺抗性水平测定"
序号 Number | 回归方程 Regression equation (y=) | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient | GR50 (g·hm-2) (95% CL) | 相对抗性指数 RI |
---|---|---|---|---|
BZ-1 | 3.0871+2.5252x | 0.9220 | 5.72 (3.89-10.98) | 52.00 |
BZ-2 | 6.7548+2.0988x | 0.8926 | 0.15 (0.01-0.39) | 1.36 |
DY-1 | 6.1746+1.2088x | 0.9405 | 0.11 (0.02-0.26) | 1.00 |
DZ-1 | 6.1210+1.8228x | 0.8825 | 0.24 (0.08-0.45) | 2.18 |
DZ-2 | 6.1178+1.5045x | 0.8717 | 0.18 (0.001-0.62) | 1.64 |
DZ-3 | 3.7060+0.9736x | 0.8519 | 21.34 (13.81-39.62) | 194.00 |
HZ-1 | 5.6433+1.2505x | 0.9203 | 0.31 (0.14-0.51) | 2.82 |
HZ-2 | 6.2837+2.3134x | 0.8914 | 0.28 (0.10-0.50) | 2.55 |
JN-1 | 5.4469+1.6999x | 0.9475 | 0.55 (0.33-0.78) | 5.00 |
JN-2 | 5.5627+1.0454x | 0.8902 | 0.29 (0.002-0.97) | 2.64 |
JN-3 | 6.1607+1.3459x | 0.9459 | 0.14 (0.03-0.31) | 1.27 |
JNI-1 | 5.6161+2.1229x | 0.9679 | 0.51 (0.30-0.74) | 4.64 |
JNI-2 | 5.3038+1.5719x | 0.9333 | 0.64 (0.18-1.20) | 5.82 |
JNI-3 | 6.4349+1.5358x | 0.8804 | 0.12 (0.01-0.30) | 1.09 |
JNI-4 | 6.5989+1.6727x | 0.9630 | 0.11 (0.01-0.31) | 1.00 |
LC-1 | 6.6323+1.9998x | 0.8911 | 0.15 (0.02-0.38) | 1.36 |
LC-2 | 6.2404+1.7165x | 0.9655 | 0.19 (0.05-0.39) | 1.73 |
LC-3 | 3.3624+2.2387x | 0.9631 | 5.39 (3.89-8.22) | 49.00 |
LW-1 | 5.6180+1.4674x | 0.9352 | 0.38 (0.19-0.59) | 3.45 |
LY-1 | 6.4307+2.3490x | 0.8925 | 0.25 (0.07-0.48) | 2.27 |
LY-2 | 5.3477+1.7628x | 0.9479 | 0.64 (0.41-0.87) | 5.82 |
LY-3 | 6.0852+1.7614x | 0.9592 | 0.24 (0.08-0.45) | 2.18 |
LY-4 | 4.0274+2.0848x | 0.9589 | 2.93 (2.48-3.44) | 26.64 |
QD-1 | 5.9423+1.3467x | 0.9401 | 0.20 (0.07-0.38) | 1.82 |
QD-2 | 6.0594+1.2737x | 0.9363 | 0.15 (0.04-0.32) | 1.27 |
RZ-1 | 5.4556+1.6946x | 0.9474 | 0.54 (0.15-1.01) | 4.91 |
RZ-2 | 6.0120+1.6168x | 0.8734 | 0.24 (0.004-0.70) | 2.18 |
TA-1 | 5.9847+1.6603x | 0.8744 | 0.26 (0.01-0.72) | 2.36 |
TA-2 | 6.0133+1.9703x | 0.8839 | 0.31 (0.13-0.52) | 2.82 |
TA-3 | 6.1886+1.3238x | 0.9432 | 0.13 (0.03-0.29) | 1.18 |
WF-1 | 6.4373+1.8136x | 0.8868 | 0.16 (0.03-0.37) | 1.45 |
WF-2 | 6.4515+2.7972x | 0.8939 | 0.30 (0.10-0.54) | 2.73 |
WF-3 | 6.1546+2.1186x | 0.8883 | 0.29 (0.11-0.50) | 2.64 |
WH-1 | 5.7762+1.1081x | 0.9022 | 0.20 (0.07-0.38) | 1.82 |
YT-1 | 4.5119+1.3342x | 0.8726 | 2.32 (1.26-3.85) | 21.09 |
YT-2 | 6.2982+1.7011x | 0.9642 | 0.17 (0.04-0.37) | 1.55 |
ZB-1 | 5.4225+1.4153x | 0.9245 | 0.50 (0.13-0.98) | 4.55 |
ZB-2 | 6.2430+1.5091x | 0.8754 | 0.15 (0.03-0.33) | 1.36 |
ZZ-1 | 6.5223+2.1754x | 0.8918 | 0.20 (0.04-0.43) | 1.82 |
