基于文献计量的园艺学基础研究发展状况分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.17.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】了解基于SCI收录文献视角的园艺学基础研究发展状况，为相关科研工作者和管理决策者提供参考。【方法】运用文献计量学的方法，通过WoS和Citespace对2005-2014年间以60余种常见园艺植物为题目的SCI收录文献进行文献总量、年度分布、篇均他引次数、h指数、研究机构、高影响因子期刊载文量、文献研究方向及研究热点的分析。【结果】10年间，以所选60余种常见园艺植物为题目的SCI收录文献数量逐年上升，中国的文献数位居全球第二位，仅次于美国。2010-2014年，中国园艺学文献数跃居全球第一。对2005-2009年与2010-2014年之间的文献进行比较，以相关果树为题目，中国的文献所占比例从8.40%上升到15.68%，文献数排名从第3位上升到第2位；在文献数排名前10位的国家中，中国文献的篇均他引次数从第5位上升到第4位，h指数排名从第3位上升到第2位；文献数量全球最多的25个科研机构中，中国的科研机构从4家增加至7家。以相关蔬菜（含西甜瓜）为题目，中国的文献所占比例从8.79%上升到16.90%；文献数两个5年中排名均居第2位；在文献数排名前10位的国家中，中国文献的篇均他引次数两个5年中排名均居第6位，h指数从第5位上升到第2位；文献数量全球最多的25个科研机构中，中国的科研机构从3家增加至5家。以相关花卉和茶为题目，中国的文献所占比例从14.12%上升到26.14%，文献数排名从第3位上升到第1位；在文献记数排名前10位的国家中，中国文献的篇均他引次数两个5年均居第7位，h指数排名从第3位上升到第2位；文献数量全球最多的25个科研机构中，中国的科研机构从3家增加至8家。10年间，生物学领域高影响因子杂志刊载中国园艺学文献数排名从第8位上升到第5位；文献数量全球最多的25个科研机构中，中国的科研机构从1家增加至3家。研究方向分析显示，中国园艺学文献在生物化学与分子生物学方向比例较多，但在农学和昆虫领域的文献比例较少。目前园艺学的研究热点主要集中在功能基因挖掘与组学研究、果实的发育与成熟以及多酚类物质研究等3个领域。【结论】近5年，中国园艺学被SCI收录文献的数量在增加，产出已居世界第一，但质量提升还未跟上；中国园艺学研究侧重于分子和组学等偏基础研究方向，与农业结合相对紧密的研究文献数量比例偏少；未来应加强问题导向的研究，布局上应更加贴近产业各环节的问题，持之以恒，形成特色。

关键词: 园艺学, 基础研究, SCI, 文献计量, 发展状况, WoS, Citespace

Abstract: 【Objective】In order to provide data support for horticulture researchers and administrative decision makers, this study surveyed the basic research development status of horticulture based on papers published in SCI-indexed journals. 【Method】Bibliometric analysis was carried out to investigate the papers published in SCI-indexed journals during 2005-2014 with titles relevant to more than 60 kinds of common horticultural plants by using comparative analysis with WoS & citespace on annual distribution, average cited times without self-citations, h-index, countries (regions), institutions, publication in high-impact journals, research areas, hotspots, etc. 【Result】The study showed that the annual quantity of papers published in SCI-indexed journals had been increased year by year in the past decade and China had become the 2nd largest country in the number of papers after the USA. The number of Chinese horticultural papers became the largest in the world between 2010 and 2014. Comparing the papers with selected fruits as the theme between 2005-2009 and 2010-2014, it was found that the proportion of Chinese horticultural papers had risen from 8.40% to 15.68%, and the ranking had risen from 3rd to 2nd. The average cited times without self-citations of Chinese papers had risen from 5th to 4th, and the h-index had risen from 3rd to 2nd, in the top 10 countries of the paper records ranking. The number of Chinese institutions that ranked in the top 25 around the world had increased from 4 to 7. Comparing the papers with selected vegetables (including melon & watermelon) as the theme between 2005-2009 and 2010-2014, it was found that the proportion of Chinese papers had risen from 8.79% to 16.90%, and the ranking had remained at 2nd. The average cited times without self-citations of Chinese papers had remained 6th and the h-index ranking had risen from 5th to 2nd in the top 10 countries of the paper records ranking. The number of Chinese institutions that ranked in the top 25 around the world had increased from 3 to 5. Comparing the papers with selected flowers & tea as the theme between 2005-2009 and 2010-2014, it was found that the proportion of Chinese papers had risen from 14.12% to 26.14%, and the ranking had risen from 3rd to 1st. The average cited times without self-citations of Chinese papers had remained 7th and the h-index ranking had risen from 3rd to 2nd in the top 10 countries of the paper reorders ranking. The number of Chinese institutions that ranked in the top 25 around the world had increased from 3 to 8. The number of Chinese horticultural papers published in high-impact biology journals increased rapidly during the past decade with its ranking rising from 8th to 5th. The number of Chinese institutions that ranked in the top 25 around the world had increased from 1 to 3. The analysis of research area showed that the proportion of Chinese horticultural papers was large in biochemistry and molecular biology, but smaller in the fields of entomology and agriculture. The research hotspots were high quality draft genome, fruit development and maturation and phenolic compound. 【Conclusion】The number of Chinese horticultural papers published in SCI-indexed journals has been increased in the past five years and the output has ranked 1st in the world, but the quality has not kept up with the quantity. Compared with part of the development countries, the proportion of Chinese horticultural papers was larger in basic research direction, but smaller in the areas which are closely related to traditional agronomy. In the future, more attentions should be paid to the problem-oriented research and the connection and contribution to problems in various links of the industry.