ZZ-2 | 6.0763+1.4651x | 0.9454 | 0.18 (0.05-0.37) | 1.64 |
表3
播娘蒿种群对苯磺隆抗性水平测定"
序号 Number | 回归方程 Regression equation (y=) | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient | GR50 (g·hm-2) (95% CL) | 相对抗性指数 RI |
---|---|---|---|---|
BZ-1 | 4.4592+0.4070x | 0.9305 | 21.31 (7.80-41.91) | 38.05 |
BZ-2 | 3.4995+2.1764x | 0.8938 | 4.89 (1.73-9.05) | 8.73 |
DY-1 | 4.5408+1.5010x | 0.8883 | 2.02 (0.27-5.44) | 3.61 |
DZ-1 | 4.5400+1.3410x | 0.8811 | 2.20 (0.42-5.40) | 3.93 |
DZ-2 | 3.7377+1.7915x | 0.8886 | 5.07 (1.96-9.11) | 9.05 |
DZ-3 | 2.7435+1.0560x | 0.9480 | 137.06 (58.29-448.11) | 244.75 |
HZ-1 | 4.0109+1.4039x | 0.9423 | 0.56 (0.03-11.73) | 1.00 |
HZ-2 | 4.0697+1.2949x | 0.9481 | 5.23 (2.24-9.17) | 9.34 |
JN-1 | 4.1869+0.9237x | 0.9913 | 7.59 (3.73-12.60) | 13.55 |
JN-2 | 4.7999+0.9194x | 0.9239 | 1.65 (0.34-4.16) | 2.95 |
JN-3 | 4.2133+1.3990x | 0.9533 | 3.65 (1.18-7.25) | 6.52 |
JNI-1 | 4.5819+1.1696x | 0.9575 | 2.28 (0.53-5.29) | 4.07 |
JNI-2 | 3.4317+1.9362x | 0.8894 | 6.46 (2.96-10.70) | 11.54 |
JNI-3 | 4.4136+1.5958x | 0.8898 | 2.33 (0.37-5.92) | 4.16 |
JNI-4 | 4.1771+1.2621x | 0.9501 | 4.49 (1.76-8.23) | 8.02 |
LC-1 | 3.7939+1.5722x | 0.9610 | 5.85 (2.59-9.96) | 10.45 |
LC-2 | 4.4694+1.8515x | 0.8941 | 1.93 (0.12-6.05) | 3.45 |
LC-3 | 4.2146+0.9707x | 0.9104 | 6.44 (3.02-10.96) | 11.50 |
LW-1 | 4.8448+0.7822x | 0.8931 | 1.58 (0.33-4.02) | 2.82 |
LY-1 | 4.3215+1.7573x | 0.8925 | 2.43 (0.35-6.26) | 4.34 |
LY-2 | 4.7095+1.5411x | 0.8909 | 1.54 (0.10-5.04) | 2.75 |
LY-3 | 4.4512+1.5314x | 0.8883 | 2.28 (0.37-5.77) | 4.07 |
LY-4 | 3.3832+1.0208x | 0.8737 | 38.36 (18.32-67.62) | 68.50 |
QD-1 | 4.0803+1.2919x | 0.9503 | 5.15 (2.19-9.07) | 9.20 |
QD-2 | 3.7652+1.5620x | 0.9589 | 6.17 (2.83-10.34) | 11.02 |
RZ-1 | 4.3648+1.5478x | 0.8879 | 2.57 (0.50-6.12) | 4.59 |
RZ-2 | 4.5092+1.3450x | 0.8808 | 2.32 (0.47-5.55) | 4.14 |
TA-1 | 3.9601+1.6906x | 0.8879 | 4.12 (1.35-8.00) | 7.36 |
TA-2 | 3.2026+2.4882x | 0.8944 | 5.28 (1.95-9.52) | 9.43 |
TA-3 | 4.2321+1.4666x | 0.9509 | 3.34 (0.96-6.92) | 5.96 |
WF-1 | 4.8405+1.4052x | 0.8883 | 1.30 (0.07-4.49) | 2.32 |
WF-2 | 4.7478+1.2172x | 0.8773 | 1.61 (0.23-4.46) | 2.88 |
WF-3 | 4.4687+1.5162x | 0.9677 | 2.24 (0.36-5.70) | 4.00 |
WH-1 | 4.7373+1.4737x | 0.8894 | 1.51 (0.10-4.85) | 2.70 |
YT-1 | 4.3582+0.9489x | 0.9037 | 4.75 (1.94-8.67) | 8.48 |
YT-2 | 4.6091+1.5464x | 0.8902 | 1.79 (0.17-5.28) | 3.20 |
ZB-1 | 4.4016+1.2996x | 0.8750 | 2.89 (0.03-10.85) | 5.16 |
ZB-2 | 4.3259+1.8489x | 0.8936 | 2.32 (0.26-6.31) | 4.14 |
ZZ-1 | 4.8315+1.4640x | 0.8900 | 1.30 (0.06-4.64) | 2.32 |
ZZ-2 | 4.3491+1.7430x | 0.8924 | 2.36 (0.32-6.18) | 4.21 |
表4
播娘蒿种群对2甲4氯抗性水平"
序号 Number | 回归方程 Regression equation (y=) | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient | GR50 (g·hm-2) (95% CL) | 相对抗性指数 RI |
---|---|---|---|---|
BZ-1 | 2.0945+2.5738x | 0.8928 | 13.45 (2.43-29.10) | 3.61 |
BZ-2 | 3.3409+1.6892x | 0.8819 | 9.60 (1.80-21.89) | 2.57 |
DY-1 | 3.9377+1.3693x | 0.8715 | 5.97 (0.69-16.27) | 1.60 |
DZ-1 | 4.3261+1.0307x | 0.9189 | 4.51 (0.60-12.56) | 1.21 |
DZ-2 | 3.7099+1.5489x | 0.8802 | 6.91 (0.73-18.38) | 1.85 |
DZ-3 | 3.4617+1.7590x | 0.8866 | 7.49 (0.66-20.53) | 2.01 |
HZ-1 | 4.2287+0.9926x | 0.9061 | 5.98 (1.17-14.62) | 1.60 |
HZ-2 | 4.9736+0.7651x | 0.8886 | 3.88 (0.40-12.68) | 1.04 |
JN-1 | 3.2623+1.7257x | 0.8826 | 10.16 (2.04-22.62) | 2.72 |
JN-2 | 3.7622+1.4396x | 0.9516 | 7.24 (1.10-18.09) | 1.94 |
JN-3 | 3.4954+1.7896x | 0.8880 | 6.93 (0.41-20.41) | 1.86 |
JNI-2 | 3.3834+1.6609x | 0.8811 | 9.40 (1.75-21.55) | 2.52 |
JNI-2 | 3.6806+1.4785x | 0.9582 | 7.81 (1.29-18.91) | 2.09 |
JNI-3 | 3.4141+1.6799x | 0.8826 | 8.79 (1.39-21.08) | 2.36 |
JNI-4 | 4.3825+1.0806x | 0.9246 | 3.73 (0.32-11.68) | 1.00 |
LC-2 | 3.7705+1.5307x | 0.8802 | 6.36 (0.59-17.83) | 1.71 |
LC-2 | 3.5698+1.4654x | 0.8705 | 9.46 (0.03-34.75) | 2.54 |
LC-3 | 3.2963+1.5965x | 0.8749 | 11.67 (3.24-23.58) | 3.13 |
LW-1 | 3.0031+2.1808x | 0.8924 | 8.24 (0.33-24.44) | 2.21 |
LY-1 | 3.4446+1.8365x | 0.8889 | 7.03 (0.38-20.88) | 1.88 |
LY-2 | 3.4498+1.6801x | 0.8831 | 8.37 (1.18-20.70) | 2.24 |
LY-3 | 4.0256+1.3975x | 0.8761 | 4.98 (0.33-15.47) | 1.34 |
LY-4 | 3.0374+1.8191x | 0.8837 | 11.99 (2.97-24.79) | 3.21 |
QD-1 | 3.1072+1.9785x | 0.8897 | 9.05 (0.95-23.20) | 2.43 |
QD-2 | 3.1567+1.9338x | 0.8890 | 8.98 (1.00-22.84) | 2.41 |
RZ-1 | 3.5592+1.7137x | 0.8860 | 6.93 (0.52-19.76) | 1.86 |
RZ-2 | 4.1233+1.4701x | 0.8825 | 3.95 (0.07-15.40) | 1.06 |
TA-1 | 3.2322+1.6788x | 0.8794 | 11.30 (2.83-23.52) | 3.03 |
TA-2 | 3.7666+1.4893x | 0.8774 | 6.73 (0.80-17.88) | 1.80 |
TA-3 | 3.0389+2.0898x | 0.8914 | 8.68 (0.61-23.81) | 2.33 |
WF-1 | 4.2364+1.2589x | 0.9485 | 4.04 (0.24-13.34) | 1.08 |
WF-2 | 3.5311+1.8064x | 0.8888 | 6.50 (0.27-20.34) | 1.74 |
WF-3 | 3.5460+1.6892x | 0.8849 | 7.26 (0.68-19.82) | 1.95 |
WH-1 | 3.2738+1.8467x | 0.8876 | 8.60 (0.98-21.99) | 2.31 |
YT-1 | 3.4549+1.8182x | 0.8884 | 7.08 (0.42-20.75) | 1.90 |
YT-2 | 3.7438+1.3591x | 0.9397 | 8.40 (1.82-18.96) | 2.25 |