Key words: horticulture, basic research, SCI, bibliometric, development status, WoS, citespace

刘彬，邓秀新. 基于文献计量的园艺学基础研究发展状况分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(17): 3504-3514.

LIU Bin, DENG Xiu-xin. Basic Research Development Status of Horticulture Based on Bibliometric Analysis[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(17): 3504-3514.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.17.016

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2015/V48/I17/3504

参考文献

[1] 中国科学技术协会. 园艺学学科发展报吿. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2012.

China Association for Science and Technology. Horticulture Discipline Development Report. Beijing: China Science & Technology Press, 2012. (in Chinese)

[2] 管曦. 中国茶产业链纵向整合研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2012.

Guan X. Research on the vertical integration of Chinese tea industry chain[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese)

[3] 高懋芳, 邱建军, 刘三超, 刘宏斌, 王立刚, 逄焕成. 基于文献计量的农业面源污染研究发展态势分析. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(6): 1140-1150.

Gao M F, Qiu J J, Liu S C, Liu H B, Wang L G, Pang H C. Status and trends of agricultural diffuse pollution research based on bibliometrics. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(6): 1140-1150. (in Chinese)

[4] 黄宝晟. 文献计量法在基础研究评价中的问题分析. 科研与发展管理, 2008, 20(6): 108-111.

Huang B S. Analysis on the application of literature metrology to basic research evaluation. R&D Management, 2008, 20(6): 108-111. (in Chinese)

[5] 陈静, 张保卫, 马克平, 蒋志刚. 中国保护生物学研究现状的文献计量学分析. 生物多样性, 2009, 17(4): 423-429.

Chen J, Zhang B W, Ma K P, Jiang Z G. Bibliometric analysis of status quo of conservation biology in China. Biodiversity Science, 2009, 17(4): 423-429. (in Chinese)

[6] 邬亚文, 夏小东, 职桂叶, 葛磊, 何建妹, 鄂志国, 李建, 王磊. 基于文献的国内外水稻研究发展态势分析. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(20): 4129-4141.

Wu Y W, Xia X D, Zhi G Y, Ge L, He J M, E Z G, Li J, Wang L. Status and trends of rice science based on bibliometrics. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(20): 4129-4141. (in Chinese)

[7] Josef D V, Sanja B. Tree fruit growing—research and production in Germany: a statistical and bibliometric analysis of the period 1950-2010. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 2012, 54(1): 11-30.

[8] Tatry M V, Dominique F, Beno?ˆt J, Francoise D. EU27 and USA leadership in fruit and vegetable research: a bibliometric study from 2000 to 2009. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(3): 2207-2222.

[9] Leiser H, Aventurier P, Fournier D, Dosba F, Jeannequin, B. Tools for producing indicators from a bibliometric study of scientific production: The case of fruit and vegetable publications by the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA). Fruits, 2009, 64(5): 305-312.

[10] Alhaider I, Ahmed M K K, Gupta B M. Global research output on date palm (Pheonix dactylifera): a 12 years scientometric perspective. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(1): 157-171.

[11] Glanzel W, Veugelers R. Science for wine: A bibliometric assessment of wine and grape research for wine-producing and consuming countries. American journal of enology and viticulture, 2006, 57(1): 23-32.

[12] 冯立娟, 尹燕雷, 招雪晴, 杨雪梅, 李英朋. 基于文献计量的世界樱桃研究态势分析. 中国农业科技导报, 2014, 16(5): 175-181.