ZB-1 | 3.0505+1.6576x | 0.9504 | 15.00 (5.39-27.35) | 4.02 |
ZB-2 | 3.6460+1.7483x | 0.8881 | 5.95 (0.20-19.50) | 1.60 |
ZZ-1 | 3.3559+1.8120x | 0.8873 | 8.08 (0.81-21.35) | 2.17 |
ZZ-2 | 4.2640+1.1111x | 0.9285 | 4.60 (0.55-13.04) | 1.23 |
[1] | 高兴祥, 李美, 房锋, 李健. 河南省冬小麦田杂草组成及群落特征. 麦类作物学报, 2016,36(10):1402-1408. |
GAO X X, LI M, FANG F, LI J. Species composition and characterization of weed community in winter wheat fields in Henan Province. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016,36(10):1402-1408. (in Chinese) | |
[2] |
高兴祥, 李美, 房锋, 张悦丽, 孙作文, 齐军山. 山东省小麦田杂草组成及群落特征. 草业学报, 2014,23(5) : 92-98.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20140510 |
GAO X X, LI M, FANG F, ZHANG Y L, SUN Z W, QI J S. Species composition and characterization of weed communities in wheat fields in Shandong Province. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014,23(5):92-98. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20140510 |
|
[3] | 李秉华, 王贵启, 魏守辉, 樊翠芹, 黄红娟, 张朝贤. 河北省冬小麦田杂草群落特征. 植物保护学报, 2013,40(1):83-88. |
LI B H, WANG G Q, WEI S H, FAN C Q, HUANG H J, ZHANG C X. Characterization of weed community in winter wheat in Hebei Province. Journal of Plant Protection, 2013,40(1):83-88. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | 高兴祥, 李美, 高宗军, 房锋, 张悦丽, 齐军山. 山东省小麦田播娘蒿对苯磺隆的抗性测定. 植物保护学报, 2014,41(3):373-378. |
GAO X X, LI M, GAO Z J, FANG F, ZHANG Y L, QI J S. Determination of flixweed (Descurainia sophia) resistance to tribenuron-methyl in Shandong Province. Journal of Plant Protection, 2014,41(3):373-378. (in Chinese) | |
[5] |
房锋, 李美, 高兴祥, 李健, 李燕. 麦田播娘蒿发生动态及其对小麦产量构成因素的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015,48(13):2559-2568.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.13.008 |
FANG F, LI M, GAO X X, LI J, LI Y. Occurrence of flixweed (Descurainia sophia) in wheat fields and its influence on wheat yield components. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015,48(13):2559-2568. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.13.008 |
|
[6] | 邓维. 抗苯磺隆播娘蒿抗性机理及抗性突变对乙酰乳酸合成酶功能影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2017. |
DENG W. The resistance mechanisms of tribenuron-methyl-resistant flixweed (Descurania sophia L.) and effects of resistance-endowing mutations on ALS functionality[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2017. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 苏少泉. 三唑嘧啶磺酰胺类除草剂新品种——双氟磺草胺. 世界农药, 2001,23(4):53-54. |
SU S Q. Florasulam: A new triazole pyrimidine sulfonamide herbicide. World Pesticides, 2001,23(4):53-54. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | 李美, 高兴祥, 高宗军, 赵维, 吴加军, 李茂昇. 双氟磺草胺、2甲4氯联合作用及作物安全性评价. 植物保护学报, 2013,40(6):557-563. |
LI M, GAO X X, GAO Z J, ZHAO W, WU J J, LI M S. Weed control effect and crop response to florasulam plus MCPA. Journal of Plant Protection, 2013,40(6):557-563. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | 侯珍, 谢娜, 董秀霞, 张晓芳, 李凌绪, 王金信. 双氟磺草胺的除草活性及对不同小麦品种的安全性评价. 植物保护学报, 2012,39(4):357-363. |
HOU Z, XIE N, DONG X X, ZHANG X F, LI L X, WANG J X. Evaluation of herbicidal activity of florasulam and its safety to various wheat varieties. Journal of Plant Protection, 2012,39(4):357-363. (in Chinese) | |
[10] | 李美, 高兴祥, 房锋, 李健, 吴加军, 李茂昇. 氟氯吡啶酯与双氟磺草胺复配的田间除草效果及其对作物安全性评价. 植物保护学报, 2016,43(3):514-522. |
LI M, GAO X X, FANG F, LI J, WU J J, LI M S. Weed control effect and safety to crops of a mixed formulation (halauxifen-methyl 10% + florasulam 10%). Journal of Plant Protection, 2016,43(3):514-522. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | 马鹏生. 猪殃殃抗双氟磺草胺的生理机制研究. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014,45(5):778-781. |
MA P S. Study on the physiological mechanism of the resistance of Galium aparine L. against florasulam. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2014,45(5):778-781. (in Chinese) | |
[12] |
LIAN L, LU X T, WU J L, ZHANG H J. A novel alternative herbicide bipyrazone as for the control of resistant shepherd’s purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.) in wheat. Chinese Journal of Pesticides Science, DOI: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2020.0034.
doi: 10.1126/science.1067226 pmid: 11809972 |
[13] |
DENG W, LIU M J, YANG Q, MEI Y, LI X F, ZHENG M Q. Tribenuron-methyl resistance and mutation diversity of Pro197 in flixweed (Descurainia sophia L.) accessions from China. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2015,117:68-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.10.012 pmid: 25619914 |
[14] |
CUI H L, ZHANG C X, WEI S H, ZHANG H J, LI X J, ZHANG Y Q, WANG G Q. Acetolactate synthase gene proline (197) mutations confer tribenuron-methyl resistance in flixweed (Descurainia sophia) populations from China. Weed Science, 2011,59(3):376-379.
doi: 10.1614/WS-D-10-00099.1 |
[15] |
CUI H L, ZHANG C X, ZHANG H J, LIU X, LIU Y, WANG G Q, HUANG H J, WEI S H. Confirmation of flixweed (Descurainia sophia) resistance to tribenuron in China. Weed Science, 2008,56(6):775-779.