Feng L J, Yin Y L, Zhao X Q, Yang X M, Li Y P. Analysis of global cherry research trend based on bibliometrics. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2014, 16(5): 175-181. (in Chinese)

[13] Liu Y X, Rao I K R, Rousseau R. Empirical series of journal h-indices: The JCR category Horticulture as a case study. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(1): 59-74.

[14] 张娟, 王宁, 张以民, 李云霞. 基于Web of Science的国际柑橘黄龙病文献计量分析. 果树学报, 2014, 31(6): 1139-1146.

Zhang J, Wang N, Zhang Y M, Li Y X. Bibliometric analysis of the research on citrus Huanblongbing based on web of science. Journal of Fruit Science, 2014, 31(6): 1139- 1146. (in Chinese)

[15] 崔晓艳, 顾和平, 袁星星, 张红梅, 陈华涛, 陈新. 马铃薯Y病毒属(Potyvirus)研究的文献计量分析. 微生物学通报, 2013, 40(5): 891-903.

Cui X Y, Gu H P, Yuan X X, Zhang H M, Chen H T, Chen X. Research dynamics on Potyvirus based on bibliometric. Microbiology China , 2013, 40(5): 891-903. (in Chinese)

[16] 晏志梅, 张春玲, 刘娟, 卢英琳, 陈全斌. 文献计量分析我国番木瓜的研究现状与发展趋势. 广东农业科学, 2008, 26(2): 112-114.

Yan Z M, Zhang C L, Liu J, Lu Y L, Chen Q B. Bibliometric analysis of research status and development trend of papaya in China. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 26(2): 112-114. (in Chinese)

[17] 马秀文, 和艳会. 采用文献计量法分析我国蝴蝶兰研究现状与发展趋势. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(6):3761-3762, 3765.

Ma X W, He Y H. Bibliometric analysis on research situation and development trends of phalaenopsis. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 39(6):3761-3762, 3765. (in Chinese)

[18] 李金格, 王艳, 赵立强, 陈全斌. 我国菊花研究状况和发展趋势文献计量分析. 现代农业科技, 2008, (2): 16-17, 20.

Li J G, Wang Y, Zhao L Q, Chen Q B. Bibliometric analysis research status and development trend of chrysanthemum in China.Modern Agricultural Science & Technology, 2008, (2): 16-17, 20. (in Chinese)

[19] 孙会军. 我国高校园艺学科SCI论文产出力与影响力比较研究. 北方园艺, 2012(20): 194-197.

Sun H J. Comparative study on papers productivity and influence based on SCI database of Chinese universities’ horticultural science. Northern Horticulture, 2012(20): 194-197. (in Chinese)

[20] 孙会军. 中国与国际园艺学科SCI论文数量与质量的比较. 北方园

艺, 2013(16): 221-224.

Sun H J. Comparison of China and international SCI papers’ quantity and quality in horticultural science. Northern Horticulture, 2013(16): 221-224. (in Chinese)

[21] 刘彬, 陈柳, 袁佩佩. 国家自然科学基金资助的2009-2013年SCI收录文献计量分析. 中国科学基金, 2014, 28(3): 214-218.

Liu B, Chen L, Yuan P P. Bibliometric analysis on SCI covered papers funded by NSFC from 2009 to 2013. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2014, 28(3): 214-218. (in Chinese)

[22] Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(46): 16569-16572.

[23] Van Haselen R. The h-index: a new way of assessing the scientific impact of individual CAM authors. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2007, 15(4): 225-227.

[24] Bornmann L, Daniel H D. Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics, 2005, 65(3): 391-392.

[25] Ruane F, Tol R S J. Rational (successive) h-indices: An application to economics in the Republic of Ireland. Scientometrics, 2008, 75(2): 395-405.

[26] Vanclay J K. Ranking forestry journals using the h-index. Journal of Informetrics, 2008, 2(4): 326-334.

[27] 杨俊丽. 基于SCI的河南农业大学科技论文统计分析. 科技管理研究, 2012, 32(11): 132-135.

Yang J L. The statistical analysis based on SCI papers of Henan Agriculture University. Science & Technology Management Research, 2012, 32(11): 132-135. (in Chinese)

[28] 周辉, 张光红, 蔡晖, 郑英姿. 原创性研究成果的SCI引用分析. 中国科学基金, 2002, 16(2): 23-25.

Zhou H, Zhang G H, Cai H, Zheng Y Z. The SCI citation analysis of the original innovation. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2002, 16(2): 23-25. (in Chinese)