doi: 10.1614/WS-08-058.1 |
[16] | 许贤, 王贵启, 樊翠芹, 李秉华. 河北省境内播娘蒿对苯磺隆抗药性研究. 华北农学报, 2011,26(增刊):241-247. |
XU X, WANG G Q, FAN C Q, LI B H. Confirmation of flixweed (Descurainia sophia) resistance to tribenuron-methyl in Hebei Province. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2011,26(Suppl.):241-247. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 刘君良, 王金信, 刘伟堂, 金涛, 李小芳, 毕亚玲. 中国北方部分地区麦田荠菜对苯磺隆的抗性水平. 农药学学报, 2011,13(4):347-353. |
LIU J L, WANG J X, LIU W T, JIN T, LI X F, BI Y L. Resistance level of Capsella bursa-pastoris to tribenuron-methyl in winter wheat fields in northern China. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2011,13(4):347-353. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | 高新菊, 王恒亮, 马毅辉, 陈威, 秦光宇, 宋语娇. 河南省部分地区麦田荠菜对苯磺隆的抗性水平及抗性靶标分子机制. 植物保护学报, 2017,44(3):501-508. |
GAO X J, WANG H L, MA Y H, CHEN W, QIN G Y, SONG Y J. Resistance of Capsella bursa-pastoris to tribenuron-methyl in winter wheat fields in some areas of Henan Province and its molecular mechanism. Journal of Plant Protection, 2017,44(3):501-508. (in Chinese) | |
[19] | 张乐乐, 王倩, 王伟. 河南省麦田荠菜对苯磺隆的抗性及其交互抗性. 植物保护学报, 2018,45(3):536-542. |
ZHANG L L, WANG Q, WANG W. Resistance to tribenuron-methyl and cross resistance in shepherd’s purse Capsella bursa-pastoris from wheat fields in Henan Province. Journal of Plant Protection, 2018,45(3):536-542. (in Chinese) | |
[20] |
ZHANG L L, GUO W L, LI Q, WU C X, ZHAO N, LIU W T, WANG J X. Tribenuron-methyl resistance and mutation diversity of the AHAS gene in shepherd’s purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.) in Henan Province, China. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2017,143:239-245.
doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2017.05.007 pmid: 29183598 |
[21] | 彭学岗, 王金信, 段敏, 杨纪辉. 中国北方部分冬麦区猪殃殃对苯磺隆的抗性水平. 植物保护学报, 2008,35(5):458-462. |
PENG X G, WANG J X, DUAN M, YANG J H. The resistance to tribenuron-methyl in Galium aparine in winter wheat fields in northern China. Journal of Plant Protection, 2008,35(5):458-462. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | 孙健, 王金信, 张宏军, 刘君良, 卞圣楠. 抗苯磺隆猪殃殃乙酰乳酸合成酶的突变研究. 中国农业科学, 2010,43(5):972-977. |
SUN J, WANG J X, ZHANG H J, LIU J L, BIAN S N. Study on mutations in ALS of resistance to tribenuron-methyl in Galium aparine L. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010,43(5):972-977. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | 崔海兰, 王藏月, 徐林林, 李香菊. 猪殃殃对AHAS抑制剂靶标抗性的快速分子检测. 植物保护学报, 2016,43(6):1049-1054. |
CUI H L, WANG C Y, XU L L, LI X J. Rapid molecular detection of the resistance of Galium aparine var. tenerum to AHAS inhibitors. Journal of Plant Protection, 2016,43(6):1049-1054. (in Chinese) | |
[24] | 吴小虎, 王金信, 刘伟堂, 郭鹤久, 崔夕英, 陈业兵. 山东省部分市县麦田杂草麦家公Lithospermum arvense对苯磺隆的抗药性. 农药学学报, 2011,13(6):597-602. |
WU X H, WANG J X, LIU W T, GUO H J, CUI X Y, CHEN Y B. Resistance of Lithospermum arvense to tribenuron-methyl in winter wheat fields in part of Shandong Province. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2011,13(6):597-602. (in Chinese) | |
[25] | 王恒智, 白霜, 吴小虎, 吴翠霞, 刘伟堂, 王金信. 小麦田麦家公对苯磺隆的抗性机理. 植物保护学报, 2019,46(1):216-223. |
WANG H Z, BAI S, WU X H, WU C X, LIU W T, WANG J X. Resistance mechanism of Lithospermum arvense L. to tribenuron-methyl in winter wheat field. Journal of Plant Protection, 2019,46(1):216-223. (in Chinese) | |
[26] | GRSSEL J, SEGEL L A. Herbicide rotations and mixtures: Effective strategies to delay resistance. Symposium Series American Chemical Society, 1990,421:430-458. |
[27] | 李永丰, 李宜慰, 刘正道, 曾宪彬. 抗药性杂草种群的发展及其防治对策. 江西农业大学学报, 1999,21(1):42-46. |
LI Y F, LI Y W, LIU Z D, ZENG X B. New developments in herbicide resistance in weed species and management strategies. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 1999,21(1):42-46. (in Chinese) | |
[28] | 李健, 李美, 高兴祥, 房锋, 董连红. 杂草抗药性及其机理研究进展. 山东农业科学, 2016,48(12):165-170. |
LI J, LI M, GAO X X, FANG F, DONG L H. Herbicide resistance and its mechanism of weed. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2016,48(12) : 165-170. (in Chinese) | |
[29] |
周清元, 王倩, 叶桑, 崔明圣, 雷维, 郜欢欢, 赵愉风, 徐新福, 唐章林, 李加纳, 崔翠. 苯磺隆胁迫下油菜萌发期相关性状的全基因组关联分析. 中国农业科学, 2019,52(3):399-413.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.03.002 |
ZHOU Q Y, WANG Q, YE S, CUI M S, LEI W, GAO H H, ZHAO Y F, XU X F, TANG Z L, LI J N, CUI C. Genome-wide association analysis of tribenuron-methyl tolerance related traits in Brassica napus L. under germination. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019,52(3):399-413. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.03.002 |
|
[30] |
YU Q, POWLES S B. Metabolism-based herbicide resistance and cross-resistance in crop weeds: A threat to herbicide sustainability and global crop production. Plant Physiology, 2014,166(3):1106-1118.
doi: 10.1104/pp.114.242750 |
[31] |
YU Q, POWLES S B. Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides: Current understanding. Pest Management Science, 2014,70(9):1340-1350.
doi: 10.1002/ps.3710 |
[32] | TRANEL P J, WRIGHT T R, HEAP I M. Mutations in herbicide-resistant weeds to ALS inhibitors. http://www.weedscience.org/Mutations/ MutationDisplayAll.aspx. |
[33] | 黄兆峰, 刘倩, 王园园, 姜翠兰, 周欣欣. 杂草对ALS抑制剂抗药性概述. 农药科学与管理, 2019,40(2):34-41. |
HUANG Z F, LIU Q, WANG Y Y, JIANG C L, ZHOU X X. Overview of weed resistance to ALS inhibitors. Pesticide Science and Administration, 2019,40(2):34-41. (in Chinese) | |
[34] |
LIU W T, WU C X, GUO W L, DU L, YUAN G H, WANG J X. Resistance mechanisms to an acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitor in water starwort (Myosoton aquaticum) populations from China. Weed Science, 2015,63(4):770-780.
doi: 10.1614/WS-D-14-00184.1 |
[35] |
MA R, KAUNDUN S S, TRANEL P J, RIGGINS C W, MCGINNESS D L, HAGER A G, HAWKES T, MCINDOE E, RIECHERS D E. Distinct detoxification mechanisms confer resistance to mesotrione and atrazine in a population of waterhemp. Plant Physiology, 2013,163(1):363-377.
doi: 10.1104/pp.113.223156 |
[1] | 高兴祥,李健,张帅,张悦丽,房锋,李美,柏连阳,张双应. 节节麦在山东省冬小麦田的扩散蔓延及对甲基二磺隆抗性测定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(5): 969-979. |
[2] | 高兴祥,李健,张悦丽,李美,房锋. 山东省小麦田大穗看麦娘抗性水平、靶标抗性机理及田间防除效果测定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(17): 3518-3526. |
[3] | 姬万丽,朱红菊,路绪强,赵胜杰,何楠,耿丽华,刘文革. 四倍体西瓜抗枯萎病菌生理小种1的机理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(19): 3750-3765. |
[4] | 房锋,李美,高兴祥,李健,李燕. 麦田播娘蒿发生动态及其对小麦产量构成因素的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(13): 2559-2568. |
[5] | 杨彩宏, 田兴山, 冯莉, 岳茂峰. 牛筋草对草甘膦的抗药性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(10): 2093-2098. |
[6] | 刘晓燕,金继运,何 萍,高 伟,李文娟. 氯化钾对玉米木质素代谢的影响及其与茎腐病抗性的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(12): 2780-2787 . |
[7] | 慕立义,王开运,姜翠玲,沈慧敏,姜家良,陈巧云,邓启荣,林国芳. 棉蚜(Aphis gossypii Glover)对氰戊菊酯、氧乐果及其混剂抗药性的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 1988, 21(06): 18-26 . |
|